Describing language assessments for school-aged children: A Delphi study

References

• American Speech and Hearing Association. (2018). Assessment tools, techniques, and data sources Retrieved from https://www.asha.org/Practice-Portal/Clinical-Topics/Late-Language-Emergence/Assessment-Tools-Techniques-and-Data-Sources/ (Accessed on 9th December, 2018)
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, S., & Bloch, S. (2018). Why is measuring communication difficult? A critical review of current speech pathology concepts and measures. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2018.1498541 10.1080/02699206.2018.1498541
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, D.V.M. (2003). Children's Communication Checklist. (2nd ed. CCC-2). US: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Boulkedid, R., Abdoul, H., Loustau, M., Sibony, O., & Alberti, C. (2011). Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 6, e20476. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020476
   Google Scholar
• Caesar, L.G., & Kohler, P.D. (2009). Tools clinicians use: A survey of language assessment procedures used by school-based speech-pathologists. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 30, 226–236. doi:10.1177/1525740108326334
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, M., Wanger, K.M., Cartwright, A., Bailey, H., Millar, J.A., & Price, M. (2001). A review of Clinical Terms Version 3 (Read Codes) for speech and language record keeping. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36, 117–126. doi:10.1080/13682820150217608
   Google Scholar
• DeJong, G., Horn, S.D., Gassaway, J.A., Slavin, M.D., & Dijkers, M.P. (2004). Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: Using an inductive approach to examine the “black box” of rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 678–686. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.033
   Google Scholar
• Dewart, H., & Summers, S. (1995). Pragmatics Profile of Everyday Communication Skills in Children. Retrieved from http://complexneeds.org.uk/modules/Module-2.4-Assessment-monitoring-and-evaluation/All/downloads/m08p080c/the_pragmatics_profile.pdf (Accessed on 9th December, 2018)
   Google Scholar
• Dockrell, J.E., & Marshall, C.R. (2015). Measurement issues: Assessing language skills in young children. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 20, 116–125, doi:10.1111/camh.12072
   Google Scholar
• Eadie, P. (2003). Speech pathology assessment practices: One assessment or many?. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 5, 65–68. doi:10.1080/14417040510001669081
   Google Scholar
• Fulcher-Rood, K., Castilla-Earls, A.P., & Higginbotham, J. (2018). School-based speech-language pathologists' perspectives on diagnostic decision making. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27, 796–812. doi:10.1044/2018_AJSLP-16-0121
   Google Scholar
• Hegde, M.N., & Pomaville, F. (Eds.). (2017). Assessment of communication disorders in children. In Assessment of communication disorders in children. US: Plural Publishing. Chapter 1, pp. 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiu-Fang, H., & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, J., & Orange, J.B. (2007). Mapping functional communication measurements for traumatic brain injury to the WHO-ICF. Revue Canadienne D’orthophonie et D’audiologie, 31, 135–142.
   Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. (Released 2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Kaderavek, J.M. (Ed.). (2015). Assessment of language disorders. In Language disorders in children: Fundamnetal concepts of assessment and intervention. US: Pearson. Chapter 3, pp. 45–95.
   Google Scholar
• Lahey, M. (1988). Language disorders and language development. New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, V.L., & McKinley, N.L. (Eds.). (2007). Procedures for direct assessment. In Communication solutions for older students: Assessment and intervention strategies (pp. 209–268). US: Thinking Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, S., & Threats, T.T. (2008). The ICF-CY and children with communication disabilities. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 92–109. doi:10.1080/1754950070183469
   Google Scholar
• Miao, M., Power, E., & O'Halloran, R. (2015). Factors affecting speech pathologists’ implementation of stroke management guidelines: A thematic analysis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37, 674–685. doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.932444
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P.E. (2007). Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14, 149–170. doi:10.1080/09695940701478321
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, S., Law, J., & Gascoigne, M. (2005). Teaching receptive vocabulary to children with Specific Ianguage Impairment: A curriculum-based approach. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 21, 39–59. doi:10.1191/0265659005ct280oa
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R., & Norbury, C.F. (2012). Chapter 2: Assessment. In R. Paul & C. F. Norbury (Eds.), Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: Listening, speaking, reading, writing and communicating (4th ed., pp. 22–60). Canada: Mosby Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Roulstone, S. (2001). Consensus and variation between speech and language therapists in the assessment and selection of preschool children for intervention: A body of knowledge or idiosyncratic decisions?. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36, 329–348. doi:10.1080/13682820010019928
   Google Scholar
• Roulstone, S. (2015). Exploring the relationship between client perspectives, clinical expertise and research evidence. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 211–222. doi:10.3109/17549507.2015.1016112
   Google Scholar
• Schleyer, T.K., & Forrest, J.L. (2000). Methods for the design and administration of web-based surveys. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 7, 416–425. doi:10.1136/jamia.2000.0070416
   Google Scholar
• Schraeder, T., Quinn, M., Stockman, I.J., & Miller, J. (1999). Authentic assessment as an approach to preschool speech-language screening. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 195–200. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0803.195
   Google Scholar
• Tapio, P., Paloniemi, R., Varho, V., & Vinnari, M. (2011). The unholy marriage? Integrating qualitative and quantitative information in Delphi processes. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 78, 1616–1628. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.016
   Google Scholar
• Wade, D.T. (2004). Assessment, measurement and data collection tools. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18, 233–237. doi:10.1191/0269215504cr183ed
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, R. & IGOTF-CSD. (2006). A history of terminology: International group on terminology frameworks – communication science and disorders. Retrieved from http://www.dhrs.uct.ac.za/sites/default/files/image_tool/images/147/History_of_CSD.pdf (Accessed on 9th December, 2018)
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, R. (2005). Meaning and purpose: A conceptual model for speech pathology terminology. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 7, 65–76. doi:10.1080/14417040500125285
   Google Scholar
• Westby, C., & Washington, K.N. (2017). Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in assessment and intervention of school-aged children with language impairments. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48, 137–152. doi:10.1044/2017_LSHSS-16-0037
   Google Scholar
• Westerveld, M., & Claessen, M. (2014). Clinician survey of language sampling practices in Australia. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 242–249. doi:10.3109/17549507.2013.871336
   Google Scholar
• Westerveld, M., & Gillon, G.T. (2002). Language Sampling Protocol. Retrieved from http://www.education.canterbury.ac.nz/documents/gillon/languageprotocol.pdf (Accessed on 9th December, 2018)
   Google Scholar
• Wiig, E.H., Semel, E., & Secord, W.A. (2004). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals - 4th Edition (CELF-4) (5 ed.): US: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K.M., Brady, T.J., & Lesesne, C. & NCCDPHP Work Group on Translation. (2011). An organizing framework for translation in public health: The knowledge to action framework. Preventing Chronic Disease, 8, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. (2015). International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (Vol. 10). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation.
   Google Scholar