Intermediaries in the justice system for people with communication disability: Enacting Sustainable Development Goal 16 in Ireland, Northern Ireland, and New Zealand

References

• Beckene, T., Forrester-Jones, R., & Murphy, G.H. (2020). Experiences of going to court: Witnesses with intellectual disabilities and their carers speak up. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disability, 33, 67–78. doi:10.1111/jar.12334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, K., & Krahenbuhl, S. (2020). Registered intermediaries’ assessment of children’s communication: An exploration of aims and processes. The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 24, 374–395. doi:10.1177/1365712720952335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, P., & Mattison, M. (2017). Intermediaries, vulnerable people and the quality of evidence. The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 21, 351–370. doi:10.1177/1365712717725534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, P., & Wurtzel, D. (2014). Better the second time around? Department of Justice Registered Intermediaries Schemes and lessons from England and Wales. Northern. Ireland. Legal Quarterly, 65, 39–61. doi:10.53386/nilq.v65i1.200
   Google Scholar
• Cusack, A. (2020). Addressing vulnerability in Ireland’s criminal justice system: A survey of recent statutory developments. The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 24, 280–306. doi:10.1177/1365712720922753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, G. (2016). Addressing vulnerability in justice systems. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23, 809–812. doi:10.1080/13218719.2016.1224021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doak, J. (2005). Child witnesses: Do special measures directions prejudice the accused’s right to a fair hearing?—R v Camberwell Green Youth Court, Ex P. D; R v Camberwell Green Youth Court, Ex P. G. The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 9, 291–295. doi:10.1350/ijep.2005.9.4.291
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, E. (2015). A very valuable tool. The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 19, 154–171. doi:10.1177/1365712715580535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, K., McCann, C., & Dudley, M. (2020a). What is communication assistance? Describing a new and emerging profession in the New Zealand youth justice system. Psychiatry Psychology and Law, 27, 300–314. doi:10.1080/13218719.2020.1719378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, K., McCann, C., Dudley, M. (2020b). ‘It’s really good…why hasn’t it happened earlier?’ Professionals’ perspectives on the benefits of communication assistance in the New Zealand youth justice system. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 53, 265–284. doi:10.1177/0004865819890377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, K., McCann, C., & Dudley, M. (2020c). ‘I was flying blind a wee bit’: Professionals’ perspectives on challenges facing communication assistance in the New Zealand youth justice system. The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 24, 104–120. doi:10.1177/1365712719877893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, K., McCann, C., & Dudley, M. (2021). ‘It was like more easier’: Rangatahi (young people) and their whānau (family) talk about communication assistance in the New Zealand Youth Justice System. Youth Justice, 21, 210–229. doi:10.1177/1473225420923763
   Google Scholar
• Hoyano, L., & Rafferty, A. (2016). Rationing defence intermediaries under the April 2016 Criminal Practice Direction. Criminal Law Review, 2, 93–105.
   Google Scholar
• Lount, S.A., Hand, L., Purdy, S.C., & France, A. (2018). Tough talk: Youth offenders’ perceptions of communicating in the Youth Justice system in New Zealand. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 51, 593–618. doi:10.1177/0004865817740404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makker, L., Clendon, S., & Doell, E. (2022). Speech-language pathologists’ perspectives of communication strategies for young people in the New Zealand youth justice system. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17549507.2022.2037708
   Google Scholar
• McEwin, A., & Santow, E. (2018). The importance of the human right to communication. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 1–2. doi:10.1080/17549507.2018.1415548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, S. (2018). Communication rights: Fundamental human rights for all. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 3–11. doi:10.1080/17549507.2018.1428687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, N., Savaii, K., McKee, A., & Kedge, S. (2018). Youth voices about youth justice. https://talkingtroublenz.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Youth-Voices-Talking-Trouble-report-20-July-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mirfin-Veitch, B., Gates, S., Diesfeld, K., & Henaghan, M. (2014). Developing a more responsive legal system for people with intellectual disability in New Zealand. Dunedin: Donald Beasley Institute Dunedin.
   Google Scholar
• Myklebust, T., Grant, T., & Milne, R. (2015). Vulnerable individuals, intermediaries and justice. Communication in investigative and legal contexts: Integrated approaches from forensic psychology, Linguistics and Law Enforcement, 287–313.
   Google Scholar
• O’Mahony, B.M., Milne, R., Bull, R., Creaton, J., Smith, K., & Milne, R. (2016). Developing a professional identity in a new work environment: The views of defendant intermediaries working in the criminal courts. Journal of Forensic Practice, 18, 155–166. doi:10.1108/JFP-08-2014-0024
   Google Scholar
• Plotnikoff, J., & Woolfson, R. (2015). Intermediaries in the criminal justice system: Improving communication for vulnerable witnesses and defendants. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plotnikoff, J., & Woolfson, R. (2019). Falling short? A snapshot of young witness policy and practice.
   Google Scholar
• Taggart, J. (2021). ‘I am not beholden to anyone… I consider myself to be an officer of the court’: A comparison of the intermediary role in England and Wales and Northern Ireland. The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 25, 141–162. doi:10.1177/13657127211002291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart, J. (2022). Intermediaries in the criminal justice system and the ‘neutrality paradox’. Journal of Law and Society, 49, 339–361. doi:10.1111/jols.12361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals: 17 Goals to transform our world. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
   Google Scholar