Stretching beyond our perceived boundaries: The role of speech-language pathology in realising autonomy through supported decision-making

References

• Arstein-Kerslake, A., & Flynn, E. (2016). The general comment on article 12 of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: A roadmap for equality before the law. International Journal of Human Rights, 20(4), 471–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2015.1107052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arstein-Kerslake, A., O’Donnell, E., Kayess, R., & Watson, J. (2021). Relational personhood: A conception of legal personhood with insights from disability rights and environmental law. Griffith Law Review, 30(3), 530–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2021.2003744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arstein-Kerslake, A., Watson, J., Browning, M., Martinis, J., & Blanck, P. (2017). Future directions in supported decision-making. Disability Studies Quarterly, 1, 37.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, M., & Kerzner, L. (2010). A new paradigm for protecting autonomy and the right to legal capacity. Prepared for the Law Commission of Ontario, October 2010. Retrieved from http://www.lco-cdo.org/en/disabilities-call-for-papers-bach-kerzner
   Google Scholar
• Beamer, S., & Brookes, M. (2001). Making decisions: Best practice and new ideas for supporting people with high support needs to make decisions. London: Values into Action.
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Douglas, J., Smith, E., Carney, T., Then, S.-N., & Wiesel, I. (2021). I used to call him a non-decision-maker - I never do that anymore: Parental reflections about training to support decision-making of their adult offspring with intellectual disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 2, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1964623
   Google Scholar
• Brown, I., & Brown, R. (2009). Choice as an aspect of quality of life for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy & Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 6, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2008.00198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning, M., Bigby, C., & Douglas, J. (2021). A process of decision-making support: Exploring supported decision-making practice in Canada. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 46(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2020.1789269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunning, K., Smith, C., Kennedy, P., & Greenham, C. (2013). Examination of the communication interface between students with severe to profound and multiple intellectual disability and educational staff during structured teaching sessions. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01513.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, L. (2001). Cognitive ableism and disability studies: Feminist reflections on the history of mental retardation. Hypatia, 16(4), 124–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2001.tb00756.x
   Google Scholar
• Dee-Price, B.-J. M., Hallahan, L., Nelson Bryen, D., & Watson, J. M. (2021). Every voice counts: exploring communication accessible research methods. Disability & Society, 6(2), 240–264. doi:10.1080/09687599.2020.1715924
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, J., & Bigby, C. (2020). Development of an evidence-based practice framework to guide decision making support for people with cognitive impairment due to acquired brain injury or intellectual disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(3), 434–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1498546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eleanor Roosevelt. (1948). ‘Speech Introducing the UDHR to the General Assembly of the United Nations’. https://www2.gwu.edu/∼erpapers/maps/UDHRspeech.htm
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, E., & Arstein-Kerslake, A. (2014). Legislating personhood: Realising the right to support in exercising legal capacity. International Journal of Law in Context, 10(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552313000384
   Google Scholar
• Forster, S. (2010). Unnamed in silence: People with intellectual and multiple disabilities are becoming an invisible population. Link Disability Magazine, 19, 32–33.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. P. (1998). Civil rights. Social Policy, 28(3), 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Goldbart, J., Chadwick, D., & Buell, S. (2014). Speech and language therapists’ approaches to communication intervention with children and adults with profound and multiple learning disability. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49(6), 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Vírseda, C., de Maeseneer, Y., & Gastmans, C. (2019). Relational autonomy: What does it mean and how is it used in end-of-life care? A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. BMC Medical Ethics, 20(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0417-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gracia, D. (2012). The many faces of autonomy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 33(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-012-9208-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, S., Byng, S., Bunning, K., & Pring, T. (2004). Teaching and learning speech and language therapy skills: The effectiveness of classroom as clinic in speech and language therapy student education. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 39(3), 365–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820410001662019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannes, M. (2019). The universal declaration of human rights and the holocaust: An endangered connection. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nedelsky, J. (1989). Reconceiving autonomy: Sources, thoughts and possibilities. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 1, 7–36.
   Google Scholar
• Nerney, T. (n.d.). Challenging incompetence: The meaning of self-determination. The Center for Self-Determination. http://www.eoutcome.org/Uploads/PATashUploads/PdfUpload/Tom%20Nerney-Challenging%20Incompetence.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oxford English Dictionary. (2022). Profound, adj. and n. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/152131?rskey=TsconH&result=1&isAdvanced=false
   Google Scholar
• PAMIS. (2022). Promoting a more inclusive society. Retrieved from https://pamis.org.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, G., Gur, A., & Watson, J. (2018). Ageism, moral agency and autonomy: Getting beyond guardianship in the 21st century. In I. Doron & N. Georgantzi (Eds.), Ageing, ageism & the law: European perspectives on the rights of older persons. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, L. J., Rosqvist, H. B., & Grigorovich, A. (2021). Regulating, fostering and preserving: The production of sexual normates through cognitive ableism and cognitive othering. Culture Health & Sexuality, 23(10), 1421–1434. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2020.1787519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scala, M. A., & Nerney, T. (2000). People first: The consumers in consumer direction. Generations, 24(3), 55–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Lassmann, H., & Forber-Pratt, A. J. (2017). Supported decision making: A synthesis of the literature across intellectual disability, mental health, and aging. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52(2), 144–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (1979). Practical ethics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (2011). Practical ethics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solms, M. (2015). The feeling brain: Selected papers on neuropsychoanalysis. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Solms, M. (2022). The hidden spring: A journey to the source of consciousness. Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Solms, M., & Panksepp, J. (2012). The “id” knows more than the “ego” admits: Neuropsychoanalytic and primal consciousness perspectives on the interface between affective and cognitive neuroscience. Brain Sciences, 2(2), 147–175. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci2020147
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Solms, M., & Turnbull, O. (2018). The brain and the inner world: An introduction to the neuroscience of subjective experience. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-humanrights
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-withdisabilities.html
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Law Reform Commission. (2012). Guardianship: Final report 24.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, H., Watson, J., & Bloomer, M. J. (2022). End-of-life issues and support needs of people with profound intellectual and multiple disability. In R. J. Stancliffe, M. Y. Wiese, P. McCallion, & M. McCarron (Eds.), End of life and people with intellectual and developmental disability: contemporary issues, challenges, experiences and practice (pp. 353–377). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98697-1_13
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. (2012). Supported decision making for people with severe or profound intellectual disability: ‘We’re all in this together, aren’t we? 6th Roundtable on Intellectual Disability Policy ‘Services and Families Working Together’, Bundoora, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. (2016a). Assumptions of decision-making capacity: The role supporter attitudes play in the realisation of article 12 for people with severe or profound intellectual disability. Laws, 5(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws5010006
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. (2016b). The right to supported decision-making for people rarely heard. Melbourne: Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. (2019). The role of speech-language pathology in supporting legal capacity. Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech Language Pathology, 21(1), 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J., Anderson, J., Wilson, E., & Anderson, K. L. (2022). The impact of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) on Victorian guardianship practice. Disability and Rehabilitation, 44(12), 2806–2814. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1836680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J., & Joseph, R. (2015). People with severe or profound intellectual disabilities leading lives they prefer through supported decision-making: Listening to those rarely heard. A guide for supporters. A training package. Melbourne, Australia, Scope Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J., Voss, H., & Bloomer, M. J. (2019). Placing the Preferences of People with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities at the Center of End-of-Life Decision Making through Storytelling. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44(4), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919879701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J., Wilson, E., & Hagiliassis, N. (2017). Supporting end of life decision making: Case studies of relational closeness in supported decision making for people with severe or profound intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities: JARID, 30(6), 1022–1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zielinski, R. E., Roosevelt, L., Nelson, K., Vargas, B., & Thomas, J. W. (2020). Relational decision-making in the context of life-limiting fetal anomalies: Two cases of anencephaly diagnosis. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 65(6), 813–817. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar