Temperature-related sex allocation shifts in a recovering keystone species, Pinus palustris

References

• Ashman TL, Knight TM, Steets JA, Amarasekare P, Burd M, Campbell DR, Dudash MR, Johnston MO, Mazer SJ, Mitchell RJ, et al. 2004. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology. 85:2408–2421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer WD. 1973. Air temperature, heat sums, and pollen shedding phenology of longleaf pine. Ecology. 54:420–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer WD. 1987. Volume growth loss: a hidden cost of periodic prescribed burning in longleaf pine? Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 11:154–157.
   Google Scholar
• Brockway DG, Outcalt KW, Boyer WD. 2006. Longleaf pine regeneration ecology and methods. In: Jose S, Jokela EJ, Miller DL, editor. The longleaf pine ecosystem: ecology, silviculture, and restoration. New York, NY: Springer. p. 95–133.
   Google Scholar
• Burd M, Allen T. 1988. Sexual allocation strategy in wind‐pollinated plants. Evolution. 42:403–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell DR, Halama KJ. 1993. Resource and pollen limitations to lifetime seed production in a natural plant population. Ecology. 74:1043–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1981. Allocation of resources to male and female functions in hermaphrodites. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 15:57–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnov EL. 1982. The theory of sex allocation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen X, Brockway DG, Guo Q. 2016. Entropy dynamics in cone production of longleaf pine forests in the southeastern United States. Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural-Resource Sciences. 8:11–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Guo Q, Brockway DG. 2017. Power laws in cone production of longleaf pine across its native range in the United States. Sustainable Agriculture Research. 6:64.
   Google Scholar
• Chen XW, Guo QF, Brockway DG. 2016. Analyzing the complexity of cone production in longleaf pine by multiscale entropy. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 35:172–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crone EE, Rapp JM. 2014. Resource depletion, pollen coupling, and the ecology of mast seeding. Year in Ecology and Conservation Biology. 1322:21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman DC, Mcarthur ED, Harper KT, Blauer AC. 1981. Influence of environment on the floral sex-ratio of monoecious plants. Evolution. 35:194–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman J, Barrett SC. 2009. Wind of change: new insights on the ecology and evolution of pollination and mating in wind-pollinated plants. Annals of Botany. 103:1515–1527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grano CX. 1958. Equipment notes: a timesaving slide for trapping atmospheric pollen. Forest Science. 4:94–95.
   Google Scholar
• Guo Q, Zarnoch SJ, Chen X, Brockway DG. 2016. Life cycle and masting of a recovering keystone indicator species under climate fluctuation. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability. 2:e01226.
   Google Scholar
• Guo QF, Rundel PW. 1997. Measuring dominance and diversity in ecological communities: choosing the right variables. Journal of Vegetation Science. 8:405–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard BB. 1998. The world according to wavelets the story of a mathematical technique in the making. 2nd ed. Natick: Massachusetts: A. K. Peters.
   Google Scholar
• Isbell F, Craven D, Connolly J, Loreau M, Schmid B, Beierkuhnlein C, Bezemer TM, Bonin C, Bruelheide H, De Luca E. 2015. Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes. Nature. 526:574–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly D, Hart DE, Allen RB. 2001. Evaluating the wind pollination benefits of mast seeding. Ecology. 82:117–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp EE, Goedde MA, Rice KJ. 2001. Pollen-limited reproduction in blue oak: implications for wind pollination in fragmented populations. Oecologia. 128:48–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight TM, Steets JA, Vamosi JC, Mazer SJ, Burd M, Campbell DR, Dudash MR, Johnston MO, Mitchell RJ, Ashman T-L. 2005. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 45:467–497.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd DG, Bawa KS. 1984. Modification of the gender of seed plants in varying conditions. Evolutionary Biology. 17:255–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira X, Abdala-Roberts L, Linhart YB, Mooney KA. 2014. Masting promotes individual- and population-level reproduction by increasing pollination efficiency. Ecology. 95:801–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ne’eman G, Goubitz S, Werger MJ, Shmida A. 2011. Relationships between tree size, crown shape, gender segregation and sex allocation in Pinus halepensis, a Mediterranean pine tree. Annals of Botany. 108:197–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ospina-Alvarez N, Piferrer F. 2008. Temperature-dependent sex determination in fish revisited: prevalence, a single sex ratio response pattern, and possible effects of climate change. Plos One. 3:e2837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson TW 2017. Longleaf pine masting, climate variability, and tick-borne disease prevalence in the southeastern US [ Dissertation]. Greensboro, NC: The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
   Google Scholar
• Petry WK, Soule JD, Iler AM, Chicas-Mosier A, Inouye DW, Miller TE, Mooney KA. 2016. Sex-specific responses to climate change in plants alter population sex ratio and performance. Science. 353:69–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp JM, McIntire EJ, Crone EE. 2013. Sex allocation, pollen limitation and masting in whitebark pine. Journal of Ecology. 101:1345–1352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robledo‐Arnuncio J, Alia R, Gil L. 2004. Increased selfing and correlated paternity in a small population of a predominantly outcrossing conifer, Pinus sylvestris. Molecular Ecology. 13:2567–2577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen O, Karkkainen K, Harju A, Nikkanen T, Rusanen M. 1993. Fertility variation in Pinus sylvestris: a test of sexual allocation theory. American Journal of Botany. 80:1016–1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvertown J. 1980. Leaf-canopy-induced seed dormancy in a Grassland Flora. New Phytologist. 85:109–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sork VL, Davis FW, Smouse PE, Apsit VJ, Dyer RJ, Fernandez JF, Kuhn B. 2002. Pollen movement in declining populations of California Valley oak, Quercus lobata: where have all the fathers gone? Molecular Ecology. 11:1657–1668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrence C, Compo GP. 1998. A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 79:61–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner J, Lechleitner M, Hosp D. 2016. Pollen limitation is not the rule in nival plants: a study from the European Central Alps. American Journal of Botany. 103:375–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlenberg WG. 1946. Longleaf pine: its use, ecology, regeneration, protection, growth, and management. Washington, DC: Charles Lathrop Pack Forestry Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang DY, Jiang XH. 2002. Size-dependent resource allocation and sex allocation in herbaceous perennial plants. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 15:74–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar