Maternal factors have stronger effect on family sex ratio than nuclear factors in a trans-Atlantic cross of Silene vulgaris

References

• Agrawal A, Lively CM. 2002. Infection genetics: gene-for-gene versus matching-alleles models and all points in between. Evol Ecol Res. 4:79–90.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey MF. 2002. A cost of restoration of male fertility in a gynodioecious species, Lobelia siphilitica. Evolution. 56:2178–2186.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey MF, McCauley DE. 2006. The effects of inbreeding, outbreeding and long-distance gene flow on survivorship in North American populations of Silene vulgaris. J Ecol. 94:98–109.
   Google Scholar
• Belhassen E, Atlan A, Couvet D, Gouyon PH, Quetier F. 1993. Mitochondrial genome of Thymus vulgaris L. (Labiate) is highly polymorphic between and among natural-populations. Heredity. 71:462–472.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley KE, Mandel JR, McCauley DE. 2010. Paternal leakage and heteroplasmy of mitochondrial genomes in Silene vulgaris: evidence from experimental crosses. Genetics. 185:961–968.
   Google Scholar
• Boutin V, Pannenbecker G, Ecke W, Schewe G, Samitou-Laprade P. 1987. Cytoplasmic male sterility and nuclear restorer genes in a natural population of Beta maritima: genetical and molecular aspects. Theor Appl Genet. 73:625–629.
   Google Scholar
• Buide ML, Del Valle JC, Castilla AR, Narbona E. 2018. Sex expression variation in response to shade in gynodioecious-gynomonoecious species: silene littorea decreases flower production and increases female flower proportion. Environ Exp Bot. 146:54–61.
   Google Scholar
• Caruso CM, Case AL. 2007. Sex ratio variation in gynodioecious Lobelia siphilitica: effects of population size and geographic location. J Evol Biol. 20:1396–1405.
   Google Scholar
• Caruso CM, Case AL. 2013. Testing models of sex ratio evolution in a gynodioecious plant: female frequency covaries with the cost of male fertility restoration. Evolution. 67:561–566.
   Google Scholar
• Charlesworth D. 1981. A further study of the problem of the maintenance of females in gynodioecious species. Heredity. 46:27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Charlesworth D, Ganders FR. 1979. Population-genetics of gynodioecy with cytoplasmic-genic male-sterility. Heredity. 43:213–218.
   Google Scholar
• Charlesworth D, Laporte V. 1998. The male-sterility polymorphism of Silene vulgaris: analysis of genetic data from two populations and comparison with Thymus vulgaris. Genetics. 150:1267–1282.
   Google Scholar
• de Haan AA, Hundscheid MPJ, van Hinsberg A. 1997. Effects of CMS types and restorer alleles on plant performance ion Plantago lanceolata L.: an indication for cost of restoration. J Evol Biol. 10:803–820.
   Google Scholar
• Del Castillo RF, Trujillo S. 2009. Evidence of restoration cost in the annual gynodioecious Phacelia dubia. J Evol Biol. 22:306–313.
   Google Scholar
• Delph LF, Montgomery BR. 2014. The evoutionary dynamics of gynodioecy in Lobelia. Int J Plant Sci. 175:383–391.
   Google Scholar
• Dufay M, Champelovier P, Kafer J, Henry JP, Mousset S, Marais GAB. 2014. An angiosperm-wide analysis of the gynodioecy-dioecy pathway. Ann Bot. 114:539–548.
   Google Scholar
• Dufay M, Vaudey V, De Cauwer I, Touzet P, Cuguen J, Arnaud JF. 2008. Variation in pollen production and pollen viability in natural populations of gynodioecious Beta vulgaris ssp maritima: evidence for a cost of restoration of male function?. J Evol Biol. 21:202–212.
   Google Scholar
• Frank SA. 1989. The evolutionary dynamics of cytoplasmic male sterility. Am Nat. 133:345–376.
   Google Scholar
• Gigord L, Lavigne C, Shykoff JA, Atlan A. 1998. No evidence for local adaptation between cytoplasmic male sterility and nuclear restorer genes in the gynodioecious species Thymus vulgaris L. Heredity. 81:156–163.
   Google Scholar
• Gigord L, Lavigne C, Shykoff JA, Atlan A. 1999. Evidence for effects of restorer genes on male and female reproductive functions of hermaphrodites in the gynodioecious species Thymus vulgaris L. J Evol Biol. 12:596–604.
   Google Scholar
• Glaettli M, Goudet J. 2006a. Inbreeding effects on progeny sex ratio and gender variation in the gynodioecious Silene vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae). New Phytol. 172:763–773.
   Google Scholar
• Glaettli M, Goudet J. 2006b. Variation in the intensity of inbreeding depression among successive life-cycle stages and generations in gynodioecious Silene vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae). J Evol Biol. 19:1995–2005.
   Google Scholar
• Gouyon PH, Couvet D. 1987. A conflict between two sexes, females and hermaphrodites. In: Stearns SC, editor. The evolution of sex and its consequences. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag; p. 245–261.
   Google Scholar
• Gouyon PH, Vichot F, Van Damme JMM. 1991. Nuclear-cytoplasmic male sterility: single-point equilibria versus limit cycles. Am Nat. 137:198–514.
   Google Scholar
• Gregorius HR, Ross MD. 1987. Selection with gene-cytoplasm interactions. 3. Evolution of dioecy. Evol Theory. 8:87–99.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson MR. 1991. Plant mitochondrial mutations and male-sterility. Annu Rev Genet. 25:461–486.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson MR, Bentolila S. 2004. Interactions of mitochondrial and nuclear genes that affect male gametophyte development. Plant Cell. 16:S154–S169.
   Google Scholar
• Hothorn T, Hornik K, Zeileis A. 2006. Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. J Comput Graph Stat. 15:651–674.
   Google Scholar
• Hothorn T, Zeileis A. 2015. partykit: A modular toolkit for recursive partytioning in R. J Machi Learn Res. 16:3905–3909.
   Google Scholar
• Houliston GJ, Olson MS. 2006. Nonneutral evolution of organelle genes in Silene vulgaris. Genetics. 174:1983–1994.
   Google Scholar
• Introducing the GLIMMIX Procedure for Generalized Linear Mixed Models, Paper 196-30. SUGI 30; 2005; Cary (N. C). SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Keller SR, Fields PD, Berardi AE, Taylor DR. 2014. Recent admixture generates heterozygosity-fitness correlations during the range expansion of an invading species. J Evol Biol. 27:616–627.
   Google Scholar
• Keller SR, Taylor DR. 2010. Genomic admixture increases fitness during a biological invasion. J Evol Biol. 23:1720–1731.
   Google Scholar
• Landergott U, Schneller JJ, Holderegger R, Thompson JD. 2009. Sex-ratio variation and spatial distribution of nuclear and cytoplasmic sex-determining genes in gynodioecious Thymus praecox across altitudinal gradients. Evol Ecol Res. 11:23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis D. 1941. Male sterility in populations of hermaphrodite plants. New Phytol. 40:56–63.
   Google Scholar
• Loh WY. 2014. Fifty Years of Classification and Regression Trees. Int Stat Rev. 82:329–348.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden-Jones EM, Turrill WB. 1957. The bladder campions. London: The Ray Society.
   Google Scholar
• McCauley DE, Bailey MF, Sherman NA, Darnell MZ. 2005. Evidence for paternal transmission and heteroplasmy in the mitochondrial genome of Silene vulgaris, a gynodioecious plant. Heredity. 95:50–58.
   Google Scholar
• McCauley DE, Taylor DR. 1997. Local population structure and sex ratio: evolution in gynodioecious plants. Am Nat. 150:406–419.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake K, Olson MS. 2009. Experimental evidence for frequency dependent self-fertilization in the gynodioecious plant, Silene vulgaris. Evolution. 63:1644–1652.
   Google Scholar
• Olson MS, McCauley DE. 2002. Mitochondrial DNA diversity, population structure, and gender association in the gynodioecious plant Silene vulgaris. Evolution. 56:253–262.
   Google Scholar
• Olson MS, McCauley DE, Taylor D. 2005. Genetics and adaptation in structured populations: sex ratio evolution in Silene vulgaris. Genetica. 123:49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Pearl SA, Welch ME, McCauley DE. 2009. Mitochondrial heteroplasmy and paternal leakage in natural populations of Silene vulgaris, a gynodioecious plant. Mol Biol Evol. 26:537–545.
   Google Scholar
• Renner SS. 2014. The relative and absolute frequencies of angiosperm sexual systems: dioecy, monoecy, gynodioecy, and an updated online database. Am J Bot. 101:1588–1596.
   Google Scholar
• Ross MD, Gregorius H-R. 1985. Selection with gene-cytoplasm interactions. II. Maintenance of Gynodioecy. Genetics. 109:427–439.
   Google Scholar
• Schabenberger O. 2005. Introducing the GLIMMIX Procedure for Generalized Linear Mixed Models, Paper 196–30, SUGI 30, SAS Institute, Cary, NC
   Google Scholar
• Stone JD, Olson MS. 2018. Pollination context alters female advantage in gynodioecious Silene vulgaris. J Evol Biol. 31:111–122.
   Google Scholar
• Storchova H, Muller K, Lau S, Olson MS. 2012. Mosaic origins of a complex chimeric mitochondrial gene in silene vulgaris. PLoS One. 7:e30401.
   Google Scholar
• Storchova H, Olson MS. 2004. Comparison between mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA variation in the native range of Silene vulgaris. Mol Ecol. 13:2909–2919.
   Google Scholar
• Storchova H, Stone JD, Sloan DB, Abeyawardana OAJ, Muller K, Walterova J, Pazoutova M. 2018. Homologous recombination changes the context of Cytochrome b transcription in the mitochondrial genome of Silene vulgaris KRA. BMC Genomics, 19:17:874.
   Google Scholar
• Swofford DL 2002. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland (Massachusetts): Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor DR, Olson MS, McCauley DE. 2001. A quantitative genetic analysis of nuclear-cytoplasmic male sterility in structured populations of Silene vulgaris. Genetics. 158:833–841.
   Google Scholar
• Touzet P, Delph LF. 2009. The effect of breeding system on polymorphism in mitochondrial genes of Silene. Genetics. 181:631–644.
   Google Scholar
• Uyenoyama MK, Takebayashi N. 2017. Evolution of the sex ratio and effective number under gynodioecy and androdioecy. Theor Popul Biol. 118:27–45.
   Google Scholar
• van der Meer S, Sebrechts T, Vanderstraeten S, Jacquemyn H. 2017. The female advantage in natural populations of gynodioecious Plantago coronopus: seed quantity vs. offspring quality. Oecologia. 185:653–662.
   Google Scholar