Differences in plant-dispersal mechanisms between contrasting Brazilian savanna habitats

References

• Abadia AC, Lenza E, Mews HA, Maracahipes-Santos L, Winck N, Gomes Pessoa MJ. 2018. Savannas on two different substrates in Brazil have a similar species diversity, but distinct edaphic conditions and species composition. Braz J Bot. 41(1):57–64. doi:10.1007/s40415-017-0424-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abreu MF, Pinto JRR, Maracahipes L, Gomes L, Oliveira EA, Marimon BS, Marimon BH, Farias J, Lenza E. 2012. Influence of edaphic variables on the floristic composition and structure of the tree-shrub vegetation in typical and rocky outcrop cerrado areas in Serra Negra, Goiás State, Brazil. Braz J Bot. 35(3):259–272. doi:10.1590/S1806-99592012000300005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alencar A, Shimbo JZ, Lenti F, Marques CB, Zimbres B, Rosa M, Arruda V, Castro I, Ribeiro J, Varela V, et al. 2020. Mapping three decades of changes in the Brazilian savanna native vegetation using landsat data processed in the google earth engine platform. Remote Sens. 12(6):23. doi:10.3390/rs12060924.
   Google Scholar
• Batalha MA, Mantovani W. 2000. Reproductive phenological patterns of cerrado plant species at the Pé-de-Gigante reserve (Santa Rita do Passa Quatro, SP, Brazil): a comparison between the herbaceous and woody floras. Rev Bras Biol. 60(1):129–145. doi:10.1590/s0034-71082000000100016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bates D, Machler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 67(1):1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benites VM, Schaefer CEGR, Simas FNB, Santos HG. 2007. Soils associated with rock outcrops in the Brazilian mountain ranges Mantiqueira and Espinhaço. Rev Bras Bot. 30(4):569–577. doi:10.1590/s0100-84042007000400003.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno ML, Rezende VL, Paula LFA, Meira-Neto JAA, Pinto JRR, Neri AV, Pontara V. 2021. Understanding how environmental heterogeneity and elevation drives the distribution of woody communities across vegetation types within the campo rupestre in South America. J Mt Sci. 18(5):1192–1207. doi:10.1007/s11629-020-6125-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadell J, Jackson RB, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED. 1996. Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia. 108(4):583–595. doi:10.1007/bf00329030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cássia-Silva C, Cianciaruso MV, Maracahipes L, Collevatti RG. 2017. When the same is not the same: phenotypic variation reveals different plant ecological strategies within species occurring in distinct Neotropical savanna habitats. Plant Ecol. 218(10):1221–1231. doi:10.1007/s11258-017-0765-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole MM. 1986. The savannas: biogeography and Geobotany. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colli GR, Vieira CR, Dianese JC. 2020. Biodiversity and conservation of the Cerrado: recent advances and old challenges. Biodivers Conserv. 29(5):1465–1475. doi:10.1007/s10531-020-01967-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousens R, Dytham C, Law R. 2008. Dispersal in Plants: a Population Perspective. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Cáceres M, Legendre P. 2009. Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. Ecology. 90(12):3566–3574. doi:10.1890/08-1823.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufrêne M, Legendre P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr. 67(3):345–366. doi:10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0345:SAAIST]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiten G. 1972. The Cerrado vegetation of Brazil. Bot Rev. 38(2):201–341. doi:10.1007/BF02859158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraway JJ. 2016. Extending the linear model with R: generalized linear, mixed effects and nonparametric regression models. Second ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC. (Texts in Statistical Science.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes GW. 2016. The megadiverse rupestrian grassland. In: Fernandes G, editor. Ecology and conservation of mountaintop grasslands in Brazil. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG; p. 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Flinn KM, Gouhier TC, Lechowicz MJ, Waterway MJ. 2010. The role of dispersal in shaping plant community composition of wetlands within an old-growth forest. J Ecol. 98(6):1292–1299. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01708.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flora e Funga do Brasil 2022 Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro
   Google Scholar
• Françoso RD, Dexter KG, Machado RB, Pennington RT, Pinto JRR, Brandão RA, Ratter JA. 2020. Delimiting floristic biogeographic districts in the Cerrado and assessing their conservation status. Biodivers Conserv. 29(5):1477–1500. doi:10.1007/s10531-019-01819-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Françoso RD, Haidar RF, Machado RB. 2016. Tree species of South America central savanna: endemism, marginal areas and the relationship with other biomes. Acta Bot Brasilica. 30(1):78–86. doi:10.1590/0102-33062015abb0244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furley PA, Ratter JA. 1988. Soil resources and plant communities of the central Brazilian Cerrado and their development. J Biogeogr. 15(1):97–108. doi:10.2307/2845050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottsberger G, Silberbauer-Gottsberger I. 1983. Dispersal and distribution in the Cerrado vegetation of Brazil. Sonderbd Naturwiss Ver Hamburg. 7:315–352.
   Google Scholar
• Gottsberger G, Silberbauer-Gottsberger I. 2006. Life in the Cerrado: a South American Tropical Seasonal Ecosystem. Vol. 2. Ulm (BW): Reta-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gottsberger G, Silberbauer-Gottsberger I. 2018. How are pollination and seed dispersal modes in Cerrado related to stratification? trends in a cerrado sensu stricto woodland in southeastern Brazil, and a comparison with Neotropical forests. Acta Bot Brasilica. 32(3):434–445. doi:10.1590/0102-33062018abb0186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartigan JA, Kleiner B. 1984. A mosaic of television ratings. Am Stat. 38(1):32–35. doi:10.1080/00031305.1984.10482869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawes JE, Vieira ICG, Magnago LFS, Berenguer E, Ferreira J, Aragao L, Cardoso A, Lees AC, Lennox GD, Tobias JA, et al. 2020. A large-scale assessment of plant dispersal mode and seed traits across human-modified Amazonian forests. J Ecol. 108(4):1373–1385. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD. 2005. Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hovestadt T, Yao P, Linsenmair KE. 1999. Seed dispersal mechanisms and the vegetation of forest islands in a West African forest-savanna mosaic (Comoe National Park, Ivory Coast). Plant Ecol. 144(1):1–25. doi:10.1023/A:1009764031116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe HF, Smallwood J. 1982. Ecology of seed dispersal. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 13(1):201–228. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.13.110182.001221.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbell SP. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biogeography and biodiversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huntley BJ, Walker BH. editors. 1982. Ecology of Tropical Savannas. HeidelbergBerlin: Springer-Verlaf.
   Google Scholar
• Joppa LN, Pfaff A. 2009. High and far: biases in the location of protected areas. PLoS ONE. 4(12):6. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly AE, Goulden ML. 2008. Rapid shifts in plant distribution with recent climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105(33):11823–11826. doi:10.1073/pnas.0802891105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kier G, Mutke J, Dinerstein E, Ricketts TH, Kuper W, Kreft H, Barthlott W. 2005. Global patterns of plant diversity and floristic knowledge. J Biogeogr. 32(7):1107–1116. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01272.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemos HL, Rodrigues Pinto JR, Mews HA, Lenza E. 2013. Structure and floristic relationships between Cerrado sensu stricto sites on two types of substrate in northern Cerrado, Brazil. Biota Neotrop. 13(4):121–132. doi:10.1590/s1676-06032013000400013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenza E, Abadia AC, Menegat H, Lúcio NW, Maracahipes-Santos L, Mews HA, Santos JO, Martins J. 2017. Does fire determine distinct floristic composition of two Cerrado savanna communities on different substrates? Acta Bot Brasilica. 31(2):250–259. doi:10.1590/0102-33062016abb0198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenza E, Pinto JRR, Pinto ADS, Maracahipes L, Bruziguessi EP. 2011. Comparação da vegetação arbustivo-arbórea de uma área de cerrado rupestre na Chapada dos Veadeiros, Goiás, e áreas de cerrado sentido restrito do Bioma Cerrado [Comparisons between a savanna on rocky soil tree-shrub community at Chapada dos Veadeiros, Goiás, and cerrado sensu stricto areas of the Cerrado biome]. Rev Bras Bot. 34:247–259. doi:10.1590/S0100-84042011000300002.
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur RH, Wilson EO. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Machado RB, Neto MBR, Pereira PGP, Caldas EF, Gonçalves DA, Santos NS, Tabor K, Steininger M. 2004. Estimativas de perda da área do Cerrado brasileiro. Brasília, DF: Conservação Internacional.
   Google Scholar
• Martins M, Zanzini ACS, Santiago WTV. 2007. Síndromes de dispersão em formações florestais do bioma Cerrado no estado do Tocantins. Rev Bras Biocienc. 5:807–809.
   Google Scholar
• Mews HA, Pinto JRR, Eisenlohr PV, Lenza E. 2014. Does size matter? Conservation implications of differing woody population sizes with equivalent occurrence and diversity of species for threatened savanna habitats. Biodivers Conserv. 23(5):1119–1131. doi:10.1007/s10531-014-0651-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mews HA, Pinto JRR, Eisenlohr PV, Lenza E. 2016. No evidence of intrinsic spatial processes driving Neotropical savanna vegetation on different substrates. Biotropica. 48(4):433–442. doi:10.1111/btp.12313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer D, Zeileis A, Hornik K. 2021. Vcd: visualizing Categorical Data. R package version 1.4-9.
   Google Scholar
• Mistry J, Berardi A. 2006. Savannas and dry forests: linking people with nature. Aldershot, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Mittelbach GG, Schemske DW. 2015. Ecological and evolutionary perspectives on community assembly. Trends Ecol Evol. 30(5):241–247. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2015.02.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta PEF, Curi N, Franzmeier DP. 2002. Relation of soils and geomorphic surfaces in the Brazilian Cerrado. In: Oliveira P Marquis R, editors. The Cerrados of Brazil Ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna. New York: Columbia University Press; p. 13–32.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy BP, Andersen AN, Parr CL. 2016. The underestimated biodiversity of tropical grassy biomes. Philos T R Soc B. 371(1703):12. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 403(6772):853–858. doi:10.1038/35002501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves ACO, Barbieri AF, Pacheco AA, Resende F, Braga RF, Azevedo AA, Fernandes GW. 2016. The human dimension in the Espinhaço Mountains: land conversion and ecosystem services. In: Fernandes G, editor. Ecology and conservation of mountaintop grasslands in Brazil. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG; p. 501–530.
   Google Scholar
• Neves ACO, Nunes FP, Carvalho FA, Fernandes GW. 2016. Neglect of ecosystems services by mining, and the worst environmental disaster in Brazil. Nat Conserv. 14(1):24–27. doi:10.1016/j.ncon.2016.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira RS, Bezerra L, Davidson EA, Pinto F, Klink CA, Nepstad DC, Moreira A. 2005. Deep root function in soil water dynamics in cerrado savannas of central Brazil. Funct Ecol. 19(4):574–581. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.01003.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozinga WA, Bekker RM, Schaminee JHJ, Van Groenendael JM. 2004. Dispersal potential in plant communities depends on environmental conditions. J Ecol. 92(5):767–777. doi:10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00916.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmesan C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 37(1):637–669. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto JRR, Lenza E, Pinto AS. 2009. Composição florística e estrutura da vegetação arbustivo-arbórea em um cerrado rupestre, Cocalzinho de Goiás, Goiás [Floristic composition and structure of woody vegetation in a cerrado rupestre, Cocalzinho de Goiás, Goiás State, Brazil]. Rev Bras Bot. 32(1):1–10. doi:10.1590/S0100-84042009000100002.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2022. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Reatto A, Correia JR, Spera ST, ÉS M. 2008. Chapter 5, Solos do bioma Cerrado: aspectos pedológicos. In: Sano S, Almeida S Ribeiro J, editors. Cerrado: ecologia e Flora. Brasília-DF: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica; p. 107–150.
   Google Scholar
• Ricklefs RE. 2007. History and diversity: explorations at the intersection of ecology and evolution. Am Nat. 170(S2):S56–70. doi:10.1086/519402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts DW. 2019. _labdsv: ordination and multivariate analysis for ecology_. R package version 2.0-1. doi:https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=labdsv.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig ML. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silva IA, Cianciaruso MVV, Batalha MA. 2009. Dispersal modes and fruiting periods in hyperseasonal and seasonal savannas, central Brazil. Rev Bras Bot. 32(1):155–163. doi:10.1590/S0100-84042009000100015.
   Google Scholar
• Silva JF, Fariñas MR, Felfili JM, Klink CA. 2006. Spatial heterogeneity, land use and conservation in the Cerrado region of Brazil. J Biogeogr. 33(3):536–548. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01422.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spasojevic MJ, Damschen EI, Harrison S. 2014. Patterns of seed dispersal syndromes on serpentine soils: examining the roles of habitat patchiness, soil infertility and correlated functional traits. Plant Ecol Divers. 7(3):401–410. doi:10.1080/17550874.2012.678506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strassburg BBN, Brooks T, Feltran-Barbieri R, Iribarrem A, Crouzeilles R, Loyola R, Latawiec AE, Oliveira FJB, Scaramuzza CAD, Scarano FR, et al. 2017. Moment of truth for the Cerrado hotspot. Nat Ecol Evol. 1(4):3. doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valladares F, Matesanz S, Guilhaumon F, Araujo MB, Balaguer L, Benito-Garzon M, Cornwell W, Gianoli E, van Kleunen M, Naya DE, et al. 2014. The effects of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation on forecasts of species range shifts under climate change. Ecol Lett. 17(11):1351–1364. doi:10.1111/ele.12348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Pijl L. 1982. Principles of dispersal in higher plants. 3rd ed. Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Vellend M. 2010. Conceptual synthesis in community ecology. Q Rev Biol. 85(2):183–206. doi:10.1086/652373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira DLM, Aquino FG, Brito MA, Fernandes-Bulhão C, Henriques RPB. 2002. Síndromes de dispersão de espécies arbustivo-arbóreas em cerrado sensu stricto do Brasil Central e savanas amazônicas [Dispersal syndromes of shrub-woody species in the cerrado sensu stricto vegetation of Central Brazil and amazonian savannas]. Rev Bras Bot. 25(2):215–220. doi:10.1590/s0100-84042002000200009.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira RRS, Pressey RL, Loyola R. 2019. The residual nature of protected areas in Brazil. Biol Conserv. 233:152–161. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang BC, Smith TB. 2002. Closing the seed dispersal loop. Trends Ecol Evol. 17(8):379–385. doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02541-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willson MF, Rice BL, Westoby M. 1990. Seed dispersal spectra: a comparison of temperate plant communities. J Veg Sci. 1(4):547–562. doi:10.2307/3235789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeilels A, Meyer D, Hornik K. 2007. Residual-based shadings for visualizing (conditional) independence. J Comput Graph Stat. 16(3):507–525. doi:10.1198/106186007x237856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar