The political in the technical: understanding the influence of national political institutions on climate adaptation

References

• Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W., & Tompkins, E. L. (2006). Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change, 15(2), 77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adger, W. N., Huq, S., Brown, K., Conway, D., and Hulme, M. (2003). Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. Progress in Development Studies, 3(3), 179–195.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A., & Lemons, M. C. (2015). Adaptive development. Nature Climate Change, 5(3), 185–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A., McSweeney, C., & Perrin, N. (2008). Local institutions and climate change adaptation. Social Development Notes; No. 113. World Bank, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Alemán, E., & Navia, P. (2009). Institutions and the legislative success of ‘strong’ presidents: An analysis of government bills in Chile. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 15(4), 401–419.
   Google Scholar
• Aleman, E., & Saiegh, S. (2007). Legislative preferences, political parties, and coalition unity in Chile. Comparative Politics, 39(3), 253–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aninat, C., & Londregan, J. (2006). Measuring spatial aspects of legislative delay: Evidence from the Chilean Congress. Center on Institutions and Governance (Working Paper No. 26.). UC Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Azhoni, A., Holman, I., & Jude, S. (2017). Adapting water management to climate change: Institutional involvement, inter-institutional networks, and barriers in India. Global Environmental Change, 44, 144–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldez, L., & Carey, J. (1999). Presidential agenda control and spending policy: Lessons from general Pinochet’s constitution. American Journal of Political Science, 43(1), 29–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, C. (1998). Against the current: Privatization, water markets, and the state in Chile. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, C. (2009). Dams and markets: Rivers and electric power in Chile. Natural Resources Journal, 49, 583–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, C. (2015). Water conflicts and entrenched governance problems in Chile’s market model. Water Alternatives, 8(2), 147–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisaro, A., Roggero, M., & Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2018). Institutional analysis in climate change adaptation research: A systematic literature review. Ecological Economics, 151, 34–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitran, E., Rivera, P., & Villena, M. (2014). Water management problems in the Copiapó Basin, Chile: Markets, severe scarcity, and the regulator. Water Policy, 16(5), 844–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, B. E., Ferejohn, J. A., & Fiorina, M. P. (1984). The constituency service basis of the personal vote for US representatives and British members of parliament. American Political Science Review, 78(1), 110–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cámara de Diputados. (1985). Law on incentives for minor irrigation works. Law 18.450.
   Google Scholar
• Cámara de Diputados de Chile. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.camara.cl/.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. (2002). Parties and coalitions in the 1990s. In S. Morgenstern & B. Nacif (Eds.), Legislative politics in Latin America (pp. 222–253). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. (2009). Legislative voting and accountability. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J., & Shugart, M. S. (1995). Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies, 14(4), 417–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, N. (2014). The politics of climate change in the UK. Climate Change, 5(3), 423–433.
   Google Scholar
• Castiglioni, R., & Rovira-Kaltwasser, C. (2016). Challenges to political representation in contemporary Chile. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 8(3), 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Climate and Resilience Research (CR2). (2016). The 2010–2015 mega-drought: A lesson for the future. Center for Climate and Resilience Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ciplet, D., Adams, K. M., Weikmans, R., & Roberts, T. J. (2018). The transformative capability of transparency in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 18(3), 130–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciplet, D., & Roberts, T. J. (2017). Climate change and the transition to neoliberal environmental governance. Global Environmental Change, 46, 148–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comisión de Agricultura, Silvicultura y Desarollo Rural. (2016, June 21). Primer informe de comisión. Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Comisión de Recursos Hídricos y Desertificación. (2015, October 20). Primer informe de comisión. Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Cosens, B., Craig, R., Hirsch, S., & Arnold, T. (2018). Legal pathways to adaptive governance in water basins in North America and Australia. In B. Cosens & L. Gunderson (Eds.), Practical panarchy for adaptive water governance (pp. 151–165). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, G. W., & Morgenstern, S. (2001). Latin America’s reactive assemblies and proactive presidents. Comparative Politics, 33(2), 171–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, R. K. (2010). Adapting water federalism to climate change impacts: Energy policy, food security, and the allocation of water resources. Environment and Energy Law and Policy Journal, 5, 183–236.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, B. F., Escobar-Lemmon, M. C., Jones, B. S., Jones, M. P., & Taylor-Robinson, M. M. (2004). Vote-seeking incentives and legislative representation in six presidential democracies. The Journal of Politics, 66(3), 823–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellink R., den Elzen, M., Aiking, H., Bergsma, E., Berkhout, F., Dekker, T., & Gupta, J. (2009). Sharing the burden of financing adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 9(4), 411–421.
   Google Scholar
• Donoso, G. (2006). Water markets: Case study of Chile’s 1981 water code. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria, 33(2), 157–171.
   Google Scholar
• Dodman, D., & Mitlin, D. (2015). The national and local politics of climate change adaptation in Zimbabwe. Climate and Development, 7(3), 223–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duverger, M. (1954). Political parties: Their organization and activity in the modern state. Barbara and Roberth North (eds). London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Fábrega, J., González, J., & Lindh, J. (2018). Polarization and electoral incentives: The end of the Chilean consensus democracy, 1990–2014. Latin American Politics and Society, 60(4), 49–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueroa del Río, L. S. (1995). Asignación y Distribución de las Aguas Terrestres. Editorial. Santiago, Chile, Universidad Gabriela Mistral. 143 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Fogt Rasmussen, J., Friis-Hansen, E., & Funder, M. (2018). Collaboration between meso-level institutions and communities to facilitate climate change adaptation in Ghana. Climate and Development, 10(4), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M., & Mitchell, P. (2005). The politics of electoral systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrick, D., Schlager, E., De Stefano, L., & Villamayor-Thomas, S. (2018). Managing the cascading risks of droughts: Institutional adaptation in transboundary rivers. Earth’s Future, 6(6), 809–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawel, E., Lehmann, P., Strunz, S., & Heuson, C. (2016). A public choice framework for climate adaptation - barriers to efficient adaptation and lessons learned from German flood disasters. (UFZ Discussion Papers, 3/2016). Leipzig: Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung - UFZ.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Chile. (1980). Article 74. Constitution of the Republic of Chile. Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Chile. (2010). Chile 2020: Obras Públicas Para El Desarrollo. Chile: Ministerio de Obras Públicas.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Chile. (2013). Estrategia Nacional de Recursos Hídricos 2012–2015. Chile: Ministerio de Obras Públicas.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Chile. (2015). Pólitica Nacional para los Recursos Hídricos 2015. Chile: Ministerio del Interior y Seguridad Pública.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M., & Lubell, M. (2018). Collaborative governance of climate change adaptation across spatial and institutional scales. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 222–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, P. (2013). What’s wrong with climate politics and how to fix it. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, K., & McIntosh Sundstrom, L. (2010). Global commons, domestic decisions: The comparative politics of climate change. Boston: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Hearnea, R., & Donosob, G. (2005). Water institutional reforms in Chile. Water Policy, 7, 53–69.
   Google Scholar
• Heitshusen, V., Young, G., & Wood, D. (2005). Electoral context and MP constituency focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 32–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, S., & Bracking, S. (2005). Exploring the politics of chronic poverty: From representation to a politics of justice? World Development, 33(6), 851–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hileman, J., & Lubell, M. (2017). The network structure of multilevel water resources governance in Central America. Ecology and Society, 23(2), 48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2014). Summary for policymakers. In C. B. Field, V. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, & L. L. White (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 1–32). Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, L. (1994). Changing private and public roles in technological development: Lessons from the Chilean fruit sector. In J. Anderson (Ed.), Agricultural technology: Current policy issues for the international community (pp. 243–266). Wallingford: CAB International.
   Google Scholar
• Javeline, D. (2014). The most important topic political scientists are not studying: Adapting to climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 12(2), 420–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. (2015). The global politics of climate change: Challenge for political science. Political Science and Politics, 48(1), 19–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M. R., & Roberts, T. J. (2013). Adaptation and international climate policy. Climate Change, 4(3), 171–189.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, R., Adams, K, Davis, M., & Siebert, C. K. (2017). Advancing climate adaptation practices and solutions: emerging research priorities. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1994). Electoral systems and party systems: A study of twenty-seven democracies, 1945–1990. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, G., Palm, R., & Feng B. (2018). Cross-national variation in determinants of climate change concern. Environmental Politics, 28(5), 793–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M. (2013). What can climate-adaptation policy in sub-Saharan Africa learn from research on governance and politics? Development Policy Review, 31(6), 647–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Londregan, J. (2000). Legislative institutions and ideology in Chile. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S., & Shugart, M. (1997). Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, D., & Norgate, T. (2012a). Summary report on Copiapó water yields and demands. CSIRO. Australia.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, D., & Norgate, T. (2012b). Summary report on the current water rights framework in Chile. CSIRO. Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Milman, A., Bunclark, L., Conway, D., & Adger, W. N. (2013). Assessment of institutional capacity to adapt to climate change in transboundary river basins. Climatic Change, 121(4), 755–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montes, J. E., Mainwaring, S., & Ortega, E. (2000). Rethinking the Chilean party systems. Journal of Latin American Studies, 32(3), 795–824.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenstern, S. (2002). Towards a model of Latin American legislatures. In S. Morgenstern & B. Nacif (Eds.), Legislative politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mullin, M., & Rubado, M. E. (2017). Local response to water crisis: Explaining variation in usage restrictions during a Texas drought. Urban Affairs Review, 53(4), 752–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navia, P. (2004). Legislative candidate selection in Chile. Dissertation, NYU.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquini, L., & Shearing, C. (2014). Municipalities, politics, and climate change: An example of the process of institutionalizing an environmental agenda within local government. The Journal of Environment and Development, 23(2), 271–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rootes, C. (2014). A referendum on the carbon tax? The 2013 Australian election, the Greens, and the environment. Environmental Politics, 23(1), 166–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. M. (2016). (Re)Politicizing inequalities: Movements, parties, and social citizenship in Chile. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 8(3), 125–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, D., & Shugart, M. S. (2010). Presidents, parties, and prime ministers: How the separation of powers affects party organization and behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlager, E., & Blomquist, W. (2008). Embracing watershed politics. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shugart, M., & Carey, J. 1992. Presidents and assemblies: Constitutional design and electoral dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shugart, M. S., & Taagepera, R. (2017). Votes from seats: Logical models of electoral systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siavelis, P. M. (1997). Continuity and change in the Chilean party system. Comparative Political Studies, 30(6), 651–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siavelis, P. M. (2000a, Spring). Disconnected fire alarms and ineffective police patrols: Legislative oversight in postauthoritarian Chile. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 42(1), 71–98.
   Google Scholar
• Siavelis, P. M. (2000b). The president and congress in postauthoritarian Chile: Institutional constraints to democratic consolidation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siavelis, P. M. (2016). Crisis of representation in Chile? The institutional connection. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 8(3), 61–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struthers, Cory L. (2018). The enduring influence of electoral systems: Investigating green parties' attention to local issues in parliament. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 56(4), 523–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suggs, Z., Ziaja, S., & Schlager, E. (2016). Conjunctive groundwater management as a response to social-ecological disturbances: A comparison of four Western U.S. States. Texas Water Journal, 7(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. L., Shugart, M. S., Lijphart, A., & Grofman, B. (2014). A different democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tranter, B. (2013). The great divide: political candidate and voter polarization over global warming in Australia. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 59(3), 397–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. K. (2012). Sampling. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Underdal, A. (2017). Climate change and international relations (after Kyoto). Annual Review of Political Science, 20, 169–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara, A. (1998). Derecho de aguas. Editorial Jurídica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 548 p.
   Google Scholar
• Vergara, A. (2014). Crisis institucional del agua: Descripción del modelo, crítica a la burocracia y necesidad de tribunales especiales. Santiago: Legal Publishing/Thomson Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Voller, L., & Fenger, P. H. (2017). Avocados and stolen water. Danwatch. Retrieved from https://old.danwatch.dk/en/undersogelse/avocados-and-stolen-water/
   Google Scholar
• Victor, D. (2001). The collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the struggle to slow global warming. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Victor, D. (2011). Global warming gridlock: Creating more effective strategies for protecting the planet. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B. J. A., Neil Adger, W., & Russel, D. (2015). Institutional barriers to climate change adaptation in decentralised governance structures: Transport planning in England. Urban Studies, 15(12):2250–2266.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, S., & Carriger, S. (2007). Water and sustainable development: Lessons from Chile. Stockholm, Sweden: Global Water Partnership/Swedish International Development Agency.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2011). The market for water rights in Chile: Major issues. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Yamin, F., & Depledge, J. (2004). The international climate change regime: A guide to rules, institutions and procedures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. (1989). The politics of international regime formation: Managing natural resources and the environment. International Organization, 43(3), 349–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, N., & Coutinho, A. (2013). Government, anti-reflexivity, and the construction of public ignorance about climate change: Australia and Canada compared. Global Environmental Politics, 13(2), 89–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar