789
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Gender issues within climate change research: a bibliometric analysis

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 725-740 | Received 09 Nov 2020, Accepted 08 Sep 2021, Published online: 24 Oct 2021

References

  • Adams, J. (2013). The fourth age of research. Nature, 497(7451), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1038/497557a
  • Akter, S., Rutsaert, P., Luis, J., Htwe, N. M., San, S. S., Raharjo, B., & Pustika, A. (2017). Women’s empowerment and gender equity in agriculture: A different perspective from Southeast Asia. Food Policy, 69, 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.05.003
  • Aleixandre-Tudo, J. L., Bolaños-Pizarro, M., Aleixandre, J. L., & Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2019). Current trends in scientific research on global warming: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Global Warming, 17(2), 142–169. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGW.2019.097858
  • Ampaire, E. L., Acosta, M., Huyer, S., Kigonya, R., Muchunguzi, P., Muna, R., & Laurence, J. (2020). Gender in climate change, agriculture, and natural resource policies: Insights from east Africa. Climatic Change, 158(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02447-0
  • Arora-Jonsson, S. (2011). Virtue and vulnerability: Discourses on women, gender and climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 744–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.005
  • Belter, C. W., & Seidel, D. C. (2013). A bibliometric analysis of climate engineering research. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(5), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.229
  • Bunce, A., & Ford, J. (2015). How is adaptation, resilience, and vulnerability research engaging with gender? Environmental Research Letters, 10(12), 123003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/123003
  • Chapman, S., Mustin, K., Renwick, A. R., Segan, D. B., Hole, D. G., Pearson, R. G., & Watson, J. E. M. (2014). Publishing trends on climate change vulnerability in the conservation literature reveal a predominant focus on direct impacts and long time-scales. Diversity and Distributions, 20(10), 1221–1228. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12234
  • Di Matteo, G., Nardi, P., Grego, S., & Guidim, C. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of climate change vulnerability Assessment research. Environmental Systems and Decisions, 38(4), 508–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-018-9687-4
  • Duc, N. M., Hiep, D. V., Thong, P. M., Zunic, L., Zildzic, M., Donev, D., Jankovic, S. M., Hozo, I., & Masic, I. (2020). Predatory Open access journals are indexed in reputable databases: A revisiting issue or an unsolved problem. Medical Archives, 74(4), 318–322. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2020.74.318-322
  • Fathallah, J., & Pyakurel, P. (2020). Addressing gender in energy studies. Energy Research & Social Science, 65, 101461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101461
  • Field, C. B., Barros, V. R., Dokken, K. J., Mach, K. J., Mastrandrea, M. D., Bilir, T. E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K. L., Estrada, Y. O., Genova, R. C., Girma, B., Kissel, E. S., Levy, A. N., MacCracken, S., Mastrandrea, P. R., & White, L. L. (2014). IPCC: Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ar5_wgII_spm_en-1.pdf
  • Ford, J. D., Berrang-Ford, L., Bunce, A., McKay, C., Irwin, M., & Pearce, T. (2015). The status of climate change adaptation in Africa and Asia. Regional Environmental Change, 15(5), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0648-2
  • Ford, J. D., & Pearce, T. (2010). What we know, do not know, and need to know about climate change vulnerability in the western Canadian Arctic: A systematic literature review. Environmental Research Letters, 5(1), 014008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014008
  • Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Chapter 11 analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative Science and Technology research (pp. 257–276). Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Goh, A. H. X. (2012). A literature review of the gender-differentiated impacts of climate change on women’s and men’s assets and well-being in developing countries. CAPRi Working Paper No. 106. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C. 10.2499/
  • Gorettie, N. N., Namaalwa, J. J., & Bomuhangi, A. (2019). Impacts of climate change on small holder households in Mt. Elgon region of Uganda: Does gender matter? In Y. Bamutaze, S. Kyamanywa, B. R. Singh, G. Nabanoga, & R. Lal (Eds.), Agriculture and ecosystem resilience in Sub Saharan Africa: Livelihood pathways under changing climate (pp. 673–690). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12974-3_30
  • Gumuci, T., Hansen, J., Huyer, S., & van Huysen, T. (2019). Gender-responsive rural climate services: A review of the literature. Climate and Development, 12(3), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1613216
  • Harzing, A.-W. (2007). Publish or Perish. https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish
  • Haunschild, R., Bornmann, L., & Werner, M. (2016). Climate change research in view of bibliometrics. PLoS One, 11(7), e0160393. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160393
  • Huang, L., Chen, K., & Zhou, M. (2020). Climate change and carbon sink: A bibliometric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(8), 8740–8758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07489-6
  • IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change [core writing team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC.
  • Jerneck, A. (2018). Taking gender seriously in climate change adaptation and sustainability science research: Views from feminist debates and sub-Saharan small-scale agriculture. Sustainability Science, 13(2), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0464-y
  • Jewell, S. T. (2018). 6 - Providing meaningful information: Part D—current awareness. In A. P. DeRosa (Ed.), A practical guide for informationists. Supporting research and clinical practice (pp. 63–70). Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102017-3.00006-1
  • Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
  • Lam Duyen, T. N., Rañola, R. F., Sander, B. O., Wassmann, R., Tien, N. D., & Khanh Ngoc, N. N. (2020). A comparative analysis of gender and youth issues in rice production in north, central, and South Vietnam. Climate and Development, 13(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2020.1734771
  • Lassi, M., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2010). Identifying factors that may impact the adoption and use of a social science collaboratory: A synthesis of previous research. Proceedings of the seventh international Conference on conceptions of library and Information science—"unity in diversity”. IR Information Research, 15(3). http://InformationR.net/ir/15-3/colis7/colis710.html
  • Li, J., Wang, M.-H., & Ho, Y.-S. (2011). Trends in research on global climate change: A Science citation index expanded-based analysis. Global and Planetary Change, 77(1-2), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.02.005
  • Liu, R.-L., & Hsu, C.-K. (2019). Improving bibliographic coupling with category-based Co-citation. Applied Sciences, 9(23), 5176. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9235176
  • Lopez-Ferrer, M. (2018). International Funding and Collaboration in Sea Level RISE Research. In: IGI Global, Climate Change and Environmental Concerns: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice. Management Association, Information Resources. Science.
  • Lu, K., & Wolfram, D. (2012). Measuring author research relatedness: A comparison of word-based, topic-based, and author cocitation approaches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(10), 1973–1986. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22628
  • Lukwale, S. R., & Sife, A. S. (2017). Climate change research trends in Tanzania: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 9(6), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJBC2017.1099
  • Marx, W., Haunschild, R., & Bornmann, L. (2017a). Global warming and Tea production – The bibliometric view on a newly emerging research topic. Climate, 5(3), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli5030046
  • Marx, W., Haunschild, R., Thor, A., & Bornmann, L. (2017b). Which early works are cited most frequently in climate change research literature? A bibliometric approach based on reference publication year spectroscopy. Scientometrics, 110(1), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2177-x
  • McAuley, L., Pham, B., Tugwell, P., & Moher, D. (2000). Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? The Lancet, 356(9237), 1228–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02786-0
  • Paez, A. (2017). Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 10(3), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12266
  • Pauna, V. H., Picone, F., Le Guyader, G., Buonocore, E., & Franzese, P. P. (2018). The scientific research on ecosystem services: A bibliometric analysis. Ecological Questions, 29(3), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2018.022
  • Pearl-Martinez, R., & Stephens, J. C. (2016). Toward a gender diverse workforce in the renewable energy transition. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 12(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2016.11908149
  • Pratiwi, N. A. H., Rahmawati, Y. D., & Setiono, I. (2017). Gender equality in climate change adaptation: A case of cirebon, Indonesia. The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development, 2(2), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijpd.2.2.74-86
  • Rao, N., Lawson, E. T., Raditloaneng, W. N., Solomon, D., & Angula, M. N. (2019). Gendered vulnerabilities to climate change: Insights from the semi-arid regions of Africa and Asia. Climate and Development, 11(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2017.1372266
  • Reckova, D., & Irsova, Z. (2015). Publication bias in measuring anthropogenic climate change. Energy & Environment, 26(5), 853–862. https://doi.org/10.1260/0958-305X.26.5.853
  • Resurrección, B. P., Bee, B. A., Dankelman, I., Park, C. M. Y., Halder, M., & McMullen, C. P. (2019). Gender-transformative climate change adaptation: advancing social equity. Background paper to the 2019 report of the Global Commission on Adaptation. Stockholm Environment Institute, Rotterdam and Washington, DC.https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/gender-transformative-climate-change-adaptation.pdf
  • Shamoo, A. E., & Resnik, D. B. (2003). Responsible conduct of research. Oxford University Press Inc.
  • Sogani, R., & Viswanathan, K. R. (2020). Gender-Sensitive approaches and issues of Urban climate changes: Benefits and challenges. In D. Joshi, & C. Brassard (Eds.), Urban spaces and gender in Asia. Sustainable Development Goals series (pp. 177–196). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36494-6_11
  • Springer. (2020). Title, Abstract and Keywords https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/authorandreviewertutorials/writing-a-journal-manuscript/title-abstract-and-keywords/10285522. (accessed 22 February 2021)
  • UN General Assembly. (2015). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
  • UN Secretary-General. (2008). Overview of United Nations activities in relation to climate change: report of the Secretary-General (A/62/644). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/617513?ln=en
  • UN Women. (2020a). About UN Women..https://www.unwomen.org/en/about-us/about-un-women
  • UN Women. (2020b). Fund for Gender Equality..https://www.unwomen.org/en/trust-funds/fund-for-gender-equality
  • United Nations. (1994). United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. https://www.unccd.int/sites/default/files/relevant-links/2017-01/UNCCD_Convention_ENG_0.pdf
  • United Nations. (1995). Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action. https://www.un.org/en/events/pastevents/pdfs/Beijing_Declaration_and_Platform_for_Action.pdf
  • United Nations. (2002). Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development Johannesburg, South Africa. A/CONF.199/20.
  • United Nations. (2017). Draft decision -/CP.23 Establishment of a gender action plan. Subsidiary Body for Implementation Forty-seventh session FCCC/SBI/2017/L.29.
  • United Nations. (2019). Gender and climate change proposal by the president Draft decision -/CP.25 Enhanced Lima work programme on gender and its gender action plan. Conference of the Parties twenty-fifth session, FCCC/CP/2019/L.3.
  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2019). Subsidiary Body for Implementation Fiftieth session Bonn, 17–27 June 2019, Item 16 of the provisional agenda Gender and climate change. Differentiated impacts of climate change on women and men; the integration of gender considerations in climate policies, plans and actions; and progress in enhancing gender balance in national climate delegations. Synthesis report by the secretariat. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/sbi2019_inf8.pdf
  • van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  • van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric etworks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact Springer international publishing (pp. 285–320). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
  • Vyas-Doorgapersad, S. (2019). Gender equality for achieving sustainable development goal one (no poverty) in South African municipalities. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 11(1), 1150–1198. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041150
  • Wang, B., Pan, S.-Y., Ke, R.-Y., Wang, K., & Wie, Y.-M. (2014). An overview of climate change vulnerability: A bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science database. Natural Hazards, 74(3), 1649–1666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1260-y
  • Wang, Z., Zhao, Y., & Wang, B. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of climate change adaptation based on massive research literature data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199(20), 1072–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.183
  • WEDO (Women’s environment and development organization). (2008). Global gender and climate alliance..https://wedo.org/global-gender-and-climate-alliance/
  • White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<327::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-4
  • World Bank. (2020). Employment in agriculture (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.AGR.EMPL.ZS
  • Wrigley-Asante, C., Owusu, K., Egyir, I. S., & Owiyo, T. M. (2019). Gender dimensions of climate change adaptation practices: The experiences of smallholder crop farmers in the transition zone of Ghana. African Geographical Review, 38(2), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376812.2017.1340168
  • Wu, F., Geng, Y., Tian, X., Zhong, S., Wu, W., Yu, S., & Xiao, S. (2018). Responding climate change: A bibliometric review on urban environmental governance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 344–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.067
  • Zapp, M. (2018). The scientization of the world polity: International organizations and the production of scientific knowledge, 1950–2015. International Sociology, 33(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580917742003
  • Zhang, L., Gong, J., & Zhang, Y. (2016). A review of ecosystem services: A bibliometric analysis based on Web of science. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(18), 5967–5977. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201504060688
  • Zhang, X., Estoque, R. C., Xie, H., Murayama, Y., & Ranagalage, M. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of highly cited articles on ecosystem services. PLoS One, 14(2), e0210707. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210707
  • Zhou, Y., & Sun, X. (2020). Toward gender sensitivity: Women and climate change policies in China. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 22(1), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2019.1687001
  • Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2014). Bibliometric Methods in Management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
  • Zyoud, S. H., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2020). Mapping of climate change research in the arab world: A bibliometric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(3), 3523–3540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07100-y

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.