Collective action by community groups: solutions for climate change or different players in the same game?

References

• Abbot, K. W. (2018). Orchestration: strategic ordering in polycentric governance. In A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. van Asselt, & J. Forster (Eds.), Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? (pp. 188–209). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aldy, J. E., Orszag, P. R., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2001, October). Climate change: an agenda for global collective action. Paper presented at the prepared for the conference on the timing of climate change policies, Pew center on global climate Change, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211(4489), 1390–1396. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7466396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, S. (2016). Collective action to avoid catastrophe: When countries succeed, when they fail, and Why. Global Policy, 7(S1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12324
   Google Scholar
• Barrios, R. E. (2014). ‘Here, I'm not at ease’: anthropological perspectives on community resilience. Disasters, 38(2), 329–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boda, C. S., & Jerneck, A. (2019). Enabling local adaptation to climate change: towards collective action in Flagler Beach, Florida, USA, Florida, USA. Climatic Change, 157(3), 631–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02611-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2004). The evolution of strong reciprocity: cooperation in heterogeneous populations. Theoretical Population Biology, 65(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2003.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S., & Richerson, P. J. (2003). The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(6), 3531–3535. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0630443100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1988). Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bulbulia, J. (2012). Spreading order: religion, cooperative niche construction, and risky coordination problems. Biology & Philosophy, 27(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-011-9295-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulley, D. (2013). Producing and governing community (through) resilience. Politics, 33(4), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chari, R., Blumenthal, M. S., & Matthews, L. J. (2019). Community Citizen Science: From Promise to Action (1977403069). https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2763.html.
   Google Scholar
• Clutton-Brock, T. (2009). Cooperation between non-kin in animal societies. Nature, 462(7269), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clutton-Brock, T. (2009). Cooperation between non-kin in animal societies. Nature, 462(7269), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colding, J., Barthel, S., Ljung, R., Eriksson, F., & Sjöberg, S. (2021). Urban commons and collective action to address climate Change. Social Inclusion, 10(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i1.4862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connors, P., & McDonald, P. (2011). Transitioning communities: community, participation and the Transition Town movement. Community Development Journal, 46(4), 558–572. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsq014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMarrais, E., & Earle, T. (2017). Collective action theory and the dynamics of complex societies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 46(1), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, A. (1999). Mancur olson – social scientist. The Economic Journal, 109(456), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doocy, S., & Tappis, H. (2017). Cash-based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13(1), 1–200. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2017.17
   Google Scholar
• Dubet, F., & Thaler, H. L. (2004). Introduction: the sociology of collective action reconsidered. Current Sociology, 52(4), 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392104043491
   Google Scholar
• Esty, D. C., & Moffa, A. L. I. (2012). Why climate change collective action has failed and what needs to be done within and without the trade regime. Journal of International Economic Law, 15(3), 777–791. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgs033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faas, A. J., & Marino, E. K. (2020). Mythopolitics of “community”: an unstable but necessary category. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 29(4), 481–484. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-04-2020-0101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavrilets, S., & Fortunato, L. (2014). A solution to the collective action problem in between-group conflict with within-group inequality. Nature Communications, 5(1), https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4526
   Google Scholar
• Glicksman, R. L. (2010). Climate change adaptation: A collective action perspective on federalism considerations. Environmental Law, 40(4), 1159–1193. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43267322.
   Google Scholar
• Haley, S. (2004). Institutional assets for negotiating the terms of development: Indigenous collective action and Oil in Ecuador and Alaska. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 53(1), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1086/423258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, W. D. (1975). Innate social aptitudes of man: an approach from evolutionary genetics. Biosocial Anthropology, Malaby Press. pp 133–153.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, P. (2007). Cash based responses in emergencies. https://odi.org/en/publications/cash-based-responses-in-emergencies-2/.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., & Boyd, R. (2001). Why people punish defectors. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 208(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2000.2202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilhorst, D. (2003). The real world of NGOs: Discourses, diversity and development. Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-3/.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., Rietig, K., & Scobie, M. (2022). Agency dynamics of international environmental agreements: actors, contexts, and drivers. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 22(2), 353–372. doi:10.1007/s10784-022-09571-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreitmair, U., & Bower-Bir, J. (2021). Too different to solve climate change? Experimental evidence on the effects of production and benefit heterogeneity on collective action. Ecological Economics, 184, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106998
   Google Scholar
• Kudo, S., Allasiw, D. I., Omi, K., & Hansen, M. (2020). Translocal learning approach: A new form of collective learning for sustainability. Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 2, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2020.100009
   Google Scholar
• Kümmerli, R., Colliard, C., Fiechter, N., Petitpierre, B., Russier, F., & Keller, L. (2007). Human cooperation in social dilemmas: comparing the Snowdrift game with the Prisoner's Dilemma. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1628), 2965–2970. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowitt, K., Hickey, G. M., Saint Ville, A., Raeburn, K., Thompson-Colón, T., Laszlo, S., & Phillip, L. E. (2015). Factors affecting the innovation potential of smallholder farmers in the Caribbean Community. Regional Environmental Change, 15(7), 1367–1377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0805-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, F. (2006). Managing Co-operation: Trust and power in Ghanaian associations. Organization Studies, 27(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605056392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskrey, A. (2011). Revisiting community-based disaster risk management. Environmental Hazards, 10(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.2011.0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, L. J. (2017). Mutualistic cooperation – why religion is common but saints are rare. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7(3), 253–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1156561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, L. J. (2022). Thinking outside the altruistic Box. Journal of Cognitive Historiography, 6(1-2), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1558/jch.39066
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010b). A multi-scale approach to coping with climate change and other collective action problems. Solutions. https://thesolutionsjournal.com/node/565.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendergraft, C. A. (1998). Human dimensions of climate change: Cultural theory and collective action. Climatic Change, 39(4), 643–666. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005323809980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, L. E. R., Shannon, G., Kelman, I., & Meriläinen, E. (2022). Toward resourcefulness: pathways for community positive health. Global Health Promotion, 29(0), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/17579759211051370
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prakash, A., & Gugerty, M. K. (2012). Advocacy organizations and collective action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roepstorff, K. (2020). A call for critical reflection on the localisation agenda in humanitarian action. Third World Quarterly, 41(2), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1644160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanello, M., McGushin, A., Di Napoli, C., Drummond, P., Hughes, N., Jamart, L., … Hamilton, I. (2021). The 2021 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: code red for a healthy future. The Lancet, 398(10311), 1619–1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01787-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, T. (2015). Collective action: fifty years later. Public Choice, 164(3-4), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-015-0252-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scobie, M. (2019). Sustainable development and climate change adaptation: goal interlinkages and the case of SIDS. In C. Klöck, & M. Fink (Eds.), Dealing with climate change on small islands: Towards effective and sustainable adaptation (pp. 101–122). Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• Shearer, C. (2012). The political ecology of climate adaptation assistance: Alaska Natives, displacement, and relocation. Journal of Political Ecology, 19(1), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.2458/v19i1.21725
   Google Scholar
• Soubry, B., Sherren, K., & Thornton, T. F. (2020). Farming along desire lines: Collective action and food systems adaptation to climate change. People and Nature, 2(2), 420–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10075
   Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B K, Linnér, B.-O, & Goodsite, M E. (2015). The political economy of climate adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 5, 616–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasker, A., & Scoones, I. (2022). High reliability knowledge networks: Responding to animal diseases in a pastoral area of northern Kenya. The Journal of Development Studies, 58(5), 968–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2021.2013469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titz, A., Cannon, T., & Krüger, F. (2018). Uncovering ‘community’: Challenging an elusive concept in development and disaster related work. Societies, 8(3), https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8030071
   Google Scholar
• Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/406755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, T., Bornstein, L., & Chapman, J. (2007). The Aid chain: Coercion and commitment in development NGOs. Practical Action Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Watt-Cloutier, S. (2018). The right to be cold: one woman's fight to protect the Arctic and save the planet from climate change. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, K. P. (2014). Indigenous women, climate change impacts, and collective action. Hypatia, 29(3), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York, A. M., Otten, C. D., BurnSilver, S., Neuberg, S. L., & Anderies, J. M. (2021). Integrating institutional approaches and decision science to address climate change: a multi-level collective action research agenda. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 52, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zefferman, M. R. (2018). Cultural multilevel selection suggests neither large or small cooperative agreements are likely to solve climate change without changing the game. Sustainability Science, 13(1), 109–118. doi:10.1007/s11625-017-0488-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar