Much ado about nothing? Why adaptation measurement matters

References

• Adaptation Committee. (2021). Approaches to reviewing the overall progress made in achieving the global goal on adaptation. UNFCCC.
   Google Scholar
• Adaptation Committee. (2022). Compilation and synthesis of indicators, approaches, targets and metrics for reviewing overall progress in achieving the global goal on adaptation. UNFCCC.
   Google Scholar
• Andonova, L. B. (2010). Public-private partnerships for the earth: Politics and patterns of hybrid authority in the multilateral system. Global Environmental Politics, 10(2), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2010.10.2.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atteridge, A., & Remling, E. (2018). Is adaptation reducing vulnerability or redistributing it? WIRES Climate Change, 9(1), e500. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.500
   Google Scholar
• Bandola Gill, J., Grek, S., & and Tichenor, M. (2022). Governing the sustainable development goals: Quantification in global public policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, E., Abdella, J., Fisher, S., McPeak, J., Patnaik, H., Koulibaly, P., Cisse, D., Toure, M., Bocoum, A., Ndao, M., Deme, Y., & Gueye, B. (2019). Resilience from the ground up: How are local resilience perceptions and global frameworks aligned? Disasters, 43(S3), S295–S317. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12342
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beauchamp, E., and Motaroki, L. 2022. Taking stock of the Global Goal on Adaptation: From the Paris Agreement to the Glasgow-Sharm el-Sheikh work programme, IIED Working Paper, London: UK.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, S., & Mahony, M. (2017). The politics of anticipation: The IPCC and the negative emissions technologies experience. Global Sustainability, 1, E8. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2018.7
   Google Scholar
• Berrang-Ford, L., Biesbrok, R., Ford, J., Lesnikowski, A., Tanabe, A., Wang, F., & Heymann, J. (2019). Tracking global climate change adaptation among governments. Nature Climate Change, 9(6), 440–449. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0490-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borie, M., Mahoney, M., Obermeister, N., & Hulme, M. (2021). Knowing like a global expert organization: Comparative insights from the IPCC and IPBES. Global Environmental Change, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bours, D., McGinn, C., & Pringle, P. (2015). Editor’s notes: Monitoring and evaluation of climate change adaptation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2015(147), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20127
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., & Newell, P. (2015). Governing climate change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, L., Martinez, G., & Naswa, P. (2018). Adaptation metrics: Perspectives on measuring, aggregating and comparing adaptation results. UNEP DTU Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Clare, A., Graber, R., Jones, L., & Conway, D. (2017). Subjective measures of climate resilience: What is the added value for policy and programming? Global Environmental Change, 46, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, B., & Fisher, S. (2015). National experiences can shape the global goal on adaptation IIED Policy briefing. London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, B., & Fisher, S. (2018). Measuring the adaptation goal in the global stocktake of the Paris agreement. Climate Policy, 18(9), 1203–1209. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1485546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dellmuth, L., & Gustafsson, M. (2021). Global adaptation governance: How intergovernmental organizations mainstream climate change adaptation. Climate Policy, 21(7), 868–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1927661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilling, L., Prakash, A., Zommers, Z., Ahmad, F., Singh, N., de Wit, S., Nalau, J., Daly, M., & Bowman, K. (2019). Is adaptation success a flawed concept? Nature Climate Change, 9(8), 572–574. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0539-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, S., Schipper, L., Scoville-Symonds, M., Vincent, K., Adam, H. N., Brooks, N., Harding, B., Khatri, D., Lenaerts, L., Liverman, D., Mills-Novoa, M., Mosberg, M., Movik, S., Muok, B., Nightingale, A., Ojha, H., Sygna, L., Taylor, M., Vogel, C., & West, J. J. (2021). Adaptation interventions and their effect on vulnerability. Wor Dev, 141, 105383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105383
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1086/517897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyben, R., Gujit, I., Roche, C., & Shutt, C. (2015). The politics of evidence and results. Practical Action Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, S. (2023). Four questions to enhance the effectiveness and the adequacy of adaptation in the global stocktake. In J. Gao & L. Christiansen (Eds.), Perspectives: Adequacy and effectiveness of adaptation in the global stocktake (pp. 24–32). UNEP.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, S., Dinshaw, A., McGray, H., Schaar, J., & Rai, N. (2015). Using methodologies from international development to address the challenges of monitoring and evaluating climate change adaptation. New Directions For Evaluation, 2015(147), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20128
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, S., & Dodman, D. (2019). Addressing climate uncertainties in urban adaptation through social learning: Climate science, process and politics. Environmental Policy and Governance, 29(3), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, S., Dodman, D., Van Epp, M., & Garside, B. (2018). The usability of climate information in sub-national planning in India, Kenya and Uganda: The role of social learning and intermediary organisations. Climatic Change, 151(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2291-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. (2017). Environmentality unbound: Multiple governmentalities in environmental politics. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 85, 311–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J., Berrang-Ford, L., Biesbroek, R., Araos, S., Austin, S., & Lesnikowksi, A. (2015). Adaptation tracking for a post-2015 climate agreement. NCC, 5, 967–969 https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2744.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuda-Parr, S., & McNeill, F. (2019). Knowledge and politics in setting and measuring the SDGs: Introduction to special issue. Global Policy, 10(S1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuda-Parr, S., Yamin, A., & Greenstein, J. (2014). The power of numbers: A critical review of millennium development goal targets for human development and human rights. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15(2–3), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2013.864622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2020). Prophets, saviours and saints: Symbolic governance and the rise of a transnational metrological field. International Review of Education, 66(2-3), 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09844-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., Lovbrand, E., Turnhout, E., & Vijge, M. (2012). In pursuit of carbon accountability: The politics of REDD+ measuring, reporting and verification systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(6), 726–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, P. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, N. (2017). What is adaptation to climate change? Epistemic ambiguity in the climate finance system. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9345-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, N., & Persson, Å. (2018). Global climate adaptation governance: Why is it not legally binding? European Journal of International Relations, 24(3), 540–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066117725157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendricks, T. (2022). A state of relief: Feelings, affect and emotions in instantiating the Malawi state in disaster relief. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 40(2), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.3167/cja.2022.400203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickmann, T., Biermann, F., Spinazzola, M., Ballard, C., Bogers, M., Forestier, O., Kalfagianni, A., Kim, R. E., Montesano, F. S., Peek, T., Sénit, C.-A., van Driel, M., Vijge, M. J., & Yunita, A. (2022). Success factors of global goal-setting for sustainable development: Learning from the millennium development goals. Sustainable Development, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2461
   Google Scholar
• ICAI (Independent Committee on Aid Impact). (2019). International Climate Finance: UK aid for low-carbon development, London.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2022). Summary for policymakers. In H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, E. S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, M. Tignor, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, & B. Rama (Eds.), Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 3–33). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jerven, M. (2013). Poor numbers: how we are misled by African development statistics and what to do about it. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L. (2019). Resilience isn’t the same for all: Comparing subjective and objective approaches to resilience measurement. WIRES Climate Change, 10(1), e552. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.552
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M., & Roberts, T. (2013). Adaptation and international climate policy. WIRES Climate Change, 4(3), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. (2015). Transnational bureaucracies Progress in Human Geography, 39(4), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514535285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiter, T. (2021). Do governments track the implementation of national climate change adaptation plans? An evidence-based global stocktake of monitoring and evaluation systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 125, 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiter, T. (2022). Too little, too slow? Climate adaptation at the united nations climate change negotiations since the adoption of the Paris agreement. Carbon & Climate Law Review, 16(4), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2022/4/5
   Google Scholar
• Leiter, T., Olhoff, A., Al Azar, R., Barmby, V., Bours, D., Clement, V. W. C., Dale, T. W., Davies, C., & Jacobs, H. (2019). Adaptation metrics: Current landscape and evolving practices. Background paper for the Global Commission on Adaptation.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Mahony, M., & Hulme, M. (2018). Epistemic geographies of climate change. Progress in Human Geography, 42(3), 395–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516681485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, D., & Cooper, D. (2017). Assembling international development: Accountability and the disarticulation of a social movement. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 63, 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGowran, P., & Donovan, A. (2021). Assemblage theory and disaster risk management. Progress in Human Geography, 45(6), 1601–1624. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325211003328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merry, S., Davis, K., & Kingsbury, B. (Eds.). (2015). The quiet power of indicators: Measuring governance, corruption, and rule of law (Cambridge studies in law and society). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S. E. (2011). Measuring the world. Current Anthropology, 52(S3), S83. https://doi.org/10.1086/657241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merry, S. E. (2016). The seduction of quantification. UCP.
   Google Scholar
• Mikulewicz, M. (2020). The discursive politics of adaptation to Clim Ch, Annals of AAG, 110.
   Google Scholar
• Moehner, A. (2018). The evolution of adaptation metrics under the UNFCCC and its Paris Agreement. In L. Christiansen, G. Martinez, & P. Naswa (Eds.), Adaptation metrics: Perspectives on measuring, aggregating and comparing adaptation results (pp. 15–28). UNEP DTU Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, D. (2004). Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice. Development and Change, 35(4), 639–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalau, J., Torabi, E., Edwards, N., Howes, M., & Morgan, E. (2021). A critical exploration of adaptation heuristics. Climate Risk Management, 32, 100292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale, A. (2016). Adaptive scholarship and situated knowledges? Hybrid methodologies and plural epistemologies in climate change adaptation research Area, 48(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlove, B. (2022). The concept of adaptation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 47(1), 535–581. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-095719
   Google Scholar
• Pelling, M. (2011). Adaptation to climate change: From resilience to transformation. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, Å. (2019). Global adaptation governance: An emerging but contested domain. WIRES Climate Change, 10(6), e618. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.618
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1999). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, A. (2022). Valuing care. Anthropology in Action, 29(2), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.3167/aia.2022.290204
   Google Scholar
• Roehrer, C., & Kouadio, K. (2015). Monitoring, reporting, and evidence-based learning in the climate investment fund’s pilot program for climate resilience. In D. Bours, C. McGinn, & P. Pringle (Eds.), Monitoring and evaluation of climate change adaptation: A review of the landscape. New directions for evaluation (Vol. 147, pp. 129–145). American Evaluation Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political through. Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar
• Schipper, L. (2006). Conceptual history of adaptation in the UNFCCC process. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 15(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2006.00501.x
   Google Scholar
• Schipper, L. (2020). Maladaptation: When adaptation to climate change goes very wrong. One Earth, 3(4), 409–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.09.014
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2018). How the Big 4 got big: Audit culture and the metamorphosis of international accountancy firms. Critique of Anthropology, 38(3), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X18775815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, C., Iyer, S., New, M., Few, R., Kuchimanchi, B., Segnon, A., & Morchain, D. (2021). Interrogating ‘effectiveness’ in climate change adaptation: 11 guiding principles for adaptation research and practice. Climate and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2021.1964937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spearman, M., & McGray, H. (2011). Making adaptation count. WRI.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2008). Global public policy, transnational policy communities, and their networks. Policy Studies Journal, 36(1), 19–38. http://doi.org/10.1111/psj.2008.36.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tichenor, M. (2020). The open encyclopedia of anthropology. In F. Stein (Ed.), Facsimile of the first edition in The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Online: http://doi.org/10.29164/20metrics
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2021). Climate champions: Race to resilience. Retrieved October 31, 2022, from https://climatechampions.unfccc.int/race-to-resilience-launches/
   Google Scholar
• Valters, C., & Whitty, B. (2017). The politics of the results agenda in DFID: 1997–2017. Overseas Development Institute (ODI).
   Google Scholar
• Weisser, F., Bollig, M., Doevenspeck, M., & Müller-Mahn, D. (2014). Translating the ‘adaptation to climate change’ paradigm: The politics of a travelling idea in Africa. The Geographical Journal, 180(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodruff, S., & Regan, P. (2019). Quality of national adaptation plans and opportunities for improvement. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 24(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-018-9794-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanguas, P. (2018). Why we lie about aid: Development and the messy politics of change. Zed Books.
   Google Scholar