Biographical Wardrobes—A Temporal View on Dress Practice

References

• Barthes, Roland. 1983. The Fashion System. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, Herbert. [1969] 1986. Symbolic Interactionism – Perspective and Method. United States of America: University of California Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, Cheryl and Hazel Clark. 2012. “Conceptualizing Fashion in Everyday Lives.” Design Issues 28 (4): 18–28.10.1162/DESI_a_00172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, Otto von. 2009. “Revisiting Affirmative Design.”, in: XXI Magazine, 80. doi: http://selfpassage.org/XXI/XXI-0904/0904.htm.
   Google Scholar
• von Busch, Otto. 2013. “Sustainable Fashion in the Age of Celebrity Culture.” In The Sustainable Fashion Handbook, edited by Sandy Black, 16–19. China: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Church-Gibson, Pamela. 2000. “No-one expects me anywhere. Invisible Women, Ageing and the Fashion Industry”. In Fashion Cultures. Theories, Explorations and Analysis, edited by Stella Bruzzi and Pamela Church Gibson, 79–89. London and New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Fred. 1994. Fashion, Culture and Identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, Erik H. 1956. “The Problem of Ego Identity.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytical Association 4 (56): 55–121.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, Kate. 2014. Local Wisdom Project. A project exploring the Craft of Use by Kate Fletcher 2009-14. doi: http://www.localwisdom.info.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, Kate and Mathilda Tham. 2004. “Clothing Rhythms.” In Eternally Yours: Time in Design, edited by Brian Eno, John Thakara and Thonik, 254–274. United Kingdom: 010 Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, L. and M. Racine. 2010. “The Complex Field of Research: for Design, through Design, and about Design”. In Proceedings from Design Research Society International Conference 2010. doi: http://www.designresearchsociety.org/docs-procs/DRS2010/PDF/043.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, Silvia. 2009. “Knowing and Learning in Practice-based Studies: an Introduction.” The Learning Organization 16 (5): 352–359.10.1108/09696470910974144
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, James. 2003. “Just do it: Tactical Formlessness and Everyday Consumption”. In Strangely Familiar: Design and Everyday Life, edited by Andrew Blauvelt, 56–71. Minneapolis, MN: ©Walker Art Center.
   Google Scholar
• Kawamura, Yuniya. 2005. Fashion-ology. An Introduction to Fashion Studies. United Kingdom: Berg/Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Kleine, Susan S., Robert E. Kleine III and Chris T. Allen. 1995. “How is a Possession “Me” or “Not Me”? Characterizing Types and an Antecedent of Material Possession Attachment.” Journal of Consumer Research 22 (3): 327–343.10.1086/jcr.1995.22.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepp, Ingun Grimstad. 2001. Hvorfor går klær ut av bruk? Avhending sett i forhold til kvinners klesvaner [Why do Clothes go Out of Use? Discarding Seen in Relation to the Dress Practice of Women]. Rapport no. 3-2001, Oslo: SIFO/Statens institut for forbruksforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Klepp, Ingun Grimstad. 2010. “Snapshot: Why Do Women Throw Out Clothes?” In Berg Encyclopedia of World Dress and Fashion: West Europe, edited by Lise Skov, Vol. 8, 169–170. United States of America: Berg/Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Lipovetsky, Gilles. 1994. The Empire of Fashion. Dressing Modern Democracy. United States of America: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackinney-Valentin, Maria. 2010. “On the Nature of Trends: A Study of Trend Mechanisms in Contemporary Society.” PhD diss., Danish Design School.
   Google Scholar
• Mattelmäki, Tuuli. 2007. “Design Probes.” PhD diss., UIAH. Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Daniel. 2009. “The Artefact as Manufactured Object.” In Design studies: A Reader, edited by H. Clark and D. Brody, 229–236. United States of America: Berg/Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Daniel and Sophie Woodward. 2012. Blue Jeans: the Art of the Ordinary. United States of America: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polhemus, Ted. 1997. Streetstyle From Sidewalk to Catwalk. Singapore: Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Roach-Higgins, Mary Ellen and Joanne B. Eicher. 1992. “Dress and Identity.” Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 10(1): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Elizabeth B. -N. and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. “Co-creation and the new Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts 4 (1): 5–18.10.1080/15710880701875068
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, Douglas and Aki Namioka. 1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. United States of America: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, Elizabeth, Matthew Watson, Martin Hand and Jack Ingram (eds.). 2007. The Design of Everyday Life (Cultures of Consumption). United Kingdom: Berg/Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Sigurjónsdóttir, Æ., Jo Turney and Michael Langkjær (eds.). 2011. Images in Time: Flashing Forward, Backward, in Front and Behind photography in Fashion, Advertising and the Press. Bath: Wunderkammer Press, Bath School of Art and Design, Bath Spa University.
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, Georg. 1957. “Fashion.” American Journal of Sociology, 62 (6): 541–558.
   Google Scholar
• Skjold, E. 2014. “The Daily Selection.” PhD diss., Kolding School of Design/Copenhagen Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Turney, Jo and Rosemary Harden. 2007. Floral Frocks. The Floral Printed Dress from 1900 to Today. Woodbridge, UK: Antique Collectors Club Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ulväng, Marie. 2013. Klädekonomi och klädkultur. Böndernes kläder i Härjedalen under 1800-tallet [Dress Economy and Dress Culture. The Clothes of Farmers in the Vally of Härje during the 19th Century]. Riga: Gidlunds Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein B. 1899. Den arbejdsfrie klasse [The Leisure Class]. København: Pax, Rhodos
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Stuart. 1995. Sustainable by Design: Explorations in Theory and Practice. Earthscan: Sterling V.A.
   Google Scholar
• Warkander, Philip. 2013. “‘This is all fake, this is all plastic, this is me’. A study of the interrelations between style, sexuality and gender in contemporary Stockholm.” PhD diss., Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis, Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, Sophie. 2007. Why Women Wear What They Wear. United Kingdom: Berg/Oxford.10.2752/9781847883483
   Google Scholar