Partnerships in Practice: Producing New Design Knowledge with Users When Developing Performance Apparel Products

References

• Al-Zu’bi, Z. M. F., and Christos Tsinopoulos. 2012. “Suppliers versus Lead Users: Examining Their Relative Impact on Product Variety.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 29 (4): 667–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, Teresa M. 1983. “The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (2): 357–76. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amed, Irman, Leonie Berg, Achim Brantberg, Saskia Hedrich, Jonattan Leon, and Robb Young. 2017. “The State of Fashion 2017.” New York.
   Google Scholar
• Barcellini, Flore, Lorène Prost, and Marianne Cerf. 2015. “Designers’ and Users’ Roles in Participatory Design: What Is Actually Co-Designed by Participants?” Applied Ergonomics 50: 31–40. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.02.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, Hugh, and Karen Holtzblatt. 1998. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centred Systems. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bossen, Claus, Christian Dindler, and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2012. “Impediments to User Gains: Experiences from a Critical Participatory Design Project.” In Participatory Design Conference’12, 31–40. Roskilde, Denmark: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, Eva, Thomas Binder, and Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders. 2013. “Tools and Techniques: Ways to Engage Telling, Making and Enacting.” In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by Jesper Simonsen and Toni Robertson, 145–81. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burrus, Daniel. 2013. “Creativity and Innovation: Your Keys to a Successful Organization.” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-burrus/creativity-and-innovation_b_4149993.html
   Google Scholar
• DeJonge, J. O. 1984. “Forward.” In Clothing: The Portable Environment, edited by Susan M. Watkins, vii–xi. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dretske, Fred. 1981. “The Pragmatic Dimension of Knowledge.” Philosophical Studies 40 (3): 363–78. doi:10.1007/BF00646423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaubinger, Kurt, and Michael Rabl. 2015. “Innovation and Product Management.” In Innovation and Product Management: A Holistic and Practical Approach to Uncertainty Reduction, edited by Kurt Gaubinger, Michael Rabl, Scott Swan, and Thomas Werani, 83–113. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, Greg, Arwen Bunce, and Laura Johnson. 2006. “How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability.” Family Health International 18 (1): 59–82.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, N. N., M. DeLong, J. Hegland, M. Thompson, and G. Williams. 2007. “Constructing Knowledge for the Future: Exploring Alternative Modes of Inquiry From a Philosophical Perspective.” Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 25 (4): 323–48. doi:10.1177/0887302X07306849.
   Google Scholar
• Janesick, Valerie J. 1998. “The Dance of Qualitative Research Design: Metaphor, Methodolatry, and Meaning.” In Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, edited by Denzin, Norman K. and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 35–56. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kanstrup, Anne Marie. 2012. “A Small Matter of Design—an Analysis of End Users as Designers.” In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers, Volume 1.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, Lucy. 2011. “Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I.” Design and Culture 3 (3): 285–306. doi:10.2752/175470811X13071166525216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbell, Lucy. 2012. “Rethinking Design Thinking: Part II.” Design and Culture 4 (2): 129–48. doi:10.2752/175470812X13281948975413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolko, Jon. 2010. “Abductive Thinking and Sensemaking: The Drivers of Design Synthesis.” Design Issues 26 (1): 15–28. doi:10.1162/desi.2010.26.1.15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusunoki, Diana, and Aleksandra Sarcevic. 2012. “Applying Participatory Design Theory to Designing Evaluation Methods.” Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts – CHI EA ’12. New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2212776.2223725.
   Google Scholar
• LaBat, K. L., and S. L. Sokolowski. 1999. “A Three-Stage Design Process Applied to an Industry-University Textile Product Design Project.” Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 17: 11–20. doi:10.1177/0887302X9901700102.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, J. M., and M. J. Kallal. 1992. “A Conceptual Framework for Apparel Design.” Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 10 (2): 42–7. doi:10.1177/0887302X9201000207.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, Sharron J., and Leslie D. Burns. 2000. “Diversity of Research in Textiles, Clothing, and Human Behavior: The Relationship Between What We Know and How We Know.” Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 18 (4): 213–26. doi:10.1177/0887302X0001800401.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, Janice M. 1998. “Designing Funded Qualitative Research.” In Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, edited by Denzin, Norman K. and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 56–86. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolajsen, Hanne Westh, and Ada Scupola. 2011. “Investigating Issues and Challenges for Customer Involvement in Business Services Innovation.” Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 26 (5): 368–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon, Natalie W., and Johanna Blakley. 2012. “Fashion Thinking: Towards an Actionable Methodology.” Fashion Practice: The Journal of Design, Creative Process & The Fashion Industry 4 (2): 153–76. doi:10.2752/175693812X13403765252262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, Ikujiro. 1994. “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation.” Organization Science 5 (1): 14–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, Ikujiro. 2007. “The Knowledge-Creating Company.” Harvard Business Review, August.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, Ikujiro, and Ryoko Toyama. 2003. “The Knowledge-Creating Theory Revisited: Knowledge Creation as a Synthesizing Process.” Knowledge Management Research & Practice 1 (1): 2–10. doi:10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500001.
   Google Scholar
• Oygür, Isul. 2017. “The Machineries of User Knowledge Production.” Design Studies Knowledge Management Research & Practice. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Pitimaneeyakul, U., K. L. LaBat, and M. R. DeLong. 2004. “Knitwear Product Development Process: A Case Study.” Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 22 (3): 113–21. doi:10.1177/0887302X0402200302.
   Google Scholar
• Raj, Deepika, and Jung E. Ha-Brookshire. 2016. “How Do They Create “Superpower”? An Exploration of Knowledge-Creation Processes and Work Environments in the Wearable Technology Industry.” International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education 9 (1): 82–93. doi:10.1080/17543266.2015.1133720.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, Ralph D. 2001. Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations: Learning and Knowledge Creation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, Abbas, and Charles Teddlie. 2010. Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, Susan M., and Lucy Dunne. 2015. Functional Clothing Design. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar