Gender and the Diversity of the Human Body as Challenges for the Inclusive Design of Wearable Technology

References

• Allison, Conor. 2019. “Emporio Armani Smartwatch 3 review: Is third time the charm for the designer’s Wear OS smartwatch?” Wareable, October 7. Accessed 21 June 2022. https://www.wareable.com/smartwatches/emporio-armani-smartwatch-3-review-7579
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Sarah Elsie. 2020. “Putting the Trans* into Design for Transition: Reflections on Gender, Technology and Natureculture.” Paper presented at the Synergy – DRS International Conference 2020, August 11–14. Held online, edited by S. Boess, M. Cheung and R. Cain. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2020.165
   Google Scholar
• Bardey, Aurore, Judith Achumba-Wöllenstein, and Pak Chiu. 2020. “Exploring the Third Gender in Fashion: From Consumers’ Behavior to Designers’ Approach towards Unisex Clothing.” Fashion Practice 12 (3): 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2020.1816317
   Google Scholar
• Barry, Ben. 2019. “Fabulous Masculinities: Refashioning the Fat and Disabled Male Body.” Fashion Theory 23 (2): 275–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704X.2019.1567064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cifor, Marika, and Patricia Garcia. 2019. “Gendered by Design: A Duoethnographic Study of Personal Fitness Tracking Systems.” ACM Transactions on Social Computing 2 (4): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/336468
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, Alison J. 2013. “Actions Speak Louder.” Design and Culture 5 (2): 151–168. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470813X13638640370698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson, P. John, and Roger Coleman. 2015. “History of Inclusive Design in the UK.” Applied Ergonomics 46 (Part B): 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dayaram, Sareena. 2022. “Louis Vuitton’s new smartwatch is more chic than geek: The $3,300 Tambour Horizon Light Up is the first Louis Vuitton smartwatch to give Google’s WearOS a miss.” CNET, January 9. Accessed 21 June 2022. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/louis-vuitton-new-tambour-smartwatch-is-more-chic-than-geek
   Google Scholar
• Dolphin, Rick, and Iris van der Tuin. 2012. New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eicher, Joanna. 2012. “Body: The Dressed Body in Fashion and Art.” In Fashion and Art, edited by Adam Geczy and Vicki Karaminas, 77–87. London & New York: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Elman, Julie Passanate. 2018. “Find Your Fit’: Wearable Technology and the Cultural Politics of Disability.” New Media & Society 20 (10): 3760–3777. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818760312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, Joanne. 2000. “Fashion and the Fleshy Body: Dress as Embodied Practice.” Fashion Theory 4 (3): 323–347. https://doi.org/10.2752/136270400778995471
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, Arturo. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of the Worlds. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Lauren Alexis. 2017. “The first Louis Vuitton Smartwatch is here.” Harper’s Bazaar, June 11. Accessed 21 June 2022. https://www.harpersbazaar.com/fashion/trends/a10288847/louis-vuitton-smartwatch/.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, William J., and Andrew Brown. 2009. Working with Qualitative Data. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Graebner, Melissa, Jeffrey A. Martin, and Philip T. Roundy. 2012. “Qualitative Data: Cooking Without a Recipe.” Strategic Organization 10 (3): 276–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012452821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimstad Klepp, Ingun, and Mari Rysst. 2016. “Deviant Bodies and Suitable Clothes.” Fashion Theory 21 (1): 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704X.2016.1138658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanington, Bruce. 2003. “Methods in the Making: A Perspective on the State of Human Research in Design.” Design Issues 19 (4): 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793603322545019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendricks, Jacklyn. 2021. “Kim Kardashian’s impressive sleep score has this celebrity trying to keep up.” Shape, September 1. Accessed June 21, 2022. https://www.shape.com/celebrities/news/kim-kardashian-sleep-habits
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, Keena, and Chanmi Hwang. 2022. “Application of 3D Prototyping to Promote Size-Inclusive Design Practices for Plus-Size Apparel.” Fashion Practice 14 (1): 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2020.1804152l
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, F., M. Smitheram, D. Cleveland, C. Stephen, and H. Fisher. 2017. “Digital Materiality, Embodied Practices and Fashionable Interactions in the Design of Soft Wearable Technologies.” International Journal of Design 11 (3): 7–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafai, Yasmin B., Gabriela T. Richard, and Brendesha M. Tynes, eds. 2016. Diversifying Barbie and Mortal Combat: Intersectional Perspectives and Inclusive Designs in Gaming. Carnegie Mellon: ETC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaygan, Pınar. 2016. “Gender, Technology, and the Designer’s Work: A Feminist Review.” Design and Culture 8 (2): 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2016.1172862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Reina. 2019. “Modest Body Politics: The Commercial and Ideological Intersect of Fat, Black, and Muslim in the Modest Fashion Market and Media.” Fashion Theory 23 (2): 243–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704X.2019.1567063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, Deborah. 2018. “Towards Design Sociology.” Sociology Compass 12 (1): e12546. First published: 26 October 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, Ellen Lupton, Farah Kafei, and Jannifer Tobias, eds. 2021. Extra Bold: A Feminist, Inclusive, Anti-Racist, Non-Binary Field Guide for Graphic Designers. Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacLean, Kate. 2019. “Fashion in Bolivia’s Cultural Economy.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 22 (2): 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877918821233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maragiannis, Anastasios, and Rain Ashford. 2019. “Diversity and Inclusivity in the Age of Wearables: A Buzzword, a Myth and Uncertain Reality.” Body, Space & Technology 18 (1): 198–214. https://doi.org/10.16995/bst.320
   Google Scholar
• McBee-Black, Kerri. 2022. “‘Making Life Easier’: A Case Study Exploring the Development of Adaptive Apparel Design Innovations from a User-Centered Approach.” Fashion Practice 14 (2): 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2022.2031011
   Google Scholar
• Mencarini, Eleonora, Chiara Leonardi, Alessandro Cappelletti, Davide Giovanelli, Antonella De Angeli, and Massimo Zancanaro. 2019. “Co-Designing Wearable Devices for Sports: The Case Study of Sport Climbing.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 124: 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordor, Intelligence. 2021. “Wearable technology market – Growth, trends, Covid-19 impact, and forecasts (2022-2027).” Accessed 21 June 2022. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/wearable-technology-market
   Google Scholar
• Morozova, Dania, and Olga Gurova. 2022. “How the Practice of Commercializing Comes Together and Falls apart in a Market of Wearable Technologies.” Journal of Consumer Culture 22 (3): 674–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540521990862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, Kaori. 2009. “The Body and the Brand: How Lycra Shaped America.” In Producing Fashion: Commerce, Culture, and Consumers, edited by R. L. Blaszczyk, 207–227. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oleson, Alannah, Christopher Mendez, Zoe Steine-Hanson, Claudia Hilderbrand, Christopher Perdriau, Margaret Burnett, and Amy J. Ko. 2018. “Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Teaching Inclusive Design.” Paper presented at the ICER ’18, August 13–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3230977.3230998
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, Carol A., and Fiona Skillen. 2020. “Women in Sports History: The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same?” Sport in History 40 (4): 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460263.2020.1835707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, Nelly, Ann Rudinow Saetnan, and Merete Lie. 2002. “On Gender and Things: Reflections on an Exhibition on Gendered Artifacts.” Women’s Studies International Forum 25 (4): 471–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(02)00284-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, Caroline Criado. 2019. Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. London: Chatto & Windus.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, Hans, Henrik Åhman, Alexander Arvei Yngling, and Jan Gulliksen. 2015. “Universal Design, Inclusive Design, Accessible Design, Design for All: Different Concepts One Goal? On the Concept of Accessibility—Historical, Methodological and Philosophical Aspects.” Universal Access in the Information Society 14 (4): 505–526. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10209-014-0358-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, Michael. 2008. “Experience and the Social World.” In Research Methods for Cultural Studies, edited by M. Pickering and G. Griffin, 17–31. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, Bradley. 2002. Techno Fashion. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Raeve, Alexandra De, and Simona Vasile. 2016. “Adapted Performance Sportswear.” Paper presented at the proc. of 7th Int. Conf. on 3D Body Scanning Technologies, Lugano, Switzerland. 9–15. https://doi.org/10.15221/16.009
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, Osmud. 2015. “Denim Jeans: A Qualitative Study of Product Cues, Body Type, and Appropriateness of Use.” Fashion Practice 7 (1): 53–74. https://doi.org/10.2752/175693815X14182200335691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, Todd. 2022. “Body Styles: Redirecting Ethics and the Question of Embodied Empathy in Fashion Design.” Fashion Practice 15 (1): 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2022.2026048
   Google Scholar
• Rommes, Els. 2014. “Feminist Interventions in the Design Process.” In Gender in Science and Technology. Interdisciplinary Approaches, edited by Waltraud Ernst and Ilona Horwath, 41–56. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggerone, Lucia. 2017. “The Feeling of Being Dressed: Affect Studies and the Clothed Body.” Fashion Theory 21 (5): 573–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704X.2016.1253302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, Annabel. 2021. “How the Oura ring became the new wellness status symbol (and it’s loved by Prince Harry).” Tatler, January 5. Accessed 21 June 2022. https://www.tatler.com/article/oura-ring-covid-predicting-prince-harry
   Google Scholar
• Savolainen, Kaisa, and Sampsa Hyysalo. 2021. “User Representations as a Design Resource. Representational Work in Achieving Accountable Design Without Access to Users.” Science & Technology Studies 34 (2): 25–45. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.84598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, K. 2010. “Gender Dimensions of Product Design.” Paper presented at the Gender, Science, and Technology Expert Group meeting of the United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women (UN-DAW), 28. 93–200.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, Susanne. 2008. “Our Lady Hates Viscose: The Role of the Customer Image in High Street Fashion Production.” Cultural Sociology 2 (3): 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975508095618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skou, Niels Peter, and Anders V. Munch. 2016. “New Nordic and Scandinavian Retro: Reassessment of Values and Aesthetics in Contemporary Nordic Design.” Journal of Aesthetics & Culture 8 (1): 32573. https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v8.32573
   Google Scholar
• Smelik, Anneke. 2018. “New Materialism: A Theoretical Framework for Fashion in the Age of Technological Innovation.” International Journal of Fashion Studies 5 (1): 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1386/infs.5.1.33_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumpf, S., A. Peters, S. Bardzell, M. Burnett, D. Busse, J. Cauchard, and E. Churchill. 2020. “Gender-Inclusive HCI Research and Design: A Conceptual Review.” Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction 13 (1): 1–69. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000056
   Google Scholar
• Suunto Run. 2021. “The importance of diversity in the outdoors.” December 8. Accessed 21 June 2022. https://www.suunto.com/fi-fi/sports/News-Articles-container-page/the-importance-of-diversity-in-the-outdoors/
   Google Scholar
• Tomico, Oscar, Lars Hallnäs, Rung-Huei Liang, and Stephan A. G. Wensveen. 2017. “Towards a Next Wave of Wearable and Fashionable Interactions.” International Journal of Design 11 (3): 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valle-Noronha, Julia. 2019. “Becoming with Clothes: Activating Wearer-Worn Engagements Through Design.” Doctoral diss.., Aalto University. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/40624
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, Susan M., and Lucy E. Dunne. 2015. Functional Clothing Design: From Sportswear to Spacesuits. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Wellcome Global Monitor. 2018. Accessed 21 June 2022. https://wellcome.org/reports/wellcome-global-monitor/2018
   Google Scholar