How may biochar influence severity of diseases caused by soilborne pathogens?

References

▪▪ of considerable interest

• Retan GA. Charcoal as a means of solving some nursery problems. J. Forestry 13, 25–30 (1915).
   Google Scholar
• Elad Y, Rav David D, Meller Harel Y et al. Induction of systemic resistance in plants by biochar: a soil-applied carbon sequestering agent. Phytopathology 100(9), 913–921 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meller Harel Y, Elad Y, Rav-David D et al. Biochar mediates systemic response of strawberry to foliar fungal pathogens. Plant Soil 357(1–2), 245–257 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪▪ First study to show that the presence of biochar in the potting media can induce upregulation of plant defence-related genes and priming.

• Elad Y, Cytryn E, Harel YM, Lew B, Graber ER. The biochar effect: plant resistance to biotic stresses. Phytopath. Mediterr. 50(3), 335–349 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmer WH, Pignatello JJ. Effect of biochar amendments on mycorrhizal associations and Fusarium crown and root rot of asparagus in replant soils. Plant Dis. 95(8), 960–966 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪▪ Study exploring interactions between mycorrhizal fungi and disease development as affected by biochar, with an emphasis on mechanisms, particularly adsorption of allelopathic compounds by biochar.

• Jaiswal AK, Elad Y, Graber ER, Frenkel O. Rhizoctonia solani suppression and plant growth promotion in cucumber as affected by biochar pyrolysis temperature, feedstock and concentration. Soil Biol. Biochem. 69, 110–118 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪Explores the relationship between biochar physical and chemical characteristics and suppression or promotion of diseases caused by a soilborne pathogen.

• Matsubara Y, Hasegawa N, Fukui H. Incidence of Fusarium root rot in asparagus seedlings infected with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus as affected by several soil amendments. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 71(3), 370–374 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwart DC, Kim S-H. Biochar amendment increases resistance to stem lesions caused by Phytophthora spp. in tree seedlings. HortScience 47(12), 1736–1740 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerome M, Toyota K, Islam TM et al. Suppression of bacterial wilt of tomato by incorporation of municipal biowaste charcoal into soil. Soil Microorgan. 59(1), 9–14 (2005) [ in Japanese].
   Google Scholar
• Bruehl GW. Soilborne Plant Pathogens. Macmillan, New York, USA (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Katan J. Soil disinfestation: environmental problems and solutions. In: Modern Agriculture and the Environment. Rosen D, Tel-Or E, Hadar Y, Chen Y (Eds). Rehovot, Israel Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. 41–45 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Katan J. Role of cultural practices for the management of soilborne pathogens in intensive horticultural systems. XXVI International Horticultural Congress: Managing Soil-Borne Pathogens: A Sound Rhizosphere to Improve Productivity. Toronto, Canada, 11–18 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Katan J, Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U. Interactions of soilborne pathogens with roots and aboveground plant organs. In: Plant Roots: The Hidden Half. Kafkafi U, Waisel Y, Eshel A (Eds). CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 949–959 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Koike S, Subbarao K, Davis RM, Turini T. Vegetable Diseases Caused by Soilborne Pathogens. UCANR Publications University of California, Oakland CA. (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel D, McLaughlin L, Zepp A et al. Environmental and economic effects of reducing pesticide use. BioScience 41(6), 402–409 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumsden RD, Lewis JA, Fravel DR. Formulation and delivery of biocontrol agents for use against soilborne plant-pathogens. In: Biorational pest control agents: Formulation and delivery. American Chemical Society, Washington, USA, 166–182 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Mazzola M, Reynolds MP. Management of resident soil microbial community structure and function to suppress soilborne disease development. Climate Change Crop Prod. 1, 200–218 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Bais HP, Weir TL, Perry LG, Gilroy S, Vivanco JM. The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Ann. Rev. Plant Bio. 57, 233–266 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrios GN. Plant Pathology. Elvesier/Academic Press, London, UK (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Aoki H, Sassa T, Tamura T. Phytotoxic metabolites of Rhizoctonia solani. Nature 200, 575 (1963).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartz FE, Glassbrook NJ, Danehower DA, Cubeta MA. Elucidating the role of the phenylacetic acid metabolic complex in the pathogenic activity of Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group 3. Mycologia 104(4), 793–803 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orellana RG, Mandava NB. m-Hydroxyphenylacetic and m-methoxyphenylacetic acids of Rhizoctonia solani: their effect on specific root-nodule activity and histopathology in soybean. J. Phytopath. 107(2), 159–167 (1983).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes R, Garbeva P, Raaijmakers JM. The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbio. Rev. 37(5), 634–663 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪▪ Comprehensive review of the importance of the rhizosphere microbiome.

• Junker RR, Tholl D. Volatile organic compound mediated interactions at the plant-microbe interface. J. Chem. Ecol. 39(7), 810–825 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farag MA, Zhang HM, Ryu CM. Dynamic chemical communication between plants and bacteria through airborne signals: Induced resistance by bacterial volatiles. J. Chem. Ecol. 39(7), 1007–1018 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitas V, Kim HS, Bennett JW, Kang S. Sniffing on microbes: diverse roles of microbial volatile organic compounds in plant health. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 26(8), 835–843 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker P, Doornbos RF, Zamioudis C, Berendsen RL, Pieterse CMJ. Induced systemic resistance and the rhizosphere microbiome. Plant Pathol. J. 29(2), 136–143 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪▪ Detailed review regarding the role of rhizosphere microbiome in plant resistance to disease.

• Philippot L, Raaijmakers JM, Lemanceau P, van der Putten WH. Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 11, 789–799. (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silber A, Levkovitch I, Graber ER. pH-Dependent mineral release and surface properties of cornstraw biochar: agronomic implications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44(24), 9318–9323 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graber ER, Tsechansky L, Lew B, Cohen E. Reducing capacity of water extracts of biochars and their solubilization of soil Mn and Fe. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 65, 162–172 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datnoff LE, Elmer WH, Huber DM. Mineral Nutrition and Plant Disease. American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Bateman DF, Basham HG. Degradation of plant cell walls and membranes by microbial enzymes. In: Physiological Plant Pathology, Heitefuß R, Williams P (Eds). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 316–355 (1976).
   Google Scholar
• Kelman A, McGuire RG, Tzeng KC. Reducing the severity of bacterial soft rot by increasing the concentration of calcium in potato tubers. In: Soilborne Plant Pathogens: Management of Diseases with Macro- and Microelements. Engelhard, AW (Ed.): American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, USA, 102–123 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Hafez AAR, Stout PR, DeVay JE. Potassium uptake by cotton in relation to Verticillium wilt. Agron. J. 67, 359–361 (1975).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendergast-Miller MT, Duvall M, Sohi SP. Biochar–root interactions are mediated by biochar nutrient content and impacts on soil nutrient availability. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 65, 173–185 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsham KK, Fitter AH, Watkinson AR. Multi-functionality and biodiversity in arbuscular mycorrhizas. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 407–411 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker R, Martinson CA. Epidemiology of diseases caused by Rhizoctonia solani. In: Rhizoctonia solani, Biology and Pathology. Parmeter JR (Ed.): University of California Press, Berkeley, USA, 125–148 (1970).
   Google Scholar
• Wall PC, Neate SM, Graham RD, Reuter DJ, Rovira AD. The effect of rhizoctonia root disease and applied nitrogen on growth, nitrogen uptake and nutrient concentrations in spring wheat. Plant Soil 163(1), 111–120 (1994).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough TJ, Condron LM, Kammann C, Moeller C. A review of biochar and soil nitrogen dynamics. Agronomy 3(2), 275–293 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Joseph SD, Camps-Arbestain M, Lin Y et al. An investigation into the reactions of biochar in soil. Aust. J. Soil Res. 48(6–7), 501–515 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husson O. Redox potential (Eh) and pH as drivers of soil/plant/microorganism systems: a transdisciplinary overview pointing to integrative opportunities for agronomy. Plant Soil 362(1–2), 389–417 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan J-H, Xu R-K. Effects of biochars generated from crop residues on chemical properties of acid soils from tropical and subtropical china. Soil Res. 50(7), 570–578 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovley DR. Electromicrobiology. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 66, 391–409 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cayuela ML, Sanchez-Monedero MA, Roig A, Hanley K, Enders A, Lehmann J. Biochar and denitrification in soils: when, how much and why does biochar reduce N2O emissions? Sci. Rep. 3, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep01732 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornemann LC, Kookana RS, Welp G. Differential sorption behaviour of aromatic hydrocarbons on charcoals prepared at different temperatures from grass and wood. Chemosphere 67(5), 1033–1042 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen BL, Chen ZM. Sorption of naphthalene and 1-naphthol by biochars of orange peels with different pyrolytic temperatures. Chemosphere 76(1), 127–133 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graber ER, Tsechansky L, Gerstl Z, Lew B. High surface area biochar negatively impacts herbicide efficacy. Plant Soil 353(1–2), 95–106 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graber ER, Tsechansky L, Khanukov J, Oka Y. Sorption, volatilization and efficacy of the fumigant 1,3-dichloropropene in a biochar-amended soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 75(4), 1365–1373 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han YX, Boateng AA, Qi PX, Lima IM, Chang JM. Heavy metal and phenol adsorptive properties of biochars from pyrolyzed switchgrass and woody biomass in correlation with surface properties. J. Environ. Manag. 118, 196–204 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchimiya M, Bannon DI, Wartelle LH. Retention of heavy metals by carboxyl functional groups of biochars in small arms range soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 60(7), 1798–1809 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu JQ, Lee KS, Matsui Y. Effect of the addition of activated charcoal to the nutrient solution on the growth of tomato in hydroponic culture. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 39(1), 13–22 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardle DA, Zackrisson O, Nilsson MC. The charcoal effect in boreal forests: mechanisms and ecological consequences. Oecologia 115(3), 419–426 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daoud FB-O, Kaddour S, Sadoun T. Adsorption of cellulase Aspergillus niger on a commercial activated carbon: kinetics and equilibrium studies. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 75, 93–99 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammirato C, A. Miltner, and M. Kaestner. Effects of wood char and activated carbon on the hydrolysis of cellobiose by β-glucosidase from Aspergillus niger. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 1936–1942 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C-YC, Pedram EO, Hines AL. Adsorption of oxalic, malonic, and succinic acids on activated carbon. J. Chem. Eng. Data 31(2), 133–136 (1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das KC, Garcia-Perez M, Bibens B, Melear N. Slow pyrolysis of poultry litter and pine woody biomass: impact of chars and bio-oils on microbial growth. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 43(7), 714–724 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graber ER, Meller-Harel Y, Kolton M et al. Biochar impact on development and productivity of pepper and tomato grown in fertigated soilless media. Plant Soil 337(1-2), 481–496 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪▪ Conjectured two alternatives for improved plant performance under biochar treatment: influence on microbial populations or hormesis due to low doses of biochar chemicals.

• Spokas KA, Novak JM, Stewart CE et al. Qualitative analysis of volatile organic compounds on biochar. Chemosphere 85(5), 869–882 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orihashi K, Kojima Y, Terazawa M. Deterrent effect of rosin and wood tar against barking by the gray-sided vole (Clethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae). J. Forest Res. 6(3), 191–196 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Yatagai M, Nishimoto M, Hori K, Ohira T, Shibata A. Termiticidal activity of wood vinegar, its components and their homologues. J. Wood Sci. 48(4), 338–342 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faix O, Fortmann I, Bremer J, Meier D. Thermal degradation products of wood: Gas chromatographic separation and mass spectrometric characterization of polysaccharide derived products. Holz als Roh-und Werkstoff 49(5), 213–219 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Lingens A, Windeisen E, Wegener G. Investigating the combustion behaviour of various wood species via their fire gases. Wood Sci. Technol. 39(1), 49–60 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald JD, Zielinska B, Fujita EM, Sagebiel JC, Chow JC, Watson JG. Fine particle and gaseous emission rates from residential wood combustion. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34(11), 2080–2091 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinke HB, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl. Microbiol. Biotech. 66(1), 10–26 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu J, Yu Z-m, Wu W-q, Wu Q-l. Preliminary study of application effect of bamboo vinegar on vegetable growth. Forestry Stud. China 8(3), 43–47 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Mun SP, Ku CS. Pyrolysis GC-MS analysis of tars formed during the aging of wood and bamboo crude vinegars. J. Wood Sci. 56(1), 47–52 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Patrick Z, Toussoun T. Plant residues and organic amendments in relation to biological control. In: Ecology of Soil-Borne Plant Pathogens: Prelude to Biological Control. Baker, KF, Snyder, WC (Eds). University of California Press, Berkeley, USA, 440–459 (1965).
   Google Scholar
• Ye SF, Yu JQ, Peng YH, Zheng JH, Zou LY. Incidence of Fusarium wilt in Cucumis sativus l. is promoted by cinnamic acid, an autotoxin in root exudates. Plant Soil 263(1–2), 143–150 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugardeyn J, Van Der Straeten D. Ethylene: fine-tuning plant growth and development by stimulation and inhibition of elongation. Plant Sci. 175(1–2), 59–70 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierik R, Tholen D, Poorter H, Visser EJW, Voesenek LACJ. The Janus face of ethylene: growth inhibition and stimulation. Trends Plant Sci. 11(4), 176–183 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigler E, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S. Oxidation of ethylene and methane in forest soils – effect of CO2 and mineral nitrogen. Geoderma 90(1-2), 147–159 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, You C. Water holding capacity and absorption properties of wood chars. Energy Fuels 27(5), 2643–2648 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S. Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Aust. J. Soil Res. 45(8), 629–634 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S. Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Aust. J. Soil Res. 46(5), 437–444 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busscher WJ, Novak JM, Evans DE, Watts DW, Niandou MAS, Ahmedna M. Influence of pecan biochar on physical properties of a Norfolk loamy sand. Soil Sci. 175(1), 10–14 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q, Wang, Y, Wu, Y, Wang, X, Du, Z, Liu, X, Song, J. Effects of Biochar amendment on soil thermal conductivity, reflectance, and temperature. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 77(5), 1478–1487 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case SDC, McNamara NP, Reay DS, Whitaker J. The effect of biochar addition on N2O and CO2 emissions from a sandy loam soil – the role of soil aeration. Soil Biol. Biochem. 51, 125–134 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammann C, Ratering S, Eckhard C, Müller C. Biochar and hydrochar effects on greenhouse gas (CO2, N2O, CH4) fluxes from soils. J. Environ. Qual. 41(4), 1052–1066 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel S, Peters A, Trinks S, Schonsky H, Facklam M, Wessolek G. Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil. Geoderma 202, 183–191 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelissen G, Martinsen V, Shitumbanuma V et al. Biochar effect on maize yield and soil characteristics in five conservation farming sites in Zambia. Agronomy 3(2), 256–274 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Schulz H, Brandl S, Miehtke H, Huwe B, Glaser B. Short-term effect of biochar and compost on soil fertility and water status of a dystric cambisol in NE Germany under field conditions. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 175(5), 698–707 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss W, Kammann C, Koyro H-W. Biochar reduced copper toxicity in Chenopodium quinoa Willd. in a sandy soil. J. Environ. Qual. 41(4), 1157–1165 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oguntunde PG, Abiodun BJ, Ajayi AE, van de Giesen N. Effects of charcoal production on soil physical properties in Ghana. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 171(4), 591–596 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzoma KC, Inoue M, Andry H, Zahoor A, Nishihara E. Influence of biochar application on sandy soil hydraulic properties and nutrient retention. J. Food Agri. Environ. 9(3–4), 1137–1143 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry WE, Grünwald NJ. Introduction to oomycetes. In: The Plant Health Instructor, American Phytopathological Society (APS), St. Paul USA. (2010)
   Google Scholar
• Verheijen, FGA, Jeffery, S, van der Velde, M, et al. Reductions in soil surface albedo as a function of biochar application rate: implications for global radiative forcing. Environ. Res. Lett. 8(4) 044008.
   Google Scholar
• Kolton M, Meller Harel Y, Pasternak Z, Graber ER, Elad Y, Cytryn E. Impact of biochar application to soil on the root-associated bacterial community structure of fully developed greenhouse pepper plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77(14), 4924–4930 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodadad CLM, Zimmerman AR, Green SJ, Uthandi S, Foster JS. Taxa-specific changes in soil microbial community composition induced by pyrogenic carbon amendments. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 43(2), 385–392 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Liu X, Zheng J et al. Biochar soil amendment increased bacterial but decreased fungal gene abundance with shifts in community structure in a slightly acid rice paddy from southwest China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 71(0), 33–44 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson CR, Condron LM, Clough TJ et al. Biochar induced soil microbial community change: implications for biogeochemical cycling of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus. Pedobiologia 54(5–6), 309–320 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez JD, Denef K, Stewart CE, Zheng J, Cotrufo MF. Biochar addition rate influences soil microbial abundance and activity in temperate soils. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 65(1), 28–39 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matos A, Kerkhof L, Garland JL. Effects of microbial community diversity on the survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the wheat rhizosphere. Microb. Ecol. 49(2), 257–264 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irikiin Y, Nishiyama M, Otsuka S, Senoo K. Rhizobacterial community-level, sole carbon source utilization pattern affects the delay in the bacterial wilt of tomato grown in rhizobacterial community model system. Appl. Soil Ecol. 34(1), 27–32 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Alexander BJR, Stewart A. Glasshouse screening for biological control agents of Phytophthora cactorum on apple (Malus domestica). N Z J. Crop Hort. Sci 29(3), 159–169 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunasinghe W, Karunaratne AM. Interactions of Colletotrichum musae and Lasiodiplodia theobromae and their biocontrol by Pantoea agglomerans and Flavobacterium sp in expression of crown rot of “Embul” banana. Biocontrol 54(4), 587–596 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebbar P, Berge O, Heulin T, Singh SP. Bacterial antagonists of sunflower (Helianthus annuus l.) fungal pathogens. Plant Soil 133(1), 131–140 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garbeva P, Hordijk C, Gerards S, Boer W. Volatiles produced by the mycophagous soil bacterium collimonas. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12252 (2013) (Epub ahead of print).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masiello CA, Chen Y, Gao X et al. Biochar and microbial signaling: production conditions determine effects on microbial communication. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47(20), 11496–11503 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪▪ Shows that adsorption of signalling molecules by biochar may influence microbial communications, providing a mechanism by which biochar may impact microbial communities.

• Vallad GE, Goodman RM. Systemic acquired resistance and induced systemic resistance in conventional agriculture. Crop Sci. 44(6), 1920–1934 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman GE, Howell CR, Vitebro RA, Chet I, Lorito M. Trichoderma species – opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2(1), 43–56 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iriti M, Rossoni M, Borgo M, Faoro F. Benzothiadiazole enhances resveratrol and anthocyanin biosynthesis in grapevine, meanwhile improving resistance to botrytis cinerea. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52(14), 4406–4413 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perazzolli M, Dagostin S, Ferrari A, Elad Y, Pertot I. Induction of systemic resistance against Plasmopara viticola in grapevine by Trichoderma harzianumT39 and benzothiadiazole. Biol. Cont. 47(2), 228–234 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belhadj A, Saigne C, Telef N et al. Methyl jasmonate induces defense responses in grapevine and triggers protection against Erysiphe necator. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54(24), 9119–9125 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajkumar M, Lee KJ, Freitas H. Effects of chitin and salicylic acid on biological control activity of Pseudomonas spp. against damping off of pepper. S. Afr. J. Bot. 74(2), 268–273 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz A, Trotel-Aziz P, Dhuicq L, Jeandet P, Couderchet M, Vernet G. Chitosan oligomers and copper sulfate induce grapevine defense reactions and resistance to gray mold and downy mildew. Phytopathology 96(11), 1188–1194 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trouvelot S, Varnier AL, Allègre M et al. A β-1,3 glucan sulfate induces resistance in grapevine against Plasmopara viticola through priming of defense responses, including HR-like cell death. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 21(2), 232–243 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamiduzzaman MM, Jakab G, Barnavon L, Neuhaus JM, Mauch-Mani B. β-aminobutyric acid-induced resistance against downy mildew in grapevine acts through the potentiation of callose formation and jasmonic acid signaling. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 18(8), 819–829 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuveni M, Agapov V, Reuveni R. Induced systemic protection to powdery mildew in cucumber by phosphate and potassium fertilizers: effects of inoculum concentration and post-inoculation treatment. Can J. Plant Pathol. 17(3), 247–251 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters D, Walsh D, Newton A, Lyon G. Induced resistance for plant disease control: maximizing the efficacy of resistance elicitors. Phytopathology 95(12), 1368–1373 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiese J, Wiese H, Schwartz J, Schubert S. Osmotic stress and silicon act additively in enhancing pathogen resistance in barley against barley powdery mildew. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 168(2), 269–274 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres PG. The interaction between environmental-stress injury and biotic disease physiology. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 22, 53–75 (1984).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiese J, Kranz T, Schubert S. Induction of pathogen resistance in barley by abiotic stress. Plant Biol. 6(5), 529–536 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal AK. Impact of biochar amendment to a potting medium on damping-off caused by Rhizoctonia solani. Hebrew University of Jerusalem, M.Sc. Thesis, (Elad, Y, Frenkel, O, Graber, ER), February 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Warnock DD, Lehmann J, Kuyper TW, Rillig MC. Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil – concepts and mechanisms. Plant Soil 300(1–2), 9–20 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar

▪ Classic review paper examining influence of biochar on mycorrhize.

• Solaiman ZM, Blackwell P, Abbott LK, Storer P. Direct and residual effect of biochar application on mycorrhizal root colonisation, growth and nutrition of wheat. Aust. J. Soil Res. 48(7), 546–554 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elad Y. Biological control of foliar pathogens by means of Trichoderma harzianum and potential modes of action. Crop Prot. 19(8–10), 709–714 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar