Advanced search
Publication Cover
Carbon Management Volume 5, 2014 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,619
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Urban carbon governance and the transition toward low-carbon urbanism: review of a global phenomenon

Kevin LoDepartment of Geography, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong
Pages 269-283 | Published online: 25 Nov 2014

References

  • Romero Lankao P, Qin H. Conceptualizing urban vulnerability to global climate and environmental change. Curr. Op. Environ. Sustain. 3(3), 142–149 (2011).
  • Hunt A, Watkiss P. Climate change impacts and adaptation in cities: a review of the literature. Clim. Change 104(1), 13–49 (2011).
  • Satterthwaite D. Cities’ contribution to global warming: notes on the allocation of greenhouse gas emissions. Environ. Urban. 20(2), 539–549 (2008).
  • Yu W, Pagani R, Huang L. CO2 emission inventories for Chinese cities in highly urbanized areas compared with European cities. Energy Policy 47, 298–308 (2012).
  • Bulkeley H, Broto VC. Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 38(3), 361–375 (2012).
  • Broto VC, Bulkeley H. A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Global Environ. Change 23, 92–102 (2013).
  • Rosenzweig C, Solecki W, Hammer SA, Mehrotra S. Cities lead the way in climate-change action. Nature, 467, 909–911 (2010).
  • Bulkeley H. Cities and the governing of climate change. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 35, 229–253 (2010).
  • Harvey LD. Tackling urban CO2 emissions in Toronto. Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 35(7), 16–44 (1993).
  • Bulkeley H. Down to earth: local government and greenhouse policy in Australia. Aust. Geogr. 31(3), 289–308 (2000).
  • Lambright WH, Chjangnon SA, Harvey LD. Urban reactions to the global warming issue: agenda setting in Toronto and Chicago. 
Clim. Change 34, 463–478 (1996).
  • Nishida Y, Hua Y. Motivating stakeholders to deliver change: Tokyo's cap-and-trade program. Build. Res. Inf. 39(5), 518–533 (2011).
  • Ng MK. A critical review of Hong Kong's proposed climate change strategy and action agenda. Cities 29(2), 88–98 (2012).
  • Romero Lankao P. How do local governments in Mexico City manage global warming? Local Environ. 12(5), 519–535 (2007).
  • Holgate C. Factors and actors in climate change mitigation: a tale of two South African cities. Local Environ. 12(5), 471–484 (2007).
  • Puppim de Oliveira JA. The implementation of climate change related policies at the subnational level: an analysis of three countries. Habitat Int. 33(3), 253–259 (2009).
  • Boyd E, Ghosh A. Innovations for enabling urban climate governance: evidence from Mumbai. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 31(5), 926–945 (2013).
  • Reiche D. Renewable energy policies in the Gulf countries: a case study of the carbon-neutral “Masdar City” in Abu Dhabi. Energy Policy 38(1), 378–382 (2010).
  • Rutland T, Aylett A. The work of policy: actor networks, governmentality, and local action on climate change in Portland, Oregon. Environ. Plan. D Soc. Space 26, 627–646 (2008).
  • Kostka G, Hobbs W. Local energy efficiency policy implementation in China: bridging the gap between national priorities and local interests. China Q. 211(1), 765–785 (2012).
  • Shey J, Belis D. Building a municipal food policy regime in Minneapolis: implications for urban climate governance. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 31, 893–910 (2013).
  • Schroeder H, Bulkeley H. Global cities and the governance of climate change: what is the role of law in cities? Fordham Urban Law J. 36, 313–359 (2009).
  • Jones S. Climate change policies of city governments in federal systems: an analysis of Vancouver, Melbourne and New York City. Reg. Stud. 47(6), 974–992 (2013).
  • Rice JL. Public targets, private choices: urban climate governance in the Pacific Northwest. Prof. Geogr. doi:10.1080/00330124.2013.787011 (2013).
  • Wheeler SM. State and municipal climate change plans: the first generation. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 74(4), 481–496 (2008).
  • Bulkeley H, Kern K. Local government and the governing of climate change in Germany and the UK. Urban Stud. 43(12), 2237–2259 (2006).
  • Kousky C, Schneider SH. Global climate policy: will cities lead the way? Climate Policy 3(4), 359–372 (2003).
  • Bedsworth LW, Hanak E. Climate policy at the local level: insights from California. Global Environ. Change 23, 664–677 (2013).
  • Bae J, Feiock R. Forms of government and climate change policies in US cities. Urban Stud. 50(4), 776–788 (2013).
  • Zimmerman R, Faris C. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in North American cities. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 3, 181–187 (2011).
  • Salzberg A, Mehndiratta S, Liu Z. Urban rail development in China: the challenges ahead. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2275, 49–57 (2012).
  • Hidalgo D, Pereira L, Estupiñán N, Jiménez PL. TransMilenio BRT system in Bogota, high performance and positive impact – main results of an ex-post evaluation. Res. Transp. Econ. 39, 133–138 (2012).
  • Yazici MA, Levinson HS, Ilicali M, Camkesen N, Kamga C. A bus rapid transit line case study: Istanbul's Metrobüs System. J. Public Transp. 16, 153–177 (2013).
  • Voukas Y, Palmer D. Sustainable transportation in East Africa: the bus rapid transit evolution in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Proceedings from conference CODATU XV: The role of urban mobility in (re)shaping cities. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (2012).
  • Jun M-J. Redistributive effects of bus rapid transit (BRT) on development patterns and property values in Seoul, Korea. Transport Policy 19(1), 85–92 (2012).
  • Fjellstrom K. Bus rapid transit in China. Built Enviro. 36(3), 363–374 (2010).
  • Buehler R, Pucher J. Big city cycling in Europe, North America, and Australia. In: City cycling. Pucher, J, Buehler, R (Eds.) MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 287–318 (2012).
  • Shaheen S, Guzman S, Zhang H. Bikesharing across the globe. In: City cycling.Pucher, J, Buehler, R (Eds.) MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 183–209 (2012).
  • DeMaio P. Bike-sharing: history, impacts, models of provision, and future. J. Public Transp. 12(4), 41–56 (2009).
  • O’Brien O, Cheshire J, Batty M. Mining bicycle sharing data for generating insights into sustainable transport systems. J. Transport Geogr. 34, 262 (2014).
  • Coutard O, Rutherford J. The rise of post-networked cities in Europe? Recombining infrastructural, ecological and urban transformations in low carbon transitions. In: Cities and low carbon transitions. Bulkeley, H, Broto, CV, Hodson, M, Marvin, S (Eds.) Routledge, London, 107–125 (2011).
  • Wolff H. Keep your clunker in the suburb: low emission zones and adoption of green vehicles. Econ. J. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12091 (2013).
  • Goh M. Congestion management and electronic road pricing in Singapore. J. Transport Geogr. 10(1), 29–38 (2002).
  • Givoni M. Re-assessing the results of the London Congestion Charging scheme. Urban Stud. 49(5), 1089–1105 (2012).
  • Börjesson M, Eliasson J, Hugosson MB, Brundell-Freij K. The Stockholm congestion charges – 5 years on. Effects, acceptability and lessons learnt. Transport Policy 20, 1–12 (2012).
  • Danielis R, Rotaris L, Marcucci E, Massiani J. A medium term evaluation of the Ecopass road pricing scheme in Milan: economic, environmental and transport impacts. Econ. Policy Energy Environ. 54, 49–83 (2012).
  • Hamin EM, Gurran N. Urban form and climate change: balancing adaptation and mitigation in the US and Australia. Habitat Int. 33(3), 238–245 (2009).
  • Atkinson-Palombo C. New housing construction in Phoenix: evidence of “new suburbanism”? Cities 27(2), 77–86 (2010).
  • Dittmar H, Ohland G (Eds.) The new transit town: best practices in transit-oriented development Island Press, Washington, DC (2004).
  • Cervero R, Murakami J. Rail and property development in Hong Kong: experiences and extensions. Urban Stud. 46(10), 2019–2043 (2009).
  • Dittmar H, Belzer D, Autler G. An introduction to transit-oriented development. In: The new transit town: best practices in transit-oriented development. Dittmar, H, Ohland, G (Eds.) Island Press, Washington, DC, 2–18 (2004).
  • Dorsey B, Mulder A. Planning, place-making and building consensus for transit-oriented development: Ogden, Utah case study. J. Transport Geogr. 32, 65–76 (2013).
  • Duncan M. The impact of transit-oriented development on housing prices in San Diego, CA. Urban Stud. 48(1), 101–127 (2011).
  • Ratner KA, Goetz AR. The reshaping of land use and urban form in Denver through transit-oriented development. Cities 30, 31–46 (2013).
  • Wilson E. Multiple scales for environmental intervention: spatial planning and the environment under New Labour. Plan. Pract. Res. 24, 119–138 (2009).
  • Sullivan C, Sullivan A. Better than compliant: codes for energy savings and sustainability. Environ. Des. Constr. 15(9), 35–40 (2012).
  • Williams J. The role of planning in delivering low-carbon urban infrastructure. Environ. Plan. B Pla. Des. 40, 683–706 (2013).
  • Liu F, Meyer AS, Hogan JF. Mainstreaming building energy efficiency codes in developing countries: global experiences and lessons from early adopters World Bank Publications, Washington DC (2010).
  • Yao J, Zhu N. Enhanced supervision strategies for effective reduction of building energy consumption – a case study of Ningbo. Energy Build. 43(9), 2197–2202 (2011).
  • Brunklaus B, Thormark C, Baumann H. Illustrating limitations of energy studies of buildings with LCA and actor analysis. Build. Res. Inf. 38(3), 265–279 (2010).
  • Hernandez P, Kenny P. From net energy to zero energy buildings: defining life cycle zero energy buildings (LC-ZEB). Energy Build. 42(6), 815–821 (2010).
  • Castleton H, Stovin V, Beck S, Davison J. Green roofs; building energy savings and the potential for retrofit. Energy Build. 42(10), 1582–1591 (2010).
  • Nässén J, Sprei F, Holmberg J. Stagnating energy efficiency in the Swedish building sector – economic and organisational explanations. Energy Policy 36(10), 3814–3822 (2008).
  • Maruejols L, Young D. Split incentives and energy efficiency in Canadian multi-family dwellings. Energy Policy 39(6), 3655–3668 (2011).
  • Sumner J, Bird L, Dobos H. Carbon taxes: a review of experience and policy design considerations. Climate Policy 11(2), 922–943 (2011).
  • Zhang H. Designing and implementing an emissions trading market in China. In: Economics and regulation in China. Faure, M, Xu, G (Eds.) Routledge, Oxon, 240–268 (2014).
  • Lo K. China's low-carbon city initiatives: the implementation gap and the limits of the target responsibility system. Habitat Int. 42, 236–244 (2014).
  • Millard-Ball A. Do city climate plans reduce emissions?J. Urban Econ. 71(3), 289–311 (2012).
  • Machell E, Reinhalter T, Chapple K. Building support for transit-oriented development: do community-engagement toolkits work? Center for Community Innovation, University of California, Berkeley, CA (2010).
  • Mathur S, Ferrell C. Measuring the impact of sub-urban transit-oriented developments on single-family home values. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 47, 42–55 (2013).
  • Dudley G. Why do ideas succeed and fail over time? The role of narratives in policy windows and the case of the London congestion charge. J. Eur. Public Policy ( Epub ahead of print), 1–18 (2013).
  • Ramaswami A, Bernard M, Chavez A et al. Quantifying carbon mitigation wedges in US cities: near-term strategy analysis and critical review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46(7), 3629–3642 (2012).
  • Schaller B. New York City's congestion pricing experience and implications for road pricing acceptance in the United States. Transport Policy 17, 266–273 (2010).
  • Sharp EB, Daley DM, Lynch MS. Understanding local adoption and implementation of climate change mitigation policy. Urban Aff. Rev. 47(3), 433–457 (2011).
  • Lindseth G. The Cities for Climate Protection Campaign (CCPC) and the framing of local climate policy. Local Environ. 9(4), 325–336 (2004).
  • Dulal HB, Akbar S. Greenhouse gas emission reduction options for cities: finding the “coincidence of agendas” between local priorities and climate change mitigation objectives. Habitat Int. 38, 100–105 (2013).
  • Betsill M. Mitigating climate change in US cities: opportunities and obstacles. Local Environ. 6, 393–406 (2001).
  • Bulkeley H, Betsill M. Rethinking sustainable cities: multilevel governance and the “urban” politics of climate change. Environ. Polit. 14(1), 42–63 (2005).
  • Bulkeley H, Betsill MM. Revisiting the urban politics of climate change. Environ. Polit. 22(1), 136–154 (2013).
  • Kern K, Alber G. Governing climate change in cities: modes of urban climate governance in multi-level systems. OECD conference proceedings, Competitive Cities and Climate Change. Milan (9–10 October 2008).
  • Burch S. In pursuit of resilient, low carbon communities: an examination of barriers to action in three Canadian cities. Energy Policy 38(12), 7575–7585 (2010).
  • Sullivan R, Gouldson A, Webber P. Funding low carbon cities: local perspectives on opportunities and risks. Clim. Policy 13(4), 514–529 (2013).
  • Zahran S, Grover H, Brody SD, Vedlitz A. Risk, stress, and capacity: explaining metropolitan commitment to climate protection. Urban Aff. Rev. 43(4), 447–474 (2008).
  • Fisher DR. Understanding the relationship between subnational and national climate change politics in the United States: toward a theory of boomerang federalism. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 31, 769–784 (2013).
  • Bache I, Flinders M. Themes and issues in multi-level governance. In: Multi-level governance. Bache, I, Flinders, M (Eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1–11 (2004).
  • Marks G. Structural policy and multilevel governance in the EC. In: The state of the European Community. Cafruny, A, Rosenthal, G (Eds). Lynne Riener, Boulder, CO, 391–410 (1993).
  • Stephenson P. Twenty years of multi-level governance:”where does it come from? What is it? Where is it going?”. J. Eur. Public Policy 20(6), 817–837 (2013).
  • Marks G, Hooghe L. Contrasting visions of multi-level governance. In: Multi-level governance. Bache, I, Flinders, M (Eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 15–30 (2004).
  • Dowling R, McGuirk P, Bulkeley H. Retrofitting cities: local governance in Sydney, Australia. Cities 38, 18–24 (2014).
  • Nilsson AE, Swartling AG, Eckerberg K. Knowledge for local climate change adaptation in Sweden: challenges of multilevel governance. Local Environ. 17, 751–767 (2012).
  • Emelianoff C. Local energy transition and multilevel climate governance: the contrasted experiences of two pioneer cities (Hanover, Germany, and Växjö, Sweden). Urban Stud. 1–16, doi:10.1177/0042098013500087 (2013).
  • Aall C, Groven K, Lindseth G. The scope of action for local climate policy: the case of Norway. Global Environ. Politics 7(2), 83–101 (2007).
  • Thomson VE, Arroyo V. Upside-down cooperative federalism: climate change policymaking and the states. Va Environ. Law J. 29, 1–62 (2011).
  • Selin H, VanDeveer SD. Changing climates in North American politics: institutions, policymaking, and multilevel governance. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2009).
  • Rabe BG. Beyond Kyoto: climate change policy in multilevel governance sytems. Gov. Int. J. Policy Adm. Inst. 20, 423–444 (2007).
  • Krane D. The middle tier in American federalism: state government policy activism during the Bush presidency. Publius J. Fed. 37, 453–477 (2007).
  • Setzer J, Biderman R. Increasing participation in climate policy implementation: a case for engaging SMEs from the transport sector in the city of São Paulo. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 31(5), 806–821 (2013).
  • Lo K, Wang M. Energy conservation in China's twelfth Five-Year Plan period: continuation or paradigm shift? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 18, 499–507 (2013).
  • Lo K. A critical review of China's rapidly developing renewable energy and energy efficiency policies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 29, 508–516 (2014).
  • Giest S, Howlett M. Comparative climate change governance: lessons from European transnational municipal network management efforts. Environ. Policy Gov. 23(6), 341–353 (2013).
  • Bouteligier S. Inequality in new global governance arrangements: the North–South divide in transnational municipal networks. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 26(3), 251–267 (2013).
  • Andonova LB, Betsill MM, Bulkeley H. Transnational climate governance. Global Environ. Polit. 9(2), 52–73 (2009).
  • Roman M. Governing from the middle: the C40 Cities Leadership Group. Corp. Gov. 10(1), 73–84 (2009).
  • Gordon DJ. Between local innovation and global impact: cities, networks, and the governance of climate change. Can. Foreign Policy J. 19(3), 288–307 (2013).
  • Bulkeley H. Urban sustainability: learning from best practice? Enviro. Plan. A 38(6), 1029–1044 (2006).
  • Gordon D. Lament for a network: a comparative case study analysis of the impacts of the Partners for Climate Protection network on climate change policy in two Canadian cities. Conference proceedings: Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference. Montreal, (2010).
  • Wang R. Adopting local climate policies: what have California cities done and why? Urban Aff. Rev. 49(4), 593–613 (2013).
  • Gore CD. The limits and opportunities of networks: municipalities and Canadian climate change policy. Rev. Policy Res. 27(1), 27–46 (2010).
  • Krause RM. An assessment of the impact that participation in local climate networks has on cities’ implementation of climate, energy, and transportation policies. Rev. Policy Res. 29(5), 585–604 (2012).
  • Kern K, Bulkeley H. Cities, Europeanization and multi-level governance: governing climate change through transnational municipal networks. J. Common Mark. Stud. 47(2), 309–332 (2009).
  • Gustavsson E, Elander I, Lundmark M. Multilevel governance, networking cities, and the geography of climate-change mitigation: two Swedish examples. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 27, 59–74 (2009).
  • Rhodes RAW. The new governance: governing without government in political studies. Polit. Stud. 44, 652–667 (1996).
  • Rhodes RAW. Understanding governance: ten years on. Organ. Stud. 28, 1243–1264 (2007).
  • Khan J. What role for network governance in urban low carbon transitions? J. Clean. Prod. 50, 133–139 (2013).
  • Späth P, Rohracher H. The “eco-cities” Freiburg and Graz. The social dynamics of pioneering urban energy and climate governance. In: Cities and low carbon transitions. Bulkeley, H, Broto, CV, Hodson, M, Marvin, S (Eds). Routledge, London, 89–106 (2011).
  • Kronsell A. Legitimacy for climate policies: politics and participation in the Green City of Freiburg. Local Environ. 18(8), 965–982 (2013).
  • Whitehead M. “ In the shadow of hierarchy”: meta-governance, policy reform and urban regeneration in the West Midlands. Area 35(1), 6–14 (2003).
  • Le Galès P. Urban governance and policy networks: on the urban political boundedness of policy networks. A French case study. Public Admin. 79(1), 167–184 (2001).
  • Aylett A. Networked urban climate governance: neighborhood-scale residential solar energy systems and the example of Solarize Portland. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 31, 858–875 (2013).
  • Walker G. The role for “community” in carbon governance. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 2(5), 777–782 (2011).
  • Warren CR, McFadyen M. Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland. Land Use Policy 27(2), 204–213 (2010).
  • Pepermans Y, Loots I. Wind farm struggles in Flanders fields: A sociological perspective. Energy Policy 59, 321–328 (2013).
  • Hall N, Ashworth P, Devine-Wright P. Societal acceptance of wind farms: analysis of four common themes across Australian case studies. Energy Policy 58, 200–208 (2013).
  • Hicks J, Ison N. Community-owned renewable energy (CRE): opportunities for rural Australia. Rural Soc. 20(3), 244–255 (2011).
  • Walker G, Hunter S, Devine-Wright P, Evans B, Fay H. Harnessing community energies: explaining and evaluating community-based localism in renewable energy policy in the UK. Global Environ. Politics 7(2), 64–82 (2007).
  • Maruyama Y, Nishikido M, Iida T. The rise of community wind power in Japan: enhanced acceptance through social innovation. Energy Policy 35(5), 2761–2769 (2007).
  • Seyfang G.Green shoots of sustainability: the 2009 transition movement survey. University of East Anglia, Norwich (2009).
  • Bailey I, Hopkins R, Wilson G. Some things old, some things new: the spatial representations and politics of change of the peak oil relocalisation movement. Geoforum 41(4), 595–605 (2010).
  • Taylor PJ. Transition towns and world cities: towards green networks of cities. Local Environ. 17(4), 495–508 (2012).
  • Hopkins R.The transition companion: making your community more resilient in uncertain times. Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction (2011).
  • North P. Eco-localisation as a progressive response to peak oil and climate change – a sympathetic critique. Geoforum 41, 585–594 (2010).
  • Connors P, McDonald P. Transitioning communities: community, participation and the Transition Town movement. Community Dev. J. 46(4), 558–572 (2011).
  • North P, Longhurst N. Grassroots localisation? The scalar potential of and limits of the “transition” approach to climate change and resource constraint. Urban Stud. 50(7), 1423–1438 (2013).
  • Bay U. Transition town initiatives promoting transformational community change in tackling peak oil and climate change challenges. Aust. Soc. Work 66(2), 171–186 (2013).
  • Smith A. The transition town network: a review of current evolutions and renaissance. Soc. Mov. Stud. 10(01), 
99–105 (2011).
  • Andonova LB, Mitchell RB. The rescaling of global environmental politics. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 35, 255–282 (2010).

Websites

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.