Persistence in carbon footprint emissions: an overview of 92 countries

References

• Mancini MS, Galli A, Niccolucci V, et al. Ecological footprint: refining the carbon footprint calculation. Ecol Indic. 2016;61:390–403. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moldan B, Janoušková S, Hák T. How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: indicators and targets. Ecol Indic. 2012;17:4–13. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Footprint Network. (2018). Global foot print network database. Available from http://data.footprintnetwork.org/countryTrends.html
   Google Scholar
• McKitrick R. Why did US air pollution decline after 1970? Empirical Econ. 2007;33:491–513. doi:10.1007/s00181-006--4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidneva N, Zivot E. Evaluating the impact of environmental policy on the trend behavior of US emissions of nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds. Nat Resour Model. 2014;27:311–337. doi:10.1111/nrm.12036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dergiades T, Kaufmann RK, Panagiotidis T. Long-run changes in radiative forcing and surface temperature: the effect of human activity over the last five centuries. J Environ Econ Manage. 2016;76:67–85. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2015.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry DF, Juselius K. Explaining cointegration analysis. Energy J. 2000;21:1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ. 2001;16:289–326. doi:10.1002/jae.616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Alana LA, Solarin SA. Have US environmental policies been effective in the reduction of US emissions? A new approach using fractional integration. Atmos Pollut Res. 2018;9:53–60. doi:10.1016/j.apr.2017.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieswiadomy ML, Strazicich MC. Are political freedoms converging? Econ Inquiry. 2004;42:323–340. doi:10.1093/ei/cbh064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christidou M, Panagiotidis T, Sharma A. On the stationarity of per capita carbon dioxide emissions over a century. Econ Modell. 2013;33:918–925. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2013.05.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Alana LA, Cunado J, Gupta R. Persistence, mean-reversion and non-linearities in CO2 emissions: evidence from the BRICS and G7 countries. Environ Resour Econ. 2017;67:869–883. doi:10.1007/s10640-016--3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Alana LA, Trani T. Time trends and persistence in the global CO2 emissions across Europe. Environ Resour Econ. 2019;73(1):213–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari AK, Kyophilavong P, Albulescu CT. Testing the stationarity of CO2 emissions series in Sub-Saharan African countries by incorporating nonlinearity and smooth breaks. Res Int Bus Financ. 2016;37:527–540. doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan B, Ulucak R, Dogan E. Analyzing long lasting effects of environmental policies: evidence from low, middle and high income economies. Sustain Cities Soc. 2019;44:130–143. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.09.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solarin SA, Bello MO. Persistence of policy shocks to an environmental degradation index: the case of ecological footprint in 128 developed and developing countries. Ecol Indic. 2018;89:35–44. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulucak R, Lin D. Persistence of policy shocks to ecological footprint of the USA. Ecol Indic. 2017;80:337–343. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilanci V, Gorus MS, Aydin M. Are shocks to ecological footprint in OECD countries permanent or temporary? J Cleaner Prod. 2019;212:270–301. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldy JE. Per capita carbon dioxide emissions: convergence or divergence? Environ Resour Econ. 2006;33:533–555. doi:10.1007/s10640-005--x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CC, Chang CP. Stochastic convergence of per capita carbon dioxide emisssions and multiple structural breaks in OECD conuntries. Econ Modell. 2009;26:1375–1381. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2009.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrion-I-Silvestre JL, Barrio-Castro TD, Lopez-Bazo E. Breaking the panels: an application to the GDP per capita. Econometrics J. 2005;8:1575–1591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezcurra R. Is there cross-country convergence in carbon dioxide emissionas? Energy Policy. 2007;35:1363–1372. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panopoulou E, Pantelidis T. Club convergence in carbon dioxide emissions. Environ Resour Econ. 2009;44:47–70. doi:10.1007/s10640-008--6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang CP, Lee CC. Are per capita carbon dioxide emissions converging among industrialized conuntries? New time series evidence with structural breaks. Environ Resour Econ. 2008;13:497–515.
   Google Scholar
• Romero-Ávila D. Convergence in cabon dioxide emissions among industrialised countries revisited. Energy Econ. 2008;30:2265–2282. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2007.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CC, Chang CP, Chen PF. Do CO2 emissions levels converge among 21 OECD countries? New evidence from unit root structural break tests. Appl Econ Lett. 2008;15:551–556. doi:10.1080/13504850500426236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavuz NC, Yilanci V. Convergence in per capita carbon dioxide emissions among countries: a TAR panel unit root approach. Environ Resour Econ. 2013;54:283–291. doi:10.1007/s10640-012--x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed M, Khan AM, Bibi S, et al. Convergence of per capita CO2 emissions across the globe: insights via wavelet analysis. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2016;75:86–97. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapetanios G, Shin Y, Snell A. Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. J Econometrics. 2003;112:359–379. doi:10.1016/S-4076(02)00202-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Zou X, Song Q, Wang T, Fu G. Analysis of the global carbon dioxide emissions from 2003 to 2015: convergence trends and regional contributions. Carbon Manage. 2018;9:45–55. doi:10.1080/17583004.2017.1418594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criado CO, Grether JM. Convergence in per capita CO2 emissions: a robust distributional approach. Resour Energy Econ. 2011;33:637–665. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrerias MJ. The environmental convergence hypothesis: carbon dioxide emissionas according to the source of energy. Energy Policy. 2013;61:1140–1150. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Lin B. Global convergence in per capita CO2 emissions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;24:357–363. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presno MJ, Landajo M, Fernández González P. Stochastic convergence in per capita CO2 emissions. An approach from nonlinear stationarity analysis. Energy Econ. 2018;70:563–581. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaunky V. The CO2 emissions-income nexus:evidence from rich countries. Energy Policy. 2011;39:1228–1240. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamazaki S, Tian J, Doko Tchatoka F. Are per capita CO2 emissions increasing among OECD countries? a test of trends and breaks. Appl Econ Lett. 2014;21:569–572. doi:10.1080/13504851.2013.875103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros CP, Gil-Alana LA, De Gracia FP. Stationarity and long range dependence of carbon dioxide emisssions: evidence for disaggregated data. Environ Resour Econ. 2016;63:45–56. doi:10.1007/s10640-014--3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belbute JM, Pereira AM. Do global CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel consuption exhibit long memory? A fractional-integration anaysis. Appl Econ. 2017;49(40): 4055-4070. http:/doi.org/10.1080/000368446.2016.1273508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulucak R, Apergis N. Does convergence really matter for the environment? An application based on club convergence and on the ecological footprint concept for the EU countries. Environ Sci Policy. 2018;80:21–27. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia J, Zhao J, Deng H, et al. Ecological footprint simulation and prediction by ARIMA model—a case study in Henan Province of China. Ecol Indic. 2010;10:538–544. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahmani-Oskooee M, Chang T, Wu T. Revisiting purchasing power parity in African countries: panel stationary test with sharp and smooth breaks. Appl Financ Econ. 2014;24:1429–1438. doi:10.1080/09603107.2014.925068.
   Google Scholar
• National Footprint Accounts. (2016). Working guidebook to the national footprint accounts: 2016. Available from http://www.footprintnetwork.org/content/documents/National_Footprint_Accounts_2016_Guidebook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Granger CWJ. Long memory relationships and the aggregation of dynamic models. J Econometrics. 1980;14:227–238. doi:10.1016/0304-(80)90092-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger CWJ. Some properties of time series data and their use in econometric model specification. J Econometrics. 1981;16:121–130. doi:10.1016/0304-(81)90079-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger CWJ, Joyeux R. An introduction to long memory time series models and fractional differencing. J Time Ser Anal. 1980;1:15–39. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9892.1980.tb00297.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hosking JRM. Fractional differencing. Biometrika. 1981;68:165–176. doi:10.1093/biomet/68.1.165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baillie RT. Long memory processes and fractional integration in econometrics. J Econometrics. 1996;73:5–59. doi:10.1016/0304-(95)01732-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Alana LA, Robinson PM. Testing of unit roots and other nonstationary hypotheses in macroeconomic time series. J Econometrics. 1997;80:241–268. doi:10.1016/S-4076(97)00038-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowell FB. Modeling long run behavior with the fractional ARIMA model. J Monetary Econ. 1992;29:277–302. doi:10.1016/0304-(92)90016-U.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barassi MR, Spagnolo N, Zhao Y. Fractional integration versus structural change- testing the convergence of CO2 emissions. Environ Resour Econ. 2018;71:923–968. doi:10.1007/s10640-017--z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solarin SA, Gil-Alana LA, Al-Mulali U. Stochastic convergence of renewable energy consumption in OECD countries: a fractional integration approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25:17289–17299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlhaus R. Efficient parameter estimation for self-similar processes. Ann Statist. 1989;17:1749–1766. doi:10.1214/aos/1176347393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson P. Efficient tests of nonstationary hypotheses. J Am Statist Assoc. 1994;89:1420–1437. doi:10.2307/2291004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey DA, Fuller WA. Distributions of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Statist Assoc. 1979;74:427–481. doi:10.2307/2286348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot G, Rothenberg TJ, Stock JH. Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica. 1996;64:813–836. doi:10.2307/2171846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCD, Schmidt P, Shin Y. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? J Econometrics. 1992;54:159–178. doi:10.1016/0304-(92)90104-Y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips PCB, Perron P. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika. 1988;75:335–346. doi:10.2307/2336182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng S, Perron P. Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica. 2001;69:519–1554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diebold FX, Rudebusch GD. On the power of Dickey-Fuller test against fractional alternatives. Econ Lett. 1991;35(2):155–160. doi:10.1016/0165-(91)90163-F.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassler U, Wolters J. On the power of unit root tests against fractional alternatives. Econ Lett. 1994;45:1–5. doi:10.1016/0165-(94)90049-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D, Schmidt P. On the power of the KPSS test of stationarity against fractionally integrated alternatives. J Econometrics. 1996;73:285–302. doi:10.1016/0304-(95)01741-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diebold FX, Inoue A. Long memory and regime switching. J Econometrics. 2001;105:131–159. doi:10.1016/S-4076(01)00073-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger CWJ, Hyung N. Occasional structural breaks and long memory with an application to the S&P 500 absolute stock return. J Empirical Financ. 2004;11:399–421. doi:10.1016/j.jempfin.2003.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Gil-Alana LA. Fractional integration and structural breaks at unknown periods of time. J Time Ser Anal. 2007;29:163–185. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9892.2007.00550.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassler U, Meller B. Detecting multiple breaks in long memory. Deutsche Bundesbank; 2011 (The case of US inflation, Discussion Paper Series 1. Economic Studies 26) Deutsche Bundesbank.
   Google Scholar
• Hyang E, Shin DW. Tests for structural breaks in memory parameters of long memory heterogeneous autoregressive models. Commun Statist Theory Models. 2018;47(21):5378–5389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao X. A simple test of changes in mean in the possible presence of long-range dependence. J Time Ser Anal. 2011;32:598–606. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9892.2010.00717.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibbertsen P. Long memory versus structural breaks. An overview. Statist Pap. 2004;45:465–515. doi:10.1007/BF02760564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar