Realistic potential increases in carbon storage via timber rotation extensions: an analysis of the Pacific Northwest

References

• Griscom BW, Adams J, Ellis PW, et al. Natural climate solutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(44):11645–11650. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710465114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargione JE, Bassett S, Boucher T, et al. Natural climate solutions for the United States. Sci Adv. 2018;4(11):eaat1869. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat1869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law BE, Hudiburg TW, Berner LT, et al. Land use strategies to mitigate climate change in carbon dense temperate forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(14):3663–3668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720064115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman S. Longer rotations and carbon. Northwest Natural Resource Group, Dec 08, 2021. [cited 2023 Feb 16]. Available from: https://www.nnrg.org/longer-rotations-and-carbon.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson K. Yes, long rotations can yield real climate gains for Cascadia. Sightline Institute, Mar. 17, 2022. [cited 2022 Aug 15]. Available from: https://www.sightline.org/2022/03/17/yes-long-rotations-can-yield-real-climate-gains-for-cascadia/.
   Google Scholar
• Stokland JN. Volume increment and carbon dynamics in boreal Forest when extending the rotation length towards biologically old stands. For Ecol Manage. 2021;488:119017. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson H, Ellison D, Appiah Mensah A, et al. “On the role of forests and the Forest sector for climate change mitigation in Sweden. GCB Bioenergy. 2022;14(7):793–813. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12943.
   Google Scholar
• Kaipainen T, Liski J, Pussinen A, et al. Managing carbon sinks by changing rotation length in european forests. Environ Sci Policy. 2004;7(3):205–219. Jun. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton MS, Kelty MJ. Tree and stand growth. In The practice of silviculture: applied forest ecology. 10th ed. Hoboken, NY: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hall ES. Thoughts on the longer rotation climate solution for Washington state – Is it a sure bet? Three Trees Consulting, Mar. 19, 2022. [cited 2023 Feb 14]. Available from: https://www.threetreesforestry.com/post/thoughts-on-the-longer-rotation-climate-solution-for-washington-state-is-it-a-sure-bet.
   Google Scholar
• Roberge J-M, Laudon H, Björkman C, et al. Socio-ecological implications of modifying rotation lengths in forestry. Ambio. 2016;45(Suppl. 2):109–123. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0747-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haynes R. Will markets provide sufficient incentive for sustainable forest management?. Pacific Northwest Research Station, US Forest Service, 2005. [cited 2023 Feb 27]. Available from: https://www.fs.usda.gov/pnw/publications/understanding-key-issues-sustainable-wood-production-pacific-northwest.
   Google Scholar
• FoleyTG, Richter D D, Galik CS. Extending rotation age for carbon sequestration: a cross-protocol comparison of North American Forest offsets. For Ecol Manage. 2009;259(2):201–209. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.014.
   Google Scholar
• Perry CH, Finco MV, Wilson BT. Forest atlas of the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2022; Forest Service, Washington, DC, FS-1172, Jun. doi: 10.2737/FS-1172.
   Google Scholar
• Burrill EA, et al. The Forest inventory and analysis database: database description and user guide for phase 2 (version 8.0). 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Forest Inventory and Analysis Database, 2023. [cited 2023 Mar 17]. Available from: https://apps.fs.usda.gov/fia/datamart/datamart.html.
   Google Scholar
• Winsor CP. The Gompertz curve as a growth curve. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1932;18(1):1–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.18.1.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harper G, Omari K, Kranabetter M, et al. Assessment of a 20-year-old mixed Western redcedar/red alder plantation in southwestern British Columbia. For Ecol Manage. 2023;529:120737. Feb. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman DMJS, Brienen RJW, Gloor E, et al. Detecting trends in tree growth: not so simple. Trends Plant Sci. 2013;18(1):11–17. Jan doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.08.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington TB, Peter DH, Marshall DD, et al. Ten-year Douglas-fir regeneration and stand productivity differ among contrasting silvicultural regimes in Western Washington, USA. For Ecol Manage. 2022;510:120102. Apr. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng C. Growth and yield models for uneven-aged stands: past, present and future. For Ecol Manage. 2000;132(2-3):259–279. Jul doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00229-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tappeiner J, Adams D, Montgomery C, et al. Growth of managed older Douglas-fir stands: implications of the black rock thinning trial in the Coast range of Western Oregon. J Forestry. 2022;120(3):282–288. doi: 10.1093/jofore/fvab063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masek JG, Cohen WB, Leckie D, et al. Recent rates of Forest harvest and conversion in North America. J. Geophys. Res. 2011;116(G4):G00K03. doi: 10.1029/2010JG001471.
   Google Scholar
• Sass EM, Butler BJ, Markowski-Lindsay MA. Forest ownership in the conterminous United States circa 2017: distribution of eight ownership types – geospatial dataset. 2020. doi: 10.2737/RDS-2020-0044.
   Google Scholar
• Washington State Department of Ecology. GHG inventories. [cited 2023 Jan 27]. Available from: https://ecology.wa.gov/Air-Climate/Reducing-Emissions/Tracking-greenhouse-gases/GHG-inventories.
   Google Scholar
• Im EH, Adams DM, Latta GS. The impacts of changes in federal timber harvest on Forest carbon sequestration in Western Oregon. Can. J. For. Res. 2010;40(9):1710–1723. doi: 10.1139/X10-110.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis RO, Carey AB. Timber supply in the pacific northwest: managing for economic and ecological values in douglas-fir Forest. J Forestry. 1996;94(9):4–7. Available from: https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/6163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn JS, Buchholz T. Forest sector greenhouse gas emissions sensitivity to changes in Forest management in Maine (USA). Forestry. 2018;91(4):526–538. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpy013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latta GS, Adams DM, Bell KP, et al. Evaluating land-use and private Forest management responses to a potential Forest carbon offset sales program in Western Oregon (USA). Forest Policy Econ. 2016;65:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randazzo NA,Gordon DR,Hamburg SP. Improved assessment of baseline and additionality for Forest carbon crediting. Ecol Appl. 2023;33(3):e2817. doi:10.1002/eap.2817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar