Logging emissions from a Forest Stewardship Council certified forest in Guyana

References

• Lesiv M, Schepaschenko D, Buchhorn M, et al. Global forest management data for 2015 at a 100 m resolution. Sci Data. 2022;9(1):199. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01332-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blaser J. Status of tropical forest management. Yokohama, Japan: International Tropical Timber Organization; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. Global forest resources assessment 2020: country Reports. [Internet]. FAO. Available from: https://connect.fsc.org/document-centre/documents/retrieve/4103bb78-8c0b-45e8-8e18-4a4366a5a859?mode=view#viewer.action=download.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards DP, Tobias JA, Sheil D, et al. Maintaining ecosystem function and services in logged tropical forests. Trends Ecol Evol. 2014;29(9):511–520. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.07.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhi Y, Riutta T, Wearn OR, et al. Logged tropical forests have amplified and diverse ecosystem energetics. Nature. 2022;612(7941):707–713. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05523-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Putz FE, Pinard MA. Reduced-impact logging as a carbon-offset method. Conserv Biol. 1993;7(4):755–757. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.7407551.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuidema PA, Zwerts JA. An energetic look at the life in logged forests. Nature. 2022;612(7941):636–637. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-04356-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellis EA, Montero SA, Hernández Gómez IU, et al. Reduced-impact logging practices reduce forest disturbance and carbon emissions in community managed forests on the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico. For Ecol Manage. 2019;437:396–410. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.01.040.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson TRH, Brown S, Murray L, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from tropical forest degradation: an underestimated source. Carbon Balance Manag. 2017;12(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13021-017-0072-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griscom BW, Busch J, Cook-Patton SC, et al. National mitigation potential from natural climate solutions in the tropics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020;375(1794):20190126. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicknell JE, Struebig MJ, Edwards DP, et al. Improved timber harvest techniques maintain biodiversity in tropical forests. Curr Biol. 2014;24(23):R1119–R1120. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.067.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• West TAP, Vidal E, Putz FE. Forest biomass recovery after conventional and reduced-impact logging in Amazonian Brazil. For Ecol Manage. 2014;314:59–63. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.11.022.
   Google Scholar
• Enters T. Asia-Pacific Forestry Commission. Trash or treasure? Logging and mill residues in Asia and the Pacific. Bangkok: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Daigneault A, Baker JS, Guo J, et al. How the future of the global forest sink depends on timber demand, forest management, and carbon policies. Glob Environ Change. 2022;76:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102582.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hertwich EG. Increased carbon footprint of materials production driven by rise in investments. Nat Geosci. 2021;14(3):151–155. doi: 10.1038/s41561-021-00690-8.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra A, Humpenöder F, Churkina G, et al. Land use change and carbon emissions of a transformation to timber cities. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4889. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32244-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Guyana. The Iwokrama International Centre for Rainforest Conservation and Development Act [Internet]. Available from: https://mola.gov.gy/sites/default/files/Cap.%2020.04%20Iwokrama.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Griscom B, Ellis P, Putz FE. Carbon emissions performance of commercial logging in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Glob Chang Biol. 2014;20(3):923–937. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zalman J, Ellis PW, Crabbe S, et al. Opportunities for carbon emissions reduction from selective logging in Suriname. For Ecol Manage. 2019;439:9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson TRH, Brown S, Casarim FM. Carbon emissions from tropical forest degradation caused by logging. Environ Res Lett. 2014;9(3):034017. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034017.
   Google Scholar
• Chave J, Réjou-Méchain M, Búrquez A, et al. Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Glob Chang Biol. 2014;20(10):3177–3190. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Réjou-Méchain M, Tanguy A, Piponiot C, et al. BIOMASS : an R package for estimating above-ground biomass and its uncertainty in tropical forests. Methods Ecol Evol. 2017;8(9):1163–1167. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokany K, Raison RJ, Prokushkin AS. Critical analysis of root : shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes. Global Change Biol. 2006;12(1):84–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001043.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: chapter 4: forest Land; 2006 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/4_Volume4/V4_04_Ch4_Forest_Land.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Feldpausch TR, Jirka S, Passos CAM, et al. When big trees fall: damage and carbon export by reduced impact logging in southern Amazonia. For Ecol Manage. 2005;219(2-3):199–215. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MO, Galbraith D, Gloor M, et al. Variation in stem mortality rates determines patterns of above-ground biomass in Amazonian forests: implications for dynamic global vegetation models. Glob Chang Biol. 2016;22(12):3996–4013. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13315.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Hout P. Code of practice for forest operations for timber sales agreement and wood cutting license holders; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• FSC FSC. Certification of Tropical Forests [Internet]. FSC International; 2019. Available from: https://ic.fsc.org/en/news-updates/events/event-details/fsc-involvement-in-rio20/certification-of-tropical-forests.
   Google Scholar
• Villalobos L, Coria J, Nordén A. Has forest certification reduced forest degradation in Sweden? Land Econ. 2018;94(2):220–238. doi: 10.3368/le.94.2.220.
   Google Scholar
• Romero C, Putz FE. Theory-of-change development for the evaluation of forest Stewardship Council Certification of Sustained Timber Yields from Natural Forests in Indonesia. Forests. 2018;9(9):547. doi: 10.3390/f9090547.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes A, Macqueen D. Raising forest revenues and employment Unlocking the potential of small and medium forest enterprises in Guyana [Internet]. International Institute for Environment and Development, Edinburgh, UK. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228389634_Raising_forest_revenues_and_employment_unlocking_the_potential_of_small_and_medium_forest_enterprises_in_Guyana_IIED_Small_and_Medium_Forest_Enterprise.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva Luz E, Soares ÁAV, Goulart SL, et al. Challenges of the lumber production in the Amazon region: relation between sustainability of sawmills, process yield and logs quality. Environ Dev Sustain. 2021;23(4):4924–4948. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-00797-9.
   Google Scholar
• Owusu F, Damnyag J, Blay D. Comparative analysis of recovery efficiencies of some milling techniques in Ghana. Ghana Journal of Forestry. 2011;27:87–100.
   Google Scholar
• Guyana Forestry Commission. Guyana Forestry Commission. $900M revolving fund to support forestry sector- President Ali announces; 2022 [Internet]. Available from: https://forestry.gov.gy/2022/10/29/900m-revolving-fund-to-support-forestry-sector-president-ali-announces/.
   Google Scholar