Aksharas, alphasyllabaries, abugidas, alphabets and orthographic depth: Reflections on Rimzhim, Katz and Fowler (2014)

REFERENCES

• Abu-Rabia, S., Share, D., & Mansour, M. S. (2003). Word recognition and basic cognitive processes among reading-disabled and normal readers in Arabic. Reading and Writing, 16, 423–442. doi:10.1023/A:1024237415143
   Google Scholar
• Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
   Google Scholar
• Agbemadon, A., & Boethius, H. (1989). Syllabaire 5. Atakpamé: SIL Togo.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, W. S. (1953). Phonetics in ancient India. London Oriental Series 1. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asfaha, Y. M., Kurvers, J., & Kroon, S. (2009). Grain size in script and teaching: Literacy acquisition in Ge’ez and Latin. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 709–724. doi:10.1017/S0142716409990087
   Google Scholar
• Barry, W. J. (2006). Phoneme. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (2nd ed.). (Vol. 9, pp. 345–50). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bhide, A., Gadgil, S., Zelinsky, C. M., & Perfetti, C. (2014). Does reading in an alphasyllabary affect phonemic awareness? Inherent schwa effects in Marathi-English bilinguals. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 73–93. doi:10.1080/17586801.2013.855619
   Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E., Luk, G., & Kwan, E. (2005). Bilingualism, biliteracy, and learning to read: Interactions among languages and writing systems. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(1), 43–61. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0901_4
   Google Scholar
• Bright, W. (Ed.). (1992). International encyclopedia of linguistics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bright, W. (2000). A matter of typology: Alphasyllabaries and abugidas. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (Urbana), 30, 63–71. ( Also in Written Language and Literacy, 2 [1999], 45–61.)
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, J., Wheldall, K., & Beaman-Wheldall, R. (2013). Why Jaydon can’t read: The triumph of ideology over evidence. Policy, 29, 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate. Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. T. (1990). Fundamentals of grammatology. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 110, 727–731.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. T. (1991). Is a structural graphemics possible? 18th LACUS Forum, 528–537.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. T. (1992a). Contacts between Semitic and Indic scripts. In A. Harrak (Ed.), Contacts between cultures: Selected papers from the 33rd International Congress of Asian and North African Studies, Toronto, August 15–25, 1990, West Asia and North Africa (Vol. 1, pp. 146–152). Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. T. (1992b). The syllabic origin of writing and the segmental origin of the alphabet. In P. Downing, S. D. Lima, & M. Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (pp. 83–110). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. T. (2000). Syllables, consonants, and vowels in West Semitic writing. Lingua Posnaniensis, 42, 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. T. (2002). The study of writing in the twentieth century: Semitic studies interacting with non-Semitic. Israel Oriental Studies, 20, 85–117.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. T. (2007). Littera ex occidente: Toward a functional history of writing. In C. L. Miller (Ed.), Studies in Semitic and Afroasiatic linguistics presented to Gene B. Gragg (pp. 53–68). Chicago, IL: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. T. (2008). Writing systems of major and minor languages. In B. Kachru, Y. Kachru, & S. N. Sridhar (Eds.), Language in South Asia (pp. 285–308). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. T. (2012). Introduction to Graphonomy. Workshop on Writing Systems. Haifa University.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. T. (2014). The type and spread of Arabic script. In M. Mumin & K. Versteegh, (Eds.), The Arabic script in Africa (pp. 17–31). Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. T. (in preparation). Writing systems: A slim guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. T., & Share, D. L. ( in preparation). Is the concept of orthographic depth too shallow?
   Google Scholar
• Das, T., Kumar, U., Bapi, R. S., Padakannaya, P., & Singh, N. C. (2009). Neural representation of an alphasyllabary – The story of Devanagari. Current Science, 97, 1033–1038.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393–447. doi:10.3102/00346543071003393
   Google Scholar
• Eviatar, Z., & Share, D. L. (2013). Processing Semitic writing systems: Introduction to a special issue of. Writing Systems Research, 5, 131–133.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15, 325–340.
   Google Scholar
• Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2014). An introduction to language (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, R. (1992). Orthography and phonology: The psychological reality of orthographic depth. In P. Downing, S. D. Lima, & M. Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (pp. 255–274). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, R. (2005). Orthographic systems and skilled word recognition processes in reading. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 272–295). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263–279. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11001841
   Google Scholar
• Gaur, A. (1995). Scripts and writing systems: A historical perspective. In I. Taylor & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy (pp. 19–30). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Gelb, I. J. (1952/1963). A study of writing (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geva, E. (2008). Facets of metalinguistic awareness related to reading development in Hebrew: Evidence from monolingual and bilingual children. In K. Koda & M. Zehler (Eds.), Learning to read across languages: Cross-linguistic relationships in first- and second language and literacy development (pp. 154–187). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gleason, A. (1996). Christian missionary activities. In P. T. Daniels & W. Bright (Eds.), The world’s writing systems (pp. 777–780). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gleitman, L. R., & Rozin, P. (1973). Teaching reading by use of a syllabary. Reading Research Quarterly, 8, 447–483. doi:10.2307/747169
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, K. S. (1989). Whole-language research: Foundations and development. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 207–220. doi:10.1086/461613
   Google Scholar
• Havelock, E. A. (1982). The literate revolution in Greece and its cultural consequence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, Z., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2002). The characteristics of Arabic slow its processing. Neuropsychology, 16, 332–326.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffery, L. (1961). The local scripts of Archaic Greece. Oxford: Clarendon. Addenda to 2nd ed. by A. W. Johnston, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Kandhadai, P., & Sproat, R. (2010). Impact of spatial ordering of graphemes in alphasyllabic scripts on phonemic awareness in Indic languages. Writing Systems Research, 2(2), 105–116. doi:10.1093/wsr/wsq009
   Google Scholar
• Katz, L., & Feldman, L. B. (1981). Linguistic coding in word recognition: Comparisons between a deep and a shallow orthography. In A. M. Lesgold & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 85–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, L., & Feldman, L. B. (1983). Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 157–66.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Koda, K. (2008). Impacts of prior literacy experience on second language learning to read. In K. Koda & M. Zehler (Eds.), Learning to read across languages: Cross-linguistic relationships in first- and second language and literacy development (pp. 68–96). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lonigan, C. J., & Shanahan, T. (2009). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel, executive summary: A scientific synthesis of early literacy development and implications for intervention. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, S. (1995). The Cree syllabary and the writing system riddle: A paradigm in crisis. In I. Taylor & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy (pp. 59–75). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, R., & Stainthorp, R. (2007). The relationship between phonological awareness and word reading accuracy in Oriya and English: A study of Oriya-speaking fifth-graders. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(1), 23–37. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00326.x
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, H. (1945). A letter on spelling reform. American Speech, 20, 208–211. doi:10.2307/486730
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, J. (2009). Towards an understanding of the relationship between diglossia and literacy, a survey commissioned by the Israel Language and Literacy Committee. Retrieved from http://education.academy.ac.il
   Google Scholar
• Nag, S. (2007). Early reading in Kannada: The pace of acquisition of orthographic knowledge and phonemic awareness. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(1), 7–22. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00329.x
   Google Scholar
• Nag, S. (2014a). Akshara-phonology mappings: The common yet uncommon case of the consonant cluster. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 105–119. doi:10.1080/17586801.2013.855621
   Google Scholar
• Nag, S. (2014b). Alphabetism and the science of reading: From the perspective of the akshara languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 866. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00866
   Google Scholar
• Nag, S., & Snowling, M. J. (2011). Cognitive profiles of poor readers of Kannada. Reading and Writing, 24, 657–676. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9258-7
   Google Scholar
• Nag, S., & Snowling, M. J. (2012). Reading in an alphasyllabary: Implications for a language-universal theory of learning to read. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 404–423. doi:10.1080/10888438.2011.576352
   Google Scholar
• Nag, S., Snowling, M., Quinlan, P., & Hulme, C. (2014). Child and symbol factors in learning to read a visually complex writing system. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 309–324. doi:10.1080/10888438.2014.892489
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, P. R., Koda, K., & Joshi, R. M. (2014). Biliteracy acquisition in Kannada and English: A developmental study. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 132–147. doi:10.1080/17586801.2013.855620
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute for Child Health and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Oberlies, T. (2007). Aśokan Prakrit and Pāli. In G. Cardona & D. Jain (Eds.), The Indo-Aryan languages (pp. 161–203). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Padakannaya, P. (2009). Language and communication. In G. Misra (Ed.), Psychology in India: Basic psychological processes and human development (Vol. I, pp. 111–151). Delhi: Dorling Kindersley.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, Pramod. (2007). Phonology–orthography interface in Devanāgari for Hindi. Written Language and Literacy, 10, 145–162. doi:10.1075/wll.10.2.06pan
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (2003). The universal grammar of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1), 3–24. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0701_02
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Harris, L. N. (2013). Universal reading processes are modulated by language and writing system. Language Learning & Development, 9, 296–316. doi:10.1080/15475441.2013.813828
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112(1), 43–59. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.43
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, P., Rekha, D., Nigam, R., & Karanth, P. (1993). Phonological awareness, orthography and literacy. In R. J. Scholes (Ed.), Literacy and language analysis (pp. 55–70). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ravid, D. (2006). Hebrew orthography and literacy. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ravid, D. (2012). Spelling morphology: The psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31–74.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C. (2012). Psychology of reading (2nd ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, P. P., & Koda, K. (2013). Orthographic constraints on phonological awareness in biliteracy development. Writing Systems Research, 5(1), 110–130. doi:10.1080/17586801.2012.748639
   Google Scholar
• Rickard, L. S. J., & Lee, L. C. (2004). Metalinguistic awareness and semi-syllabic scripts: Children's spelling errors in Malay. Reading and Writing, 17(1/2), 7–26. doi:10.1023/B:READ.0000013833.79570.de
   Google Scholar
• Rimzhim, A., Katz, L., & Fowler, C. A. (2014). Brahmi-derived orthographies are typologically aksharik but functionally predominantly alphabetic. Writing Systems Research, 6(1), 41–53. doi:10.1080/17586801.2013.855618
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. (2008). Thirty years of tone orthography testing in West African languages (1977–2007). Journal of West African Languages, 35, 199–242.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. (2013). Testing tone orthographies in African languages: A summary of previous research. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, H. (1995). Optimal orthographies. In I. Taylor & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy (pp. 31–43). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Henkin-Roitfarb, R. (2014). The structure of Arabic language and orthography. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy and orthography (pp. 3–28). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, R. G. (2006). Kharo⋅⋅hi syllables used as location markers in Gandhāran stūpa architecture. In P. Callieri (Ed.), Architetti, capomastri, artigiani: L’organizzazione dei cantieri e della produzione artistica nell’Asia ellenistica, Studi offerti a Domenico Faccenna nel suo ottantesimo compleano (pp. 181–224.) Rome: Istituto Italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, R. G. (2007). Writing systems of the Indo-Aryan languages. In G. Cardona & D. Jain (Eds.), The Indo-Aryan languages (pp. 67–103.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, R. G. (2012). Some principles and patterns of script change. In S. D. Houston (Ed.), The shape of script: How and why writing systems change (pp. 119–133.). Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M., Leikin, M., & Share, D. L. (2005). Bi-literate bilingualism versus mono-literate bilingualism: A longitudinal study of reading acquisition in Hebrew (L2) among Russian-speaking (L1) children. Written Language and Literacy, 8, 179–207.
   Google Scholar
• Scragg, D. G. (1974). A history of English spelling. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S. (2013). The science of reading and its educational implications. Language Learning and Development, 9, 331–360. doi:10.1080/15475441.2013.812017
   Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (1995) Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
   Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of over-reliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–615. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584
   Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (2012). Frost and fogs, or sunny skies? Orthography, reading, and misplaced optimalism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 307–308. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12000271
   Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (2014). Alphabetism in reading science. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 752. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00752
   Google Scholar
• Share, D. L. (in press). Learning to read Hebrew. In L. Verhoeven & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Reading acquisition: Cross-linguistic and cross-script perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shimron, J. (2006). Reading Hebrew: The language and the psychology of reading it. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shimron, J., & Navon, D. (1981). The distribution of information within letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 483–491. doi:10.3758/BF03204845
   Google Scholar
• Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2005). The science of reading: A handbook. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sproat, R.. (2010). Language, technology, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, S. L., & Altwerger, B. (2007). The logographic nature of English alphabetics and the fallacy of direct intensive phonics instruction. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 7, 299–319. doi:10.1177/1468798407083664
   Google Scholar
• Swiggers, P. (1984). On the nature of West-Semitic writing systems. Aula Orientalis, 2, 149–151.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, I.. (1883/1899). The alphabet: An account of the origin and development of letters (2nd ed.). London: Kegan Paul, Trench.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, I., & Taylor, M. (1995). Writing and Literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Tunmer, W. E., Nicolson, T., Greaney, K. T., Prochnow, J. E., Chapman, J. E., & Arrow, A. W. (2013). PIRLS before swine. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 43, 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Vaid, J., & Gupta, A. (2002). Exploring word recognition in a semi-alphabetic script: The case of Devanagari. Brain and Language, 81, 679–690. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2556
   Google Scholar
• Valle-Arroyo, F. (1990). Spelling errors in Spanish. Reading and Writing, 2(1), 83–98. doi:10.1007/BF00383375
   Google Scholar
• van der Kuijp, L. W. J. (1996). The Tibetan script and derivatives. In P. T. Daniels & W. Bright (Eds.), The world’s writing systems (pp. 431–441). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Venezky, R. L. (1976). Notes on the history of English spelling. Visible Language, 10, 351–365.
   Google Scholar
• Venezky, R. L. (1995). How English is read: Grapheme–phoneme regularity and orthographic structure in word recognition. In I. Taylor & D. R. Olson (Eds.), Scripts and literacy (pp. 111–129. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Venezky, R. L. (1999). The American way of spelling: The structure and origins of American English orthography. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Whitney, W. D.. (1877). On the comparative frequency of occurrence of the alphabetic elements in Sanskrit. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 10, cl–clii.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3
   Google Scholar