Txting across time: undergraduates’ use of ‘textese’ in seven consecutive first-year psychology cohorts

References

• Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7, 585–614. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5tk670n8 doi: 10.1177/1461445605054407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodomo, A. B. (2010). Computer-mediated communication for linguistics and literacy: Technology and natural language education. Hershey, NY: Information Science.
   Google Scholar
• Crystal, D. (2008). Txtng: The gr8 db8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Jonge, S., & Kemp, N. (2012). Text-message abbreviations and language skills in high school and university students. Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 49–68. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01466.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte. (2014). Deloitte global mobile consumer survey 2014. Retrieved from http://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/pages/technology-media-and-telecommunications/articles/global-mobile-consumer-survey.html
   Google Scholar
• Drouin, M., & Davis, C. (2009). R u txting? Is the use of text speak hurting your literacy? Journal of Literacy Research, 41, 46–67. doi:10.1080/10862960802695131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drouin, M., & Driver, B. (2014). Texting, textese and literacy abilities: A naturalistic study. Journal of Research in Reading, 37, 250–267. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01532.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drouin, M. A. (2011). College students’ text messaging, use of textese and literacy skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 67–75. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00399.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enhanced Media Metrics. (2013). Digital Australia. Retrieved from http://emma.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/digital.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ExactTarget. (2015). 2014 mobile behaviour report. Retrieved from http://www.exacttarget.com/sites/exacttarget/files/deliverables/etmc-2014mobilebehaviorreport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Garton, L., & Wellman, B. (1995). Social impacts of electronic mail in organizations: A review of research literature. Communication Yearbook, 18, 434–453. Retrieved from http://groups.chass.utoronto.ca/netlab/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Social-Impacts-of-Electronic-Mail-in-Organizations-A-Review-of-the-Research-Literature.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grace, A., & Kemp, N. (2015). Text messaging language: A comparison of undergraduates’ naturalistic textism use in four consecutive cohorts. Writing Systems Research, 7, 220–234. doi:10.1080/17586801.2014.898575
   Google Scholar
• Grace, A., Kemp, N., Martin, F. H., & Parrila, R. (2012). Undergraduates’ use of text messaging language: Effects of country and collection method. Writing Systems Research, 4, 167–184. doi:10.1080/17586801.2012.712875
   Google Scholar
• Grace, A., Kemp, N., Martin, F.H., & Parrila, R. (2014). Undergraduates’ text messaging language and literacy skills. Reading and Writing, 27, 855–873. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9471-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, N. (2003). Outwardly mobile: Young people and mobile technologies. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Machines that become us: The social context of personal communication technology (pp. 201–218). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, M. (1999). Explaining article-possessor complementarity: Economic motivation in noun phrase syntax. Language, 75, 227–243. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/417260 doi: 10.2307/417260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C., & Zelenkauskaite, A. (2008). Gendered typography: Abbreviation and insertion in Italian iTV SMS. In J. F. Siegel, T. C. Nagel, A. Laurente-Lapole, & J. Auger (Eds.), IUWPL7: Gender in language: Classic questions, new contexts (pp. 73–92). Bloomington, IN: IULC Publications. Retrieved from http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/ herring/iuwpl.2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. (2011). Text messaging, personality, and the social context. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 92–99. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffaker, D. A., & Calver, S. L. (2005). Gender, identity, and language use in teenage blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00238.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, N. (2010). Texting vs. txtng: Reading and writing text messages, and links with other linguistic skills. Writing Systems Research, 2, 53–71. doi:10.1093/wsr/wsq002
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, N., & Bushnell, C. (2011). Children’s text-messaging: Abbreviations, input methods, and links with literacy. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 27, 18–27. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00400.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, N., Wood, C., & Waldron, S. (2014). Do i know its wrong: Children’s and adults’ use of unconventional grammar in text messaging. Reading and Writing, 27, 1585–1602. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9508-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowski, G., & Harrington, S. (2006). The influence of phonetic abbreviations on evaluation of student performance. Current Research in Social Psychology, 11, 215–226. Retrieved from http://www.uiowa.edu/~grpproc/crisp/crisp11_15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., & Fabos, B. (2005). Instant messaging, literacies, and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 470–501. doi:10.1598/RRQ.40.4.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, R. (2004). Mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, R. (2007). The length of text messages and the use of predictive texting: Who uses it and how much do they have to say? (American University TESOL Working Papers, No. 4). Retrieved from http://new.american.edu/cas/tesol/pdf/upload/WP-2007-Ling-Length-of-Text.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ling, R., & Baron, N. (2007). Text messaging and IM: Linguistic comparison of American college data. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26, 291–298. doi:10.1177/0261927X06303480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyddy, F., Farina, F., Hanney, J., Farrell, L., & Kelly O’Neill, N. (2014). An analysis of language in university students’ text messages. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 546–561. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobile Marketing Association. (2015). Industry overview. Retrieved from http://www.mmaglobal.com/about/industry-overview
   Google Scholar
• Morrill, T., Jones, R. M., & Vaterlaus, J. M. (2013). Motivations for text messaging: Gender and age differences among young adults. North American Journal of Psychology, 15, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G. & Michaud, M. (2016). Generation Text: Relations among undergraduates’ use of text messaging, textese, and language and literacy skills. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 48, 217–221. doi:10.1037/cbs0000046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plester, B., Wood, C., & Joshi, P. (2009). Exploring the relationship between children’s knowledge of text message abbreviations and school literary outcomes. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 145–161. doi:10.1348/026151008X320507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quina, K., Wingard, J. A., & Bates, H. G. (1987). Language style and gender stereotypes in person perception. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 111–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00778.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redeker, G. (1990). Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 267–281. doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(90)90095-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, L.D., Chang, J., Erwin, L., Carrier, M., & Cheever, N.A. (2010). The relationship between “textisms” and formal and informal writing among young adults. Communication Research, 37, 420–440. doi:10.1177/0093650210362465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortis, T. (2001). The language of ICT: Information and communication technology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tagg, C. (2011). Wot did he say or could u not c him 4 dust? Written and spoken creativity in text messaging. In C.M.L. Ho, K.T. Anderson, & A.P. Leong (Eds.), Transforming literacies and language: Multimodality and literacy in the new media age (pp. 223–236). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Tagg, C. (2013). Scraping the barrel with a shower of social misfits: Everyday creativity in text messaging. Applied Linguistics, 34, 480–500. doi:10.1093/applin/ams072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (1995). Gender and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., & Vincent, J. (2005). An SMS history. In L. Hamill & A. Lasen (Eds.), Mobile world: Past, present and future (pp. 75–91). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, C., & Brown, A. (2003). Generation txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online. Retrieved from tp://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a3/thurlow2002003.html
   Google Scholar
• Tossell, C. C., Kortum, P., Shepard, C., Barg-Walkow, L. H., Rahmati, A., & Zhong, L. (2012). A longitudinal study of emoticon use in text messaging from smartphones. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 659–663. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, M. K., Rosen, L. H., More, D., Ehrenreich, S. E., & Gentsch, J. K. (2012). The blackberry project: Capturing the content of adolescents’ text messaging. Developmental Psychology, 48, 295–302. doi:10.1037/a0025914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnhagen, C. K., McFall, G. P., Pugh, N., Routledge, L., Sumida-MacDonald, H., & Kwong, T. E. (2010). lol: New language and spelling in instant messaging. Reading and Writing, 23, 719–733. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9181-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, S., Wood, C., & Kemp, N. (2016). Use of predictive text in text messaging over the course of a year and its relationship with spelling, orthographic processing and grammar. Journal of Research in Reading. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witmer, D. F., & Katzman, S. L. (1997). On-line smiles: Does gender make a difference in the use of graphic accents? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. (2000). Emotional expression online: Gender differences in emoticon use. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 3, 827–833. doi: 10.1089/10949310050191809
   Google Scholar
• Wood, C., Kemp, N., & Waldron, S. (2014). Exploring the longitudinal relationships between the use of grammar in text messaging and performance on grammatical tasks. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32, 415–429. doi:10.1111/bjdp.12049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Ravenio Books.
   Google Scholar