The neural antecedents to voluntary action: A conceptual analysis

REFERENCES

• Ayton, P., & Fischer, I. (2004). The hot hand fallacy and the gambler’s fallacy: Two faces of subjective randomness? Memory & Cognition, 32(8), 1369–1378. doi:10.3758/BF03206327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Band, G. P. H., & van Boxtel, G. J. M. (1999). Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: Review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. Acta Psychologica, 101(2–3), 179–211. doi:10.1016/S0001–6918(99)00005–0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, W. P., & Isham, E. A. (2009). We infer rather than perceive the moment we decided to act. Psychological Science, 20(1), 17–21. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02254.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, W. P., & Isham, E. A. (2010). Do we really know what we are doing? Implications of reported time of decisio n for theories of volition. Conscious Will and Responsibility, 47–60. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195381641.003.0006
   Google Scholar
• Bedard, A. -C., Nichols, S., Barbosa, J. A., Schachar, R., Logan, G. D., & Tannock, R. (2002). The development of selective inhibitory control across the life span. Developmental Neuropsychology, 21(1), 93–111. doi:10.1207/S15326942DN2101_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugger, P. (1997). Variables that influence the generation of random sequences: An update. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84(2), 627–661. doi:10.2466/pms.1997.84.2.627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisek, P. (2007). Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1485), 1585–1599. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisek, P., & Kalaska, J. F. (2005). Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: Specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action. Neuron, 45(5), 801–814. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, R., Coles, M. G., Logan, G. D., & Gratton, G. (1990). In search of the point of no return: The control of response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 164–182. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmurget, M., Reilly, K. T., Richard, N., Szathmari, A., Mottolese, C., & Sirigu, A. (2009). Movement intention after parietal cortex stimulation in humans. Science, 324(5928), 811–813. doi:10.1126/science.1169896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, M. (1998). The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30(1), 146–156. doi:10.3758/BF03209424
   Google Scholar
• Fried, I., Katz, A., McCarthy, G., Sass, K. J., Williamson, P., Spencer, S. S., & Spencer, D. D. (1991). Functional organization of human supplementary motor cortex studied by electrical stimulation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 11(11), 3656–3666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1977). “The theory of affordances,” in perceiving, acting, and knowing. Towards an ecological psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Grèzes, J., & Decety, J. (2002). Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia, 40(2), 212–222. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00089-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, P. M. S. (2007). Human nature: The categorial framework. Oxford: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Haggard, P. (2008). Human volition: Towards a neuroscience of will. Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 9(12), 934–946. doi:10.1038/nrn2497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, P., & Eimer, M. (1999). On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements. Experimental Brain Research, 126(1), 128–133. doi:10.1007/s002210050722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, P., & Libet, B. (2001). Conscious intention and brain activity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(11), 47–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanes, D. P., & Carpenter, R. H. S. (1999). Countermanding saccades in humans. Vision Research, 39(16), 2777–2791. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00011-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanes, D. P., Patterson II, W. F., & Schall, J. D. (1998). Role of frontal eye fields in countermanding saccades: Visual, movement, and fixation activity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79(2), 817–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazelhoff, F. F., & Wiersma, H. (1924). Die Wahrnehmungszeit. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 96, 171–188.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. R., Parkinson, A., Kim, S. Y., Schüermann, M., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2011). On the functional anatomy of the urge-for-action. Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(3–4), 227–243. doi:10.1080/17588928.2011.604717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornhuber, H. H., & Deecke, L. (1965). Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente Potentiale. Pflüger’s Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere, 284(1), 1–17. doi:10.1007/BF00412364
   Google Scholar
• Libet, B., Gleason, C. A., Wright, E. W., & Pearl, D. K. (1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-Potential) the unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain, 106(3), 623–642. doi:10.1093/brain/106.3.623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, S. H., Dinner, D. S., Pillay, P. K., Lüders, H., Morris, H. H., Klem, G., … Awad, I. A. (1994). Functional anatomy of the human supplementary sensorimotor area: Results of extraoperative electrical stimulation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 91(3), 179–193. doi:10.1016/0013–4694(94)90068–X
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Logan, G. D., & Burkell, J. (1986). Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation: A comparison of stop, change, and dual-task paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(4), 549–563. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.12.4.549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91(3), 295–327. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, J. L. (1974). The cement of the universe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nachev, P. (2011). Urges, inhibition, and voluntary action. Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(3–4), 247–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachev, P., & Husain, M. (2010). Action and the fallacy of the “internal”: Comment on Passingham et al. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(5), 192–193. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachev, P., Kennard, C., & Husain, M. (2008). Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas. Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 9(11), 856–869. doi:10.1038/nrn2478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachev, P., Rees, G., Parton, A., Kennard, C., & Husain, M. (2005). Volition and conflict in human medial frontal cortex. Current Biology : CB, 15(2), 122–128. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obhi, S. S. (2012). The troublesome distinction between self-generated and externally triggered action: A commentary on. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(1), 587–588. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman, A., Kornblum, S., & Meyer, D. E. (1986). The point of no return in choice reaction time: Controlled and ballistic stages of response preparation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(3), 243–258. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.12.3.243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman, A., Kornblum, S., & Meyer, D. E. (1990). Does motor programming necessitate response execution? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 183–198. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paré, M., & Hanes, D. P. (2003). Controlled movement processing: Superior colliculus activity associated with countermanded saccades. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23(16), 6480–6489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell, J. C., & Edwards, M. J. (2011). An urge to act or an urge to suppress?. Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(3–4), 250–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schall, J. D. (2004). On building a bridge between brain and behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 23–50. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schopenhauer, A. (1859). Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. (3rd edition). FA Brockhaus: Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Schurger, A., Sitt, J. D., & Dehaene, S. (2012). An accumulator model for spontaneous neural activity prior to self-initiated movement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(42), E2904–E2913. doi:10.1073/pnas.1210467109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüü r, F., & Haggard, P. (2011). What are self-generated actions? Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1697–1704. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A. K., Shapiro, E. S., Gerald, J., & Feinberg, T. E. (1988). Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (2nd ed., Vol. xxiv). New York, NY, England: Raven Press, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Soon, C. S., Brass, M., Heinze, H. -J., & Haynes, J. -D. (2008). Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. Nature Neuroscience, 11(5), 543–545. doi:10.1038/nn.2112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumner, P., & Husain, M. (2008). At the edge of consciousness: Automatic motor activation and voluntary control. The Neuroscientist, 14(5), 474–486. doi:10.1177/1073858408314435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehovnik, E. J. (1996). Electrical stimulation of neural tissue to evoke behavioral responses. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 65(1), 1–17. doi:10.1016/0165-0270(95)00131-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipper, S. P., Paul, M. A., & Hayes, A. E. (2006). Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 493–498. doi:10.3758/BF03193875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towse, J. N., & Valentine, J. D. (1997). Random generation of numbers: A search for underlying processes. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(4), 381–400. doi:10.1080/713752566
   Google Scholar
• Tune, G. S. (1964). A brief survey of variables that influence random-generation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 18, 705–710. doi:10.2466/pms.1964.18.3.705
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009). Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(5), 647–661. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Wright, G. H. (1963). Norm and action: A logical enquiry. Vol. 15. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, W. A. (1972). Generation of random sequences by human subjects: A critical survey of literature. Psychological Bulletin, 65–72. doi:10.1037/h0032060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, H. (2001). Neurophilosophy of free will: From libertarian illusions to a concept of natural autonomy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar