Effects of contrast inversion on face perception depend on gaze location: Evidence from the N170 component

REFERENCES

• Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E., & McCarthy, G. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 551–565. doi:10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, A. W. Y., Kravitz, D. J., Truong, S., Arizpe, J., & Baker, C. I. (2010). Cortical representations of bodies and faces are strongest in commonly experienced configurations. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 417–418. doi:10.1038/nn.2502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lissa, P., McArthur, G., Hawelka, S., Palermo, R., Mahajan, Y., & Hutzler, F. (2014). Fixation location on upright and inverted faces modulates the N170. Neuropsychologia, 57, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2006). The Cambridge face memory test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants. Neuropsychologia, 44, 576–585. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, M. (1998). Does the face-specific N170 component reflect the activity of a specialized eye processor? Neuroreport, 9, 2945–2948. doi:10.1097/00001756-199809140-00005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, M. (2000). Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 694–705. doi:10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00285-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer, M. (2011). The face-sensitive N170 component of the event-related brain potential. In A. J. Calder, G. Rhodes, M. H. Johnson, & J. V. Haxby (Eds.), The oxford handbook of face perception (pp. 329–344). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galper, R. E. (1970). Recognition of faces in photographic negative. Psychonomic Science, 19, 207–208. doi:10.3758/BF03328777
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, T., Suresh, N., & Sinha, P. (2012). EEG responses to facial contrast-chimeras. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 11, 201–211. doi:10.1142/S021963521250015X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilad, S., Meng, M., & Sinha, P. (2009). Role of ordinal contrast relationships in face encoding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 5353–5358. doi:10.1073/pnas.0812396106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, J. H., & Cottrell, G. (2008). Two fixations suffice in face recognition. Psychological Science, 19, 998–1006. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02191.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itier, R. J., Alain, C., Sedore, K., & McIntosh, A. R. (2007). Early face processing specificity: It’s in the eyes! It’s in the eyes! Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1815–1826. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itier, R. J., Latinus, M., & Taylor, M. J. (2006). Face, eye and object early processing: What is the face specificity? NeuroImage, 29, 667–676. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2002). Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: A repetition study using ERPs. Neuroimage, 15, 353–372. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, A., Hill, H., & Carman, N. (1992). Recognising faces: Effects of lighting direction, inversion, and brightness reversal. Perception, 21, 365–375. doi:10.1068/p210365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., Pike, G., White, P., & Musselman, A. (1996). Perception and recognition of normal and negative faces: The role of shape from shading and pigmentation cues. Perception, 25, 37–52. doi:10.1068/p250037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laguesse, R., Dormal, G., Biervoye, A., Kuefner, D., & Rossion, B. (2012). Extensive visual training in adulthood significantly reduces the face inversion effect. Journal of Vision, 12, 14. doi:10.1167/12.10.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C. H., Collin, C. A., Burton, A. M., & Chaudhuri, A. (1999). Lighting direction affects recognition of untextured faces in photographic positive and negative. Vision Research, 39, 4003–4009. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00109-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C. H., Collin, C. A., & Chaudhuri, A. (2000). Does face recognition rely on encoding of 3-D surface? Examining the role of shape-from-shading and shape-from-stereo. Perception, 29, 729–743. doi:10.1068/p3065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nederhouser, M., Yue, X., Mangini, M. C., & Biederman, I. (2007). The deleterious effect of contrast reversal on recognition is unique to faces, not objects. Vision Research, 47, 2134–2142. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemrodov, D., Anderson, T., Preston, F. F., & Itier, R. J. (2014). Early sensitivity for eyes within faces: A new neuronal account of holistic and featural processing. NeuroImage, 97, 81–94. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orban de Xivry, J.J., Ramon, M., Lefèvre, P., & Rossion, B. (2008). Reduced fixation on the upper area of personally familiar faces following acquired prosopagnosia. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2, 245–268. doi:10.1348/174866407X260199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. F., & Eckstein, M. P. (2012). Looking just below the eyes is optimal across face recognition tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, E3314–E3323. doi:10.1073/pnas.1214269109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion, B. (2009). Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: The perceptual field hypothesis. Acta Psychologica, 132, 300–312. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion, B., Delvenne, J. F., Debatisse, D., Goffaux, V., Bruyer, R., Crommelinck, M., & Guérit, J. M. (1999). Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: An event-related potentials study. Biological Psychology, 50, 173–189. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00013-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, R., Sinha, P., Biederman, I., & Nederhouser, M. (2006). Is pigmentation important for face recognition? Evidence from contrast negation. Perception, 35, 749–759. doi:10.1068/p5490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, P. (2002). Qualitative representations for recognition. In H. H. Bulthoff, S.W. Lee, T. A. Poggio, & C. Wallraven (Eds.), In biologically motivated computer vision (pp. 249–262). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sormaz, M., Andrews, T. J., & Young, A. W. (2013). Contrast negation and the importance of the eye region for holistic representations of facial identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1667–1677. doi:10.1037/a0032449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong, Q. C., Peissig, J. J., Harrison, M. C., & Tarr, M. J. (2005). The role of surface pigmentation for recognition revealed by contrast reversal in faces and greebles. Vision Research, 45, 1213–1223. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar