Miscanthus and switchgrass feedstock potential for bioenergy and carbon sequestration on minesoils

References

• US Congress. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Schnepf R, Yacobucci BD. Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS): overview and issues. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress 2013 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Downing M, et al. US billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry. No. ORNL/TM-2011/224, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency. 2014 Standards for the Renewable Fuel Standard Program. Federal Register 78(230) (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Dufey A. Biofuels Production, Trade and Sustainable Development: Emerging Issues. International Institute for Environment and Development, London (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Soetaert W, Vandamme EJ. Biofuels in perspective. Biofuels, Wiley, Chichester, Reino Unido, 257 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel D, Patzek TW. Ethanol production using corn, switchgrass and wood; biodiesel production using soybean. In: Biofuels, Solar and Wind as Renewable Energy Systems: Benefits and Risks. Pimentel D. (Ed.), Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 375–396 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Heaton EA, Dohleman FG, Long SP. Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of miscanthus. Glob. Change Biol. 14(9), 2000–2014 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng J. Biomass to Renewable Energy Processes. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Akala VA, Lal R. Soil organic carbon pools and sequestration rates in reclaimed minesoils in Ohio. J. Environ. Qual. 30(6), 2098–2104 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shrestha RK, Lal R. Soil carbon and nitrogen in 28-year-old land uses in reclaimed coal mine soils of Ohio. J. Environ. Qual. 36(6), 1775–1783 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keene T, Skousen J. Switchgrass production potential on reclaimed surface mines in West Virginia. Proceedings of the 2010 National Meeting, American Society for Mining and Reclamation, 5–11 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Schmer MR, Liebig MA, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB. Field-scale soil property changes under switchgrass managed for bioenergy. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenerg. 3(6), 439–448 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel D. Ethanol fuels: energy balance, economics and environmental impacts are negative. Nat. Resour. Res. 12(2), 127–134 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Sims RE, Mabee W, Saddler JN, Taylor M. An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. Bioresource Technol. 101(6), 1570–1580 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis SC, Anderson-Teixeira KJ, DeLucia EH. Life-cycle analysis and the ecology of biofuels. Trends Plant. Sci. 14(3), 140–146 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherubini F, Bird ND, Cowie A, Jungmeier G, Schlamadinger B, Woess-Gallasch S. Energy-and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 53(8), 434–447 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonin C, Lal R. Agronomic and ecological implications of biofuels. Adv. Agron. 117, 1–50 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• *Review of biofuels and their ecological impacts, economic costs, and energetic efficiencies.
   Google Scholar
• Scown CD, Nazaroff WW, Mishra U, et al. Lifecycle greenhouse gas implications of US national scenarios for cellulosic ethanol production. Environ. Res. Lett. 7(1), 014011.
   Google Scholar
• Thornley P, Rogers J, Huang Y. Quantification of employment from biomass power plants. Renew. Energ. 33(8), 1922–1927 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture: Foreign Agricultural Service. Grain: World markets and trade. FG, 11–13 (October 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Roos A, Graham RL. Hektor B, Rakos C. Critical factors to bioenergy implementation. Biomass Bioenerg. 17(2), 113–126 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Mooney DF, Roberts RK, English BC. Tyler DD, Larson JA. Yield and breakeven price of Alamo switchgrass for biofuels in Tennessee. Agron. J. 101(5), 1234–1242 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellas A. Biomass and electrical energy. In: Power generation, transmission, distribution and energy conversion (MedPower 2010), Seventh Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition on IET, 1–7 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Outlook, Annual Energy. Energy Information Administration. United States (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Foust TD, Aden A, Dutta A, Phillips S. An economic and environmental comparison of a biochemical and a thermochemical lignocellulosic ethanol conversion processes. Cellulose 16(4), 547–565 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beringer TIM, Lucht W, Schaphoff S. Bioenergy production potential of global biomass plantations under environmental and agricultural constraints. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenerg. 3(4), 299–312 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel D, Marklein A, Toth MA, et al. Environmental and economic costs of biofuels. Hum. Ecol. 4, 349–369 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Fargione JE, Plevin RJ, Hill JD. The ecological impact of biofuels. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S. 41, 351–377 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin Z, Zhuang Q, Chen M. Impacts of land use change due to biofuel crops on carbon balance, bioenergy production, and agricultural yield, in the conterminous United States. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenerg. 4(3), 277–288 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco-Canqui H. Energy crops and their implications on soil and environment. Agron. J. 102(2), 403–419 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIsaac GF, David MB. Switchgrass production in Central Illinois: Impacts on hydrology and inorganic nitrogen leaching. J. Environ. Qual. 39(5), 1790–1799 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian DG, Riche AB. Nitrate leaching losses under miscanthus grass planted on a silty clay loam soil. Soil Use Manage. 14, 131–135 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Study on miscanthus management effects on water quality.
   Google Scholar
• Ng TL, Eheart JW, Cai XM, Miguez F. Modeling miscanthus in the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) to simulate its water quality effects as a bioenergy crop. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 7138–7144 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Love BJ, Nejadhashemi AP. Water quality impact assessment of large-scale biofuel crops expansion in agricultural regions of Michigan. Biomass Bioenerg. 35, 2200–2216 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Liu S. Impacts of biofuels production alternatives on water quantity and quality in the Iowa River Basin. Biomass Bioenerg. 36, 182–191 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadas PA, Barnett KH, Undersander DJ. Economics and energy of ethanol production from alfalfa, corn, and switchgrass in the Upper Midwest, USA. Bioenerg. Res. 1(1), 44–55 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Major land uses, 2007 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Bonin C, Lal R. Bioethanol potentials and life-cycle assessments of biofuel feedstocks. Cr. Rev. Plant Sci. 31(4), 271–289 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field CB, Campbell JE, Lobell DB. Biomass energy: the scale of the potential resource. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23(2), 65–72 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai X, Zhang X, Wang D. Land availability for biofuel production. Envir. Sci. Tech. 45, 334–339 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of Surface Mining. Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC: Office of Surface Mining, Department of Interior, (2012).
   Google Scholar
• SMCRA, 1977. Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act, Public Law 95-87. US Code Vol. 30, Sec 1265.
   Google Scholar
• Haering KC, Daniels WL, Roberts JA. Changes in mine soil properties resulting from overburden weathering. J. Environ. Qua. 22(1), 194–200 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson CD, Skousen JG. Minesoil properties of 15 abandoned mine land sites in West Virginia. J. Environ. Qua. 24(4), 635–643 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Sencindiver JC, Ammons JT, Barnhisel RI, Darmody RG, Daniels WL. Minesoil genesis and classification. In: Reclamation of Drastically Disturbed Lands, Barnhisel R, Darmody R, Daniels W (Eds). ASA Monograph No. 41. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, 595–614 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Office of Surface Mining. Annual Report 2003. Washington, DC: Office of Surface Mining, Department of Interior (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Cadoux S, Riche AB, Yates NE, Machet JM. Nutrient requirements of Miscanthus x giganteus: Conclusions from a review of published studies. Biomass and Bioenerg. 38, 14–22 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowski I, Scurlock JMO, Lindvall E, Christou M. The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe. Biomass Bioenerg. 25, 335–361 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• **Excellent summary of agronomic and physiological performance of miscanthus and switchgrass in the US.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver JE. Prairie Plants and their Environment: A Fifty-year Study in the Midwest. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, 276 (1968).
   Google Scholar
• Tufekcioglu A, Raich JW, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC. Biomass, carbon and nitrogen dynamics of multi-species riparian buffers within an agricultural watershed in Iowa, USA. Agroforest. Syst. 57(3), 187–198 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Dohleman FG, Heaton EA, Arundale RA, Long SP. Seasonal dynamics of above and below ground biomass and nitrogen partitioning in Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum across three growing seasons. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenerg. 4(5), 534–544 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuter M. Breeding approaches to improvement of yield and quality in miscanthus grown in Europe. European Miscanthus Improvement: Final Report September, 28–52 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Hodkinson TR, Chase MW, Renvoize SA. Characterization of a genetic resource collection for Miscanthus (Saccharinae, Andropogoneae, Poaceae) using AFLP and ISSR PCR. Anns. Bot. 89(5), 627–636 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skousen J. Keene T, Marra M, Gutta B. Reclamation of mined land with switchgrass, miscanthus, and arundo for biofuel production. Oral paper presented at the 2013 National Meeting of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation, Laramie, WY, Reclamation Across Industries, June 1–6, (2013).
   Google Scholar
• *One of few studies done on miscanthus and switchgrass in minesoils.
   Google Scholar
• Amougou N, Bertrand I, Cadoux S, Recous S. Miscanthus × giganteus leaf senescence, decomposition and C and N inputs to soil. Glol. Change Biol. Bioenerg. 4(6), 698–707 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Beale CV, Bint DA, Long SP. Leaf photosynthesis in the C4-grass Miscanthus x giganteus, growing in the cool temperate climate of southern England. J. Exp. Bot. 47(2), 267–273 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Evanylo GK, Abaye AO, Dundas C, Zipper CE, Lemus R, Sukkariyah B, Rockett J. Herbaceous vegetation productivity, persistence, and metals uptake on a biosolids-amended mine soil. J. Environ. Qua. 34(5), 1811–1819 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marra M, Keene T, Skousen J, Griggs T. Switchgrass yield on reclaimed surface mines for bioenergy production. J. Environ. Qua. 42(3), 696–703 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts JA, Daniels WL, Bell JC, Martens DC. Tall fescue production and nutrient status on Southwest Virginia mine soils. J. Environ. Qua. 17(1), 55–62 (1988).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarchow ME, Liebman M, Rawat V, Anex RP. Functional group and fertilization affect the composition and bioenergy yields of prairie plants. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenerg. 4(6), 671–679 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Tokgoz S, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, et al. Emerging biofuels: outlook of effects on US grain, oilseed, and livestock markets. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Sobek AA, Skousen JG, Fisher Jr SE. Chemical and physical properties of overburdens and minesoils. In: Reclamation of Drastically Disturbed Lands. Barnhisel R, Darmody R, Daniels W (Eds). ASA Monograph No. 41. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, 77–104 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Coile TS. Moisture content of small stone in soil. Soil Sci. 75, 203–207 (1952).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla MK, Lal R, Underwood J, Ebinger M. Physical and hydrological characteristics of reclaimed minesoils in southeastern Ohio. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68(4), 1352–1359 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagliai M, Vittori Antisari L. Influence of waste organic matter on soil micro- and macrostructure. Bioresource Technol. 43, 205–213 (1993).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asensio V, Guala SD, Vega FA, Covelo EF. A soil quality index for reclaimed mine soils. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 32(10), 2240–2248 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haering KC, Daniels WL, Galbraith JM. Appalachian mine soil morphology and properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68(4), 1315–1325 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haering KC, Daniels WL, Feagley SE, Barnhisel RI, Darmody RG. Reclaiming mined lands with biosolids, manures, and papermill sludges. In: Reclamation of Drastically Disturbed Lands. Barnhisel R, Darmody R, Daniels W (Eds), ASA Monograph No. 41. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, 615–644 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Ciolkosz EJ, Cronce RC, Cunningham RL, Petersen GW. Characteristics, genesis, and classification of Pennsylvania minesoils. Soil Sci. 139, 232–238 (1985).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Guidelines for Soil Description. Rome, Italy (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen TA, Rogowski AS, Pennock R. Physical characteristics of some minesoils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44(2), 321–328 (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha RK, Lal R. Carbon and nitrogen pools in reclaimed land under forest and pasture ecosystems in Ohio, USA. Geoderma. 157(3), 196–205 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Jacinthe PA, Lal R. Spatial variability of soil properties and trace gas fluxes in reclaimed mine land of southeastern Ohio. Geoderma. 136(3), 598–608 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Thompson PJ, Jansen IJ, Hooks CL. Penetrometer resistance and bulk density as parameters for predicting root system performance in mine soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51(5), 1288–1293 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Barnhisel RI, Hower JM. Coal surface mine reclamation in the eastern United States: the revegetation of disturbed lands to hayland/pasture or cropland. Advan. Agrono. 61, 233–275 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner WC, Broersma K, Naeth A, Chanasyk D, Jobson A. Influence of biosolids and fertilizer amendments on physical, chemical and microbiological properties of copper mine tailings. Can. J. Soil Sci. 90(4), 571–583.
   Google Scholar
• Coile TS. Moisture content of small stone in soil. Soil Sci. 75, 203–207 (1952).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunker RE, Barnhisel RI. Cropland reclamation. In: Reclamation of Drastically Disturbed Lands, Barnhisel R, Darmody R, Daniels W (Eds). ASA Monograph No. 41. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, 323–369 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Barnhisel RI, Hower JM. Coal surface mine reclamation in the eastern United States: The revegetation of disturbed lands to hayland/pasture or cropland. Advan. Agron. 61, 233–275 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen GA, Cunningham, RL, Parlock PP, Seibert DR. Corn on strip-mined land can equal other soil yields. Sci. Agr. 27(2), 12–13 (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Sobek AA, Skousen JG, Fisher Jr SE. Chemical and physical properties of overburdens and minesoils. p. 77–104. In: Reclamation of Drastically Disturbed Lands, Barnhisel R, Darmody R, Daniels W (Eds). ASA Monograph No. 41. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI; 77–104 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Peterson JR, Pietz RI, Lue-Hing C. Water, soil, and crop quality of Illinois coal mine spoils amended with sewage sludge. In: Utilization of Municipal Sewage Effluent and Sludge on Forest and Disturbed Land. Sopper WE, Kerr S (Eds). The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, 360–368 (1979).
   Google Scholar
• Hinesly TD, Redborg KE, Ziegler EL, Rose-Innes IH. Effects of chemical and physical changes in strip-mined spoil amended with sewage sludge on the uptake of metals by plants. In: Land Reclamation and Biomass Production with Municipal Wastewater and Sludge. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA, 339–352 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha RK, Lal R. Changes in physical and chemical properties of soil after surface mining and reclamation. Geoderma. 161(3), 168–176 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha RK, Lal R. Land use impacts on physical properties of 28 years old reclaimed mine soils in Ohio. Plant Soil 306(1-2), 249–260 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Simmons FW, Darmody RG, Dunker RE, Lang JM. Physical properties of deep tilled surface mined soils. In: Proceedings of the 1992 National Symposium on Prime Farmland Reclamation. Dunker RE, Barnhisel RI, Darmody RG (Eds.), 71–76 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Struthers PH. Chemical weathering of strip minesoils. The Ohio J. Sci. 64, 125–131 (1964).
   Google Scholar
• Ussiri DA, Lal R. Land management effects on carbon sequestration and soil properties in reclaimed farmland of Eastern Ohio, USA. Open J. Soil Sci. 3, 46–57 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Amichev BY, Burger JA, Rodrigue JA. Carbon sequestration by forests and soils on mined land in the Midwestern and Appalachian coalfields of the US. Forest Ecol. Manag. 256(11), 1949–1959 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Roberts JA, Daniels WL, Burger JA, Bell JC. Early stages of mine soil genesis in a southwest Virginia spoil lithosequence. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52(3), 716–723 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Daniels WL, Amos DF. Mapping, characterization and genesis of mine soils on a reclamation research area in Wise County, Virginia. In: Symposium on Surface Mining Hydrology, Sedimentology and Reclamation. University of Kentucky, Lexington, 8–15 (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Gaskin JW, Brobst RB, Miller WP, Tollner EW. Long-term biosolids application effects on metal concentrations in soil and bermudagrass forage. J. Environ. Qua. 32(1), 146–152 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lavado RS, Rodriguez MB, Taboada MA. Treatment with biosolids affects soil availability and plant uptake of potentially toxic elements. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 109(3), 360–364 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Ries RE, Nilson DJ, Barnhisel RI, Darmody RG, Daniels WL. Reclamation considerations for range, pasture, and hay lands receiving twenty-five to sixty-six centimeters annual precipitation. In: Reclamation of Drastically Disturbed Lands, Barnhisel R, Darmody R, Daniels W (Eds). ASA Monograph No. 41. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, 273–302 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Jacinthe PA, Lal R. Tillage effects on carbon sequestration and microbial biomass in reclaimed farmland soils of southwestern Indiana. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73(2), 605–613 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield HE, Handley JF, Bradshaw AD. Nutrient deficiencies and the aftercare of reclaimed derelict land. J. Appl. Ecol. 19, 151–158 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Bendfeldt ES, Burger JA, Daniels WL. Quality of amended mine soils after sixteen years. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65(6), 1736–1744 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Fitzmorris KB, Sarmiento F, O’Callaghan P. Biosolids and sludge management. Water Environ. Res. 81(10), 1376–1393 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner WC, Broersma K, Naeth A, Chanasyk D, Jobson A. Influence of biosolids and fertilizer amendments on physical, chemical and microbiological properties of copper mine tailings. Can. J. Soil Sci. 90(4), 571–583 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Sopper WE. Municipal Sludge Use in Land Reclamation. CRC Press, Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Daniels WL, Haering KC. Use of sewage sludge for land reclamation in the central Appalachians. Sewage sludge: In: Land Utilization and the Environment, ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI, 105–121 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Cooperband L, Bollero LG, Coale F. Effect of poultry litter and composts on soil nitrogen and phosphorus availability and corn production. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 62, 185–194 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartl W, Putz B, Erhart E. Influence of rates and timing of biowaste compost application on rye yield and soil nitrate levels. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 39, 129–139 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluge R. Key benefits of compost use for the soil-plant system. Ecologically sound use of biowaste in the EU. Brussels 31 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Grigg AH, Sheridan GJ, Pearce AB, Mulligan DR. The effect of organic mulch amendments on the physical and chemical properties and revegetation success of a saline-sodic minespoil from central Queensland, Australia. Aust. J. Soil Res. 44, 97–105 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kravchenko AN, Bullock DG. Correlation of corn and soybean grain yield with topography and soil properties. Agron. J. 92(1), 75–83 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beale CV, Long SP. Seasonal dynamics of nutrient accumulation and partitioning in the perennial C4 grasses Miscanthus x giganteus and Spartina cynosuroides. Biomass Bioenerg. 12(6), 419–428 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amougou N, Bertrand I, Machet JM, Recous S. Quality and decomposition in soil of rhizome, root and senescent leaf from Miscanthus x giganteus, as affected by harvest date and N fertilization. Plant Soil 338(1-2), 83–97 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Dohleman FG, Heaton EA, Arundale RA, Long SP. Seasonal dynamics of above and below ground biomass and nitrogen partitioning in Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum across three growing seasons. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenerg. 4(5), 534–544 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton EA, Dohleman FG, Long SP. Seasonal nitrogen dynamics of Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenerg. 1(4), 297–307 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowski I, Heinz A. Delayed harvest of miscanthus influences on biomass quantity and quality and environmental impacts of energy production. Eur. J. Agron. 19(1), 45–63 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler PR, Sanderson MA, Boateng AA, Weimer PJ, Jung HJG. Biomass yield and biofuel quality of switchgrass harvested in fall or spring. Agrony. J. 98(6), 1518–1525 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemus R, Brummer CE, Burras LC, Moore K J., Barker MF, Molstad NE. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on biomass yield and quality in large fields of established switchgrass in southern Iowa, USA. Biomass Bioenerg. 32(12), 1187–1194 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha RK, Lal R, Jacinthe PA. Enhancing carbon and nitrogen sequestration in reclaimed soils through organic amendments and chiseling. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73(3), 1004–1011 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ussiri DAN, Lal R, Jacinthe PA. Soil properties and carbon sequestration of afforested pastures in reclaimed minesoils of Ohio. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 70(5), 1797–1806 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha RK, Ussiri DAN, Lal R. Terrestrial carbon sequestration potential in reclaimed mine land ecosystems to mitigate the greenhouse effect. In Soil Carbon Sequestration and the Greenhouse Effect, 2nd edition. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. Special Publication 57, 321–346 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• *Review of ecosystem carbon dynamics in minesoils.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri S, Mcdonald LM, Skousen J, Pena-Yewtukhiw EM. Soil organic carbon molecular properties: Effects of time since reclamation in a minesoil chronosequence. Land Degrad. Develop. (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha RK, Lal R. Ecosystem carbon budgeting and soil carbon sequestration in reclaimed mine soil. Enviro. Int. 32(6) 781–796 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sperow M. Carbon sequestration potential in reclaimed mine sites in seven east-central states. J. Environ. Qua. 35(4) 1428–1438 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skog KE, Nicholson GA. Carbon cycling through wood products: the role of wood and paper products in carbon sequestration. Forest. Prod. J. 48(7), 75–83 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Cole DW, Rapp M. Elemental cycling in forest ecosystems. Dynamic Properties Forest Ecosyst. (23), 341–410 (1981).
   Google Scholar
• Oades JM. The retention of organic matter in soils. Biogeochemistry 5(1), 35–70 (1988).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kering MK, Butler TJ, Biermacher JT, Guretzky JA. Biomass yield and nutrient removal rates of perennial grasses under nitrogen fertilization. Bioenerg. Res. 5(1), 61–70 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Lal R. On farm assessment of tillage impact on soil carbon and associated soil quality parameters. Soil Till. Res. 104(2), 270–277 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Frank AB, Berdahl JD, Hanson JD, Liebig MA, Johnson HA. Biomass and carbon partitioning in switchgrass. Crop Sci. 44(4), 1391–1396 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Z, Wood CW, Bransby DI. Impact of row spacing, nitrogen rate, and time on carbon partitioning of switchgrass. Biomass Bioenerg. 20(6), 413–419 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson-Teixeira KJ, Davis SC, Masters MD, DeLucia EH. Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops. Glob. Change Bio. Bioenerg. 1(1), 75–96 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ** Modeling done to estimate soil organic carbon lasses associated with land conversion and rates of change in soil organic carbon over time in biofuel crops.
   Google Scholar
• Akala VA, Lal R. Potential of mine land reclamation for soil organic carbon sequestration in Ohio. Land Degrad. Dev. 11(3), 289–297 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Poeplau C, et al. Temporal dynamics of soil organic carbon after land use change in the temperate zone–carbon response functions as a model approach. Glob. Change Biol. 17(7), 2415–2427 (2011)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zan CS, Fyles JW, Girouard P, Samson RA. Carbon sequestration in perennial bioenergy, annual corn and uncultivated systems in southern Quebec. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 86, 135–144 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen EM, Christensen BT, Jensen LS, Kristensen K. Carbon sequestration in soil beneath long-term Miscanthus plantations as determined by 13C abundance. Biomass Bioenerg. 26, 97–105 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319(5867), 1235–1238 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman JG, Lal R. Carbon life cycle assessment for prairie as a crop in reclaimed mine land. Submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Taheripour F, Hertel TW, Tyner WE, Beckman JF, Birur DK. Biofuels and their by-products: global economic and environmental implications. Biomass Bioenerg. 34(3), 278–289 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterka, A. Ethanol: fledgling cellulosic industry puts down roots, raises hopes in Corn Belt. Greenwire, Environmental and Energy Publishing, December 13 (2013). http://www.eenews.net/stories/1059991342
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture ( USDA), Economic Research Service. Bioenergy (2013). http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/farm-economy/bioenergy.aspx
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme: Global Environment Outlook (GEO-4) (2007). http://unep.org/geo/geo4/media/
   Google Scholar