Bioenergy done right for jobs and economic growth in Africa: dealing with land, biofuels and food security issues

References

• US Congress. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. HR 6 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• CEC. Renewable Energy Roadmap. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium (2006).
   Google Scholar
• CEC. Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium (2008).
   Google Scholar
• McCarl BA, Sands RD. Competitiveness of terrestrial greenhouse gas offsets: are they a bridge to the future? Climatic Change. 80(1-2), 109−126 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silalertruksa T, Gheewala SH, Hunecke K, Fritsche UR. Biofuels and employment effects: Implications for socioeconomic development in Thailand. Biomass Bioenerg. 46(1), 409−418 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Arndt C, Benefica R, Tarp F, Thurlow J, Uaiene R. Biofuels, poverty, and growth: a computable general equilibrium analysis of Mozambique. Environ. Develop. Econ. 15(1), 81−105 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Arndt C, Pauw K, Thurlow J. Biofuels and Economic Development in Tanzania. IFPRI, Washington, DC, 29 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• FAO. FAO Statistics. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J. World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. ESA Working paper. FAO, Rome, Italy (2012).
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. World Development Indicators. World Bank (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Goldemberg J. Ethanol for a sustainable energy future. Science. 315(5813), 808−810 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldemberg J, Coelho TS, Guardabassi P. The sustainability of ethanol production from sugacane. Energ. Policy. 36(6), 2086−2097 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldemberg J, Guardabassi P. Ethanol: can the success of Brazil be replicated? Biofuels. 1(5), 663−665 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Wicke B, Smeets E, Watson H, Faaij A. The current bioenergy production potential of semi-arid and arid regions in sub-Saharan Africa. Biomass Bioenerg. 35(7), 2773−2786 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Msangia S, Evans M. Biofuels and developing economies: is the timing right? Biofuels. 44(4-5), 501 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science. 319(5867), 1235−1238 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Gassman PW, Reyes MR, Green CH, Arnold JG. The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. Trans. ASABE. 50(4), 1211−1240 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parish ES, Hilliard MR, Baskaran LM, et al. Multimetric spatial optimization of switchgrass plantings across a watershed. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref. 6(1), 58−72 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldemberg J. The brazilian biofuels industry. Biotech. Biofuels. 1(6), 1−7 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Alliance for Green Revolution in Africa. Africa Agriculture Status Report: Focus on Staple Crops. Alliance for Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), Nairobi (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Prášková DM. Land Grabs in Africa: A Threat to Food Security. Prague Global Policy Institute – Glopolis, Prague (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Cotula L, Vermeulen S, Leonard R, Keeley J. Land Grab or Development Opportunity? Agricultural Investment and International Land Deals in Africa. FAO, London/Rome (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Platteau J-P. The evolutionary theory of land rights as applied to Sub-Saharan Africa: A critical assessment. Dev. Change. 27(1), 29−86 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromley DW, Cernea MM. The management of common property natural resources: Some conceptual and operational fallacies. World Bank Discussion Papers. The World Bank, Washington, DC (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Rajagopal D, Zilberman D. Environmental, Economic and Policy Aspects of Biofuels. Now Publishers, Delft, The Netherlands (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Meyer S, Thompson W. How do biofuel use mandates cause uncertainty? United States Environmental Protection Agency cellulosic waiver options. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy. 34(4), 570−586 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbendewe-Mondzozo A, Swinton S, Izzauralde RC, Manowitz D, Xuesong Z. Maintaining environmental quality while expanding biomass production: Sub-regional U.S. policy simulations. Energ. Policy. 57(1), 518−531 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Havilik P, Schneider UA, Schmid E, et al. Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets. Energ. Policy. 39 (10), 5690−5702 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar