Biofuel sustainability in Latin America and the Caribbean – a review of recent experiences and future prospects

References

• EIA. International Energy Statistics: Biofuels Production. National Energy Information Center, Washington, DC. (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Bailis R, Baka J. Constructing sustainable biofuels: governance of the emerging biofuel economy. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 104(4), 1–12 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Sorda G, Banse M, Kemfert C. An overview of biofuel policies across the world. Energ. Policy, 38(11), 6977–6988 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science, 319(5867), 1235–1238 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson GP, Dale VH, Doering OC et al. Sustainable biofuels redux. Science, 322(5898), 49–50 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon BD. Biofuels and sustainability. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1185(1), 119–134 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAPRI. 2009 U.S. and World Agricultural Outlook. Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute, Iowa State University (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Solomon BD, Bailis R. Introduction. In: Sustainable Development of Biofuels in Latin America and the Caribbean. Solomon BD, Bailis R (Eds). Springer, New York, 1–26 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Fitzherbert EB, Struebig MJ, Morel A et al. How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.), 23(10), 538–545 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Skutsch M, Drigo R, Pacheco P, Masera O. Assessing deforestation from biofuels: methodological challenges. Appl. Geogr. 31(2), 508–518 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterfield B. EU admits green fuel targets will damage rainforests. In: The Daily Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group, London (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Actionaid. FOOD, FARMERS AND FUEL: Balancing Global Grain and Energy Policies with Sustainable Land Use. ActionAid International Johannesburg, South Africa, (2008) 20.
   Google Scholar
• Zoomers A. Globalisation and the foreignisation of space: seven processes driving the current global land grab. J. Peasant. Stud. 37(2), 429–447 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos S. The tainted grail of Brazilian ethanol achieving oil independence but who has borne the cost and paid the price. N.Y. City L. Rev. 61, 61–93 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Welch C. Globalization and the transformation of work in rural Brazil: agribusiness, Rural Labor Unions, and Peasant Mobilization. Int. Labor Working Class Hist. 70(1), 35–60 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Babcock BA. The impact of US biofuel policies on agricultural price levels and volatility. China Agr. Econ. Rev. 4(4), 407–426 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keleman A, Raño HG. The Mexican tortilla crisis of 2007: the impacts of grain-price increases on food-production chains. Dev. Prac. 21(4-5), 550–565 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal E. As biofuel demand grows, so do Guatemala's hunger pangs. In: New York Times (2013).
   Google Scholar
• McMichael P. Agrofuels in the food regime. J. Peasant Stud. 37(4), 609–629 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nepstad DC, Stickler CM, Almeida OT. Globalization of the Amazon soy and beef industries: opportunities for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 20(6), 1595–1603 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer D. Climate change, biofuels and eco-social impacts in the Brazilian Amazon and Cerrado. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 363(1498), 1747–1752 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delvenne P, Vasen F, Vara AM. The “soy-ization” of Argentina: the dynamics of the “globalized” privatization regime in a peripheral context. Technol. Soc. 35(2), 253–162 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Hilbert JA, Galligani S. Argentina. In: Sustainable Development of Biofuels in Latin America and the Caribbean. Solomon BD, Bailis R (Eds). Springer, New York, 127–140 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Gomes M, Biondi A, Brianezi T, Glass V. Brazil of biofuels: impacts of crops on land, environment and society - animal fat, palm oil, cotton, jatropha, sunflower and rapeseed - 2009. In: Brazil of Biofuels. Amigos da Terra - Amazônia Brasileira, Centro de Tecnologia Alternativa (CTA), Instituto Centro de Vida (ICV), Portal Beef Point, Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UniR), Brasilia, 70 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Tomei J, Upham P. Argentinean soy-based biodiesel: an introduction to production and impacts. Energy Policy, 37(10), 3890–3898 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maughan MJ. Land grabs and oil palm in Colombia. In: International Conference on Global Land Grabbing. International Institute of Social Studies in The Hague, Sussex University (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Selfa T, Bain C, Moreno R. Colombia. In: Sustainable Development of Biofuels in Latin America and the Caribbean. Solomon BD, Bailis R (Eds). Springer, New York, 157–178 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Arima EY, Richards P, Walker R, Caldas MM. Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Res. Lett. 6(2), 024010 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CARB. Proposed Regulation to Implement the Low Carbon Fuel Standard: Volume I. CalEPA Air Resources Board, Sacramento, 374 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Lapola DM, Schaldach R, Alcamo J et al. Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107(8), 3388–3393 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GEXSI. Global Market Study on Jatropha: Final Report. Global Exchange for Social Investment (prepared for the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)), London and Berlin, 187 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Finco MVA, Doppler W. Bioenergy and sustainable development: the dilemma of food security and climate change in the Brazilian savannah. Energ. Sustain. Dev. 14(3), 194–199 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achten WMJ, Maes WH, Aerts R et al. Jatropha: from global hype to local opportunity. J. Arid. Environ. 74(1), 164–165 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailis R, Kavlak G. The environmental implications of innovations in jatropha production in Central-West Brazil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47(14), 8042–8050 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl N, Hildebrandt T, Moser C et al. Insights into jatropha projects worldwide-key facts & figures from a global survey. In: Available at SSRN 2254823. Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM), Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Luneburg, 72 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Bailis R, Baka J. Greenhouse gas emissions and land use change from jatropha curcas-based jet fuel In Brazil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44(22), 8684–8691 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto AC, Guarieiro LLN, Rezende MJC et al. Biodiesel: an overview. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 16, 1313–1330 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usher P, Lea-Langton A, Camargo-Valero MA, Gale WF, Ross A. Integrating microalgae into the Brazilian program for biodiesel production and use. Biofuels 5(1), 45–52 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Bailis R, Yu E. Environmental and social implications of integrated seawater agriculture systems producing Salicornia bigelovii for biofuel. Biofuels 3(5), 555–574 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• van Gelder JW, German L, Bailis R. Biofuel investments in tropical forest-rich countries: implications for responsible finance. SAMPJ 3(2), 134–160 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Janssen R, Rutz DD. Sustainability of biofuels in Latin America: risks and opportunities. Energ Policy 39(10), 5717–5725 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA FAS. Brazil Biofuels Annual: 2012. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Washington, DC, 28 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• USDA FAS. EU-27 Biofuels Annual: 2013. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Washington, DC, 34 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Lane J. Biofuels mandates around the world: 2012. In: Biofuels Digest. Green Thinking (Services) Ltd, London (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st century (REN21). Renewables Global Status Report: 2013 Update. REN21 Secretariat, Paris, 177 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• FAOSTAT. FAOSTAT Agricultural Production Data. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Moncada J, Tolosa RA, Cardona CA. Peru. In: Sustainable Development of Biofuels in Latin America and the Caribbean.Solomon BD, Bailis R (Eds). Springer, New York, 141–155 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• UNICA. Histórico de exportação mensal de etanol pelo Brasil. Brasilia (2013)
   Google Scholar
• Solomon BD, Bailis R (Eds). Sustainable Development of Biofuels in Latin America and the Caribbean. Springer, New York (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Solomon BD, Barnes JR, Halvorsen KE. Grain and cellulosic ethanol: history, economics, and energy policy. Biomass Bioenergy 31(6), 416–425 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldemberg J, Coelho ST, Nastari PM, Lucon O. Ethanol learning curve—the Brazilian experience. Biomass Bioenergy 26(3), 301–304 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hira A, de Oliveira LG. No substitute for oil? How Brazil developed its ethanol industry. Energ Policy 37(6), 2450–2456 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho ST, Guardabassi P. Brazil: Ethanol. In: Sustainable Development of Biofuels in Latin America and the Caribbean.Solomon BD, Bailis R (Eds). Springer, New York, 71–101 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Thompson J. Brazil makes corn ethanol, too. In: Farm Futures. Farm Progress, St. Charles, Illinois, USA (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Eastmond A, García C, Fuentes A, Becerril-García J. Mexico. In: Sustainable Development of Biofuels in Latin America and the Caribbean.Solomon BD, Bailis R (Eds). Springer, New York, 203–222 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• CEPEA. Açúcar - Álcool. Centro de Estudos Avancados em Economia Aplicada, Sao Paulo (2013).
   Google Scholar
• MME. Relatório do Mercado de Derivados de Petróleo. Brasilia, 26 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Tomei J, Diaz-Chavez R. Guatemala. In: Sustainable Development of Biofuels in Latin America and the Caribbean.Solomon BD, Bailis R (Eds). Springer, New York, 179–202 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• USDA FAS. Peru Biofuels Annual: 2012. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Washington, DC (2012)
   Google Scholar
• Yacobucci BD. Ethanol imports and the Caribbean Basin Initiative. In: CRS Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service (CRS), Washington, DC, 6 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Ludena CE. The Caribbean. In: Sustainable Development of Biofuels in Latin America and the Caribbean.Solomon BD, Bailis R (Eds). Springer, New York, 223–240 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. EU to impose definitive anti-dumping duties on biodiesel from Argentina and Indonesia. In: Press Release Database. European Commission, Brussels (2013)
   Google Scholar
• USDA FAS. EU-27 Oilseeds and Products Annual: 2013. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Washington, DC, 46 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Eurostat. In: EU Trade Since 1988 By SITC. European Commission, Brussels (2013)
   Google Scholar
• German L, Schoneveld GC, Pacheco P. The social and environmental impacts of biofuel feedstock cultivation: evidence from multi-site research in the forest frontier. Ecol. Soc. 16(3), 24 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgera E, Kulosevi K, Gobena A. Case studies on bioenergy policy and law: options for sustainability: 102. In: FAO Legislative Study. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome (2009)
   Google Scholar
• Secretaría de Energia. Programa “GENREN”: Licitación de Generación Eléctrica a partir de Fuentes Renovables, Discurso ofrecido por el Secretario de Energía Daniel Cameron en Casa de Gobierno, 9 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• USDA FAS. Argentina - Biofuels annual 2013. USDA Foreign Agriculture Service, Buenas Aires, 24 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• IICA. Atlas de la agroenergía y los biocombustibles en las Américas. II. Biodiesel. Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA), San José, Costa Rica (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Presidente Interino de la Republica. Ley No. 3207. La Paz, Bolivia (2005)
   Google Scholar
• CNE. Política Energética: Nuevos Lineamientos: Transformando la crisis energética en una oportunidad. Comisión Nacional de Energía (CNE), Santiago, Chile, 113 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Energía. Chile's Energy Challenge: The Foundations of a Developed Country. Ministerio de Energía, Santiago, Chile, 38 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• MinMinas. Política General en Materia de Biocombustibles. Ministerio de Minas y Energía, Bogotá, 10 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• DNP. Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2010-2014: Más empleo menos pobreza y más seguridad. Departamento Nacional de Planeación, Bogotá, DC, Colombia, 481 (2011) 481.
   Google Scholar
• El Presidente de la República. Decreto de Biocombustibles: Decreto Ejecutivo No. XXXXX. San José, Costa Rica, (2007) 11.
   Google Scholar
• MINAE. V Plan Nacional de Energía 2008-2021. Ministerio del Ambiente y Energia, San José, Costa Rica, 71 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• MINAET. VI Plan Nacional de Energía 2012-2030. Ministerio del Ambiente, Energia y Telecomunicaciones, San José, Costa Rica, 71 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• El Congreso Nacional. Law 57-07 on Renewable Sources of Energy Incentives and its Special Regimes. Santo Domingo de Guzmán, Dominican Republic, 24 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• DENC-SEIC. Los biocombustibles en República Dominicana. Santo Domingo, República Dominicana (no date)
   Google Scholar
• Presidente Constitucional De La Republica. Decreto No. 2332. Registro Oficial No. 482, 15 de diciembre de 2004, Quito, Ecuador (2004)
   Google Scholar
• Congreso de la Republica de Guatemala. Ley de Incentivos para el desarrollo de proyectos de energía renovable. Centro Nacional de Análisis y Documentación Judicial (CENADOJ), Guatemala City, Guatemala, 6 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Energía y Minas. Biocombustibles en Guatemala. Ministerio de Energía y Minas, Guatemala City, Guatemala, 26 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Energy and Mining. National Renewable Energy Policy 2009 – 2030. Creating a Sustainable Future. Renewable Energy Policy Working Group, Kingston, Jamaica, 71 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Cámara de Diputados. Ley de Promocíon y Desarrollo de los Bioenergéticos. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca, y Alimentación (SAGARPA), Mexico, DF (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Gobierno Nacional República de Panamá. Asamblea Nacional, Ley No. 42. Gaceta Oficial Digital 26770, Panamá, 38 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Republica Oriental de Uruguay. Agrocombustibles: Ley No. 18.195. Montevideo, Uruguay (2007)
   Google Scholar
• Guariguata MR, Masera OR, Johnson FX et al. A review of environmental issues in the context of biofuel sustainability frameworks. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia, 26 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• El Presidente de la República. Aprueban reglamento de la ley de promoción del mercado de biocombustibles. Lima, Peru (2005)
   Google Scholar
• Moser C, Hildebrandt T, Bailis R. International sustainability standards and certification. In: Sustainable Development of Biofuels in Latin America and the Caribbean. Solomon BD, Bailis R (Eds). Springer, New York, 27–69 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• van Dam J, Junginger M, Faaij APC. From the global efforts on certification of bioenergy towards an integrated approach based on sustainable land use planning. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 14(9), 2445–2472 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamers P, Hamelinck C, Junginger M, Faaij A. International bioenergy trade – a review of past developments in the liquid biofuel market. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 15(6), 2655–2676 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Congress. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 In: Public Law 109-58. Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 551 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• US Congress. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. In: H.R.6 (2007)
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RFS2) Regulatory Impact Analysis. OTAQ-USEPA, Washington, DC, 1120 (2010) 1120.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. EPA Issues Notice of Data Availability Concerning Renewable Fuels Produced from Palm Oil under the RFS Program. OTAQ-USEPA, Washington, DC (2011)
   Google Scholar
• Scarlat N, Dallemand J-F. Recent developments of biofuels/bioenergy sustainability certification: a global overview. Energy Policy 39(3), 1630–1646 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament. Off. J. Euro. Union L. 140(5.6.2009), 16–62 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council: Amending Directive 98/70/EC Relating to the Quality of Petrol and Diesel Fuels and Amending Directive 2009/28/EC on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources. In: Procedure File. European Commission, Brussels (2012)
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Biofuels - Sustainability Schemes. European Commission, Brussels (2013).
   Google Scholar
• ISCC. Sustainability Requirements for the Production of Biomass. ISCC System GmbH, Köln, Germany (2012).
   Google Scholar
• 2BSvs. 2BSvs: Biomass Biofuel, Sustainability Voluntary Scheme. 2BSvs (2013).
   Google Scholar
• RSB. RSB Principles & Criteria for Sustainable Biofuel Production. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 29 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Diaz-Chavez RA. Assessing biofuels. Aiming for sustainable development or complying with the market? Energy Policy 39(10), 5763–5769 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol APJ. Boundless Biofuels? Between Environmental Sustainability and Vulnerability. Sociologia Ruralis 47(4), 297–315 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponte S, Riisgaard L. Competition, ‘best practices’ and exclusion in the market for social and environmental standards. In: Governing through Standards: Origins, Drivers and Limitations. Ponte S, Gibbon P, Vestergaard J (Eds). Palgrave Macmillan, London, 236–265 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowski I, Faaij A. Steps towards the development of a certification system for sustainable bio-energy trade. Biomass Bioenerg. 30(2), 83–104 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdonk M, Dieperink C, Faaij APC. Governance of the emerging bio-energy markets. Energ Policy 35(7), 3909–3924 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JSH, Rist L, Obidzinski K, Ghazoul J, Koh LP. No farmer left behind in sustainable biofuel production. Biol. Conserv. 144(10), 2512–2516 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards DP, Laurance SG. Green labelling, sustainability and the expansion of tropical agriculture: Critical issues for certification schemes. Biol. Conserv. 151(1), 60–64 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romijn H, Heijnen S, Arora S. Standardizing sustainability: certification of Tanzanian biofuel smallholders in a global value chain. In: Sustainable Value Chain Management: A Research Anthology. Lindgreen A, Sankar S, Maon F, Vanhamme J (Eds). Gower Press, 473–488 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Efroymson RA, Dale VH, Kline KL et al. Environmental Indicators of biofuel sustainability: what about context? Environ. Manage. 51(2), 291–306 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatiwada D, Seabra J, Silveira S, Walter A. Accounting greenhouse gas emissions in the lifecycle of Brazilian sugarcane bioethanol: methodological references in European and American regulations. Energy Policy 47, 384–397 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogelpohl T, Hirschl B. Soziale Kriterien in der freiwilligen Zertifizierung von Biokraftstoffen - Demokratische Legitimität in nicht-staatlichen Governanceformen. Ökologisches Wirtschaften 1, 30–34 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• German L, Schoneveld GC. Social sustainability of EU-approved voluntary schemes for biofuels. Implications for rural livelihoods. In: Working Paper 75 CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 24 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• RSB. RSB Screening Tool. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 26 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Lee N, George C. Environmental Assessment in Developing and Transitional Countries: Principles, Methods and Practice. Wiley, (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Jay S, Jones C, Slinn P, Wood C. Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect. Environ. Impact Asses. Rev. 27(4), 287–300 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RSB. Certificates. Roundtable on Sustainable Biomaterials, Lausanne, Switzerland, 23 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• ISCC. Alle zertifikate. ISCC System GmbH, Köln, Germany (2014).
   Google Scholar
• 2BSvs. Economic operators - Certified operator data base. In: Biomass Biofuels Sustainability Voluntary Scheme, 2BSvs (2014).
   Google Scholar
• RSPO. Certified growers. Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 51 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• RTRS. Certified companies chain of custody. RTRS International Technical Group (ITG), Buenos Aires (2014).
   Google Scholar
• RTRS. Certified producers. RTRS International Technical Group (ITG), Buenas Aires (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Bonsucro. Certified members. Bonsucro, London (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Bailis R. Brazil: biodiesel. In: Sustainable Development of Biofuels in Latin America and the Caribbean.Solomon BD, Bailis R (Eds). Springer, New York, 103–126 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• USDA FAS.Colombia Biofuels Annual: 2013. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Washington, DC (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Goh CS, Junginger M, Joudrey J, Chum H. Task 3: Impacts of Sustainability Certification on Bioenergy Markets and Trade. IEA Bioenergy, Paris (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Fortin E. Multi-stakeholder initiatives to regulate biofuels: the Roundtable for Sustainable Biofuels. In: International Conference on Global Land Grabbing. International Institute of Social Studies in The Hague, Sussex University (2011).
   Google Scholar
• RSB. Indicators of Compliance for the RSB Principles & Criteria. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne,, Lausanne, Switzerland, 81 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Ponte S. ‘Roundtabling’ sustainability: Lessons from the biofuel industry. Geoforum 54, 261–271 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upham P, Tomei J, Dendler L. Governance and legitimacy aspects of the UK biofuel carbon and sustainability reporting system. Energy Policy 39(5), 2669–2678 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stupak I, Joudrey J, Smith CT, Cowie A, Englund O. Survey on Governance and Certification of Sustainable Biomass and Bioenergy. IEA Bioenergy, Paris, 68 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco P. Soybean and oil palm expansion in South America: a review of main trends and implications. In: CIFOR Working Paper. CIFOR, 28 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Zezza A. Sustainability certification in the biofuel sector: a case study of Brazilian ethanol. In: Discussion Paper 2013-03. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs and Sustainability Science Program – Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 37 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Hoefnagels R, Smeets E, Faaij A. Greenhouse gas footprints of different biofuel production systems. Renew. Sustain. Energ Rev. 14(7), 1661–1694 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Voet E, Lifset RJ, Luo L. Life-cycle assessment of biofuels, convergence and divergence. Biofuels 1(3), 435–449 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Börjesson P. Good or bad bioethanol from a greenhouse gas perspective – what determines this? Appl. Energ. 86(5), 589–594 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza SP, Pacca S, de Ávila MT, Borges JLB. Greenhouse gas emissions and energy balance of palm oil biofuel. Renew. Energ. 35(11), 2552–2561 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chum H, Faaij A, Moreira J et al. Bioenergy. In: IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. Edenhofer O, Pichs Madruga R, Sokona Y et al. (Eds). IPCC, Bonn, chapter2 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Bailis R, McCarthy H. Carbon impacts of direct land use change in semiarid woodlands converted to biofuel plantations in India and Brazil. GCB Bioenerg. 3(6), 449–460 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plevin RJ, O’Hare M, Jones AD, Torn MS, Gibbs HK. Greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels’ indirect land use change are uncertain but may be much greater than previously estimated. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44(21), 8015–8021 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RTRS. RTRS Standard for Responsible Soy Production Version 1.0. RTRS International Technical Group (ITG), Buenas Aires (2010)
   Google Scholar
• RSPO. RSPO Principles and Criteria for Sustainable Palm Oil Production. Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 51 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Bonsucro. Bonsucro Production Standard - Principles and Criteria. Bonsucro, London, (2011).
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. Water Implications of Biofuels Production in the United States National Academies PressWashington, DC (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Tingey-Holyoak J, Pisaniello JD. Implications of biomass production and accountability for “water grabbing”. Sustain. Account. Manag. Policy J. 3(2), 262–275 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel D, Hepperly P, Hanson J, Douds D, Seidel R. Environmental, energetic, and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems. BioScience 55(7), 573–582 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BNDES. Sugarcane-based Bioethanol: Energy for Sustainable Development. Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Economico e Social (BNDES), Rio de Janeiro, 300 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Pérez MA, Peña MR, Alvarez P. Agro-industria cañera y uso del agua: análisis crítico en el contexto de la política de agrocombustibles en Colombia. Ambiente & Sociedade, 14(2), 153–178 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell D.A Note on Rising Food Prices. The World Bank, 19 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Rosegrant MW.Biofuels and Grain Prices: Impacts and Policy Responses. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, 4 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Runge CF, Senauer B. How Biofuels Could Starve the Poor. Foreign Aff. 86(3) (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Actionaid. Fueling the Food Crisis: the Cost to Developing Countries of US Corn Ethanol Expansion. ActionAid InternationalWashington, DC, 32 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• USDA. US Corn Trade. USDA, Washington, DC (2013).
   Google Scholar
• McMichael P. A food regime analysis of the ‘world food crisis’. Agric. Human Values 26(4), 281–295 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosillo-Calle F, Pelkmans L, Walter A. A global overview of vegetable oils, with reference to biodiesel. A Report for the Bioenergy Task, 40 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Altieri MA. Agroecology, small farms, and food sovereignty. Mon. Rev. 61(3), 102–113 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotula L, Dyer N, Vermeulen S. Fueling Exclusion?: The Biofuels Boom and Poor People's Access to Land. FAO and IIED, Rome (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Peskett L, Slater R, Stevens C, Dufey A. Biofuels, Agriculture and Poverty Reduction. Department For International Development: Programme of Advisory Support Services For Rural Livelihoods, London (2008)
   Google Scholar
• Alesina A, Rodrik D. Distributive Politics and Economic Growth. Q. J. Econ. 109(2), 465–490 (1994).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Ferranti DM. Inequality in Latin America: Breaking with History? World Bank (2004).
   Google Scholar
• García-López GA, Arizpe N. Participatory processes in the soy conflicts in Paraguay and Argentina. Ecol. Econ. 70(2), 196–206 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson A. Green governance or green grab? The biopolitics of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) and its processes in Ecuador. In: Global Land Grabbing II. Organized by the Land Deals Politics Initiative (LDPI), Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 24 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Glass V. “ In someone else's lands” Expansion of the soybean and sugarcane frontiers on indigenous territories in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. In: Brazil of Biofuels. Repórter Brasil, Brasilia, 62 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Gomes M, Biondi A, Brianezi T, Glass V. Brazil of biofuels: impacts of crops on land, environment and society - sugarcane 2009. In: Brazil of Biofuels. Amigos da Terra - Amazônia Brasileira, Centro de Tecnologia Alternativa (CTA), Instituto Centro de Vida (ICV), Portal Beef Point, Universidade Federal de Rondônia (UniR), Brasilia, 62 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Van Gelder J, Dros JM. From Rainforest to Chicken Breast: Effects of Soybean Cultivation for Animal Feed on People and Nature in the Amazon Region – A Chain of Custody Study. AIDEnvironment, Profundo, Amsterdam, (2006) 47.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Alier J. The EROI of agriculture and its use by the Via Campesina. J. Peasant Stud. 38(1), 145–160 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras Jr SM. La Vía Campesina and its global campaign for agrarian reform. J. Agrar. Change 8(2-3), 258–289 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RSPO. Promoting the Growth and Use of Sustainable Palm Oil. RSPO, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch P. Titling against grabbing? Critiques and conundrums around land formalisation in Southeast Asia. In: International Conference on Global Land Grabbing, 18 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• RSB. RSB Guidelines for Land Rights. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 23 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Jacques C. Biofuels Face Sharp Slowdown to 3.2% Annual Growth as Next-generation Fuels Emerge. Press Release, Lux Research, Inc. (2013). MVO. Market Analysis: Oils and Fats for Fuel. Product Board for Margarine, Fats and Oils. Rijswijk, The Netherlands (2009).
   Google Scholar