Flow optimization and performance evaluation of bioreactors for municipal solid waste treatment

References

• Kale SP. Nisargruna plant for Urban and Rural waste management, energy conservation, better environment and restoration of soil fertility. Bio-Energy News. 2003;7(3):13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Yadvika, Santosh TZ, Sreekrishna S, et al. Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques. Science Direct, Biosource Technology. October 2004;95(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonvillani P, Ferrari MP, Duros EM, et al. Theoretical and experimental study of the effects of scale-up on mixing time for a stirred tank bioreactor. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2006;23(1):1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douaire M, Morchain J, Liné A. Mini review: Relationship between hydrodynamic conditions and substrate influx toward cells. Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Mixing, London, UK; April, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ridenour W, Borole AP, Klasson KT, et al. Effect of mixing in anaerobic digester on conversion of farm waste to methane in 100l upflow bioreactor. 27th symposium on Biotechnology for fuel and chemicals, Denver, CO. Paper No. 5- 53; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Cibrorowski P. Anaerobic digestion in the dairy industry. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Air Innovation Conference; St. Paul, MN. 2004. Available from: www.epa.gove.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes TD, Jewell WJ, Dell'Orto S, et al. Digestion of Cattle Manure. Handout First International Symposium on Anaerobic Digestion: University College. Cardiff, Wales; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Kossmann W, Herbermehl S, Uta P. Basics of producing and using biogas from dung and organic waste materials. Biogas – country reports, Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH: Germany. Biogas Digest. 1999;I-IV:2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ononogbo C, Nwufo OC, Nwaiwu CF, et al. An innovative approach to construction and operation of biodigesters: A consderation of floating drum biogas plant. TLEP International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research. 2015;1(3):3. Available from: www.tlepub.org
   Google Scholar
• Williams RB, Jenkins BM, Nguyen D. Solid waste conversion: A review and database of current and emerging technologies. California Integrated Waste Management Board, Santa Rosa, CA; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Joshua R, Ruihong Z, Bryan MJ, et al. Current anaerobic digestion technologies used for treatment of municipal organic solid waste: A Report. California Integrated Waste Management Board, Santa Rosa, CA; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Edelmann W, Baier U, Engeli H. Environmental aspects of the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes of solid agricultural wastes. Water Science and Technology. 2005;52(1-2):203–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo S, Aramaki T, Hwang YW, et al. Environmental impact of solid waste treatment methods in Korea. Journal of Environmental Engineering-Asce. 2004;130(1): 81–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Baere L. Will anaerobic digestion of solid waste survive in the future? Water Science and Technology. 2006;53(8):187–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusuf MOL, Debora A, Ogheneruona DE. Ambient temperature kinetic assessment of biogas production from co-digestion of horse and cow dung. Res. Agr Engineering. 2011;57(3):97–104.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh P, Samanta A, Ray S. Kinetics based on mechanisms of COD reduction for industrial effluent in fenton process. International Journal of Chemical Technology. 2011;3:26–36.
   Google Scholar
• Budiyono IN, Sunarso JS. The kinetics of biogas production rate from cattle manure in batch mode. International Journal of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering. 2010;3:39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Agulanna CN. Development of integrated bioreactors for anaerobic digestion of organic municipal wastes. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Technology Owerri. Imo state, Nigeria; 2012.
   Google Scholar