A comparative exergoeconomic evaluation of biomass post-firing and co-firing combined power plants

References

• Macmillan P. Human development report 2009: Overcoming barriers: Human mobility and development. NY: Published for the United Nations Development Programme; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Stanek W, Czarnowska L, Kalina J. Application of life cycle thermo-ecological cost methodology for evaluation of biomass integrated gasification gas turbine based cogeneration. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014;70:1007–1017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu P. In: Biomass gasification, pyrolysis and torrefaction. Practical design and theory (2nd edition). London, UK: Elsevier Inc; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Luis E, Pérez A, Casas-Ledón Y, et al. Thermodynamic predictions of performance of a bagasse integrated gasification combined cycle under quasi-equilibrium conditions. Chem. Eng. J. 2014;258:402–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya A, Manna D, Paul B, et al. Biomass integrated gasification combined cycle power generation with supplementary biomass firing: Energy and exergy based performance analysis. Energy. 2011;36:2599–2610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnanapragasm NV, Reddy BV, Rosen MA. Optimum conditions for a natural gas combined cycle power generation system based on available oxygen when using biomass as supplementary fuel. Energy. 2009;34:816–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues M, Faaij Andre PC, Walter A. Techno-economic analysis of co-fired biomass integrated gasification/combined cycle systems with inclusion of economies of scale. Energy. 2003;28:1229–1258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen MA, Dincer I. Exergoeconomic analysis of power plants operating on various fuels. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2003;23:643–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsatsaronis G, Pisa J. Exergoeconomic evaluation and optimization of energy system; application to the CGAM problem. Energy. 1994;19:287–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltani S, Mahmoudi SMS, Yari M, et al. Thermodynamic analyses of an externally fired gas turbine combined cycle integrated with a biomass gasification plant. Energ. Convers. Manage. 2013;70:107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta A, Ganguly R, Sarkar L. Energy and exergy analyses of an externally fired gas turbine (EFGT) cycle integrated with biomass gasifier for distributed power generation. Energy. 2010;35:341–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco A, Giannini N. Perspectives for the use of biomass as fuel in combined cycle power plants. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2005;44:163–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltani S, Mahmoudi SMS, Yari M, et al. Thermodynamic analyses of a biomass integrated fired combined cycle. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2013;59:60–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter A, Rodrigues M, Overend R. Feasibility of co-firing (Biomass + Natural Gas). In: The fourth biomass conference of the Americas. Oakland, California, and USA; 1998, Proceedings vol. 2. Oxford: Elsevier; 1999. p. 1321–1327.
   Google Scholar
• Walter A, Llagostera J, Gallo WLR. Impact of gas turbine de-rating on the performance and economics of BIG-GT cycles. In: Advanced Energy Systems Division. Anaheim: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition; 1998. p. 67–72.
   Google Scholar
• Cocco D, Deiana P, Cau G. Performance evaluation of small size externally fired gas turbine (EFGT) power plants integrated with direct biomass dryers. Energy. 2006;31:1459–1471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert HP, Don WG. In: Perry's chemical engineers hand book (6th edition). NY, USA: McGraw Hill; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Soltani S, Mahmoudi SMS, Yari M, et al. A comparative exergoeconomic analysis of two biomass and co-firing combined power plants. Energy Convers. Manage. 2013;76:83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrakopoulou F, Boyano A, Cabrera M, et al. Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of a combined cycle power plant with chemical looping technology. Int. .J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2011;5:475–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran MJ, Shapiro HN, Boettner DD, et al. In: Fundamentals of engineering thermodynamics (7th Edition). NY, USA: Wiley; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Dincer I, Rosen MA. In: Exergy: Energy, environment and sustainable development (2nd edition). Oxford, UK: Elsevier; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kotas TJ. In: The exergy method of energy plant analysis. London: Butterworths; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Szargut J, Styrylska T. Approximate evaluation of exergy of fuels. Brennstoff Warme Kraft. 1964;16(12):589–596.
   Google Scholar
• Zainal ZA, Ali R, Lean CH. Prediction of performance of downdraft gasifier using equilibrium modeling for different biomass materials. Energy Convers. Manage. 2001;42:1499–1515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alauddin ZA. Performance and characteristics of a biomass gasifier system. PhD thesis, UK: University of Wales, College of Cardiff; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• EES (Engineering Equation Solver). V7.847, #92. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1992–2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran M. Thermal design and optimization. NY, USA: Wiley; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Economic Indicators. Marshall&Swift Equipment Cost Index. Chemical engineering; 2012;119(1):56.
   Google Scholar