Gas-releasing potential of biogas digestate

References

• Herrmann A. Biogas Production from Maize: Current State, Challenges and Prospects. 2. Agronomic and Environmental Aspects. Bioenerg Res. 2013;6(1):372–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. The Science of Climate Change. In: Houghton JT MFL, Callander BA, Harris N, Kattenberg AS, Maskell K, editor. Climate Change 1995. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of working group I of the Fithf Assessment Report of the Intergovernmenta Panel on Climate Change. In: Stocker TF, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, P.M. Midgley, editor. Climate Change 2013. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Groth A, Maurer C, Reiser M, et al. Determination of methane emission rates on a biogas plant using data from laser absorption spectrometry. Bioresour Technol. 2015;178:359–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oonk H, Koopmans J, Geck C, et al. Methane emission reduction from storage of manure and digestate-slurry. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences. 2015;12(1):121–137
   Google Scholar
• Baldé H, VanderZaag AC, Burtt SD, et al. Methane emissions from digestate at an agricultural biogas plant. Bioresour Technol. 2016;216:914–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husted S. Seasonal Variation in Methane Emission from Stored Slurry and Solid Manures. J Environ Qual. 1994;23(3):585–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltschmitt M, Hartmann H, Hofbauer H. Energie aus Biomasse. [Energy from Biomass]. 2 ed. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin; 2009. German.
   Google Scholar
• Boulamanti AK, Donida Maglio S, Giuntoli J, et al. Influence of different practices on biogas sustainability. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2013;53:149–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV). Act on granting priority to renewable energy sources. The renewable energy sources act [Internet]. 2012 June [cited 2018 May 25]. Available from: https://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/Publications/EEG-Amendment2012.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
   Google Scholar
• Nkoa R. Agricultural benefits and environmental risks of soil fertilization with anaerobic digestates: A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2014;34(2):473–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer C, Müller J. Ammonia (NH3) emissions during drying of untreated and dewatered biogas digestate in a hybrid waste-heat/solar dryer. Engineering in Life Sciences. 2012;12(3):321–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awiszus S, Meissner K, Reyer S, et al. Ammonia and methane emissions during drying of dewatered biogas digestate in a two-belt conveyor dryer. Bioresour Technol. 2018;247:419–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wächter M. Tabellenbuch der Chemie, Daten zur Analytik, Laborpraxis und Theorie. [Table book of chemistry, data for analysis, theory and pratical application] 1’st ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VHC Verlag &CO KGaA, Germany; 2012.German.
   Google Scholar
• Gioelli F, Dinuccio E, Balsari P. Residual biogas potential from the storage tanks of non-separated digestate and digested liquid fraction. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(22):10248–10251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerholm M, Isaksson S, Karlsson Lindsjö O, et al. Microbial community adaptability to altered temperature conditions determines the potential for process optimisation in biogas production. Applied Energy. 2018;226:838–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmer A, Naegele H-J, Sondermann J. How Efficient are Agitators in Biogas Digesters? Determination of the Efficiency of Submersible Motor Mixers and Incline Agitators by Measuring Nutrient Distribution in Full-Scale Agricultural Biogas Digesters. Energies. 2013;6(12):6255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naegele H, Lemmer A, Oechsner H, et al. Electric energy consumption of the full scale research biogas plant 'Unterer Lindenhof': Results of longterm and full detail measurements. Energies. 2012;5(12):5198–5214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Government of Germany. German Renewable Energy Act. [Internet]. 2014 Aug. [cited 2018 May 25]. Available from: https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/G/gesetz-fuer-den-ausbau-erneuerbarer-energien.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1
   Google Scholar
• Lindner J, Zielonka S, Oechsner H, et al. Effects of mechanical treatment of digestate after anaerobic digestion on the degree of degradation. Bioresour Technol. 2015;178:194–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naegele HJ, Lindner J, Merkle W, et al. Effects of temperature, pH and O2 on the removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas by external biological desulfurization in a full scale fixed-bed trickling bioreactor (FBTB). International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. 2013;6(1):69–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German Institute for Standardiziton (DIN). Characterization of sludges - Determination of dry residue and water content. DIN; 2001. DIN EN 12880:2001-02
   Google Scholar
• German Institute for Standardiziton (DIN). Sludge, treated biowaste, soil and waste - Determination of loss on ignition. DIN; 2012. DIN EN 15935:2012-11
   Google Scholar
• Möller K, Schulz R, Müller T. Substrate inputs, nutrient flows and nitrogen loss of two centralized biogas plants in southern Germany. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2010;87(2):307–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillingham M, VanderZaag A, Singh J, et al. Characterizing the Performance of Gas-Permeable Membranes as an Ammonia Recovery Strategy from Anaerobically Digested Dairy Manure. Membranes. 2017;7(4):59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller K, Müller T. Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: A review. Engineering in Life Sciences. 2012;12(3):242–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guštin S, Marinšek-Logar R. Effect of pH, temperature and air flow rate on the continuous ammonia stripping of the anaerobic digestion effluent. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2011;89(1):61–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hörnig G, Türk M, Wanka U. Slurry Covers to reduce Ammonia Emission and Odour Nuisance. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 1999;73(2):151–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebetrau J, Clemens J, Cuhls C, et al. Methane emissions from biogas-producing facilities within the agricultural sector. Engineering in Life Sciences. 2010;10(6):595–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrad M, Piringer M, Huber-Humer M. Determining methane emissions from biogas plants-Operational and meteorological aspects. Bioresour Technol. 2015;191:234–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldaner L, Wagner-Riddle C, VanderZaag AC, et al. Methane emissions from storage of digestate at a dairy manure biogas facility. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2018;258:96–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodhe LKK, Ascue J, Willén A, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from storage and field application of anaerobically digested and non-digested cattle slurry. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2015;199:358–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang J, Kwon G, Nam JH, et al. Carbon dioxide stripping from anaerobic digestate of food waste using two types of aerators. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2017;14(7):1397–1408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czubaszek R, Wysocka-Czubaszek A. Emissions of carbon dioxide and methane from fields fertilized with digestate from an agricultural biogas plant. 2018;32(1):29.
   Google Scholar