Energy and exergy efficiencies of four biomass cookstoves using wood chips

References

• Abeliotis K, Pakula C. Reducing health impacts of biomass burning for cooking—the need for cookstove performance testing. Energy Efficiency. 2013;6:585–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adkins E, Tyler E, Wang J, et al. Field testing and survey evaluation of household biomass cookstoves in rural sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2010;14:172–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adkins E, Chen J, Winiecki J, et al. Testing institutional biomass cookstoves in rural Kenyan schools for the Millennium Villages Project. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2010;14:186–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afanasyeva OV, Mingaleeva GR. Comprehensive exergy analysis of the efficiency of a low-capacity power plant with coal gasification and obtaining sulphur. Energy Efficiency. 2015;8:255–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora P, Das P, Jain S, et al. A laboratory based comparative study of Indian biomass cookstove testing protocol and Water Boiling Test. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2014;21:81–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur MFSR, Zahran S, Bucini G. On the adoption of electricity as a domestic source by Mozambican households. Energy Policy. 2010;38:7235–7249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoub J, Brunet E. Performance of large portable metal woodstoves for community kitchens. Renew Energy. 1996;7:71–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailis R, Ogle D, MacCarty N, et al. (2007a). The Water Boiling Test (WBT) Version 3.0, Household Energy and Health Programme, Shell Foundation, University of California Berkeley; Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bailis R, Berrueta V, Chengappa C, et al. Performance testing for monitoring improved biomass stove interventions: experiences of the Household Energy and Health Project. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2007;11:57–70.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard-Tremeer G, Jawurek HH. Comparison of five rural, wood burning cooking devices. Biomass Bioenergy. 1996;11:419–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrueta VM, Edwards RD, Masera OR. Energy performance of wood-burning cookstoves in Michoacan, Mexico. Renewable Energy. 2008;33:859–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birzer C, Medwell P, MacFarlane G, et al. A biochar-producing, dung-burning cookstove for humanitarian purposes. Procedia Engineering. 2014;78:243–249.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce N, Perez-Padilla R, Albalak R. Indoor air pollution in developing countries: a major environmental and public health challenge. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78:1078–1092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng L, Torres-Rojas D, Burford M, Whitlow TH, Lehmann J, Fisher EM. Fuel sensitivity of biomass cookstove performance. Appl Energy.. 2018;215:13–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dincer I, Rosen MA. (2007). Exergy, energy, environment and sustainable development. London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ekouevi K, Freeman KK, Soni R. (2014). Understanding the differences between cookstoves. LiveWire, a Knowledge Note Series for the Energy and Extractive Global Practice; World Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ganapathy T, Alagumurthi N, Gakkhar RP, et al. Exergy analysis of operating lignite fired thermal power plant. JESTR.. 2009;2:123–130.
   Google Scholar
• Geller HS. Fuel efficiency and performance of traditional and innovative cookstoves. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences Section C: Engineering Sciences. 1982;5:373–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granderson J, Sandhu JS, Vasquez D, et al. Fuel use and design analysis of improved wood burning cookstoves in the Guatemalan Highlands. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2009;33:306–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimsby LK, Rajabu HM, Treiber MU. Multiple biomass fuels and improved cook stoves from Tanzania assessed with the Water Boiling Test. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2016;14:63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner J, Uckert G, Graef F, et al. A quantitative performance assessment of improved cooking stoves and traditional three-stone-fire stoves using a two-pot test design in Chamwino, Dodoma, Tanzania. Environ Res Lett.. 2018;13:025002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepbasli A. A key review on exergetic analysis and assessment of renewable energy resources for a sustainable future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2008;12:593–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosier RH, Dowd J. Household fuel choice in Zimbabwe: an empirical test of the energy ladder hypothesis. Resources and Energy. 1987;9:347–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA (2016) World Energy Outlook 2016 Executive Summary. International Energy Agency, IEA/OECD: Paris, France. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WorldEnergyOutlook2016ExecutiveSummaryEnglish.pdf. (Accessed on September 6, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Jetter JJ, Kariher P. Solid-fuel household cook stoves: characterization of performance and emissions. Biomass Bioenergy. 2009;33:294–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jetter J, Zhao Y, Smith KR, et al. Pollutant emissions and energy efficiency under controlled conditions for household biomass cookstoves and implications for metrics useful in setting international test standards. Environ Sci Technol.. 2012;46:10827–10834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeuland MA, Pattanayak SK. Benefits and costs of improved cookstoves: assessing the implications of variability in health, forest and climate impacts. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinci Y, Hepbasli A, Dincer I. Efficiency assessment of an integrated gasifier/boiler system for hydrogen production with different biomass types. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2010;35:4991–5000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik SC, Reddy VS, Tyagi SK. Energy and exergy analyses of thermal power plants: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2011;15:1857–1872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik SC, Ranjan KR, Panwar NL. Optimum exergy efficiency of single-effect ideal passive solar stills. Energy Efficiency. 2013;6:595–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kshirsagar MP, Kalamkar VR. A comprehensive review on biomass cookstoves and a systematic approach for modern cookstove design. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014;30:580–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kees M, Feldmann L. The role of donor organisations in promoting energy efficient cook stoves. Energy Policy. 2011;39:7595–7599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar M, Kumar S, Tyagi SK. Design, development and technological advancement in the biomass cookstoves: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2013;26:265–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis JJ, Pattanayak SK. Who adopts improved fuels and cookstoves? A systematic review. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:637–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi F, Riva F, Bonamini G, et al. Laboratory protocols for testing of Improved Cooking Stoves (ICSs): A review of state-of-the-art and further developments. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2017;98:321–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L'Orange C, DeFoort M, Willson B. Influence of testing parameters on biomass stove performance and development of an improved testing protocol. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2012;16:3–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L'Orange C, Leith D, Volckens J, et al. A quantitative model of cookstove variability and field performance: implications for sample size. Biomass Bioenergy. 2015;72:233–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCarty N, Still D, Ogle D, et al. A laboratory comparison of the global warming impact of five major types of biomass cooking stoves. Energy Sustain Dev. 2008;12:56–65.
   Google Scholar
• MacCarty N, Still D, Ogle D. Fuel use and emissions performance of fifty cooking stoves in the laboratory and related benchmarks of performance. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2010;14:161–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamuye F, Lemma B, Woldeamanuel T. Emissions and fuel use erformance of two improved stoves and determinants of their adoption in Dodola, southeastern Ethiopia. Sustainable Environment Research. 2018;28:32–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobarak AM, Dwivedi P, Bailis R, et al. Low demand for nontraditional cookstove technologies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.. 2012;109:10815–10820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeher LP, Brauer M, Lipsett M, et al. Woodsmoke health effects: a review. Inhal Toxicol. 2007;19:67–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naterer GF, Regulagadda P, Dincer I. Exergy analysis of a thermal power plant with measured boiler and turbine losses. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2010;30:970–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochieng CA, Tonne C, Vardoulakis S. A comparison of fuel use between a low cost, improved wood stove and traditional three-stone stove in rural Kenya. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2013;58:258–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obeng GY, Mensah E, Ashiagbor G, et al. Watching the Smoke Rise Up: Thermal Efficiency, Pollutant Emissions and Global Warming Impact of Three Biomass Cookstoves in Ghana. Energies. 2017;10:641. doi: 10.3390/en10050641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obi OF, Ezema JC, Okonkwo WI. Energy performance of biomass cookstoves using fuel briquettes. Biofuels. 2017;. DOI:10.1080/17597269.2017.1374769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obi OF, Ezeoha SL, Okorie IC. Energetic performance of a top-lit updraft (TLUD) cookstove. Renewable Energy. 2016;99:730–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojeda K, Sanchez E, Kafarov V. Sustainable ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass-application of exergy analysis. Energy. 2011;36:2119–2128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal K, Jha MK, Gera P, et al. Experimental study on the performance evaluation and emission reduction potential of different cookstove models using standard design parameters and testing protocols. Biofuels. 2016;7:313–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal K, Jha MK, Gera P, et al. Energy and exergy analysis of a natural-draft improved biomass cookstove with varying quantities of different biomass feedstocks. Biofuels. 2018; DOI:10.1080/17597269.2018.1475711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey AK, Tyagi VV, Park SR, et al. Comparative experimental study of solar cookers using exergy analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;109:425–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panwar NL. Energetic and exergetic performance evaluation of improved biomass cookstoves. IJEX.. 2014;14:430–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SR, Pandey AK, Tyagi VV, et al. Energy and exergy analysis of typical renewable energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014;30:105–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penner JE, Dickinson RE, O'Neill CA. Effects of aerosol from biomass burning on the global radiation budget. Science. 1992;256:1432–1434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Mercado I, Masera O, Zamora H, et al. Adoption and sustained use of improved cookstoves. Energy Policy. 2011;39:7557–7566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Mercado I, Masera O. Patterns of stove use in the context of fuel-device stacking: rationale and implications. Ecohealth. 2015;12:42–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saidur R, BoroumandJazi G, Mekhilef S, et al. A review on exergy analysis of biomass based fuels. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16:1217–1222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon GL, Bailis R, Baumgartner J, et al. Current debates and future research needs in the clean cookstove sector. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2014;20:49–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinton JE, Smith KR, Peabody J, et al. An assessment of programs to promote improved household stoves in China. Energy Sustainable Dev. 2004;8:33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Smith KR, Samet JM, Romieu I, et al. Indoor air pollution in developing countries and acute lower respiratory infections in children. Thorax. 2000a;5:518–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith KR, Uma R, Kishore V, et al. (2000b). Greenhouse gases from small-scale combustion devices in developing countries, phase IIA. Household stoves in India (EPA/600/R-00/052). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Sultana A, Kumar A, Harfield D. Development of agri-pellet production cost and optimum size. Bioresour Technol.. 2010;101:5609–5621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh R, Singh VK, Malik JK, et al. Evaluation of the performance of improved biomass cooking stoves with different solid biomass fuel types. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2016;95:27–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutar KB, Kohli S, Ravi MR, et al. Biomass cookstoves: A review of technical aspects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;41:1128–1166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyagi SK, Pandey AK, Sahu S, et al. Experimental study and performance evaluation of various cook stove models based on energy and exergy analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;111:1791–1799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyagi VV, Pandey AK, Kaushik SC, et al. Thermal performance evaluation of a solar air heater with and without thermal energy storage. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;107:1345–1352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyagi SK, Wang W, Kaushik SC, et al. Exergy analysis and parametric study of concentrating type solar collectors. Int J Therm Sci. 2007;46:1304–1310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tryner J, Willson BD, Marchese AJ. The effects of fuel type and stove design on emissions and efficiency of natural-draft semi-gasifier biomass cookstoves. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2014;23:99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urmee T, Gyamfi S. A review of improved cookstove technologies and programs. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2014;33:625–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Water Boiling Test 4.2.3 (2014). http://cleancookstoves.org/binary-data/DOCUMENT/file/000/000/399-1.pdf (Accessed August 30, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• WHO (2018). Opportunities for transition to clean household energy: application of the Household Energy Assessment Rapid Tool (HEART) in Ghana. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO). Licence: CC BYNC-SA 3.0 IGO.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong C, Peters CJ, Arons JS. Thermodynamics modelling of biomass conversion process. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2002;194–197:805–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar