Life-cycle assessment-based comparison of different lignocellulosic ethanol production routes

References

• Rebitzer G, Ekvall T, Frischknecht R, et al. Life cycle assessment: Part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ Int. 2004;30(5):701–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington DW, Potting J, Finnveden G, et al. Life cycle assessment Part 2: current impact assessment practice. Environ Int. 2004;30(5):721–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palma-Rojas S, Caldeira-Pires A, Nogueira JM. Environmental and economic hybrid life cycle assessment of bagasse-derived ethanol produced in Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2017;22(3):317–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilar-Sanchez P, Navarro-Pineda F, Sacramento-Rivero J, et al. Life-cycle assessment of bioethanol production from sweet sorghum stalks cultivated in the state of Yucatan, Mexico. Clean Techn Environ Policy. 2018;20(7):1685–1696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olofsson J, Barta Z, Borjesson P, et al. Integrating enzyme fermentation in lignocellulosic ethanol production: life-cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10(1):51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borrion AL, McManus MC, Hammond GP. Environmental life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic conversion to ethanol: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16(7):4638–4650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shonnard DR, Klemetsrud B, Sacramento-Rivero J, et al. A review of environmental life cycle assessments of liquid transportation biofuels in the pan American region. Environ Manage. 2015;56(6):1356–1376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales M, Quintero J, Conejeros R, et al. Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic bioethanol: Environmental impacts and energy balance. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;42:1349–1361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A, Pant D, Korres NE, et al. Key issues in life cycle assessment of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: Challenges and perspectives. Bioresource Technol. 2010;101(13):5003–5012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherubini F, Strømman AH. Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. Bioresource Technol. 2011;102(2):437–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiloso EI, Heijungs R, de Snoo GR. LCA of second generation bioethanol: a review and some issues to be resolved for good LCA practice. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16(7):5295–5308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKone TE, Nazaroff WW, Berck P, et al. Grand challenges for life-cycle assessment of biofuels. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(5):1751–1756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadam KL. Environmental benefits on a life cycle basis of using bagasse-derived ethanol as a gasoline oxygenate in India. Energy Policy. 2002;30(5):371–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soam S, Kumar R, Gupta RP, et al. Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol from sugarcane molasses in northern and western India and its impact on Indian biofuel programme. Energy. 2015;83:307–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsiropoulos I, Faaij APC, Seabra JEA, et al. Life cycle assessment of sugarcane ethanol production in India in comparison to Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2014;19(5):1049–1067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandade P, Bakshi BR, Yadav GD. Ethanol from Indian agro-industrial lignocellulosic biomass: a life cycle evaluation of energy, greenhouse gases, land and water. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2015;20(12):1649–1658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soam S, Borjesson P, Sharma PK, et al. Life cycle assessment of rice straw utilization practices in India. Bioresource Technol. 2017;228:89–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soam S, Kapoor M, Kumar R, et al. Global warming potential and energy analysis of second generation ethanol production from rice straw in India. Appl Energy. 2016;184:353–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spatari S, Bagley DM, MacLean HL. Life cycle evaluation of emerging lignocellulosic ethanol conversion technologies. Bioresource Technol. 2010;101(2):654–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad A, Sotenko M, Blenkinsopp T, et al. Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment methods in biofuel production. Int J Life Cycle Assess.. 2016;21(1):44–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello S, Ríos C, Feijoo G, et al. Comparative evaluation of lignocellulosic biorefinery scenarios under a life-cycle assessment approach. Biofuels, Bioprod Bioref. 2018;12(6):1047–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lask J, Wagner M, Trindade LM, et al. Life cycle assessment of ethanol production from miscanthus: A comparison of production pathways at two European sites. GCB Bioenergy. 2019;11(1):269–288.
   Google Scholar
• Sukumaran RK, Surender VJ, Sindhu R, et al. Lignocellulosic ethanol in India: Prospects, challenges and feedstock availability. Bioresource Technol. 2010;101(13):4826–4833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardona Alzate CA, Sánchez Toro OJ. Energy consumption analysis of integrated flowsheets for production of fuel ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. Energy. 2006;31(13):2447–2459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare [internet]. New Delhi: Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare, Government of India; [cited 2019 October 1]. Available from: http://ppqs.gov.in/divisions/cib-rc/major-uses-of-pesticides
   Google Scholar
• Renouf MA, Wegener MK, Nielsen LK. An environmental life cycle assessment comparing Australian sugarcane with US corn and UK sugar beet as producers of sugars for fermentation. Biomass Bioenergy. 2008;32(12):1144–1155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Confederation of Indian Industry. Estimation of energy and carbon balance of biofuels in India. New Delhi: Department of Biotechnology, Government of India; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Malik L, Tiwari G, Mohan D. Promoting low carbon transport in India: assessment of heavy duty vehicle characteristics in Delhi. New Delhi: Magnum Custom Publishing; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Baidya S, Borken-Kleefeld J. Atmospheric emissions from road transportation in India. Energy Policy. 2009;37(10):3812–3822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal BCJ, Dien BS, Ting KC, et al. Influence of feedstock particle size on lignocellulose conversion - a review. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2011;164(8):1405–1421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shastri YN, Rodriguez LF, Hansen AC, et al. Impact of distributed storage and pre-processing on Miscanthus production and provision systems. Biofuels, Bioprod Bioref. 2012;6(1):21–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupont C, Chiriac R, Gauthier G, et al. Heat capacity measurements of various biomass types and pyrolysis residues. Fuel. 2014;115:644–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothe CG, de Miranda IC. Characterization of sugarcane and coconut fibers by thermal analysis and FTIR. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2009; 97(2):661–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastern Research Group. Report on revisions to 5th edition AP-42, Section 1.3., Fuel Oil Combustion. Research Triangle Park, NC: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. Airs Facility Subsystem Source Classification Codes and Emission Factor Listing For Criteria Air Pollutants. Research Triangle Park, NC: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, United States Environmental Protection Agency; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Botha T, von Blottnitz H. A comparison of the environmental benefits of bagasse-derived electricity and fuel ethanol on a life-cycle basis. Energy Policy. 2006;34(17):2654–2661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar