The pre-acidification gas impact on upgrading the biogas produced in expanded granular sludge bed reactor

References

• Rouse S. Precise biogas flow measurement: overcoming the challenges of changing gas composition. 2013; p. 1–7. Available from: https://www.sierrainstruments.com/userfiles/file/wpsierrabiogas.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Golpour H, Boravelli T, Smith JD, et al. Production of syngas from biomass using a downdraft gasifier. IJERA. 2017;7(6):61–71.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong Q, Yang Y, Xu F, et al. Overview of computational fluid dynamics simulation of reactor-scale biomass pyrolysis. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2017;5(4):2783–2798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbanian M. Enhancement of anaerobic digestion of actual industrial wastewaters: reactor stability and kinetic. Louisville: University of Louisville; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Saleh MM, Mahmood UF. Uasb/Egsb applications for industrial wastewater treatment. Water Technol. 2003;2003:335–344.
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbanian M, Lupitskyy RM, Satyavolu JV, et al. Impact of hydraulic retention time at constant organic loading rate in a two-stage expanded granular sludge bed reactor. Environ Eng Sci. 2014;31(6):317–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalvo S, Guerrero L, Borja R, et al. Treatment of wastewater from red and tropical fruit wine production by zeolite anaerobic fluidized bed reactor. J Environ Sci Heal Part B Pestic Food Contam Agric Wastes. 2008;43(5):437–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JD, Alembath A, Al-Rubaye H, et al. Validation and application of a kinetic model for downdraft biomass gasification simulation. Chem Eng Technol. 2019;42(12):2505–2519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Hu J, Lee D-J. Biogas from anaerobic digestion processes: research updates. Renew Energy. 2016;98:108–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbas A. Political, economic and environmental impacts of biofuels: a review. Appl Energy. 2009;86(Suppl 1):S108–S117.
   Google Scholar
• Lee TS, Cho JH, Chi SH. Carbon dioxide removal using carbon monolith as electric swing adsorption to improve indoor air quality. Build Environ. 2015;92:209–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sridhar S, Smitha B, Aminabhavi TM. Separation of carbon dioxide from natural gas mixtures through polymeric membranes - a review. Sep Purif Rev. 2007;36(2):113–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guido GD, Pellegrini LA, Besagni G, et al. Acid gas removal from natural gas by water washing. Chem Eng Trans. 2017;57:1129–1134.
   Google Scholar
• Osorio F, Torres JC. Biogas purification from anaerobic digestion in a wastewater treatment plant for biofuel production. Renew Energy. 2009;34(10):2164–2171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Rubaye H, Karambelkar S, Shivashankaraiah MM, et al. Process simulation of two-stage anaerobic digestion for methane production. Biofuels. 2017;10(2):111–181.
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbanian M, Lupitskyy RM, Satyavolu JV, et al. Impact of supplemental hydrogen on biogas enhancement and substrate removal efficiency in a two-stage expanded granular sludge bed reactor. Environ Eng Sci. 2014;31(5):253–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo G, Angelidaki I. Integrated biogas upgrading and hydrogen utilization in an anaerobic reactor containing enriched hydrogenotrophic methanogenic culture. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109(11):2729–2736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim SJ. Comparisons between the UASB and the EGSB reactor. Iowa State Univ Publ. 2011;17(1969):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Luo G, Angelidaki I. Co-digestion of manure and whey for in situ biogas upgrading by the addition of H(2): process performance and microbial insights. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97(3):1373–1381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Rubaye H, Smith JD, Shivashankaraiah MM, et al. The impact of hydraulic retention time and operating temperature on biofuel production and process wastewater treatment. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif. 2018;129:171–180.,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo G, Johansson S, Boe K, et al. Simultaneous hydrogen utilization and in situ biogas upgrading in an anaerobic reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109(4):1088–1094.,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandra JN, Stronach LM, Rudd T. Anaerobic digestion processes in industrial wastewater treatment. Berlin: Springer, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn Y-H, Min K-S, Speece RE. Pre-acidification in anaerobic sludge bed process treating brewery wastewater. Water Res. 2001;35(18):4267–4276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James A, Chernicharo CA, Campos CM. The development of a new methodology for the assessment of specific methanogenic activity. Water Res. 1990;24(7):813–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton DW. Anaerobic digestion of animal manures: understanding the basic processes. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service BAE-1747. Oklahoma: Oklahoma State University; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Fang C, Boe K, Angelidaki I. Biogas production from potato-juice, a by-product from potato-starch processing, in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) and expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactors. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(10):5734–5741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho Y, Young JC. Prediction Of Gas Production And Cod Removal Of Two-Stage Cyclic Anaerobic Filters By Mass Transfer Models. Environ. Eng. Res, 6(4): 211–222.
   Google Scholar
• Hulshoff Pol LW, De Castro Lopes SI, Lettinga G, et al. Anaerobic sludge granulation. Water Res. 2004;38(6):1376–1389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasar A, Ahmad N, Chaudhry MN, et al. Sludge granulation and efficiency of phase separator in UASB reactor treating combined industrial effluent. J Environ Sci. 2007;19(5):553–558.,
   Google Scholar
• Keyser M, Witthuhn RC, Ronquest L-C, et al. Treatment of winery effluent with upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) – granular sludges enriched with Enterobacter sakazakii. Biotechnol Lett. 2003;25(22):1893–1898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkanok G, Demirel B, Onay TT. Determination of biogas generation potential as a renewable energy source from supermarket wastes. Waste Manag. 2014;34(1):134–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder R, Thomas P. Biological wastewater treatment for industrial effluents: technology and operation. Balk: Paques; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Pakarinen O, Kaparaju P, Rintala J. The effect of organic loading rate and retention time on hydrogen production from a methanogenic CSTR. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(19):8952–8957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajeshwari KV, Balakrishnan M, Kansal A, et al. State-of-the-art of anaerobic digestion technology for industrial wastewater treatment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2000;4(2):135–156.,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim K, Klasson KT, Drescher S, et al. Mesophilic digestion kinetics of manure slurry. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2007;142(3):231–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girault R, Rousseau P, Steyer JP, et al. Combination of batch experiments with continuous reactor data for ADM1 calibration: application to anaerobic digestion of pig slurry. Water Sci Technol. 2011;63(11):2575–2582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang LK, Ivanov V, Tay J-H. Environmental biotechnology. vol. 10, no. 1. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Dhir A, Ram C. Design of an anaerobic digester for wastewater treatment. Int J Adv Res Eng Appl Sci. 2012;1(5):56–66.
   Google Scholar