Bioethanol fuel quality assessment using dielectric spectroscopy

References

• Alfonsín V, Maceiras R, Gutiérrez C. Bioethanol production from industrial algae waste. Waste Manag. 2019;87:791–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayodele BV, Alsaffar MA, Mustapa SI. An overview of integration opportunities for sustainable bioethanol production from first- and second-generation sugar-based feedstocks. J Cleaner Prod. 2020;245:118857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusuf AA, Inambao FL. Bioethanol production from different Matooke peels species: a surprising source for alternative fuel. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2019;13:100357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang R, Zhou L, Hua J, et al. Experimental investigation on combustion characteristics in dual-fuel dual-injection engine. Energy Convers Manage. 2019;181:15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oseev A, Zubtsov M, Lucklum R. Octane number determination of gasoline with a phononic crystal sensor. Procedia Eng. 2012;47:1382–1385.
   Google Scholar
• Abdul Jameel AG, Van Oudenhoven V, Emwas A-H, et al. predicting octane number using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and artificial neural networks. Energy Fuels. 2018;32(5) :6309–6329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdul Jameel AG, Sarathy S. Prediction of RON and MON of gasoline-ethanol usin, G 1H NMR spectroscopy. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Badra J, AlRamadan AS, Sarathy SM. Optimization of the octane response of gasoline/ethanol blends. Appl Energy. 2017;203:778–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Álvarez A, Lapuerta Mn, Agudelo JR. Prediction of flash-point temperature of alcohol/biodiesel/diesel fuel blends. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2019;58(16) :6860–6869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldana DA, Starck L, Mougin P, et al. Prediction of flash points for fuel mixtures using machine learning and a novel equation. Energy Fuels. 2013; 27(7) :3811–3820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradelle F, Leal Braga S, Fonseca de Aguiar Martins AR, et al. Experimental assessment of some key physicochemical properties of diesel-biodiesel-ethanol (DBE) blends for use in compression ignition engines. Fuel. 2019;248:241–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos DC, Dall’Oglio EL, de Sousa PT, et al. Investigation of dielectric properties of the reaction mixture during the acid-catalyzed transesterification of Brazil nut oil for biodiesel production. Fuel. 2014;117:957–965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan L, Feng XL, Li ZC, et al. Determination of octane numbers for clean gasoline using dielectric spectroscopy. Fuel. 2009;88(8):1453–1459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarein M, et al. Prediction and optimization of fish biodiesel characteristics using permittivity properties. J Agric Sci Technol. 2019;21(2):309–322.
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez A, Fayos-Fernández J, Monzó-Cabrera J, et al. Measurement and correlation of the dielectric properties of a grape pomace extraction media. Effect of temperature and composition. J Food Eng. 2017;197:98–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardabili S, Mosavi A, Várkonyi-Kóczy AR. Systematic review of deep learning and machine learning models in biofuels research. In International Conference on Global Research and Education. 2019. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nabipour N, Daneshfar R, Rezvanjou O, et al. Estimating biofuel density via a soft computing approach based on intermolecular interactions. Renewable Energy. 2020;152:1086–1098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostami A, Baghban A, Shirazian S. On the evaluation of density of ionic liquids: towards a comparative study. Chem Eng Res Des. 2019;147:648–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghban A, Kardani MN, Habibzadeh S. Prediction viscosity of ionic liquids using a hybrid LSSVM and group contribution method. J Mol Liq. 2017;236:452–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldana DA, Starck L, Mougin P, et al. Prediction of density and viscosity of biofuel compounds using machine learning methods. Energy Fuels. 2012;26(4):2416–2426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebayang AH, Masjuki HH, Ong HC, et al. Prediction of engine performance and emissions with Manihot glaziovii bioethanol – gasoline blended using extreme learning machine. Fuel. 2017;210:914–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silitonga AS, Masjuki HH, Ong HC, et al. Evaluation of the engine performance and exhaust emissions of biodiesel-bioethanol-diesel blends using kernel-based extreme learning machine. Energy. 2018;159:1075–1087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moayedi H, Aghel B, Foong LK, et al. Feature validity during machine learning paradigms for predicting biodiesel purity. Fuel. 2020;262:116498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson SO, Datta AK. Dielectric properties of food materials and electric field interactions. Handbook of microwave technology for food applications. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2001. p. 69–114.
   Google Scholar
• Ozbas EE, Aksu D, Ongen A, et al. Hydrogen production via biomass gasification, and modeling by supervised machine learning algorithms. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2019;44(32):17260–17268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzegar R, Moghaddam AA, Deo R, et al. Mapping groundwater contamination risk of multiple aquifers using multi-model ensemble of machine learning algorithms. Sci Total Environ. 2018;621:697–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshtegar B, Mert C, Kisi O. Comparison of four heuristic regression techniques in solar radiation modeling: Kriging method vs RSM, MARS and M5 model tree. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2018; 81:330–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanaeifar A, Bakhshipour A, de la Guardia M. Prediction of banana quality indices from color features using support vector regression. Talanta. 2016;148:54–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaseen ZM, Sulaiman SO, Deo RC, et al. An enhanced extreme learning machine model for river flow forecasting: State-of-the-art, practical applications in water resource engineering area and future research direction. J Hydrol. 2019;569:387–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz I, Yuksek G. Prediction of the strength and elasticity modulus of gypsum using multiple regression, ANN, and ANFIS models. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2009;46(4):803–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg A, Vijayaraghavan V, Tai K, et al. Model development based on evolutionary framework for condition monitoring of a lathe machine. Measurement. 2015;73:95–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano S, Sorichetti P. Correlations between electrical properties and flash point with methanol content in biodiesel. Chem Phys Res J. 2009;3(2/3):259–268.
   Google Scholar
• Muley PD, Boldor DJBt. Investigation of microwave dielectric properties of biodiesel components. Bioresour Technol. 2013;127:165–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano SD, Sorichetti PA. Dielectric spectroscopy in biodiesel production and characterization.Springer Science & Business Media; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins DM. The problem of overfitting. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004; 44(1) :1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barzegar R, Ghasri M, Qi Z, et al. Using bootstrap ELM and LSSVM models to estimate river ice thickness in the Mackenzie River basin in the northwest territories, Canada. J Hydrol. 2019;577:123903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar