Hydrogen production via biomass gasification: simulation and performance analysis under different gasifying agents

References

• Safarian S, Khodaparast P, Kateb M. Modeling and technical-economic optimization of electricity supply network by three photovoltaic systems. J Sol Energy Eng. 2014;136(2):024501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajaeifar MA, Akram A, Ghobadian B, et al. Environmental impact assessment of olive pomace oil biodiesel production and consumption: a comparative lifecycle assessment. Energy. 2016;106:87–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talebnia F, Karakashev D, Angelidaki I. Production of bioethanol from wheat straw: an overview on pretreatment, hydrolysis and fermentation. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(13):4744–4753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safarian S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C. Techno-economic analysis of power production by using waste biomass gasification. JPEE. 2020;08(06):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sarıdemir S, Ağbulut Ü. Combustion, performance, vibration and noise characteristics of cottonseed methyl ester–diesel blends fuelled engine. Biofuels. 2019;1–10.doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2019.1667658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng J, Xiao R, Zhang H, et al. Chemical looping pyrolysis-gasification of biomass for high H2/CO syngas production. Fuel Process Technol. 2017;168:116–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo H, Lin W, Song W, et al. Three dimensional full-loop CFD simulation of hydrodynamics in a pilot-scale dual fluidized bed system for biomass gasification. Fuel Process Technol. 2019;195:106146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar B, Bhardwaj N, Agrawal K, et al. Current perspective on pretreatment technologies using lignocellulosic biomass: an emerging biorefinery concept. Fuel Process Technol. 2020;199:106244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi P, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Development and assessment of an integrated biomass-based multi-generation energy system. Energy. 2013;56:155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shayan E, Zare V, Mirzaee I. Hydrogen production from biomass gasification; a theoretical comparison of using different gasification agents. Energy Convers Manage. 2018;159:30–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue G, Zhang H, Zhao C, et al. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Fluidized Bed Combustion. Springer Science & Business Media; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Di Carlo A, Borello D, Bocci E. Process simulation of a hybrid SOFC/mGT and enriched air/steam fluidized bed gasifier power plant. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38(14):5857–5874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherubini F, Peters GP, Berntsen T, et al. CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming. GCB Bioenergy. 2011;3(5):413–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huda A, Mekhilef S, Ahsan A. Biomass energy in Bangladesh: current status and prospects. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2014;30:504–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safarian S, Unnþórsson R, Richter C. A review of biomass gasification modelling. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2019;110:378–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safarian S, Sattari S, Hamidzadeh Z. Sustainability assessment of biodiesel supply chain from various biomasses and conversion technologies. Biophys Econ Resour Qual. 2018;3(2):6.
   Google Scholar
• Safarian S, Sattari S, Unnthorsson R, et al. Prioritization of bioethanol production systems from agricultural and waste agricultural biomass using multi-criteria decision making. Biophys Econ Resour Qual. 2019;4(1):4.
   Google Scholar
• Safarian S, Unnthorsson R. An assessment of the sustainability of lignocellulosic bioethanol production from wastes in Iceland. Energies. 2018;11(6):1493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inayat A, Raza M, Khan Z, et al. Flowsheet modeling and simulation of biomass steam gasification for hydrogen production. Chem Eng Technol. 2020;43(4):649–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safarian S, Ebrahimi Saryazdi SM, Unnthorsson R, et al. Artificial neural network integrated with thermodynamic equilibrium modeling of downdraft biomass gasification-power production plant. Energy. 2020; 213:118800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safarian S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C. The equivalence of stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric methods for modeling gasification and other reaction equilibria. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2020;131:109982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo P-C, Wu W, Chen W-H. Gasification performances of raw and torrefied biomass in a downdraft fixed bed gasifier using thermodynamic analysis. Fuel. 2014;117:1231–1241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramzan N, Ashraf A, Naveed S, et al. Simulation of hybrid biomass gasification using Aspen plus: a comparative performance analysis for food, municipal solid and poultry waste. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;35(9):3962–3969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordillo G, Annamalai K, Carlin N. Adiabatic fixed-bed gasification of coal, dairy biomass, and feedlot biomass using an air–steam mixture as an oxidizing agent. Renewable Energy. 2009;34(12):2789–2797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• All Power Laboratories Berkeley, CA: APL; 2012. Available from: http://www.allpowerlabs.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Safarian S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C. Simulation and performance analysis of integrated gasification–syngas fermentation plant for lignocellulosic ethanol production. Fermentation. 2020;6(3):68.
   Google Scholar
• Safarian S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C. Performance analysis and environmental assessment of small-scale waste biomass gasification integrated CHP in Iceland. Energy. 2020; 197:117268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcantonio V, De Falco M, Capocelli M, et al. Process analysis of hydrogen production from biomass gasification in fluidized bed reactor with different separation systems. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2019;44(21):10350–10360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balat H, Kırtay E. Hydrogen from biomass–present scenario and future prospects. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2010;35(14):7416–7426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin M, Svensson N, Fonseca J, et al. Quantifying the environmental performance of integrated bioethanol and biogas production. Renewable Energy. 2014;61:109–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon SJ, Son Y-I, Kim Y-K, et al. Gasification and power generation characteristics of rice husk and rice husk pellet using a downdraft fixed-bed gasifier. Renewable Energy. 2012;42:163–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safarian S, Saboohi Y, Kateb M. Evaluation of energy recovery and potential of hydrogen production in Iranian natural gas transmission network. Energy Policy. 2013;61:65–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çağlar A, Demirbaş A. Hydrogen rich gas mixture from olive husk via pyrolysis. Energy Convers Manage. 2002;43(1):109–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frigo S, Spazzafumo G. Cogeneration of power and substitute of natural gas using biomass and electrolytic hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2018;43(26):11696–11705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Song G, Xiao J, et al. Exergy analysis of biomass staged-gasification for hydrogen-rich syngas. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2019;44(5):2569–2579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin H, Fan C, Wei W, et al. Evolution of pore structure and produced gases of Zhundong coal particle during gasification in supercritical water. J Supercrit Fluids. 2018;136:102–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omar MM, Munir A, Ahmad M, et al. Downdraft gasifier structure and process improvement for high quality and quantity producer gas production. J Inst Energy. 2018;91(6):1034–1044.
   Google Scholar
• Safarian S, Richter C, Unnthorsson R. Waste biomass gasification simulation using aspen plus: performance evaluation of wood chips, sawdust and mixed paper wastes. JPEE. 2019;07(06):12–30.
   Google Scholar
• Safarian S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C. Simulation of small-scale waste biomass gasification integrated power production: a comparative performance analysis for timber and wood waste. IJAPE. 2020;9(2):147–152.
   Google Scholar
• Safarian S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C. Techno-economic and environmental assessment of power supply chain by using waste biomass gasification in Iceland. Biophys Econ Sust. 2020;5(2):7.
   Google Scholar
• Safarianbana S, Unnthorsson R, Richter C, editors. Development of a new stoichiometric equilibrium-based model for wood chips and mixed paper wastes gasification by ASPEN Plus. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition; 2019: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Damartzis T, Michailos S, Zabaniotou A. Energetic assessment of a combined heat and power integrated biomass gasification–internal combustion engine system by using Aspen Plus®. Fuel Process Technol. 2012;95:37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi N, Tanaka M, Piao G, et al. High temperature air-blown woody biomass gasification model for the estimation of an entrained down-flow gasifier. Waste Manag. 2009;29(1):245–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen TLT, Hermansen JE, Nielsen RG. Environmental assessment of gasification technology for biomass conversion to energy in comparison with other alternatives: the case of wheat straw. J Cleaner Prod. 2013;53:138–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porcu A, Sollai S, Marotto D, et al. Techno-economic analysis of a small-scale biomass-to-energy BFB gasification-based system. Energies. 2019;12(3):494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy D, Samanta S, Ghosh S. Thermo-economic assessment of biomass gasification-based power generation system consists of solid oxide fuel cell, supercritical carbon dioxide cycle and indirectly heated air turbine. Clean Techn Environ Policy. 2019;21(4):827–845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil J, Corella J, Aznar MP, et al. Biomass gasification in atmospheric and bubbling fluidized bed: effect of the type of gasifying agent on the product distribution. Biomass Bioenergy. 1999;17(5):389–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meramo-Hurtado SI, Puello P, Cabarcas A. Process analysis of hydrogen production via biomass gasification under computer-aided safety and environmental assessments. ACS Omega. 2020;5(31):19667–19681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakyai T, Authayanun S, Patcharavorachot Y, et al. Exergoeconomics of hydrogen production from biomass air-steam gasification with methane co-feeding. Energy Convers Manage. 2017;140:228–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu P. Combustion and gasification in fluidized beds. CRC Press; Boca Raton, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Boerrigter H, Rauch R. Review of applications of gases from biomass gasification. ECN Biomassa, Kolen en Milieuonderzoek. 2006;20:211–230.
   Google Scholar
• Puig-Arnavat M, Bruno JC, Coronas A. Review and analysis of biomass gasification models. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2010;14(9):2841–2851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moneti M, Di Carlo A, Bocci E, et al. Influence of the main gasifier parameters on a real system for hydrogen production from biomass. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2016;41(28):11965–11973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safarian S, Bararzadeh M. Exergy analysis of high-performance cycles for gas turbine with air-bottoming. J Mech Eng Res. 2012;5(2):38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Adeniyi AG, Ighalo JO, Amosa MK. Modelling and simulation of banana (Musa spp.) waste pyrolysis for bio-oil production. Biofuels. 2019;1–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2018.1554949
   Google Scholar
• Tauqir W, Zubair M, Nazir H. Parametric analysis of a steady state equilibrium-based biomass gasification model for syngas and biochar production and heat generation. Energy Convers Manage. 2019;199:111954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preciado JE, Ortiz-Martinez JJ, Gonzalez-Rivera JC, et al. Simulation of synthesis gas production from steam oxygen gasification of Colombian coal using Aspen Plus®. Energies. 2012;5(12):4924–4940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjardin M, Damen K, Faaij A. Techno-economic prospects of small-scale membrane reactors in a future hydrogen-fuelled transportation sector. Energy. 2006;31(14):2523–2555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li A, Liang W, Hughes R. The effect of carbon monoxide and steam on the hydrogen permeability of a Pd/stainless steel membrane. J Membr Sci. 2000;165(1):135–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrara A, Perdichizzi A, Barigozzi G. Simulation of an hydrogen production steam reforming industrial plant for energetic performance prediction. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2010;35(8):3499–3508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sircar S, Waldron WE, Anand M, et al. Hydrogen recovery by pressure swing adsorption integrated with adsorbent membranes Google Patents; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Pallozzi V, Di Carlo A, Bocci E, et al. Performance evaluation at different process parameters of an innovative prototype of biomass gasification system aimed to hydrogen production. Energy Convers Manage. 2016;130:34–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honeywell U. Years of PSA technology for H2 purification. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Lv P, Xiong Z, Chang J, et al. An experimental study on biomass air-steam gasification in a fluidized bed. Bioresour Technol. 2004;95(1):95–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbaş A. Calculation of higher heating values of biomass fuels. Fuel. 1997;76(5):431–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayah T, Aye L, Fuller RJ, et al. Computer simulation of a downdraft wood gasifier for tea drying. Biomass Bioenergy. 2003;25(4):459–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahmani M, Périlhon C, Marvillet C, et al. editors. Development of a fixed bed gasifier model and optimal operating conditions determination. AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty W, Reynolds A, Kennedy D. Simulation of a circulating fluidised bed biomass gasifier using ASPEN Plus: a performance analysis. Proc. 21st International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems, 1241–1248. Krakow, Poland, 2008. doi:https://doi.org/10.21427/3aae-7t77.
   Google Scholar