Investigation of the attitudes of Greek consumers towards the biofuel’s consumption using social acceptance theory

References

• Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 May 2003on the promotion of the use of biofuels or other renewable fuels for transport. 2003 May 8.
   Google Scholar
• Moioli E, Salvati F, Chiesa M, et al. Analysis of the current world biofuel production under a water–food–energy nexus perspective. Adv Water Resour. 2018;121:22–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr A, Raman S. Lessons from first generation biofuels and implications for the sustainability appraisal of second-generation biofuels. Energy Policy. 2013;63(100):114–122.
   Google Scholar
• Tariq M, Ali S, Khalid N. Activity of homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts, spectroscopic and chromatographic characterization of biodiesel: a review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2012;16(8):6303–6316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aro EM. From first generation biofuels to advanced solar biofuels. Ambio. 2016;45(S1):24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Binod P, Gnansounou E, Sindhu R, et al. Enzymes for second generation biofuels: recent developments and future perspectives. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2019;5:317–325.
   Google Scholar
• Jatoi AS, Abbasi SA, Hashmi Z, et al. Recent trends and future perspectives of lignocellulose biomass for biofuel production: a comprehensive review. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2021;1:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Foteinis S, Chatzisymeon E, Litinas A, et al. Used-cooking-oil biodiesel: Life cycle assessment and comparison with first-and third-generation biofuel. Renewable Energy. 2020;153:588–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alalwan HA, Alminshid AH, Aljaafari HA. Promising evolution of biofuel generations. Subject review. Renewable Energy Focus. 2019;28:127–139.
   Google Scholar
• Mofijur M, Siddiki SYA, Shuvho MBA, et al. Effect of nanocatalysts on the transesterification reaction of first, second and third generation biodiesel sources-a mini-review. Chemosphere. 2021;270:128642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilal M, Iqbal H. Recent advancements in the life cycle analysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Curr Sustainable Renewable Energy Rep. 2020;7(3):100–107.
   Google Scholar
• Phwan CK, Ong HC, Chen W-H, et al. Overview: comparison of pretreatment technologies and fermentation processes of bioethanol from microalgae. Energy Convers Manage. 2018;173:81–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mofijur M, Rasul MG, Hassan NMS, et al. Recent development in the production of third generation biodiesel from microalgae. Energy Proc. 2019;156:53–58.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Wang K, Chen Y, et al. Third-generation biorefineries as the means to produce fuels and chemicals from CO2. Nat Catal. 2020;3(3):274–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaloudas D, Pavlova N, Penchovsky R. Lignocellulose, algal biomass, biofuels and biohydrogen: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 2021;19(4):2809–2824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batel S. Research on the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies: past, present and future. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2020;68:101544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauter R, Watson J. Micro-generation: a disruptive innovation for the UK energy system? Governing Technol Sustainability. 2007;1:110–128.
   Google Scholar
• Wüstenhagen R, Wolsink M, Bürer MJ. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept. Energy Policy. 2007;35(5):2683–2691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dael M, Lizin S, Swinnen G, et al. Young people’s acceptance of bioenergy and the influence of attitude strength on information provision. Renewable Energy. 2017;107:417–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Lucia L, Ericsson K. Low-carbon district heating in Sweden – examining a successful energy transition. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2014;4:10–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lee GE, Loveridge S, Joshi S. Local acceptance and heterogeneous externalities of biorefineries. Energy Econ. 2017;67:328–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu M, Ahponen P, Tahvanainen L, et al. Chinese university students’ knowledge and attitudes regarding forest bio- energy. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2011;15(8):3649–3657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southwell B, Ronneberg K, Shen K, et al. Energy information engagement among the poor: Predicting participation in a free workshop. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2014;4:21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Negash M, Swinnen JFM. Biofuels and food security: micro- evidence from Ethiopia. Energy Policy. 2013;61:963–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.C S, Khanal SK, Shrestha P, et al. Current status of renewable energy in Nepal: opportunities and challenge. Renewable and Sustainable Energy. 2011;15(8):4107–4117.
   Google Scholar
• Kortsch Τ, Hildebrand J, Schweizer-Ries P. Acceptance of biomass plants – results of a longitudinal study in the bioenergy-region Altmark. Renewable Energy. 2015;83:690–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar