Optimizing the grass bio methanation in lab scale reactor utilizing response surface methodology

References

• Nges IA, Escobar F, Fu X, et al. Benefits of supplementing an industrial waste anaerobic digester with energy crops for increased bio-gas production. Waste Manage. 2012;32(1):53–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal S, Ahlgren EO, Shukla PR. Barriers to biogas dissemination in India: a review. Energy Policy. 2018;112:361–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souk S, Shen V, Yan M, et al. Biogas production from Napier Grass and cattle slurry using a green energy technology. Int J Innov Res Sci Stud. 2021;4(3):174–180.
   Google Scholar
• Lohan SK, Dixit J, Kumar R, et al. Biogas: a boon for sustainable energy development in India’s cold climate. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;43(c):95–101.
   Google Scholar
• Li P, Sakuragi K, Makino H. Extraction techniques in sustainable biofuel production: a concise review. Fuel Process Technol. 2019;193:295–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alalwan HA, Alminshid AH, Aljaafari HAS. Promising evolution of biofuel generations. Subject review. Renew Energy Focus. 2019;28:127–139.
   Google Scholar
• Achinas S, Achinas V, Willem Euverink GJ. A Technological overview of biogas production from biowaste. Engineering. 2017;3(3):299–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski KJ, Dubis BB, Bórawski WS, et al. Energy efficiency of crops grown for biogas production in a large-scale farm in Poland. Energy Elsevier. 2016;109(C):277–286.
   Google Scholar
• Mast B, Lemmer A, Oechsner H, et al. Methane yield potential of novel perennial biogas crops influenced by harvest date. Indus Crops Products. 2014;58:194–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinuevo-Salces B, Larsen SU, Ahring BK, et al. Biogas production from catch crops: evaluation of biomass yield and methane potential of catch crops in organic crop rotations. Biomass Bioenergy. 2013;59:285–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao M, Sukhesh J, Venkateswara P. Anaerobic Digestion of crop residues: technological developments and environmental impact in the Indian context. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2018;16:513–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEniry J, Padraig O. Anaerobic methane production from five common grassland species at sequential stages of maturity. Bioresour Technol. 2013;127:143–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beausang C, McDonnell K, Murphy F. Assessing the environmental sustainability of grass silage and cattle slurry for biogas production. J Clean Prod. 2021;298:126838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phuttaro C, Sawatdeenarunat C, Surendra KC, et al. Anaerobic digestion of hydrothermally-pretreated lignocellulosic biomass: in-fluence of pretreatment temperatures, inhibitors and soluble organics on methane yield. Bioresour Technol. 2019;284:128–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vats S, Maurya D, Shaimoon M, et al. Development of a microbial consortium for production of blend of enzymes for hydrolysis of agricultural wastes into sugars. J Sci Indus Res. 2013;72:585–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li QM, Li XJ, Jiang YL, et al. Analysis of degradation products and structural characterization of giant reed and Chinese silver grass pre-treated by 60Co-γ irradiation. Indus Crops Prod. 2016;83:307–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra R, Takeuchi H, Hasegawa T. Methane production from lignocellulosic agricultural crop wastes: a review in context to second generation of biofuel production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16(3):1462–1476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindmark J, Leksell N, Schnürer A, et al. Effects of mechanical pre-treatment on the biogas yield from ley crop silage. Appl Energy. 2012;97:498–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Cheng K, Liu D. Organosolv pre treatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;82(5):815–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rekha BN, Aniruddha BP. Performance Enhancement of batch anaerobic digestion of Napier grass by alkali pre-treatment. Int J Chem Tech Res. 2013;5:558–564.
   Google Scholar
• Kukde PK. Low cost power supply to farmers (without subsidy). Committee report. Nagpur: Institution of Engineers; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC, Wiley J. Design analysis of engineering experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson Cook CM. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Hoboken: Wiley; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Zahmatkesh S, Klemeš JJ, Bokhari A, et al. Reducing chemical oxygen demand from low strength wastewater: A novel application of fuzzy logic based simulation in MATLAB. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2022;166:107944 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box GEP, Wilson KB. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B. 1951;13(1):1–45.
   Google Scholar
• Akbarpour N, Salehi-Amiri A, Hajiaghaei-Keshteli M, et al. An innovative waste management system in a smart city under stochastic optimization using vehicle routing problem. Soft Comput. 2021;25(8):6707–6727. 10.1007/s00500-021-05669-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box GEP, Draper N. Response surfaces, mixtures, and ridge analyses. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Liao Y, Kaviyani-Charati M, Hajiaghaei-Keshteli M, et al. Designing a closed-loop supply chain network for citrus fruits crates considering environmental and economic issues. J. Manuf. Syst. 2020;55:199–220. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin RH, Sloane NJA. 1995. Computer-generated minimal (and larger) response surface designs: (i) the sphere.
   Google Scholar
• Abdi A, Abdi A, Akbarpour N, et al. Innovative approaches to design and address green supply chain network with simultaneous pick-UP AND split delivery. J. Cleaner Prod. 2020;250:119437 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahmatkesh S, Pirouzi A. Effects of the microalgae, sludge and activated carbon on the wastewater treatment with low organics (weak wastewater). Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2020;17(5):2681–2688. 10.1007/s13762-020-02661-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 1998. p. 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Abutaleb A, Imran M, Zouli N, et al. Fe3O4-multiwalled carbon nanotubes-bentonite as adsorbent for removal of methylene blue from aqueous solutions. Chemosphere. 2023;316:137824.
   Google Scholar
• Zahmatkesh S, Far SS, Sillanpaa M. RSM-D-optimal modelling approach for COD removal from low strength wastewater by microalgae, sludge, and activated carbon-case study. Mashhad J Hazard Mater Adv. 2022;7:100110.
   Google Scholar
• Zahmatkesh S, Klemes JJ, Bokhari A, et al. Reducing chemical oxygen demand from low strength wastewater: a novel application of fuzzy logic based simulation in MATLAB. Comput Chem Eng. 2022;166:107944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanathaworn J, Thararux C, Paoaiang J. Determining optimization of factors affecting biogas production by co-digestion of sweet corncob waste with wastewater using response surface methodology. J Renew Energy Smart Grid Technol. 2018;13(1). Open access. https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/RAST/article/view/65162
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Rao CR. eds. Design and analysis of experiments. Handbook of statistics. Vol. 13. 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Pukelsheim F. 2006. Optimal design of experiments. ISBN 978-0-89871-604-7.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Zahmatkesh S, Yang J, et al. Ultrasound-enhanced catalytic degradation of simulated dye wastewater using waste printed circuit boards: catalytic performance and artificial neuron network-based simulation. Environ Monit Assess. 2023;195(1):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stat-Ease. 2009. Design-expert 8 for windows: software for design of experiments (DOE).
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez C, Alaswad A, Benyounis KY, et al. Pretreatment techniques used in biogas production from grass. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;68(P2):1193–1204.
   Google Scholar
• Tedesco S, Benyounis KY, Olabi AG. Mechanical pretreatment effects on macroalgae digestion in Ireland. Energy. 2013;61(C):27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Warade H, Daryapurkar R, Nagarnaik PB. Review of biogas production from various substrates and co-substrates through different anaerobic reactor. Int J Emerg Technol. 2019;10(2):235–242.
   Google Scholar
• Rabah AB, Baki AS, Hassan LG, et al. Production of biogas waste at different retention time. Sci World J. 2010;5(4):23–26.
   Google Scholar
• Buendía IM, Francisco JF, José V, et al. Feasibility of anaerobic co-digestion as a treatment option of meat industry wastes. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(6):1903–1909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy JD, McCarthy K. Ethanol production from energy crops and wastes for use as a transport fuel in Ireland. Appl Energy. 2005;82(2):148–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy JD, Power NM. An argument for using biomethane generated from grass as a biofuel in Ireland. Biomass Bioenergy. 2009;33(3):504–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirne DG, Lehtomaki A, Bjornsson L, et al. Hydrolysis and microbial community analyses in two-stage anaerobic digestion of energy crops. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;103(3):516–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahmatkesh S, Hajiaghaei-Keshteli M, Bokhari A, et al. Wastewater treatment with nanomaterials for the future: a state-of-the-art review. Environ Res. 2022;216(3):114652.
   Google Scholar
• Zahmatkesh S, Klemeš J, Bokhari A, et al. Various advanced wastewater treatment methods to remove microplastics and prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to airborne microplastics. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2022:1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alawamleh HSK, Mousavi S, Ashoori D, et al. Wastewater management using coagulation and surface adsorption through different polyferrics in the presence of TiO2-g-PMAA particles. Water. 2022;15(1):145 10.3390/w15010145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(10):4044–4064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Xu F, Ge X, et al. Challenges and strategies for solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;44:824–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babaee A, Shayegan J, Roshani A. Anaerobic slurry co-digestion of poultry manure and straw: effect of organic loading and temperature. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2013;11(1):15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li Y, Park SY, Zhu J. Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15(1):821–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahmatkesh S, Amiri MK, Zaferani SP, et al. Machine learning modeling of polycarbonate ultrafiltration membranes at different temperatures, Al2O3 nanoparticle volumes, and water ratios. Chemosphere. 2023;313:137424.
   Google Scholar
• Salminen E, Rintala J. Anaerobic digestion of organic solid poultry slaughterhouse waste: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2002;83(1):13–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parawira W, Read JS, Mattiasson B, et al. Energy production from agricultural residues: high methane yields in pilot-scale two-stage anaerobic digestion. Biomass Bioenergy. 2008;32(1):44–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza TSO, Carvajal A, Donoso-Bravo A, et al. ADM1 calibration using BMP tests for modelling the effect of autohydrolysis pre-treatment on the performance of continuous sludge digesters. Water Res. 2013;47(9):3244–3254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajeena BB, Jose PP, Madhu G. Optimization of process parameters affecting bio-gas production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste via anaerobic digestion. Int J Bioeng Life Sci. 2014;8(1):43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Mata-Alvarez J. Biomethanization of the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes. IWA Publishing; 2005. ISBN:9781780402994
   Google Scholar
• Zahmatkesh S, Ni B-J, Klemes JJ, et al. Carbon quantum dots-Ag nanoparticle membrane for preventing emerging contaminants in oil produced water. J Water Process Eng. 2022;50:103309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawatdeenarunat C, Sung S, Khanal SK. Enhanced volatile fatty acids production during anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass via micro oxygenation. Bioresour Technol. 2017;10:139–145.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang L, Wang J, Liang S, et al. Butyric acid fermentation in a fibrous bed bioreactor with immobilized Clostridium tyrobutyricum from cane molasses. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(13):3403–3409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei D, Liu X, Yang ST. Butyric acid production from sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate by Clostridium tyrobutyricum immobilized in a fibrous-bed bioreactor. Bioresour Technol. 2013;129:553–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eraky M, Jin K, Zhang Q, et al. Acidogenic biorefinery of rice straw for volatile fatty acids production via sequential two-stage fermentation: effects of pre-treatments. Environ Technol Innov. 2021;23:101686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budiyono W, Johari IN, Sunarso S. The Influence of total solid contents on biogas yield from cattle manure using rumen fluid inoculum. Energy Res J. 2010;1(1):6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Riggio V, Comino E, Rosso M. Energy production from anaerobic co-digestion processing of cow slurry, olive pomace and apple pulp. Renew Energy Elsevier. 2015;83(C):1043–1049.
   Google Scholar
• Keanoi N, Hussaro K, Teekasap S. Effect of with/without agitation of agricultural waste on biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion: a small scale. Am J Environ Sci. 2014;10(1):74–85.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Yang G, Li F, et al. Response surface optimization of methane potentials in anaerobic co-digestion of multiple substrates: dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw. Waste Manage Res. 2013;31(1):60–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari K, Khandeshwar S, Waghmare C, et al. Experimental evaluation of industrial mushroom waste substrate using hybrid mechanism of vermicomposting and effective microorganisms. Materials. 2022;15(9):2963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari K, Shrikhande A, Malik MA, et al. Optimization and operational analysis of domestic greywater treatment by electrocoagulation filtration using response surface methodology. Sustainability. 2022;14(22):15230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahmatkesh S, Rezakhani Y, Chofreh AG, et al. SARS-CoV-2 removal by mix matrix membrane: a novel application of artificial neural network based simulation in MATLAB for evaluating wastewater reuse risks. Chemosphere. 2023;310:136837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar