To conform or to transform? A comparative case analysis of the societal embedding of biogas systems

References

• Mühl DD, de Oliveira L. Features of anaerobic digestion plants in the Brazilian agricultural sector. Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy. 2022;1:100001. doi: 10.1016/j.clcb.2021.100001.
   Google Scholar
• Silva dos Santos IF, Braz Vieira ND, de Nóbrega LGB, et al. Assessment of potential biogas production from multiple organic wastes in Brazil: impact on energy generation, use, and emissions abatement. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2018;131:54–63. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börjesson P, Berglund M. Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—part II: the environmental impact of replacing various reference systems. Biomass Bioenergy. 2007;31(5):326–344. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Oliveira LGS, Negro SO. Contextual structures and interaction dynamics in the Brazilian biogas innovation system. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2019;107:462–481. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanger L, Geels FW, Sovacool B, et al. Technological diffusion as a process of societal embedding: lessons from historical automobile transitions for future electric mobility. Transportation Res Part D: Transport and Environ. 2019;71:47–66. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith A, Raven R. What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, Special Section on Sustainability Transitions. 2012;41(6):1025–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, Damsgaard J. What’s wrong with the diffusion of innovation theory? In: Ardis MA, Marcolin BL, editors. Diffusing software product and process innovations, IFIP—the international federation for information processing. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2001; p. 173–190. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-35404-0_11.
   Google Scholar
• Geels FW, Johnson V. Towards a modular and temporal understanding of system diffusion: adoption models and socio-technical theories applied to Austrian biomass district-heating (1979–2013). Energy Res Soc Sci. 2018;38:138–153. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp R, Volpi M. The diffusion of clean technologies: a review with suggestions for future diffusion analysis. J Cleaner Production, Diffusion of Cleaner Technol: modeling, Case Studies and Policy. 2008;16(1):S14–S21. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigboldus S, Leeuwis C. Towards responsible scaling up and out in agricultural development (No. CDI-13-023). Wageningen UR: Centre for Development Innovation; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wigboldus S, Klerkx L, Leeuwis C, et al. Systemic perspectives on scaling agricultural innovations. A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2016;36(3):46. doi: 10.1007/s13593-016-0380-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip A, Kemp R. Technological change. In Human choice and climate change. Vol. II, Resources and Technology. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press; 1998; p. 327–399.
   Google Scholar
• Mylan J, Morris C, Beech E, et al. Rage against the regime: niche-regime interactions in the societal embedding of plant-based milk. Environ Innovation Societal Transitions. 2019;31:233–247. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2018.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanda W, Geissdoerfer M, Hjelm O. From circular business models to circular business ecosystems. Bus Strat Env. 2021;30(6):2814–2829. doi: 10.1002/bse.2895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW, Raven R. Non-linearity and expectations in Niche-Development trajectories: ups and downs in Dutch Biogas Development (1973–2003). Technol Anal Strategic Manage. 2006;18(3-4):375–392. doi: 10.1080/09537320600777143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottosson M, Magnusson T, Andersson H. Shaping sustainable markets—a conceptual framework illustrated by the case of biogas in Sweden. Environ Innovation Societal Transitions. 2020;36:303–320. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2019.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos-Mejía M, Franco-Garcia M-L, Jauregui-Becker JM. Sustainability transitions in the developing world: challenges of socio-technical transformations unfolding in contexts of poverty. Environmental Science & Policy. 2018;84:217–223. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieczorek AJ. Sustainability transitions in developing countries: major insights and their implications for research and policy. Environ Sci Policy. 2018;84:204–216. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW, Pieters T, Snelders S. Cultural enthusiasm, resistance and the societal embedding of new technologies: psychotropic drugs in the 20th century. Technol Anal Strategic Manage. 2007;19(2):145–165. doi: 10.1080/09537320601168052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes TP. Networks of power : electrification in Western society, 1880-1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Deuten J, Rip A, Jelsma J. Societal embedding and product creation management. Technol Anal Strategic Manage. 1997;9(2):131–148. doi: 10.1080/09537329708524275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW. Disruption and low-carbon system transformation: progress and new challenges in socio-technical transitions research and the multi-level perspective. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2018;37:224–231. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson T, Berggren C. Competing innovation systems and the need for redeployment in sustainability transitions. Technol Forecasting Social Change. 2018;126:217–230. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.08.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson M, Anderberg S. Dimensions and characteristics of biogas policies – modelling the european policy landscape. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2021;135:110200. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen L, Benneworth P, Truffer B. Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy. 2012;41(6):968–979. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho L, Mingardo G, Van Haaren J. Green urban transport policies and cleantech innovations: evidence from Curitiba, Göteborg and Hamburg. Eur Planning Studies. 2012;20(3):375–396. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.651801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ABiogás. O potencial brasileiro do biogás. São Paulo: Abiogás; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• CIBiogás. Foz do Iguaçu: BiogasMap; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• IBGE. Cidades. Brasília: IBGE; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira MV. 2009. O Programa de Despoluição da Baía de Guanabara. Entraves institucionais e impactos territoriais na Região Metropolitana do Rio De Janeiro [MSc thesis Geography xiv, p. 89. p. 25il]. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ.
   Google Scholar
• Lofhagen JCP, Bollmann HA, Scott C. Collective agro-energy generation in family agriculture: the ajuricaba condominium case study in Brazil. R Tecnol Soc. 2018;14(34):35–61. doi: 10.3895/rts.v14n34.7626.
   Google Scholar
• Kanda W, Zanatta H, Magnusson T, et al. Policy coherence in a fragmented context: the case of biogas systems in Brazil. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2022;87:102454. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth S, Markard J, Truffer B, et al. Informal institutions matter: professional culture and the development of biogas technology. Environ Innovation Societal Transitions. 2013;8:20–41. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2013.06.002.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson B, Stankiewicz R. On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. J Evol Econ. 1991;1(2):93–118. doi: 10.1007/BF01224915.
   Google Scholar
• Raven R, Schot J, Berkhout F. Space and scale in socio-technical transitions. Environ Innovation Societal Transitions. 2012;4:63–78. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2012.08.001.
   Google Scholar
• Geels FW. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, Nelson + WINTER +. 2002;31(8–9):1257–1274. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider BR. The developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspectives. Rev Econ Polit. 2015;35(1):114–132. doi: 10.1590/0101-31572015v35n01a07.
   Google Scholar
• Verbong G, Christiaens W, Raven R, et al. Strategic niche management in an unstable regime: biomass gasification in India. Environmental Science & Policy, Socio-Technical Experiments in Asia – a Driver for Sustainability Transition. 2010;13(4)? :272–281. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.01.004.
   Google Scholar