Multi-label classification algorithms for composite materials under infrared thermography testing

References

• Ciampa F, Mahmoodi P, Pinto F, et al. Recent advances in active infrared thermography for non-destructive testing of aerospace components. Sensors. 2018;18(2):609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katunin A, Dragan K, Dziendzikowski M. Damage identification in aircraft composite structures: a case study using various non-destructive testing techniques. Compos Struct. 2015;127:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Péronnet E, Pastor M, Huillery R, et al., Non-destructive investigation of defects in composite structures by three infrared thermographic techniques. In 15thInternational Conference on Experimental Mechanics, Porto, Portugal. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Montanini R. Quantitative determination of subsurface defects in a reference specimen made of Plexiglas by means of lock-in and pulse phase infrared thermography. Infrared Phys Technol. 2010;53(5):363–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findeis D, Gryzagoridis J, Lombe C. Comparing infrared thermography and ESPI for NDE of aircraft composites. Insight - Non-Destructive Test Condition Monit. 2010;52:5.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra-Castanedo C, Genest M, Guibert S, et al. Inspection of aerospace materials by pulsed thermography, lock-in thermography, and vibrothermography: a comparative study. SPIE. 2007;6541:321–329.
   Google Scholar
• Bendada A, Erchiqui F, Lamontagne M. Pulsed thermography in the evaluation of an aircraft composite using 3D thermal quadrupoles and mathematical perturbations. Inverse Problems. 2005;21(3):857–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Hung Y, Ng S, et al. Review and comparison of shearography and active thermography for nondestructive testing and evaluation (NdT&E). SPIE. 2009;7375:1139–1144.
   Google Scholar
• Zalameda J, Rajic N, Winfree W. A comparison of image processing algorithms for thermal nondestructive evaluation. SPIE. 2003;5073:374–385.
   Google Scholar
• Madruga FJ, Ibarra-Castanedo C, Conde OM, et al. Infrared thermography processing based on higher-order statistics. NDT & E Int. 2010;43(8):661–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavilov VP, Burleigh DD. Review of pulsed thermal NDT: physical principles, theory and data processing. NDT & E Int. 2015;73:28–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Ye L, Li E, et al. Gapped smoothing algorithm applied to defect identification using pulsed thermography. Case Stud NondestrTest Eval. 2015;30(2):171–195.
   Google Scholar
• Guo X, Vavilov V. Pulsed thermographic evaluation of disbonds in the insulation of solid rocket motors made of elastomers. Polymer Testing. 2015;45:31–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez F, Ibarra-Castanedo C, de Paulo Nicolau V, et al. Optimization of pulsed thermography inspection by partial least-squares regression. NDT & E Int. 2014;66:128–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang Y-S, Yan Z, Wang K-H, et al. Non-destructive testing of CFRP using pulsed thermography and multi-dimensional ensemble empirical mode decomposition. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2016;61:54–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Tinsley L, Addepalli S, et al. A coefficient clustering analysis for damage assessment of composites based on pulsed thermographic inspection. NDT & E Int. 2016;83:59–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grammatikos SA, Kordatos EZ, Matikas TE, et al., Service and maintenance damage assessment of composite structures using various modes of infrared thermography. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; Bristol, UK. 2015;74:012006.
   Google Scholar
• Almond DP, Angioni SL, Pickering SG. Long pulse excitation thermographic non-destructive evaluation. NDT & E Int. 2017;87:7–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora V, Siddiqui JA, Mulaveesala R, et al. Pulse compression approach to nonstationary infrared thermal wave imaging for nondestructive testing of carbon fiber reinforced polymers. IEEE Sens J. 2015;15(2):663–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ley O, Butera M, Godinez V. Inspection of composite structures using line scanning thermography. SPIE. 2012;8354:28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ley O, Godinez V, Line scanning thermography and its application inspecting aerospace composites. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on NDT in Aerospace, Singapore, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes H, Zhang H, Figueiredo A, et al. Machine learning and infrared thermography for fiber orientation assessment on randomly-oriented strands parts. Sensors (Basel). 2018;18(1):288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Fernandes H, Djupkep Dizeu FB, et al. Pulsed micro-laser line thermography on submillimeter porosity in carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites: experimental and numerical analyses for the capability of detection. Appl Opt. 2016;55(34):D1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodayar F, Lopez F, Ibarra-Castanedo C, et al. Optimization of the inspection of large composite materials using robotized line scan thermography. J Nondestr Eval. 2017;36(2):32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedala Y, Streza M, Sepulveda F, et al. Infrared lock-in thermography crack localization on metallic surfaces for industrial diagnosis. J Nondestr Eval. 2014;33(3):335–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roemer J, Uhl T, Pieczonka L, Laser spot thermography for crack detection in aluminum structures, 7th International Symposium on NDT in Aerospace, 16. 18. Nov 2015, Bremen, Germany (AeroNDT 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Sakagami T, Ogura K. A new flaw inspection technique based on infrared thermal images under joule effect heating. Trans Jpn Soc Mech Eng Series A. 1992;58(555):2224–2231.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki Y, Todoroki A, Mizutani Y, et al. Impact damage detection in CFRP using statistical analysis of resistance-temperature characteristics. J Solid Mech Mater Eng. 2011;5(1):33–43.
   Google Scholar
• Abry JC, Bochard S, Chateauminois A, et al. In situ detection of damage in CFRP laminates by electrical resistance measurements. Compos Sci Technol. 1999;59(6):925–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte K, Baron C. Load and failure analyses of CFRP laminates by means of electrical resistivity measurements. Compos Sci Technol. 1989;36(1):63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki Y, Todoroki A, Matsuzaki R, et al. Impact-damage visualization in CFRP by resistive heating: development of a new detection method for indentations caused by impact loads. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2012;43(1):53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki Y, Todoroki A, Matsuzaki R, et al. Indentation-damage visualization in CFRP by resistive heating: analytical verification of the inspection of aircraft using its lightning protection systems. J Solid Mech Mater Eng. 2012;6(3):213–226.
   Google Scholar
• Grammatikos SA, Kordatos EZ, Barkoula NM, et al. Innovative non-destructive evaluation and damage characterisation of composite aerostructures using thermography. Plast Rubber Compos. 2011;40(6–7):342–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald-Tranta B. Detection and characterisation of short fatigue cracks by inductive thermography. Quant Infrared Thermogr J. 2022;19:239–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu K, Huang K, Sfarra S, et al. Factor analysis thermography for defect detection of panel paintings. Quant Infrared Thermogr J. 2021;0:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kim C, Park G, Jang H, et al. Automated classification of thermal defects in the building envelope using thermal and visible images. Quant Infrared Thermogr J. 2022;0:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Saeed N, Abdulrahman Y, Amer S, et al. Experimentally validated defect depth estimation using artificial neural network in pulsed thermography. Infrared Phys Technol. 2019;98:192–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed N, Omar MA, Abdulrahman Y. A neural network approach for quantifying defects depth, for nondestructive testing thermograms. Infrared Phys Technol. 2018;94:55–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erazo-Aux J, Loaiza-Correa H, Restrepo-Giron AD, et al. Thermal imaging dataset from composite material academic samples inspected by pulsed thermography. Data BR. 2020;32:106313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FLIR SystemsHigh Performance MWIR INSB Camera. Flir X6900sc. [ accessed on Sep 12, 2021]. Available online: https://www.flir.com/products/x6900sc-mwir/
   Google Scholar
• Szul T, Tabor S, Pancerz K. Application of the BORUTA algorithm to input data selection for a model based on rough set theory (RST) to prediction energy consumption for building heating. Energies. 2021;14:2779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Zhou Z. A review on multi-label learning algorithms. IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Eng. 2014;26:1819–1837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pushpa M, Karpagavalli S. Multi-label classification: problem transformation methods in tamil phoneme classification. Procedia Comput Sci. 2017;115:572–579.
   Google Scholar
• Adeleke A, Noor A, Shamsul S, et al. An improved multi-label classifier chain method for automated text classification. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2021. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120352
   Google Scholar
• Elena M, Robin S, Jose B, et al. Dependent binary relevance models for multi-label classification. Pattern Recogn. 2014;47:1494–1508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohri M, Rostamizadeh A, Talwalkar A, et al. Foundations of machine learning (Adaptive computation and machine learning series). London (UK): The MIT Press; Aug. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bonaccorso G. Machine learning algorithms: a reference guide to popular algorithms for data science and machine learning. Birmingham (UK): Packt Publishing; Jul. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Watt J, Borhani R, Katsaggelos AK. Machine learning refined, foundations, algorithms, and applications. 1st ed. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; Nov. 2016.
   Google Scholar