The Sequencing of Basic Chemistry Topics by Physical Science Teachers

References

• Berlach, R. G. (2004). Outcomes based education and the death of knowledge. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education conference, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/04pap.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H. (2007). Curriculum research: Towards a framework for ‘research-based curricula’. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 38(1), 35–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education (2003). National Curriculum Statement for grades 10–12 (general) Physical Sciences. Pretoria: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education (2006). Revised National Curriculum Statement FET Physical Sciences (NCS). Pretoria: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education (2011). National Curriculum Statement (NCS) Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS), further education and training grades 10–12, Physical Sciences (NCS). Pretoria: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Deters, K. M. (2006). What are we teaching in high school chemistry? Journal of Chemical Education, 83(10), 1492–1498. doi: 10.1021/ed083p1492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghirardi, M., Marchetti, F., Pettinari, C., Regis, A., & Roletto, E. (2014). A teaching sequence for learning the concept of chemical equilibrium in secondary school education. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(1), 59–65. doi: 10.1021/ed3002336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, T. V., & Johnstone, A. H. (1971). Reason or memory? The learning of formulae and equations, Edinburgh. National Curriculum Development Centre Bulletin 1.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of Chemistry – logical or psychological. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 1(1), 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, A. H. (2006). Chemical education research in Glasgow in perspective. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 7(2), 49–63.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X. (2013). Difficulties of items related to energy and matter: Implications for learning progression in high school chemistry. Educacion Quimica, 24(4), 416–422.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, F. E., Nerb, J., Lehtinen, E., & O’Shea, T. (2007). In order to learn: How the sequence of topics influences learning. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossini, F. D. (1967). A logical sequence of topics in teaching chemical thermodynamics, with special emphasis on the fundamental principles and their development. Lecture presented at the Symposium on Thermodynamics, Heidelberg, Germany. Retrieved September 30, 2014 from http://pac.iupac.org/publications/pac/pdf/1969/pdf/1803×0405.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. H., Wang, H. C., & McKnight, C. C. (2005). Curriculum coherence: An examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 525–559. doi: 10.1080/0022027042000294682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shayer, M., & Adey, P. (1981). Towards a science of science teaching: Cognitive development and curriculum demand (1st ed.). London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Sibanda, D. (2014). How teachers construct teaching–learning sequences in chemistry education in the Further Education and Training phase. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of KwaZulu–Natal, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Sibanda, D., & Hobden, P. (2015). Planning a teaching sequence for the teaching of chemical bonding. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(1), 23–33. doi: 10.1080/10288457.2014.1002298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in Chemistry: An overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 2–20.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, K. (2013). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: Drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemical Education: Research and Practice, 14, 156–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry ‘triplet’. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179–195. doi: 10.1080/09500690903386435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkel, B., De Vos, W., Verdonk, A. H., & Pilot, A. (2000). Normal science education and its dangers: The case of school Chemistry. Science & Education, 9(1), 123–159. doi: 10.1023/A:1008765531336
   Google Scholar
• Yoblinski, B. J. (2003). Sequencing general chemistry: A new more logical approach. Journal of College Science Teaching, 32, 382–387.
   Google Scholar
• Zeintek, L. R., & Thompson, B. (2009). Matrix summaries improve research reports: Secondary analyses using published literature. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 343–352. doi: 10.3102/0013189X09339056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar