The Validity and Reliability of an Instrument to Measure Physical Science Teachers’ Topic Specific Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Stoichiometry

References

• Abell, S.K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405–1416. doi: 10.1080/09500690802187041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydeniz, M., & Kirbulut, Z.D. (2014). Exploring challenges of assessing pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 147–166. doi: 10.1080/1359866X.2014.890696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, J.A., & Lederman, N.G. (1999). Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 147–161). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, T.G., & Fox, C.M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, W.J., & Rogan, J. (2005). Rigour in quantitative analysis: The promise of Rasch analysis techniques. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(1), 25–38. doi: 10.1080/10288457.2005.10740574
   Google Scholar
• Boone, W.J., Staver, J., & Yale, M.S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, J., & Daehler, K.R. (2019). Repositioning of PCK in teachers’ professional knowledge: The Refined Consensus Model of PCK. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning PCK in teachers’ professional knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Basic Education (2017). National senior certificate examination 2016 diagnostic report. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Basic Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fach, M., de Boer, T., & Parchmann, I. (2007). Results of an interview study as basis for the development of stepped supporting tools for stoichiometric problems. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(1), 13–31. doi: 10.1039/B6RP90017H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furio, C., Azcona, R., & Guisasola, J. (2002). The learning and teaching of the concepts ‘amount of substance’and ‘mole’: A review of the literature. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 3(3), 277–292. doi: 10.1039/B2RP90023H
   Google Scholar
• Geddis, A.N., & Wood, E. (1997). Transforming subject matter and managing dilemmas: A case study in teacher education. Teacher & Teacher Education, 13(6), 611–626. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(97)80004-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). Abington: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597–607.
   Google Scholar
• Green, K.E. (1996). Applications of the Rasch model to evaluation of survey data quality. New Directions for Evaluation, 70, 81–92. doi: 10.1002/ev.1036
   Google Scholar
• Gulacar, O., Overton, T.L., Bowmanc, C.R., & Fyneweverd, H. (2013). A novel code system for revealing sources of students’ difficulties with stoichiometry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 507–514. doi: 10.1039/C3RP00029J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, D.M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks Principle. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 419–469. doi: 10.3102/00346543060003419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M. (2011). The errors of our ways. Journal of Educational Measurement, 48(1), 12–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00128.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204. doi: 10.1080/03057260903142285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1978). The mole. Journal of Chemical Education, 55(11), 728–732. doi: 10.1021/ed055p728
   Google Scholar
• Kromrey, J.D., & Renfrow, D.D. (1991). Using multiple choice examination items to measure teachers’ content-specific pedagogical knowledge. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, K., Kleickmann, T., & Moeller, K. (2009). Measuring primary school teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in science education with open-ended and multiple-choice items. In M.F. Tasar & G. Cakmakci (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: Teaching (pp. 67–69). Ankara: ESERA.
   Google Scholar
• Liepertz, S., & Borowski, A. (2019). Testing the consensus model: Relationships among physics teachers’ professional knowledge, interconnectedness of content structure and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 890–910. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1478165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre, J.M. (2012). A user’s guide to winsteps® ministeps (Version 3.74.0) Retrieved from http://www.winsteps.com
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2012). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (2nd ed.). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm, S.A. (2015). The design and validation of an instrument to measure topic-specific pedagogical content knowledge in stoichiometry of Physical Sciences teachers. Unpublished Master of Science research report, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283672432
   Google Scholar
• Mavhunga, E. (2019). Exposing pathways for developing topic specific teacher professional knowledge. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning PCK in teachers’ professional knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mavhunga, E., & Rollnick, M. (2013). Improving pck of chemical equilibrium in pre-service teachers. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 17(1–2), 113–125. doi: 10.1080/10288457.2013.828406
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher, 18(2), 5–11. doi: 10.3102/0013189X018002005
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, I., Keast, S., Panizzon, D., & Mitchell, J. (2017). Using ‘big ideas’ to enhance teaching and student learning. Teachers and Teaching, 23(5), 596–610. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2016.1218328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Chen, Y.-C. (2012). Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from high school Biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 922–941. doi: 10.1002/tea.21022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Oliver, J.S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261–284. doi: 10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohaan, E.J., Taconis, R., & Jochems, W.M.G. (2009). Measuring teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in primary technology education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 27(3), 327–338. doi: 10.1080/02635140903162652
   Google Scholar
• Rollnick, M., & Mavhunga, E. (2015). The PCK summit and its effect on work in South Africa. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education (pp. 135–146). Abington: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. doi: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar