212
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

An Exploratory Study on the Alignment between the Different Levels of the Curriculum on Circuit Electricity

&

References

  • Baser, M. (2006). Effects of conceptual change and traditional confirmatory simulations on pre-service teachers’ understanding of direct current circuits. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(5–6), 367–381. doi: 10.1007/s10956-006-9025-3
  • Bhaw, N., & Kriek, J. (in press). The alignment of the Grade 12 physics examination and the CAPS curriculum: (November 2014- March 2018). South African Journal of Education.
  • Canrinus, E. T., Klette, K., Hammerness, K., & Bergem, O. K. (2019). Opportunities to enact practice in campus courses: Taking a student perspective. Teachers and Teaching, 25(1), 110–124. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2018.1526171
  • Dega, B., Kriek, J., & Mogese, T. (2013). Students’ conceptual change in electricity and magnetism using simulations: A comparison of cognitive perturbation and cognitive conflict. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(6), 677–698. doi: 10.1002/tea.21096
  • Department of Basic Education (DoBE). (2011). Curriculum and assessment policy statement (CAPS) grades 10-12: Physical sciences. Pretoria: Author.
  • Department of Basic Education (DoBE). (2014). Report on the national senior certificate examination: National diagnostic report on learner performance. Pretoria: Author.
  • Department of Basic Education (DoBE). (2015). Report on the national senior certificate examination: National diagnostic report on learner performance. Pretoria: Author.
  • Department of Basic Education (DoBE). (2016). Report on the national senior certificate examination: National diagnostic report on learner performance. Pretoria: Author.
  • Department of Basic Education (DoBE). (2017). Report on the national senior certificate examination: National diagnostic report on learner performance. Pretoria: Author.
  • Department of Basic Education (DoBE). (2018). Report on the national senior certificate examination: National diagnostic report on learner performance. Pretoria: Author.
  • Department of Basic Education (DoBE). (2019). Report on the national senior certificate examination: National diagnostic report on learner performance. Pretoria: Author.
  • Edwards, N. (2010). An analysis of the alignment of the Grade 12 physical sciences examination and the core curriculum in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 30(4), 571–590. doi: 10.15700/saje.v30n4a389
  • Gunstone, R., & Mulhall, P. J. (2009). Physics teachers’ perceptions of the difficulty of teaching electricity. Research in Science Education, 39, 515–538. doi: 10.1007/s11165-008-9092-y
  • Koszalka, T. A., Breman, J., & Moore, M. K. (1999). Sharing lesson plans over the World Wide Web: Important components. Education and Information Technologies, 4(2), 143–151. doi: 10.1023/A:1009647900657
  • Kriek, J., & Basson, I. (2008). Implementation of the new FET physical sciences curriculum: Teachers’ perspectives. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(sup1), 63–75. doi: 10.1080/10288457.2008.10740642
  • Kriek, J., & Grayson, D. (2009). A holistic professional development model for South African physical science teachers. South African Journal of Education, 29, 185–203.
  • Kumar, R. (2019). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. London: Sage.
  • McDermott, L. C., & Shaffer, P. S. (1992). Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part I: Investigation of student understanding. American Journal of Physics, 60(11), 994–1003. doi: 10.1119/1.17003
  • Moodley, K., & Gaigher, E. (2019). Teaching electric circuits: Teachers’ perceptions and learners’ misconceptions. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 73–89. doi: 10.1007/s11165-017-9615-5
  • Nakedi, M., Taylor, D., Mundalamo, F., Rollnick, M., & Mokeleche, M. (2012). The story of a physical science curriculum: Transformation or transmutation? African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(3), 273–288. doi: 10.1080/10288457.2012.10740745
  • Phaeton, M. J., & Stears, M. (2017). Exploring the alignment of the intended and implemented curriculum through teachers’ interpretation: A case study of a-level biology practical work. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 723–740. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00640a
  • Resnick, L. B., Rothmman, R., Slattery, J. B., & Vraneck, J. L. (2004). Benchmarking and alignment of standards and testing. Educational Assessment, 9(1–2), 1–27. doi: 10.1080/10627197.2004.9652957
  • Shimizu, Y. (2002, April). Discrepancies in perceptions of lesson structure between the teacher and the students in the mathematics classroom. In Interactive Symposium, “International Perspectives on Mathematics Classrooms”, at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
  • Squires, D. (2012). Curriculum alignment research suggests that alignment can improve student achievement. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 85(4), 129–135. doi: 10.1080/00098655.2012.657723
  • Tsanwani, A., Harding, A., Engelbrecht, J., & Maree, K. (2014). Perceptions of teachers and learners about factors that facilitate learners’ performance in mathematics in South Africa. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), 40–51. doi: 10.1080/10288457.2014.884262
  • Van den Akker, J. (2003). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper, & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1–10). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Van den Akker, J. (2007). Curriculum design research. In T. Plomp & N. Neiveen (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research (pp. 37–51). Enschede, The Netherlands: SLO.
  • Webb, N. L. (2007). Issues related to judging the alignment of curriculum standards and assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 20(1), 7–25. doi: 10.1080/08957340709336728
  • Welman, C., Kruger, F., & Mitchell, B. (2005). Research methodology (3rd ed.). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.