Teachers’ Use of Computer-based Simulations in Teaching Electrolysis: A Case Study in Eswatini

References

• Bong, A., & Lee, T. (2016). Form four students’ misconceptions in electrolysis of molten compounds and aqueous solutions. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1), article 8.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, O., & Taber, K. S. (2014). The many faces of high school chemistry. In N. G. Lederman & R. Schwartz (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education vol. 2 (pp. 457–480). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doymus, K., Karacop, A., & Simsek, U. (2010). Effects of jigsaw and animation techniques on students’ understanding of concepts and subjects in electrochemistry. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 671–691. doi: 10.1007/s11423-010-9157-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumon, A., & MzoughiKhadhraoui, I. (2014). Teaching chemical change modelling to Tunisian students: An expanded chemistry triplet for analysing teachers’ discourse. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(1), 70. doi: 10.1039/C3RP00126A
   Google Scholar
• Examination Council of Eswatini. (2016). Swaziland general certificate of secondary education (SGCSE) physical science examination reports. Ezulwini, Eswatini: Apollo Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK Summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jaakkola, T., & Nurmi, S. (2008). Fostering elementary school students’ understanding of simple electricity by combining simulation and laboratory activities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(4), 271–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00259.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaheru, S., & Kriek, J. (2016). The effect of computer simulations on acquisition of knowledge and cognitive load: A gender perspective. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(1), 67–79. doi: 10.1080/10288457.2016.1150558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kunnath, B., & Kriek, J. (2018). Exploring effective pedagogies using computer simulations to improve Grade 12 learners’ understanding of the photoelectric effect. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(3), 329–339. doi: 10.1080/18117295.2018.1531500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, R., & Schwartz, D. (2009). Spatial learning and computer simulations in science. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 419–438. doi: 10.1080/09500690802595813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, L., & Borko, N. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching: PCK and science education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mbajiorgu, N., & Reid, N. (2006). Factors influencing curriculum development in chemistry. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/factors-influencing-curriculum-development-chemistry.
   Google Scholar
• Minner, D. D., Levy, A., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction: What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. doi: 10.1002/tea.20347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan, T., Yildirim, O., & Ozgur, S. (2012). Determining of university freshmen students’ misconceptions and alternative conceptions about mitosis and meiosis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3677–3680. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.126
   Google Scholar
• Rollnick, M., & Mavhunga, E. (2014). PCK of teaching electrochemistry in chemistry teachers: A case in Johannesburg, Gauteng Province, South Africa. Educación Química, 25(3), 354–362.
   Google Scholar
• Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarabando, C., Cravino, J. P., & Soares, A. (2014). Contribution of a computer simulation to students’ learning of the physics concepts of weight and mass. Procedia Technology, 13, 112–121. doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2014.02.015
   Google Scholar
• Scheurs, J., & Dumbraveanu, R. (2018). A shift from the teacher centered to learner centered approach. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 4(3), 36–41. doi: 10.3991/ijep.v4i3.3395
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Trey, L., & Khan, S. (2008). How science students can learn about unobservable phenomena using computer-based analogies. Computers and Education, 51(2), 519–529. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar