References
- Abell, T. N., & Bretz, S. L. (2018). Dissolving salts in water: Students’ particulate explanations of temperature changes. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(4), 504–511. doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00845
- Adadan, E., & Savasci, F. (2012). An analysis of 16–17-year-old students’ understanding of solution chemistry concepts using a two-tier diagnostic instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 34(4), 513–544. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.636084
- Ausubel, D. P. (2012). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
- Cavlazoglu, B., Akgun, O. E., & Stuessy, C. L. (2013). An innovative use of concept mapping for improving and assessing STEM teachers’ conceptual understanding. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference.
- Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2013). The landscape of qualitative research (4th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Department of Education, D. o. E. (2011). National curriculum statement: Curriculum and assessment policy statement, grades 10-12 physical science. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.
- Department of Education, D. o. E. (2015). National senior certification 2014: diagnostic report. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.
- Doymus, K., Karacop, A., & Simsek, U. (2010). Effects of jigsaw and animation techniques on students’ understanding of concepts and subjects in electrochemistry. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(6), 671–691. doi: 10.1007/s11423-010-9157-2
- Fortus, D., Sutherland Adams, L. M., Krajcik, J., & Reiser, B. (2015). Assessing the role of curriculum coherence in student learning about energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(10), 1408–1425. doi: 10.1002/tea.21261
- Konicek-Moran, R., & Keeley, P. (2015). Teaching for conceptual understanding in science. Washington, DC: NSTA Press, National Science Teachers Association.
- Naah, B. M., & Sanger, M. J. (2012). Student misconceptions in writing balanced equations for dissolving ionic compounds in water. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(3), 186–194. doi: 10.1039/C2RP00015F
- Naah, B. M., & Sanger, M. J. (2013). Investigating students’ understanding of the dissolving process. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(2), 103–112. doi: 10.1007/s10956-012-9379-7
- Nicol, D. (2009). Assessment for learner self-regulation: Enhancing achievement in the first year using learning technologies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(3), 335–352. doi: 10.1080/02602930802255139
- Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate prepositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571. doi: 10.1002/sce.10032
- Novak, J. D. (2010). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 6(3), 21–30.
- Patton, M. (2015). Qualitative research and methods: Integrating theory and practice. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
- Potgieter, M., & Davidowitz, B. (2010). Grade 12 achievement rating scales in the new national senior certificate as indication of preparedness for tertiary chemistry. South African Journal of Chemistry, 63, 75–82.
- Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Relational perspectives on higher education teaching and learning in the sciences. Studies in Science Education, 33(1), 31–60. doi: 10.1080/03057269908560135
- Scott, P., Mortimer, E., & Ametller, J. (2011). Pedagogical link-making: A fundamental aspect of teaching and learning scientific conceptual knowledge. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 3–36. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2011.549619
- Sibanda, D., & Hobden, P. (2016). The sequencing of basic chemistry topics by physical science teachers. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), 142–153. doi: 10.1080/18117295.2016.1187505
- Sikorski, T. R., & Hammer, D. (2017). Looking for coherence in science curriculum. Science Education, 101(6), 929–943. doi: 10.1002/sce.21299
- Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 2–20.
- Taber, K. S. (2014). Constructing active learning in chemistry: Concepts, cognition and conceptions. In I. Devetak, & S. A. Glažar (Eds.), Learning with understanding in the chemistry classroom (pp. 5–23). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Warfa, A.-R. M., Roehrig, G. H., Schneider, J. L., & Nyachwaya, J. (2014). Role of teacher-initiated discourses in students’ development of representational fluency in chemistry: A case study. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(6), 784–792. doi: 10.1021/ed4005547