References
- Baser, M., & Geban, O. (2008). Effect of instruction based on conceptual change activities on students’ understanding of static electricity concepts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(2), 243–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140701250857
- Ceberio, M., Almudí, J.M., & Franco, Á. (2016). Design and application of interactive simulations in problem-solving in university-level physics education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 590–609.
- Clark, R.W., Threeton, M.D., & Ewing, J.C. (2010). The potential of experiential learning models and practices in career and technical education and career and technical teacher education. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 25(2), 46–62.
- Council for Higher Education (2018). The state of Higher Education in South Africa. Higher Education Monitor, No. 6, October. Council for Higher Education.
- Creswell, J. (2015). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. London: Pearson.
- Daniel, A. (2019). Experiential learning model in two-dimensional kinematics. The Physics Teacher, 57(9), 648–649. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5135803
- Dilber, R., Karaman, I., & Duzgun, B. (2009). High school students’ understanding of projectile motion concepts. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(3), 203–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610902899101
- Ebersbach, M., Van Dooren, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). Knowledge on accelerated motion as measured by implicit and explicit tasks in 5 to 16 year olds. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(1), 25–46.
- Eccles, D. & Arsal, G. (2017). The think aloud method: what is it and how do I use it? Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 1(18). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2017.1331501
- Green, S.K., & Gredler, M.E. (2002). A review and analysis of constructivism for school-based practice. School Psychology Review, 31(1), 53–70.
- Grusche, S. (2019, August). Phenomenon-based learning and model-based teaching: Do they match?. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1287, No. 1, p. 012066). IOP Publishing.
- Guo, Y., & Fang, N. (2015). Interactive Computer Simulation and Animation (CSA) to improve student learning of projectile motion in an undergraduate engineering dynamics course. CSEDU, 2, 173–180.
- Herreid, C.F. (Ed.). (2007). Start with a story: The case study method of teaching college science. NSTA Press.
- Hutem, A., & Kerdmee, S. (2013). Physics learning achievement study: Projectile, using Mathematica program of Faculty of Science and Technology Phetchabun Rajabhat University students. European Journal of Physics Education, 4, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20308/ejpe.v4i3.94
- Jordan, C., Dunn, A., Armstrong, Z., & Adams, W.K. (2018). Projectile Motion Hoop Challenge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 56(4), 200–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5028229
- Kotoka, J., & Kriek, J. (2014). The impact of computer simulations as interactive demonstration tools on the performance of Grade 11 learners in electromagnetism. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), 100–110. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC155443
- Kunnath, B., & Kriek, J. (2018). Exploring effective pedagogies using computer simulations to improve Grade 12 learners’ understanding of the photoelectric effect. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(3), 329–339. ttps://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-12a2a941d5
- Kurt, S. (2020). Kolb’s experiential learning theory & learning styles. Educational Technology. https://educationaltechnology.net/kolbs-experiential-learning-theory-learning-styles/
- Lamina, O.G. (2019). Investigating the effects of PhET Interactive simulation-based activities on students’ learning involvement and performance on two-dimensional motion topic in Physics Grade 9. Scholar’s Press Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29649.28006
- Manolas, E.I., & Kehagias, T.I. (2005). Kolb’s experiential learning model: Enlivening Physics courses in primary education. The Internet TESL Journal, 3(9). http://iteslj.org/Articles/Kelly-Experiential/
- Mascolo, M. F., & Fischer, K. W. (2015). Dynamic development of thinking, feeling, and acting. In W. F. Overton, P. C. M. Molenaar, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Theory and method (pp. 113–161). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy104
- Mills, G.E., & Gay, L.R. (2016). Education research: Competencies for analysis and applications. London: Pearson Education.
- Moore, E.B., & Perkins, K.K. (2018). Advances in PhET interactive simulations: Interoperable and accessible. In Cyber-physical laboratories in engineering and science education (pp. 141–162). Cham: Springer.
- Ndihokubwayo, K., Uwamahoro, J., & Ndayambaje, I. (2020). Effectiveness of PhET simulations and YouTube videos to improve the learning of optics in Rwandan secondary schools. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 24(2), 253–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2020.1818042
- Park, M. (2019). Effects of simulation-based formative assessments on students’ conceptions in physics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(7), em1722. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103586
- Rodrigues, M., & Carvalho, P.S. (2013) Teaching physics with Angry Birds: Exploring the kinematics and dynamics of the game. Physics Education, 48(4), 31–36.
- Steele, M.M. (2005). Teaching students with learning disabilities: Constructivism or Behaviorism? Current Issues in Education, 8(10). http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume8/number10/.
- Steinberg, R.N., & Oberem, G.E. (2000). Based instructional software in modern physics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 19(2), 115–136. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/8066/.
- Stephens, A.L., & Clement, J. (2015). Use of physics simulations in whole class and small group settings: Comparative case studies. Computers & Education, 86(1), 137–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.014
- Stieff, M., Hegarty, M., & Deslongchamps, G. (2011). Identifying representational competence with multi-representational displays. Cognition and Instruction, 29(1), 123–145.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
- Walker, L., & Warfa, A.R.M. (2017). Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL®) marginally effects student achievement measures but substantially increases the odds of passing a course. PLoS One, 12(10), e01862. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186203