Effect of Hands-on Laboratory Experiment and Demonstration Teaching Techniques on Rwandan Secondary School Students’ Academic Performance in Solutions and Titration

References

• Abanikannda, M. O. (2016). Influence of problem-based learning in chemistry on academic achievement of high school students in Osun State, Nigeria. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 4(3), 55–63.
   Google Scholar
• Acar, B., & Tarhan, L. (2008). Effects of cooperative learning on ‘students’ understanding of metallic bonding. Research in Science Education, 38(4), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9054-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajayi, O. V. (2017). Effect of hands-on activities on senior secondary chemistry students achievement and retention in stoichiometry in zone C of Benue state. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2992803
   Google Scholar
• Atagana, H., & Engida, T. (2014). What makes chemistry difficult? African Journal of Chemical Education, 4(May), 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Børte, K., Nesje, K., Lillejord, S., & Børte, K. (2020). Barriers to student active learning in higher education Barriers to student active learning in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28, 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1839746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byusa, E., Kampire, E., & Mwesigye, A. R. (2020). Analysis of teaching techniques and scheme of work in teaching chemistry in Rwandan secondary schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/7833
   Google Scholar
• Caglak, S. (2017). Does hands-on science practices make an impact on achievement in science? Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 3, 69–87.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. Y., & Liu, S. Y. (2020). Using augmented reality to experiment with elements in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 111(April), 106418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106418
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. Y., & Liu, S. Y. (2020). Using augmented reality to experiment with elements in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 111(May), 106418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106418
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). Learning by viewing versus learning by doing: Evidence-based guidelines for principled learning environments. Performance Improvement, 47(9), 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Damanhuri, M. I. M., Treagust, D. F., Won, M., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2016). High school ‘students’ understanding of acid–base concepts: An ongoing challenge for teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2015.284a
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, T., & Lazonder, A. W. (2014). The guided discovery learning principle in multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 371–390). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.019
   Google Scholar
• Demircioǧlu, G., Ayas, A., & Demircioǧlu, H. (2005). Conceptual change achieved through a new teaching program on acids and bases. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1039/B4RP90003K
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children's reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 424–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, M., Browne, T., Walker, R., Hewitt, R., Martin, S., Notari, M., … Pimmer, C. (2015). Self-regulated and technology-enhanced learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 38(2), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9181-5
   Google Scholar
• Juriševič, M., Vrtačnik, M., Kwiatkowski, M., & Gros, N. (2012). The interplay of students’ motivational orientations, their chemistry achievements and their perception of learning within the hands-on approach to visible spectrometry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(3), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2rp20004j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klahr, D. (2009). To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heavens: What about direct instruction? Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure?, 291–310. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203878842
   Google Scholar
• Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15(10), 661–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00737.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logar, A., & Savec, V. F. (2011). Students’ hands-on experimental work vs lecture demonstration in teaching elementary school chemistry. Acta Chimica Slovenica, 58(4), 866–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., Bailey, J. M., Bretones, P. S., Prather, E. E., Ballen, C. J., … Docktor, J. L. (2021). The curious construct of active learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(1), 8–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovelace, M., & Brickman, P. (2012). The contribution of student-led experiments on the students’ knowledge quality in the third grade of primary. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 634–651.
   Google Scholar
• Maričić, M., Cvjetićanin, S., & Anđić, B. (2015). Teacher-demonstration and student hands-on experiments in teaching. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18, 768–779.
   Google Scholar
• Markic, S., & Childs, E. P. (2016). Language and the teaching and learning of chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(3), 434–438. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp90006b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKee, E., Williamson, V. M., & Ruebush, L. E. (2007). Effects of a demonstration laboratory on student learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(5), 395–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9064-4
   Google Scholar
• Musengimana, J., Kampire, E., & Ntawiha, P. (2022). Effect of task-based learning on students’ understanding of chemical reactions among selected Rwandan lower secondary school students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(1), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndihokubwayo, K. (2017). Investigating the status and barriers of science laboratory activities in Rwandan teacher training colleges towards tmprovisation practice. Rwandan Journal of Education, 4(1), 47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Ndihokubwayo, K., & Habiyaremye, H. T. (2018). Why did Rwanda shift from knowledge to competence based curriculum? Syllabuses and textbooks point of view. African Research Review, 12(3), 38. https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v12i3.4
   Google Scholar
• Ndihokubwayo, K., Uwamahoro, J., & Ndayambaje, I. (2020). Effectiveness of PhET simulations and YouTube videos to improve the learning of optics in Rwandan secondary schools. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 24(2), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2020.1818042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyachwaya, J. M. (2016). General chemistry students’ conceptual understanding and language fluency: acid–base neutralization and conductometry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00015K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman, K., & Sukor, N. S. (2013). Conceptual understanding in secondary school chemistry: A discussion of the difficulties experienced by students. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(5), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2013.433.441
   Google Scholar
• Österlund, L. L., Berg, A., & Ekborg, M. (2010). Redox models in chemistry textbooks for the upper secondary school: Friend or foe? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(3), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1039/c005467b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman, K., & Lay, A. N. (2022). MyKimDG module: An interactive platform towards development of twenty-first century skills and improvement of students' knowledge in chemistry. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1461–1474.
   Google Scholar
• Ramadhani, M. H., & Titisari, P. W. (2019). Laboratory hands-on activity: A case study in senior high school of Pekanbaru–Indonesia. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(2), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i2.8457
   Google Scholar
• REB (2015). Comptence-based curriculum. Curriculum framework pre-primary to upper secondary. 15th International Conference the Knowledge-Based Organization: Behavioral and Social Sciences, Conference Proceedings, 4, 308–312.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, H. W. (2011). The learning-by-doing principle. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 17(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100597
   Google Scholar
• Sansom, R., & Walker, J. P. (2020). Investing in laboratory courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(1), 308–309. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. N., & Plass, J. L. (2014). Click versus drag: User-performed tasks and the enactment effect in an interactive multimedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweisfurth, M. (2013). Learner-centred education in international perspective. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.14425/00.45.70
   Google Scholar
• Sesen, B. A., & Tarhan, L. (2010). Promoting active learning in high school chemistry: Learning achievement and attitude. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2625–2630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.384
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, K. (2006). High school students’ understanding of titrations and related acid–base phenomena. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1039/B5RP90014J
   Google Scholar
• Sibomana, A., Karegeya, C., & Sentongo, J. (2021). Effect of cooperative learning on chemistry students’ achievement in Rwandan day-upper secondary schools. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 1907–1918.
   Google Scholar
• Side, S. (2022). Analysis of students’ learning difficulties in physical chemistry : Perspective on various sub-variable. Journal: Jurnal Akademika Kimia, 11(November), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.22487/j24775185.2022.v11.i4.pp219-224
   Google Scholar
• Sikandar, A. (2016). John Dewey and his philosophy of education. Journal Akademika Kimia, 2(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v2i2.446
   Google Scholar
• Stott, A. E. (2018). Are instructivist pedagogies more appropriate for learning the sciences in South African low-quintile schools than western literature suggests? Journal of Education, 71. https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i71a03
   Google Scholar
• Stull, A. T., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Learning by doing versus learning by viewing: Three experimental comparisons of learner-generated versus author-provided graphic organizers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 808–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stull, A. T., Gainer, M. J., & Hegarty, M. (2017). Learning by enacting: The role of embodiment in chemistry education. Learning and Instruction, 55, 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Upahi, J. E., & Ramnarain, U. (2019). Representations of chemical phenomena in secondary school chemistry textbooks. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8rp00191j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utami, B., Saputro, S., Ashadi, A., Masykuri, M., & Widoretno, S. (2017). Critical thinking skills profile of high school students in learning chemistry. In International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series (Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 124–130). DOI:10.4324/978020387884210.20961/ijsascs.v1i2.5134
   Google Scholar
• Uwizeyimana, D., Yadav, L., Musengimana, T., & Uwamahoro, J. (2018). The impact of teaching approaches on effective physics learning an investigation conducted in five secondary schools in Rusizi district, Rwanda. Rwandan Journal of Education, 4(2), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Van Loon, A. F. (2019). Learning by doing: enhancing hydrology lectures with individual fieldwork projects. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43(2), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1599330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Hodges, G., & Lee, J. (2022). Connecting macroscopic, molecular, and symbolic representations with immersive technologies in high school chemistry: The case of redox reactions. Education Sciences, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziaeefard, S., Miller, M. H., Rastgaar, M., & Mahmoudian, N. (2017). Co-robotics hands-on activities: A gateway to engineering design and STEM learning. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 97, 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2017.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar