Bayesian network with quantitative input for maritime risk analysis

References

• Anderson, E.L., et al., 1999. Foundations. Risk Analysis, 19 (1), 47–68.
   Google Scholar
• Antão, P. et al., 2009. Analysis of maritime accident data with BBN models. In: S. Martorell et al., eds. Safety, reliability and risk analysis: theory, methods and applications. London, UK: Taylor & Francis Group
   Google Scholar
• Antão, P. and Soares, C.G., 2008. Causal factors in accidents of high-speed craft and conventional ocean-going vessels. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93 (9), 1292–1304. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergantino, A. and Marlow, P., 1998. Factors influencing the choice of flag: empirical evidence. Maritime Policy & Management, 25 (2), 157–174. doi: 10.1080/03088839800000026
   Google Scholar
• Cariou, P., Mejia, MQJ and Wolff, F.C., 2008. On the effectiveness of port state control inspections. Transportation Research Part E, 44 (3), 491–503. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2006.11.005
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Y.H. and Yeh, C.H., 2004. A new airline safety index. Transportation Research Part B, 38 (4), 369–383. doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(03)00047-X
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, M. Franses, P.H., and Slagter, E. 1999. Censored regression analysis in large samples with many zero observations. Econometric Institute Research Report 9939/A
   Google Scholar
• Damien, P. and Kockelman, K., 2010. Preface to special issue on Bayesian methods. Transportation Research Part B, 44 (5), 631–632. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2010.03.005
   Google Scholar
• Drewry, 2007. Ship operating costs annual review and forecast 2007/08. London: Drewry House, Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd
   Google Scholar
• Eleye-Datubo, A.G. and et al., 2006. Enabling a powerful marine and offshore decision-support solution through Bayesian Network techniques. Risk Analysis, 26 (3), 695–721. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00775.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eleye-Datubo, A.G. and et al., 2008. Marine and offshore safety assessment by incorporative risk modelling in a fuzzy-Bayesian Network of an induced mass assignment paradigm. Risk Analysis, 28 (1), 95–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01004.x
   Google Scholar
• Franses, P.H. and Paap, R., 2001. Quantitative models in marketing research, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaarder, S., Rognstad, K. and Olofsson, M., 1997. The impact of human element in maritime risk management. Advances in safety and reliability, Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Hauer, E., 2001. Overdispersion in modeling accidents on road sections and in empirical Bayes estimation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 33 (6), 799–808. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00094-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havold, I.J., 2010. Safety culture and safety management aboard tankers. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 95 (5), 511–519. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockaday, SLM and Chatziioanou, A., 1986. An analytical method for aircraft collision risk estimation. Transportation Research Part B, 20 (5), 415–428. doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(86)90013-5
   Google Scholar
• Hu, S., et al., 2007. Formal safety assessment based on relative risks model in ship navigation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 92 (3), 369–377. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, D., et al., 2002. A model of fishing vessel accident probability. Journal of Safety Research, 33 (4), 497–510. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4375(02)00050-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, D. and Thunberg, E., 2005. An analysis of fishing vessel accidents in fishing areas off the northeastern United States. Safety Science, 43 (8), 523–540. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A., 1982. Judgments under uncertainty, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, S. and Franses, P.H., 2007. Econometric analysis on the effect of port state control inspections on the probability of casualty. Can targeting of substandard ships for inspections be improved?. Marine Policy, 31 (4), 550–563. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2006.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, S. 2005. Maritime transportation safety management and risk analysis. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann
   Google Scholar
• Kweon, Y.J. 2010. Disaggregate safety evaluation for signalized intersections and evaluation tool. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 46, 151–160
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Choi, J. and Kim, S.W., 2010. Bayesian approach with the power prior for road safety analysis. Transportmetrica, 6 (1), 39–51. doi: 10.1080/18128600902929609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd's Fairplay, 1979–2008. World casualty statistics (Casualty return). Annual Report
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd's Fairplay, 2008. World Shipping Encyclopedia. Version 2008
   Google Scholar
• Li, K.X., 1999. The safety and quality of open registers and a new approach for classifying risky ships. Transportation Research Part E, 35 (2), 135–141. doi: 10.1016/S1366-5545(99)00002-2
   Google Scholar
• Li, K.X., Wang, Y. and Min, J., 2009. Quantitative analysis of materiality in maritime insurance. Maritime Policy & Management, 36 (5), 437–455. doi: 10.1080/03088830903187168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, K.X. and Wonham, J., 1999. Who is safe and who is at risk: a study of 20-year-record on accident total loss in different flags. Maritime Policy & Management, 26 (2), 137–144. doi: 10.1080/030888399286961
   Google Scholar
• Ma, J., Kockelman, K. and Damien, P., 2008. A multivariate Poisson-lognormal regression model for prediction of crash counts by severity, using Bayesian methods. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40 (3), 964–975. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manuele, F.M., 2003. On the practice of safety. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Merrick, R.W., et al., 2003. A traffic density analysis of proposed ferry service expansion in San Francisco Bay using a maritime simulation model. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 81 (2), 119–132. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(03)00054-1
   Google Scholar
• Montewka, J., et al., 2010. Probability modeling of vessel collisions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 95 (5), 573–589. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, M.G. and Henrion, M., 1990. Uncertainty: a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mosleh, A., Bier, V.M. and Apostolakis, G., 1988. A critique of current practice for the use of expert opinions in probabilistic risk assessment. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 20 (1), 63–85. doi: 10.1016/0951-8320(88)90006-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netjasov, F. and Janic, M., 2008. A review of research on risk and safety modeling in civil aviation. Journal of Air Transport Management, 14 (4), 213–220. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2008.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, J., et al., 2008. A methodology to model causal relationships on offshore safety assessment focusing on human and organizational factors. Journal of Safety Research, 39 (1), 87–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, J., et al., 2009. An offshore risk analysis method using fuzzy Bayesian Network. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 131 (4), 3–16. doi: 10.1115/1.3124123
   Google Scholar
• Romer, H., Petersen, HJS and Rup, P., 1995. Maritime accident frequencies: review and recent empirical results. Journal of Navigation, 48 (3), 410–424. doi: 10.1017/S037346330001290X
   Google Scholar
• Shin, K. and Washington, S.P., 2012. Empirical Bayes method in the study of traffic safety via heterogeneous negative multinomial model. Transportmetrica, 8 (2), 131–147. doi: 10.1080/18128601003680976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shively, S.T., Kockelman, K. and Damien, P., 2010. A Bayesian semi-parametric model to estimate relationships between crash counts and roadway characteristics. Transportation Research Part B, 44 (5), 699–715. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2009.12.019
   Google Scholar
• Skjong, R. and Wentworth, B.H. 2001. Expert judgment and risk perception, In: International offshore and polar engineering conference. Stavanger, Norway
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S., 1979. Rating the risks. Environment, 21 (3), 14–25. doi: 10.1080/00139157.1979.9933091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares, C.G. and Teixeira, A.P., 2001. Risk assessment in maritime transportation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 74 (3), 299–309. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00104-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szwed, P., et al., 2006. A Bayesian paired comparison approach for relative accident probability assessment with covariate information. European Journal of Operational Research, 169 (1), 157–177. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trucco, P., et al., 2008. A Bayesian Belief Network modeling of organizational factors in risk analysis: a case study in maritime transportation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93 (6), 823–834.
   Google Scholar
• Uncles, M.D., 1987. A beta-logistic model of mode choice: goodness of fit and inter temporal dependence. Transportation Research Part B, 21 (3), 195–205. doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(87)90003-8
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD, 2010. Review of maritime transport, New York, Geneva: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Vanem, E., et al., 2008. Analysing the risk of LNG carrier operations. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93 (9), 1328–1344. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vose, D., 1996. Risk analysis: a quantitative guide to Monte Carlo Simulation modeling, ChichesterEngland: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. Quddus, M., and Ison, S. 2011. A spatio-temporal analysis of the impact of congestion on traffic safety on major roads in the UK. Transportmetrica, DOI:10.1080/18128602.2010
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Z.L., Bonsall, S. and Wang, J., 2008. Fuzzy rule-based Bayesian reasoning approach for prioritization of failure in FMEA. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 57 (3), 517–528. doi: 10.1109/TR.2008.928208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar