Analytic approximations for computing probit choice probabilities

References

• Aitken, AC (1935). Note on selection from a multivariate normal population. Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, 4, 106–110. doi: 10.1017/S0013091500008063
   Google Scholar
• Bolduc, D (1999). A practical technique to estimate multinomial probit models in transportation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 33, 63–79. doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(98)00028-9
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, CR (2001). Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model. Transportation Research B, 35, 677–693. doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00014-X
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, CR 2010. The maximum approximated composite marginal likelihood (MACML) estimation of mixed unordered response choice models. Technical Paper, Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, CR, Sidharthan, R 2011. Maximum approximate composite marginal likelihood (MACML) estimator for mixed multinomial probit models. Transportation Research Part B, 45 (7), 940–953
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, CR, Varin, C, Ferdous, N (2010). A Comparison of the Maximum Simulated Likelihood and Composite Marginal Likelihood Estimation Approaches in the Context of the Multivariate Ordered Response Model. Advances in Econometrics: Maximum Simulated Likelihood Methods and Applications, 26, 65–106. doi: 10.1108/S0731-9053(2010)0000026007
   Google Scholar
• Börsch-Supan, A, Hajivassiliou, V (1993). Smooth unbiased multivariate probability simulators for maximum likelihood estimation of limited dependent variable models. Journal of Econometrics, 58, 347–368. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(93)90049-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunch, DS (1991). Estimability in the multinomial probit model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 25, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(91)90009-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, CE (1961). The greatest of a finite set of random variables. Operations Research, 9, 145–162. doi: 10.1287/opre.9.2.145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connors, RD, Sumalee, A, Watling, DP (2007). Sensitivity analysis of the variable demand probit stochastic user equilibrium with multiple user-classes. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 41, 593–615. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2006.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranley, R, Patterson, TNL (1976). Randomization of number theoretic methods for multiple integration. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 13, 904–914. doi: 10.1137/0713071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daganzo, C (1979). Multinomial probit: the theory and its application to demand forecasting, New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalal, SR, Klein, RW (1988). A flexible class of discrete choice models. Marketing Science, 7, 232–251. doi: 10.1287/mksc.7.3.232
   Google Scholar
• Dansie, BR (1985). Parameter estimability in the multinomial probit model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 19, 526–528. doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(85)90047-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drezner, Z (1990). Approximations to the multivariate normal integral. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation, 19, 527–534. doi: 10.1080/03610919008812873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drezner, Z (1994). Computation of the trivariate normal integral. Mathematics of Computation, 62, 289–294. doi: 10.1090/S0025-5718-1994-1185242-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drezner, Z, Wesolowsky, GO (1990). On the computation of the bivariate normal integral. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 35, 101–107. doi: 10.1080/00949659008811236
   Google Scholar
• Genz, A (1992). Numerical computation of multivariate normal probabilities. Journal of computational and graphical statistics, 1, 141–149.
   Google Scholar
• Genz, A (2004). Numerical computation of rectangular bivariate and trivariate normal and t-probabilities. Statistics and Computing, 14, 251–260. doi: 10.1023/B:STCO.0000035304.20635.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genz, A, Bretz, F (1999). Numerical computation of multivariate t-probabilities with application to power calculation of multiple contrasts. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 63, 103–117. doi: 10.1080/00949659908811962
   Google Scholar
• Genz, A, Bretz, F (2002). Comparison of methods for the computation of multivariate t-probabilities. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 11, 950–971. doi: 10.1198/106186002394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, S, Train, KE, Polak, JW (2006). On the use of a modified latin hypercube sampling (MLHS) approach in the estimation of a mixed logit model for vehicle choice. Transportation Research Part B, 40(2), 147–163. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2004.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Joe, H (1995). Approximations to multivariate normal rectangle probabilities based on conditional expectations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 957–964. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamakura, WA (1989). The estimation of multinomial probit models: a new calibration algorithm. Transportation Science, 23, 253–265. doi: 10.1287/trsc.23.4.253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane, MP (1992). A note on identification in the multinomial probit model. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10, 193–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langdon, MG (1984a). Improved algorithms for estimating choice probabilities in the multinomial probit model. Transportation Science, 18, 267–299. doi: 10.1287/trsc.18.3.267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langdon, MG (1984b). Methods of determining choice probability in utility maximising multiple alternative models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 18, 209–234. doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(84)90033-X
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L (1992). On the efficiency of methods of simulated moments and simulated likelihood estimation of discrete choice models. Econometric Theory, 8, 518–552. doi: 10.1017/S0266466600013207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L (1995). Asymptotic bias in simulated maximum likelihood estimation of discrete choice models. Econometric Theory, 11, 437–483. doi: 10.1017/S0266466600009361
   Google Scholar
• Manski, C, Lerman, S (1981). On the use of simulated frequencies to approximate choice probabilities. In ManskiCFMcFaddenD (Ed.), Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications, (pp. 305–319). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D (1978a). Modeling the choice of residential location. In KarlqvistALundqvistLSnickarsFWeibullJ (Ed.), Spatial interaction theory and planning models, (pp. 75–96). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D 1978b. Quantitative methods for analysing travel behaviour of individuals: some recent developments., In: D.A. Hensher and P.R. Stopher, eds. Behavioral travel modeling. Croom Helm, London, pp. 279–318
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D (1989). A method of simulated moments for estimation of discrete response models without numerical integration. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 57, 995–1026. doi: 10.2307/1913621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D, Train, KE (2000). Mixed MNL models of discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15, 447–470. doi: 10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5<447::AID-JAE570>3.0.CO;2-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendell, N, Elston, R (1974). Multifactorial qualitative traits – genetic-analysis and prediction of recurrence risks. Biometrics, 30, 41–57. doi: 10.2307/2529616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederreiter, H (1972). On a number-theoretical integration method. Aequationes Mathematicae, 8, 304–311. doi: 10.1007/BF01844507
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, K (1903). On the influence of natural selection on the variability and correlation of organs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, A200, 1–66.
   Google Scholar
• Rifaat, SM, Chin, HC (2007). Accident severity analysis using ordered probit model. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 41(1), 91–114. doi: 10.1002/atr.5670410107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, A 2003. Probit based methods in traffic assignment and discrete choice modelling, (unpublished PhD Thesis), Napier University
   Google Scholar
• Solow, AR (1990). A method for approximating multivariate normal orthant probabilities. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 37, 225–229. doi: 10.1080/00949659008811306
   Google Scholar
• Sumalee, A Uchida, K. and Lam, WHK. 2009. Stochastic multi-modal transport network under demand uncertainties and adverse weather condition. In: 18th International symposium on transportation and traffic theory, 16–18 July 2009, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, 19–41
   Google Scholar
• Teng, H, Qi, Y, Martinelli, DR (2008). Parking difficulty and parking information system technologies and costs. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 42(2), 151–178. doi: 10.1002/atr.5670420204
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273–286. doi: 10.1037/h0070288
   Google Scholar
• Train, K 2000, Halton sequences for mixed logit. Working Paper No. E00-278, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley
   Google Scholar
• Train, KE (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zito, P, et al. (2010). The effect of advanced traveller information systems on public transport demand and its uncertainty. Transportmetrica, 7(1), 31–43. doi: 10.1080/18128600903244727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar