Teacher Perceptions of Moodle and Throughput in a Blended Learning Programme for In-Service Secondary School Mathematics Teachers

References

• Adler, J. 2000. “Social Practice Theory and Mathematics Teacher Education: A Conversation Between Theory and Practice.” Nordic Mathematics Education Journal 8 (3): 31–53.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., L. Rourke, D. R. Garrison, and W. Archer. 2001. “Assessing Teaching Presence in a Computer Conference Context.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5 (2): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Boitshwarelo, B. 2009. “Exploring Blended Learning for Science Teacher Professional Development in an African Context.” International Review of Research in Open Distance Learning 10 (4): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. 2004. “Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain.” Educational Researcher 33 (8): 3–15. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033008003
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P. 1994. “Where Is the mind? Constructivist and Sociocultural Perspectives on Mathematical Development.” Educational Researcher 23 (7): 13–20. doi: 10.3102/0013189X023007013
   Google Scholar
• Dias, S. B., J. A. Diniz, and L. J. Hadjileontiadis. 2014. “Towards an Intelligent Learning Management System Under Blended Learning: Trends, Profiles and Modelling Perspectives.” In Intelligent Systems Reference Library, edited by J. Kacprzyk and L. C. Jain. Volume 59. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., H. Asoko, J. Leach, E. Mortimer, and P. Scott. 1994. “Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom.” Educational Researcher 23 (7): 5–12. doi: 10.3102/0013189X023007005
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. A., P. Ginns, and L. Piggot. 2009. “E-Learning in Higher Education: Some Key Aspects and Their Relationship to Approaches to Study.” Higher Education Research and Development 28 (3): 303–318. doi: 10.1080/07294360902839909
   Google Scholar
• Fusco, J., S. Haavind, J. Remold, and P. Schank. 2011. “Exploring Differences in Online Professional Development Seminars with the Community of Inquiry Framework.” Educational Media International 48 (3): 139–149. doi: 10.1080/09523987.2011.607318
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., and T. Anderson. 2003. E-learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. London: Routledge/Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., T. Anderson, and W. Archer. 2000. “Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education.” The Internet and Higher Education 2(2–3): 87–105. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., T. Anderson, and W. Archer. 2001. “Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence, and Computer Conferencing in Distance Education.” American Journal of Distance Education 15 (1): 7–23. doi: 10.1080/08923640109527071
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., T. Anderson, and W. Archer. 2010. “The First Decade of the Community of Inquiry Framework: A Retrospective.” The Internet and Higher Education 13 (1): 5–9. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., M. Cleveland Innes, and T. S. Fung. 2010. “Exploring Causal Relationships Among Teaching, Cognitive and Social Presence: Student Perceptions of the Community of Inquiry Framework.” The Internet and Higher Education 13 (1–2): 31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., and H. Kanuka. 2004. “Blended Learning: Uncovering Its Transformative Potential in Higher Education.” The Internet and Higher Education 7 (2): 95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. 2003. “Situative Research Relevant to Standards for School Mathematics.” In A research Companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, edited by J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin and D. Schifter, 304–332. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Güzer, B., and H. Caner. 2014. “The Past, Present and Future of Blended Learning: An In-Depth Analysis of Literature.” Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences 116: 4596–4603. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.992
   Google Scholar
• Hadjileontiadou, S. J., S. B. Dias, J. A. Diniz, and L. J. Hadjileontiadis. 2015. “Fuzzy Logic-Based Modeling in Collaborative and Blended Learning.” In Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design (AETID). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, P. 2006. “What Is Teacher Learning? A Socio-Cultural Perspective.” Oxford Review of Education 32 (4): 505–519. doi: 10.1080/03054980600884227
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, L. H. 2007. “Community of Inquiry in an Online Undergraduate Information Technology Course.” Journal of Information Technology Education 6: 153–168.
   Google Scholar
• Makri, K., K. Papanikolaou, A. Tsakiri, and S. Karkanis. 2014. “Blending the Community of Inquiry Framework with Learning by Design: Towards a Synthesis for Blended Learning in Teacher Training.” Electronic Journal of e-Learning 12 (2): 183–194.
   Google Scholar
• Mostert, I., and M. van Heyningen. 2011. “Designing and Implementing a Blended Learning Programme for Mathematics Teachers: A South African P erspective.” In Proceedings of the 5th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, INTED 2011, 2984–2990, Valencia, March 7–9, edited by L. Gómez Chova, I. Candel Torres and A. López Martinez. International Association for Technology, Education and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Owston, R., D. York, and S. Murtha. 2013. “Student Perceptions and Achievement in a University Blended Learning Strategic Initiative.” The Internet and Higher Education 18: 38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, V. 2006. Mathematics and Science Achievement at South African schools in TIMSS 2003. Cape Town: HSRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, P., and T. Bidjerano. 2009. “Community of Inquiry as a Theoretical Framework to Foster ‘Epistemic Engagement’ and ‘Cognitive Presence’ in Online Education.” Computers and Education 52 (3): 543–553. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. V. 2013. “Face-to-Face vs. Blended Learning: Effects on Secondary Students’ Perceptions and Performance.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 89: 79–83. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.813
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K., D. R. Garrison, and J. Richardson. 2009. “A Constructivist Approach to Online Learning: The Community of Inquiry Framework.” In Information Technology and Constructivism in Higher Education: Progressive Learning Frameworks, edited by C. R. Payne. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Szeto, E. 2015. “Community of Inquiry as an Instructional Approach: What Effects of Teaching, Social and Cognitive Presences Are There in Blended Synchronous Learning and Teaching?.” Computers and Education 81: 191–201. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.015
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., X. Han, and J. Yang. 2015. “Revisiting the Blended Learning Literature: Using a Complex Adaptive Systems Framework.” Educational Technology and Society 18 (2): 380–393.
   Google Scholar