Multi-dimensional assessment and scoring system for dairy farms

References

• AIA. 2014. Bollettino dei controlli della produttivita del latte of the Italian Breeders Association; [cited 2015 Jan]. Available from: http://bollettino.aia.it/bollettino/bollettino.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Bava L, Zucali M, Sandrucci A, Brasca M, Vanoni L, Zanini L, Tamburini A. 2011. Effect of cleaning procedure and hygienic condition of milking equipment on bacterial count of bulk tank milk. J Dairy Res. 78:211–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bava L, Sandrucci A, Zucali M, Guerci M, Tamburini A. 2014. How can farming intensification affect the environmental impact of milk production? J Dairy Sci. 97:4579–4593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battelli G, De Noni I. 2009. Branched-chain fatty acids: a potential parameter for assessing authenticity of PDO mountain cheeses. Proceedings “Methods and issues in cheese Authenticity Studies: a Workshop”; 2009 Sep 4–5; Avellino; p. 30.
   Google Scholar
• Battini M, Andreoli E, Mattiello S. 2010. Il benessere della bovina da latte nei sistemi zootecnici alpini: confronto tra differenti tipologie di stabulazione e gestione. Quaderni SoZooAlp. 6:169–182.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford TP, Fitzsimons NA, Brennan NL, Cogan TM. 2001. Recent advances in cheese microbiology. Int Dairy J. 11:259–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergamo P, Fedele E, Iannibelli L, Marzillo G. 2003. Fat-soluble vitamin contents and fatty acid composition in organic and conventional Italian dairy products. Food Chem. 82:625–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielfeldt JC, Badertscher R, Tölle KH, Krieter J. 2005. Risk factors influencing lameness and claw disorders in dairy cows. Livestock Prod Sci. 95:265–271.
   Google Scholar
• Blokhuis HJ, Miele M, Veissier I, Jones RB. 2013. Improving farm animal welfare. Science and society working together: the welfare quality approach. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Borreani G, Tabacco E. 2008. Low permeability to oxygen of a new barrier film prevents butyric acid bacteria spore formation in farm corn silage. J Dairy Sci. 91:4272–4281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredhal ME, Northern JR, Boeker A, Normile MA. 2001. Consumer demand sparks the growth of quality assurance schemes in the European food sector. In: Regmi A, editor. Changing structure of global food consumption and trade. Washington (DC): Market and Trade Economic Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture and Trade report; pp. 90–102. Available from: http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/293645/wrs011_1_.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Broom DM. 2010. Animal welfare: an aspect of care, sustainability, and food quality required by the public. J Vet Med Educ. 37:83–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller H. 2013. Animal welfare: from production to consumption. In: Blokhuis HJ, Miele M, Veissier I, Jones B, editors. Improving farm animal welfare. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; p. 49–69.
   Google Scholar
• Calamari L, Bertoni G, Châtel A, Turille G. 2007. Messa a punto di un modello per la valutazione del benessere della vacca da latte negli allevamenti della Valle d’Aosta. Quaderni SoZooAlp. 5:67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Castellini C, Boggia A, Cortina C, Dal Bosco A, Paolotti L, Novelli E, Mugnai C. 2012. A multicriteria approach for measuring the sustainability of different poultry production systems. J Cleaner Prod. 37:192–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clal. 2014 [cited 2015 Jan]. Available from: http://www.clal.it/.
   Google Scholar
• De Noni I, Battelli G. 2008. Terpenes and fatty acid profiles of milk fat and “Bitto” cheese as affected by transhumance of cows on different mountain pastures. Food Chem. 109:299–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decimo M, Morandi S, Silvetti T, Brasca M. 2014. Characterisation of gram‐negative psychrotrophic bacteria isolated from italian bulk tank milk. J Food Sci. 79:2081–2090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DEFRA. 2010. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Definitions of terms used in farm business management. Available from: http://www.defra.gov.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Del Prado A, Crosson P, Olesen JE, Rotz CA. 2013. Whole-farm models to quantify greenhouse gas emissions and their potential use for linking climate change mitigation and adaptation in temperate grassland ruminant-based farming systems. Animal. 7:373–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilzer A, Park Y. 2012. Implication of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in human health. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 52:488–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEA. 2009. EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook. Technical guidance to prepare national emission inventories. 4.D Crop production and agricultural soils; [cited 2012 Feb]. Available from: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/emep-eea-emission-inventory-guidebook-2009/part-b-sectoral-guidancechapters/4-agriculture/4-d/4-d-crop-production-and-agricultural-soils.pdf/view.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA. 2009. Scientific opinion on welfare of dairy cows in relation to leg and locomotion problems based on a risk assessment with special reference to the impact of housing, feeding, management and genetic selection. EFSA J. 1142:1–57.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2008. Sustainable Consumption and Production and Sustainable Industrial Policy Action Plan. COM 397 Final.
   Google Scholar
• Ferlay A, Agabriel C, Sibra C, Journal C, Martin B, Chilliard Y. 2008. Tanker milk variability in fatty acids according to farm feeding and husbandry practises in a French semi-mountain area. Dairy Sci Technol. 88:193–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G. 2013. Tackling climate change through livestock – A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Roma: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO).
   Google Scholar
• Giusti AM, Bignetti E, Cannella C. 2008. Exploring new frontiers in total food quality definition and assessment: from chemical to neurochemical properties. Food Bioprocess Technol. 1:130–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunert KG, Hieke S, Wills J. 2014. Sustainability labels on food products: consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy. 44:177–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerci M, Bava L, Zucali M, Sandrucci A, Penati C, Tamburini A. 2013. Effect of farming strategies on environmental impact of intensive dairy farms in Italy. J Dairy Res. 80:300–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDF. 2015. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation no 479/2015. A common carbon footprint approach for dairy. The IDF guide to standard lifecycle assessment methodology for the dairy sector. Brussels (Belgium): International Dairy Federation.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2003. International Organisation for Standardisation ISO 4833:2003. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs. Horizontal method for the enumeration of microorganisms. Colony count technique at 30 C. Geneva (Switzerland).
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2007. International Organisation for Standardisation ISO 7218:2007. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs-general requirements and guidance for microbiological examinations. Geneva (Switzerland).
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2006. Emissions from livestock and manure management. Chapter 10 and 11; [cited 2015 Jan]. Available from: http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2007: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, editors. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen T, Mogensen L, Knudsen MT, Hermansen JE. 2011. Effect of production system and farming strategy on greenhouse gas emissions from commercial dairy farms in a life cycle approach. Livestock Sci. 140:136–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lean IJ, Westwood CT, Golder HM, Vermunt JJ. 2013. Impact of nutrition on lameness and claw health in cattle. Livestock Sci. 156:71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattiello S, Arduino D, Tosi MV, Carenzi C. 2005. Survey on housing, management and welfare of dairy cattle in tie-stalls in western Italian Alps. Acta Agric Scand Sect A Anim Sci. 55:31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Mattiello S, Battini M, Andreoli E, Barbieri S. 2011. Short communication: breed differences affecting dairy cattle welfare in traditional alpine tie-stall husbandry systems. J Dairy Sci. 94:2403–2407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattiello S, Klotz C, Baroli D, Minero M, Ferrante V, Canali E. 2009. Welfare problems in alpine dairy cattle farms in Alto Adige (Eastern Italian Alps). Ital J Anim Sci. 8(Suppl. 2):628–630.
   Google Scholar
• Meul M, Van Middelaar CE, de Boer IJM, Van Passel S, Fremaut D, Haesaert G. 2014. Potential of life cycle assessment to support environmental decision making at commercial dairy farms. Agr Syst. 131:105–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meul M, Van Passel S, Nevens F, Dessein J, Rogge E, Mulier A, Van Hauwermeiren A. 2008. MOTIFS: a monitoring tool for integrated farm sustainability. Agronomy Sust Dev. 28:321–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno MF, Sarantinopoulos P, Tsakalidou E, De Vuyst L. 2006. The role and application of enterococci in food and health. Int J Food Microbiol. 106:1–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Lindenlauf M, Deittert C, Köpke U. 2010. Assessment of environmental effects, animal welfare and milk quality among organic dairy farms. Livestock Sci. 128:140–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien D, Shalloo L, Patton J, Buckley F, Grainger C, Wallace M. 2012. Evaluation of the effect of accounting method, IPCC v. LCA, on grass-based and confinement dairy systems’ greenhouse gas emissions. Animal. 9:1512–1527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirlo G, Carè S, Fantin V, Falconi F, Buttol P, Terzano GM, Masoni P, Pacelli C. 2014. Factors affecting life cycle assessment of milk produced on 6 Mediterranean buffalo farms. J Dairy Sci. 97:6583–6593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prandini A, Sigolo S, Piva G. 2009. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and fatty acid composition of milk, curd and Grana Padano cheese in conventional and organic farming systems. J Dairy Res. 76:278–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRé Consultants. 2014. SimaPro (8.0.3.), LCA software. Amersfoort, The Netherlands; [cited 2015 Jan]. Available from: http://www.pre.nl.
   Google Scholar
• Quigley L, O'Sullivan O, Stanton C, Beresford TP, Ross RP, Fitzgerald GF, Cotter PD. 2013. The complex microbiota of raw milk. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 37:664–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ran-Ressler RR, Bae SE, Lawrence P, Wang DH, Brenna JT. 2014. Branched-chain fatty acid content of foods and estimated intake in the USA. Br J Nutr. 112:565–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizos EC, Ntzani EE, Bika E, Kostapanos MS, Elisaf MS. 2012. Association between omega-3 fatty acid supplementation and risk of major cardiovascular disease events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Ass. 308:1024–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roer AG, Johansen A, Bakken AK, Daugstad K, Fystro G, Strømman AH. 2013. Environmental impacts of combined milk and meat production in Norway according to a life cycle assessment with expanded system boundaries. Livestock Sci. 155:384–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS. 2004. 9.2. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC. Available from: http://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/91pdf/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sterk A, Johansson BEO, Taweel HZH, Murphy M, van Vuuren AM, Hendriks WH, Dijkstra J. 2011. Effects of forage type, forage to concentrate ratio, and crushed linseed supplementation on milk fatty acid profile in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 94:6078–6091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacheyrou M, Normand AC, Guyot P, Cassagne C, Piarroux R, Bouton Y. 2011. Cultivable microbial communities in raw cow milk and potential transfers from stables of sixteen French farms. Int J Food Microbiol. 146:253–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlaeminck B, Fievez V, Cabrita ARJ, Fonseca AJM, Dewhurst RJ. 2005. Factors affecting odd- and branched-chain fatty acids in milk: a review. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 131:389–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welfare Quality®. 2009. Welfare quality^® assessment protocol for cattle. Welfare quality^® consortium. Lelystad, Netherlands. Available from: http://www.agricultura.gov.br/arq_editor/file/camaras_setoriais/Leite_e_derivados/41RO/Welfare%20Quality.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zucali M, Bava L, Colombini S, Brasca M, Decimo M, Morandi S, Tamburini A, Crovetto GM. 2014. Management practices and forage quality affecting the contamination of milk with anaerobic spore-forming bacteria. J Sci Food Agric. 95:1294–1302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucali M, Bava L, Tamburini A, Brasca M, Vanoni L, Sandrucci A. 2011. Effect of cleaning procedure and hygienic condition of milking equipment on bacterial count of bulk tank milk. J Dairy Res. 78:436–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar