In vitro gas production and in vivo nutrient digestibility and growth performance of Thai indigenous cattle fed fresh and conserved pangola grass

References

• Animal Nutrition Division, 2002. Pangola Grass. Bangkok, Thailand: Department of Livestock Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives.
   Google Scholar
• Animal Nutrition Division. 2004. Table of Animal Nutrition Values. (Technical Document No. 47(3)-0514-182). Department of Livestock Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Bangkok, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• AOAC. 2000. Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists Publ., 17th ed. Gaithersburg (MD), USA.
   Google Scholar
• Archimède H, Boval M, Alexandre G, Xandé A, Aumont G, Poncet C. 2000. Effect of regrowth age on intake and digestion of Digitaria decumbens consumed by Black-belly sheep. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 87:153–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blümmel M, Makkar HPS, Becker K. 1997. In vitro gas production: a technique revisited. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 77:24–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaokaur A, Pholsen P, Nishida T, Pattarajinda V, Sommart K. 2008. Metabolizable energy evaluation of beef cattle feedstuffs under tropical condition. p. 34–37 in Proc. 4th Anim Sci Sem Conf. 31 January 2008, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Tailand.
   Google Scholar
• Charoensook R, Knorr C, Brenig B, Gatphayak K. 2013. Thai pigs and cattle production, genetic diversity of livestock and strategies for preserving animal genetic resources. Maejo Int J Sci Technol. 7:113–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chobtang J, Angthong W, Khotprom N, Phojun S, Namsilee R. 2012. Effect of quality of Digitaria eriantha hay on intake, digestibility and methane emission by beef cattle. Khon Kaen Agric J. 40:166–169.
   Google Scholar
• Cook BG, Pengelly BC, Brown SD, Donnelly JL, Eagles DA, Franco MA, Hanson J, Mullen BF, Partridge IJ, Peters M, et al. 2005. Tropical Forages: an interactive selection tool. Brisbane, Qld: CIAT and ILRI.
   Google Scholar
• Fanchone A, Archimede H, Delagarde R, Boval M. 2012. Comparison of intake and digestibility of fresh Digitaria decumbens grass fed to sheep, indoors or at pasture, at two different stages of regrowth. Animal. 6:1108–1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getachew G, Blümmel M, Makkar HPS, Becker K. 1998. In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feed: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 72:261–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GfE. 1995. Zur Energiebewertung beim Wiederkäuer. Proc Soc Nutr Physiol. 4:121–123.
   Google Scholar
• GfE. 2008. New equations for predicting metabolisable energy of grass and maize products for ruminants. Proc Soc Nutr Physiol. 17:191–197.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker JB. 1992. Digitaria eriantha Steudel. In: t'Mannetje L, Jones RM, editors. Plant Resources of South-East Asia, No 4, Forages. Wageningen, Netherlands: Pudoc-DLO; p. 121–123.
   Google Scholar
• Hare MD, Tatsapong P, Lunpha A, Wongpichet K. 2005. Brachiaria species in north-east Thailand: dry matter yields and seed production. Trop. Grasslands. 39:99–106.
   Google Scholar
• Hare MD, Tatsapong P, Phengphet S. 2009. Herbage yield and quality of Brachiaria cultivars, Paspalum atratum and Panicum maximum in north-east Thailand. Trop Grasslands. 43:65–72.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh CH. 1990. Grazing management and grazing system establishment. p. 167–177 in Proc. Sem. Forage Res. Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Juárez Reyes AS, Cerrillo Soto MA, Gutiérrez Ornelas E, Romero Treviño EM, Colín Negrete J, Bernal Barragán H. 2009. Assessment of the nutritional value of tropical grasses obtained from conventional analyses and in vitro gas production. Téc Pecu Méx. 47:55–67.
   Google Scholar
• Leng RA. 1990. Factors affecting the utilization of ‘poor-quality’ forages by ruminants particularly under tropical conditions. Nutr Res Rev. 3:277–303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonald P. 1981. A revised model for the estimation of protein degradability in the rumen. J Agric Sci. 96:251–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JFD, Morgan CA. 2002. Animal nutrition. 6th ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell LR. 1985. Nutrient requirements of ruminants, In: Cunha TJ and McDowell LR editors Nutrition of grazing ruminants in warm climates. 1st ed. Orlando (FL): Academic Press; p. 443.
   Google Scholar
• Meeske R, Basson HM, Cruywagen CW. 1999. The effect of a lactic acid bacterial inoculant with enzymes on the fermentation dynamics, intake and digestibility of Digitaria eriantha silage. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 81:237–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menke KH, Steingass H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Dev. 28:7–55.
   Google Scholar
• Mikled C, Choo-samut N, Thimkhlai R, Odton J, Mungdee C, Buangiyapan P, Nakkitset S, Sonloy V, Tikam K. 2008. Utilization of protein blocks (PB) as concentrate supplementation for livestock. A Report to ASA (American Soybean Association). International Marketing, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Mikled C, Potikanon N, Karlpinyo T. 1991. Study on feedlot feeding of White Lamphun bulls with 2 levels of concentrate. J Agric Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. 7:267–274.
   Google Scholar
• Minson D. 1973. Effect of fertilizer nitrogen on digestibility and voluntary intake of Chloris gayana, Digitaria decumbens and Pennisetum clandestinum. Aust J Exp Agric. 13:153–157.
   Google Scholar
• Nitipot P, Nishida T, Chaithiang R, Pattarajinda V, Sommart K. 2009. Metabolizable energy evaluation of pangola grass hay, cassava chip, cassava pulp and brewery waste in Thai native cattle. Proc Agric Sem Conf. 55–57. p. in 26 January 2009, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Pezo DA, Devendra C. 2002. Module 1: The relevance of crop-animal systems in South-East Asia. In: Research approaches and methods for improving crop-animal systems in South-East Asia. Nairobi: International Livestock Research Institute Training Manual 5; p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Poathong S, Phaikaew C. 2001. Silage production practices and techniques in Thailand [Internet]. Proc. 7th Meeting of the Regional Working Group on Grazing and Feed Resources. [cited 2015 Aug 4]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/ag/Agp/agpc/doc/Proceedings/manado/chap28.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Preston TR, Leng RA. 2009. Matching ruminant production systems with available resources in the tropics and sub- tropics. Penambul Press, Armidale, NSW, Australia [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jul 23]. Available from: http://www.utafoundation.org/P&L/preston&leng.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman MM, Abdullah RB, Wan Embong WK, Nakagawa T, Akashi R. 2013. Effect of palm kernel cake as protein source in a concentrate diet on intake, digestibility and live weight gain of goats fed Napier grass. Trop Anim Health Prod. 45:873–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattanaronchart S. 1998. White Lamphun cattle conservation and development project: a brief of 15 years experience. Project report. Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Rees MC, Minson DJ, Smith FW. 1974. The effect of supplementary and fertilizer sulphur on voluntary intake, digestibility, retention time in the rumen, and site of digestion of pangola grass in sheep. J Agric Sci. 82:419–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suksathit S, Wachirapakorn C, Opatpatanakit Y. 2011. Effects of levels of ensiled pineapple waste and pangola hay fed as roughage source on feed intake, nutrient digestibility and ruminal fermentation of Southern Thai native cattle. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol. 33:281–289.
   Google Scholar
• Sultan JI, Fluharty FL, Loerch SC. 1991. Effects of energy level, protein level and protein source on steer feedlot performance. Pak J Agric Sci. 28:350–354.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki T, Phaophaisal I, Pholsen P, Narmsilee R, Indramanee S, Nitipot P, Chaokaur A, Sommart K, Khotprom N, Panichpol V, et al. 2008. In vivo nutritive value of pangola grass (Digitaria eriantha) hay by a novel indirect calorimeter with a ventilated hood in Thailand. JARQ. 42:123–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiputen S, Sommart K. 2012. Prediction equations of metabolisable energy content in beef cattle diets. KKU Res J. 17:35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Tikam K, Phatsara C, Mikled C, Vearasilp T, Phunphiphat W, Chobtang J, Cherdthong A, Südekum K-H. 2013. Pangola grass as forage for ruminant animals: a review. SpringerPlus. 2:604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tikam K, Phatsara C, Mikled C, Vearasilp T, Samiprem S, Cherdthong A, Gerlach K, Südekum K-H. 2015. In vitro gas production, nutrient digestibilities, and metabolisable energy concentrations for sheep of fresh and conserved pangola grass. Small Ruminant Res. 128:34–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjandraatmadja M, Norton BW, Mac Rae IC. 1994. Ensilage characteristics of three tropical grasses as influenced by stage of growth and addition of molasses. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 10:74–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74:3583–3597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VDLUFA. 2012. VDLUFA-Methodenbuch. Bd. III. Die Chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Ventura M, Moore JE, Ruelke OC, Franke DE. 1975. Effect of maturity and protein supplementation on voluntary intake and nutrient digestibility of pangola digitgrass hays. J Anim Sci. 40:769–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanapat M, Devendra C. 1992. Feeding and nutrition of dairy cattle and buffaloes in Asia. Proc. Sustainable Animal Production. 177–194. pp in 6th AAAP Anim. Sci. Congr. Bangkok, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Weißbach F, Kuhla S. 1995. Stoffverluste bei der Bestimmung des Trockenmassegehaltes von Silagen und Grünfutter: Entstehende Fehler und Möglichkeiten der Korrektur. Übers Tierernährg. 23:189–214.
   Google Scholar