New genetic identification and characterisation of 12 Algerian sheep breeds by microsatellite markers

References

• Al-Barzinji YMS, Lababidi S, Rischkowsky B, Al-Rawi AA, Tibbo M, Hassen H, Baum M. 2011. Assessing genetic diversity of Hamdani sheep breed in Kurdistan region of Iraq using microsatellite markers. Afr J Biotechnol. 10:15109–15116.
   Google Scholar
• Agaviezor BO, Peters SO, Adefenwa MA, Yakubu A, Adebambo OA, Ozoje MO, Ikeobi CO, Wheto M, Ajayi OO, Amusan SA, et al. 2012. Morphological and microsatellite DNA diversity of Nigerian indigenous sheep. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 3:38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora R, Bhatia S. 2004. Genetic structure of Muzzafarnagri sheep based on microsatellite analysis. Small Rumin Res. 54:227–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arranz JJ, Bayón Y, San Primitivo F. 2001. Differentiation among Spanish sheep breeds using microsatellites. Genet Select Evol. 33:529–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashley MV, Dow BD. 1994. The use of microsatellite analysis in population biology: background, methods and potential applications. In: Schierwater B, Streit B, Wagner GP, desalle R, editors. Boston: Birkhauser Verlag; p. 185–202.
   Google Scholar
• Belkhir K, Borsa P, Goudet J, Chikhi L, Bonhomme F. 2000. GENETIX logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Montpellier, France: Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II.
   Google Scholar
• Ben Sassi-Zaidy Y, Maretto F, Charfi-Cheikrouha F, Cassandro M. 2014. Genetic diversity, structure, and breed relationships in Tunisian sheep. Small Rumin Res. 119:52–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruford MW, Wayne RK. 1993. Microsatellites and their application to population genetic studies. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 3:939–943.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cemal I, Yilmaz O, Karaca O, Binbaş P, Ata N. 2013. Analysis of genetic diversity in indigenous Çine Çaparı sheep under conservation by microsatellite markers. Afkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 19:383–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chellig R. 1992. Algerian sheep breeds. Algeria: Office of University Publications (Races ovines algériennes. Algérie: Office des publications universitaires).
   Google Scholar
• Couput M. 1900. Espèce Ovine et Laine et industrie lainière, Giralt, Imprimeur-Photograveur, Alger-Mustapha; p. 164.
   Google Scholar
• Djaout A. 2016. Study of the biodiversity of Algerian sheep breeds [Thèse de Doctorat]. Souk Ahras, Algeria: Institute of Agro Veterinary Sciences. University Mohamed Cherif Messaadia.
   Google Scholar
• Earl DA, vonHoldt BM. 2012. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour. 4:359–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 14:2611–2620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. 2007. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Mol Ecol Notes. 7:574–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. 2011. Molecular genetic characterization of animal genetic resources. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Farid A, O’Reilly E, Kelsey JCR. 2000. Genetic analysis of ten sheep breeds using microsatellite markers. Can J Anim Sci. 80:9–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes SH, Hogg JT, Buchanan FC, Crawford AM, Allendorf FW. 1995. Microsatellite evolution in congeneric mammals: domestic and bighorn sheep. Mol Biol Evol. 12:1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaouar SBS, Da Silva A, Ciani E, Kdidi S, Aouissat M, Dhimi L, Lafri M, Maftah A, Mehtar N. 2015b. Admixture and local breed marginalization threaten Algerian sheep diversity. PLoS One. 10:e0122667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaouar SBS, Kdidi S, Ouragh L. 2016a. Estimating population structure and genetic diversity of five Moroccan sheep breeds by microsatellite markers. Small Rumin Res. 144:23–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaouar SBS, Kdidi S, Tabet Aouel N, Aït-Yahia R, Boushaba N, Aouissat M, Dhimi L, Yahyaoui MH, Saidi-Mehtar N. 2014. Genetic admixture of North-African ovine breeds as revealed by microsatellite loci. Livest Res Rural Dev. 26:7.
   Google Scholar
• Gaouar SBS, Kdıdı S, Tabet Aouel N, Aïtyahıa R, Boushaba N, Aouıssat M, Saıdı-Mehtar N. 2015a. Investigation of genetic relationships among Hamra and Béni-Ighil sheep breeds based on microsatellite markers. Small Rumin Res. 90:101–108.
   Google Scholar
• Gaouar SBS, Lafri M, Djaout A, El-Bouyahiaoui R, Bouri A, Bouchatal A, Maftah A, Ciani E, Da Silva A. 2016b. Genome-wide analysis highlights genetic dilution in Algerian sheep. Heredity. 118:293–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaouar SBS, Tabet-Aoul N, Khaïb dit Naïb O, Hamouda L, Boushaba N, Brahami N, Aouissat M, Dhimi L, Saïdi-Mehtar N. 2011. Genetic variability and phylogenetic relationships of ovine Algerian breeds using microsatellites. New Trends Innov Mediterran Anim Prod. 129:52–54.
   Google Scholar
• Gaouar SBS. 2002. Contribution à l’étude moléculaire de la variabilité génétique: caractérisation de deux races ovines algériennes [Thèse de Magister]. Université des sciences et de téchnologie d’Oran (USTO).
   Google Scholar
• Gaouar SBS. 2009. Etude de la biodiversité: Analyse de la variabilité génétique des «races» ovines algériennes et de leurs relations phylogénétiques par l’utilisation des microsatellites [Thèse de Doctorat]. Université des sciences et de technologie d’Oran (USTO).
   Google Scholar
• Goudet J. 2001. FSTAT (Version 2.9.3). A program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices. Lausanne, Switzerland: University of Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Guang-Xin E, Zhong T, Ma YH, Gao HJ, He JN, Liu N, Zhao YJ, Zhang JH, Huang YF. 2016. Conservation genetics in Chinese sheep: diversity of fourteen indigenous sheep (Ovis aries) using microsatellite markers. Ecol Evol. 6:810–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoda A, Marsan PA. 2012. Genetic characterization of Albanian sheep breeds by microsatellite markers, analysis of genetic variation in animals. In: Caliskan M, editor. Analysis of genetic variation in animals. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; p. 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. 2009. Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Resour. 9:1322–1332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huson DH, Scornavacca C. 2012. Dendroscope 3: an interactive tool for rooted phylogenetic trees and networks. Syst Biol. 61:1061–1067.
   Google Scholar
• Jyotsana B, Jakhesara S, Prakash V, Rank DN, Vataliya PH. 2010. Genetic features of Patanwadi, Marwari and Dumba sheep breeds (India) inferred by microsatellite markers. Small Rumin Res. 93:57–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC. 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol. 16:1099–1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappes SM, Keele JW, Stone RT, McGraw RA, Sonstegard TS, Smith TP, Lopez-Corrales NL, Beattie CW. 1997. A second-generation linkage map of the bovine genome. Genome Res. 7:235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kdidi S, Calvo JH, González-Calvo L, Ben-Sassi M, Khorchani T, Yahyaoui MH. 2015. Genetic relationship and admixture in four Tunisian sheep breeds revealed by microsatellite markers. Small Rumin Res. 131:64–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loukovitis D, Siasiou A, Mitsopoulos I, Lymberopoulos AG, Laga V, Chatzipli D. 2016. Genetic diversity of Greek sheep breeds and transhumant populations utilizing microsatellite markers. Small Rumin Res. 136:238–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luikart G, Biju-Duval MP, Ertugrul O, Zagdsuren Y, Maudet C, Taberlet P. 1999. Power of 22 microsatellite markers in fluorescent multiplexes for parentage testing in goats (Capra hircus). Anim Genet. 30:431–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall TC. 2006. Cervus, 3.0, Cervus is a computer program for assignment of parents to their offspring using genetic markers. Cervus, a Windows package for parentage analysis using likelihood approach. CERVUS was written by Tristan Marshall (1998/2006).
   Google Scholar
• Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HFRN. 1988. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:1215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nei M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat. 106:283–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nei M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ocampo R, Cardona H, Martínez R. 2016. Genetic diversity of Colombian sheep by microsatellite markers. Chil J Agric Res. 76:40–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othman OEM, Payet-Duprat N, Harkat S, Laoun A, Maftah A, Lafri M, Da Silva A. 2016. Sheep diversity of five Egyptian breeds: genetic proximity revealed between desert breeds: local sheep breeds diversity in Egypt. Small Rumin Res. 144:346–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes. 6:288–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2012. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics. 28:2537–2539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 155:945–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos-Silva F, Ivo RS, Sousa MCO, Carolino MI, Ginja C, Gama LT. 2008. Assessing genetic diversity and differentiation in Portuguese coarse-wool sheep breeds with microsatellite markers. Small Rumin Res. 78:32–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlotterer C. 2004. The evolution of molecular markers—just a matter of fashion? Nat Rev Genet. 5:63–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodhi M, Mukesh M, Bhatia S. 2006. Characterizing Nali and Chokla sheep differentiation with microsatellite markers. Small Rumin Res. 65:185–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahlberger-Saitbekova N, Schläpfer J, Dolf G, Gaillard C. 2001. Genetic relationships in Swiss sheep breeds based on microsatellite analysis. J Anim Breed Genet. 118:379–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 30:2725–2729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir BS, Cockerham CC. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution. 38:1358–1370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics. 16:97–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yeh FC, Yang RC, Boyle TBJ, Ye ZH, Mao JX. 1997. POPGENE: the user-friendly shareware for population genetic analysis. Edmonton, AB, Canada: University of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz O, Cemal I, Karaca O. 2014. Genetic diversity in nine native Turkish sheep breeds based on microsatellite analysis. Anim Genet. 45:604–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar